Quadrennial World Cup is a different kettle of fish
By Ben Somerford, 1 Jul 2010 Ben Somerford is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Australia, Brazil, Cristiano Ronaldo, England, Fabio Cannavaro, FIFA World Cup, Germany, portugal, Socceroos, Wayne Rooney
Related coverage
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- Cristiano Ronaldo news
- Socceroos 2014 FIFA World Cup Qualifying news
Have you heard about the Nike ‘Write The Future’ curse? You’ve seen the commercials, right? The superstars from those ads, such as Wayne Rooney, Cristiano Ronaldo and Fabio Cannavaro, have failed to replicate their club form on the world stage in South Africa and you’ve got to wonder why.
Those three aren’t alone, though, as Brazilian wizz Ronaldinho didn’t even get the call-up, Ivory Coast’s Didier Drogba is already back in West Africa and France’s Franck Ribery played his part in the Les Bleus’ mutiny as they went home early in disgrace.
Okay, maybe it’s not so much a curse as a coincidence, but the main point is some of club football’s best stars haven’t lived up to their billing at the World Cup.
Maybe it’s the mental and physical strain of getting up for another tournament after a long domestic season. Maybe there’s more to it.
Indeed, if you put yourself in a player’s shoes for a brief moment, you realise international football (especially the month-long World Cup tournament) is a totally different kettle of fish compared to the club game.
Different teammates, different coaches, different tactics, different surroundings, a different environment, a different routine, a different schedule and time-frame, all make the World Cup, well, erm… different.
Sure, you’d think quality players would remain quality players, but the standard of the World Cup these days is pretty good, so you’ve got to be on your game if you’re going to do well.
Portugal’s Ronaldo was a curious example where Carlos Queiroz’s conservative and disciplined gameplan didn’t play to the Real Madrid star’s strengths, but nor did his obvious mindset of frustration towards it all.
We’ve seen him frustrated at Real and Man U before, but in a four-week tournament like the World Cup, it’s hard to overcome and reverse the negativity associated with that mindset in such a short space of time.
To emphasize Portugal’s conservative approach, you only need to ponder they conceded just one goal in South Africa, whilst only scoring (albeit heavily) in one game too. Pretty prudent stuff!
But a frustrated Ronaldo didn’t do himself any favours, and his South African safari will be moreso remembered for him running into opponents and complaining to the ref on the floor, rather than any inspiring brilliance. He did show flashes of his magic, but it was usually lacking substance and non-influential.
And while Ronaldo’s example shows unfamiliar tactics or a foreign gameplan can lead to frustration in a player’s mind, the England example represents another side of the challenge of a World Cup.
Throughout England’s time in South Africa the issue of player boredom had been well reported by the English press.
John Terry, who infamously had a go at England boss Fabio Capello after the Algeria draw, said during the tournament: “We have table tennis, darts, snooker and the pool. But between lunch and dinner is about six hours and there is a little bit of boredom kicking in.”
Wayne Rooney admitted: “I don’t really enjoy sitting around or lying in bed at two in the afternoon”.
You wonder if Rooney spent those afternoon hours surfing the net browsing the English press because he appeared anxious to quieten his critics and his public attack on the boo-boys was odd.
Boredom, like frustration, is a negative emotion and staying stimulated and positive is pretty important in all realms of leading a successful life, let alone when you’re striving to win the fiercely competitive World Cup. It’s obvious there’s a big mental game going on at the World Cup.
Sure, you can understand players getting bored at the World Cup in a foreign land, as they’re away from their families, in an unfamiliar environment with a new routine. But then again, it is one of the challenges which teams face.
Even the Socceroos had their own issues with player boredom, with wives and children invited to Kloofzicht Lodge as a positive distraction on a few occasions at the Australia camp.
It’s an interesting point, though, as it clearly goes both ways. Just look at the Germans who are known as tournament specialists, or the business-like Brazil who seem to always be there or thereabouts at the end of these competitions.
Germany’s Polish-born attacking duo Miroslav Klose and Lukas Podolski provide an excellent example of players who’ve done the opposite of Nike’s superstars by turning poor club form into excellent form for the national team.
It’s hard to put a finger on it, but people often refer to the German mentality, which is a rather ambiguous term. But when you ponder the aforementioned points, perhaps this is where the Germans get it right, in preparation, stimulation and staying positive.
So much of football is played between the ears and the quadrennial World Cup provides unique mental challenges for players, so mastering the art of tournament play is something worth paying special attention to.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- Australia, Brazil, Cristiano Ronaldo, England, Fabio Cannavaro, FIFA World Cup, Germany, portugal, Socceroos, Wayne Rooney


July 1st 2010 @ 1:15pm
Axel V said | July 1st 2010 @ 1:15pm | Report comment
I think the biggest factor of the stars not shining, not even the slightest in this World Cup has to do with the jubalani. You might say it’s “just a ball” but it’s what’s done with the ball that decides the game. The best players in the world possess that killer touch that can setup a team mate for a goal, turn your opposing defender inside out and bang the ball with precision in the corner.
Not a single of 736 players in the world cup have had that killer touch and as a result, every single player’s control of the ball has been mediocre, it’s easy as a defender to boot away the beach ball when it’s presented to you so easily. You can argue that the German’s are good at using the ball and it’s no excuse but then again they’ve been practising with it since January (Adidas is German) meanwhile the rest of the world have never kicked the Jubalani until last month.
There have been no spectacular free kicks, there have been countless balls over hit to simply switch flanks of the field, too many corners over hit, heavy touches of the ball from the best players in the world, the ball rolling faster than players can run and not slowing down on that through ball… it’s no coincidence.
July 1st 2010 @ 1:47pm
Roger Rational said | July 1st 2010 @ 1:47pm | Report comment
That Irish article is interesting but it’s worth remembering that the Irish and Scots view England’s fortunes through their own, not exactly objective prism.
Ryan Nelsen’s take is probably closest to the truth:
“The players will never admit it, but it is mentally and physically the hardest league in the world,” Nelsen said. “It is so draining. Inevitably, all the players around the world that have come down with injuries are generally Premier League players. The English players are all proud enough not to say it, and will be politically correct and say this is a World Cup. But it is very tough.”
Or Michael Ballack:
“We lost six matches last season, but still won the league, which would not happen in Germany or Italy,” Ballack said. “Before every match in England you know you can lose, so must give absolutely everything.”
July 1st 2010 @ 2:04pm
Art Sapphire said | July 1st 2010 @ 2:04pm | Report comment
Roger – there have been articles of a similar nature written by Englishmen in the last few days.
What has been pointed put is self evident to football followers.
Secondly, Ballack’s comparison is pure bunkum
How about Ballack saying “we lost 3 matches last season and still lost the league, which would not happen in Germany”
Chelsea 07/08 Played 38 Won 25 Drew 10 Lost 3 – 85 points – Runners Up
July 1st 2010 @ 2:24pm
apaway said | July 1st 2010 @ 2:24pm | Report comment
That Ballack quote doesn’t make sense: If you know you can lose, why must you give absolutely everything?
The Irish Times article is very good, and the examination of the German development system makes me wonder whether the FFA might be looking for a German coach for the Socceroos. Some of the development principles have already been adapted by the FFA in their professional coaching pathways.
July 1st 2010 @ 2:51pm
Roger Rational said | July 1st 2010 @ 2:51pm | Report comment
I’m fascinated that you two seem to know more about the respective demands of English-v-German football than Michael Ballack, who’s only, er, played in both leagues.
The point about giving young English players the opportunity to play is absolutely right. But England doesn’t need to look to Germany for the answers. It only needs to look to its own (very recent) history. We’re hearing much high praise of the German development system (and rightly so). But where did the Germans look to in 2000 for inspiration? The English Academy system. To clubs like Liverpool, Man Utd, West Ham and Leeds who produced players like Gerrard, Owen, McManaman, Scholes, Beckham, Giggs, Joe Cole, Ferdinand, Carrick, Kewell, Woodgate and Lennon.
Humphries’ point, I guess, is that maybe now players like Scholes and Gerrard wouldn’t be given the chance to play and develop. I think there’s probably some truth in that – and I hope that the new UEFA rules will help matters.
But this other cliche de jour – that the EPL is too quick and not technical enough – is just nonsense. I’ll repeat again: Jurgen Klinsmann is on the record stating that he and Low used the EPL template to re-model the German national team. Those quick, lightning counter-attacks are basically English football. I mean, if the EPL is so technically useless, why do its clubs hold their own against La Liga and Serie A clubs? And why is the Bundesliga usually nowhere in the Champions League?
Finally, it’s natural for people to search for grand theories and big structural issues, but the single biggest factor stopping Enlgand being competitive is simple and easily solved: a smaller league and a winter break. These guys are athletes: their bodies are the tools of their trade, and when those bodies are 20% off, they struggle. Nelsen and Ballack are telling us the answers – it’s just that people don’t want to listen.
July 1st 2010 @ 3:15pm
Art Sapphire said | July 1st 2010 @ 3:15pm | Report comment
Roger – good argument.
But, apart from Bayern, the other German clubs don’t have the budgets to be consistently successful in the Champions League. When you say EPL you should say the Big 4.
Also, when it comes to the performance other EPL clubs in the Europa League you will see that its a much more level playing field.
July 1st 2010 @ 3:27pm
whiskeymac said | July 1st 2010 @ 3:27pm | Report comment
big 4 – well maybe also man city, spurs and occassional effort by Villa and Everton =)
anyhooters, still more than the other big leagues.
german system is good. so is the dutch and french. so successful all the best players play inthe german english and italian and spanish leagues =)
bayern were pants not so long ago. are they any good without their marquees robben and ribery i wonder?
July 1st 2010 @ 3:49pm
Art Sapphire said | July 1st 2010 @ 3:49pm | Report comment
Roger – Here is your answer as to why EPL clubs hold their own in the Champions league and the Bundesliga clubs are nowhere. Its pure Soccernomics. Its money that talks.
Here is a list of the top 12 most valuable clubs that participated in last years champions league in terms of player value.
The more money your players are worth the better chance you have of winning it. Simple.
Barcelona 457.020.000 pounds
Real Madrid CF 399.600.000
Chelsea FC 398.025.000
Manchester United 339.795.000
Inter Milan 325.755.000
Liverpool FC 289.305.000
Arsenal FC 279.090.000
Bayern Munich 230.445.000
Juventus Turin 227.745.000
AC Milan 225.720.000
FC Sevilla 188.460.000
Olympique Lyon 161.370.000
July 1st 2010 @ 3:43pm
Towser said | July 1st 2010 @ 3:43pm | Report comment
Heres another article on the World Cup. This one indicates that creating an “International Club team” with the correct blend is the go. So bring through the young, but blend with experience. However experience need not mean old.
Quote from it :-
“Germany, meanwhile, are a team of two generations, hastily spliced together because of injuries but skilfully blended. Joachim Low’s willingness to trust the products of the Under-21 squad is rightly respected. A few years their senior, Per Mertesacker, Philipp Lahm, Bastian Schweinsteiger and Lukas Podolski are all 26 or under, yet possess almost 300 caps between them. While only Mertesacker has retained the same role, that stability in a winning side breeds belief in one another.”
“It is little wonder they don’t look like strangers when placed on a pitch together. The key is not experience per se, as the aged English and Italians illustrate, but experience of playing as a team, establishing patterns of play, uniting players who combine profitably and discarding those who cannot function within the unit. They are prospering by possessing balance, rather than trying to cram in incompatible or unhappy players. Rather than blaming the clubs, the cleverer international managers are emulating the better ones. ”
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/world-cup/columns/story?id=804390&cc=3436&ver=global
I mentioned on another Roar subject why this cannot be done by integrating the the 4 age groups better ie u17,20,23 & Socceroos so we dont go from one World Cup to the next relying on old bugars for experience &we have some like the
Germans with vast experience, but under what used to be considered in my day of football your physical peak 25 or 26.
July 2nd 2010 @ 8:18am
whiskeymac said | July 2nd 2010 @ 8:18am | Report comment
i assume that to some extent the All whites and Nix offer a closer to home example
but germany aside what are the make ups of the other 7 teams in the QFs – we are all comparing england to germany, but what about the other countries and systems that have been (to date) just as successful this WC. do they all play together like the germans do?