How to beat the Boks? Ban the vuvuzela!
By stash, 9 Jul 2010 stash is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, ARU, Football World Cup, NZRU, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, vuvuzelas, wallabies
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- South Africa Springboks news

South Africa's Frans Steyn chases the ball forward into attack during a Tri Nations Test match. AAP Image/Tony McDonough
No old western movie was complete without the triumphant cavalry charge headed by the call of the bugle. Nor can one deny the bone-chilling impact from the chords of the Last Stand.
For rugby, there are some sounds that are part of the fabric and culture of the sport.
Whether it’s the distinctive boom of the ball as it is kicked off for a much anticipated match, the shrill whistle adjoining the successful try, or the inspired, spontaneous lurching into of the second British anthem, Swing Low Sweet Chariot.
Or perhaps it’s the powerful call-out of the famed Ngati Toa, Ka Mate Haka.
There have been some blatant attempts by the rugby gods to bring a compelling and distinctive sound to their rugby brand, such as the ill-devised exercise by the Australian Rugby Union to make Waltzing Matilda a rugby anthem after a one-off spontaneous and rapturous crowd rendition during a match between the All Blacks and the Wallabies.
It now appears as if another sound will not be synonymous with rugby, and that is the sound of the South African vuvuzela.
Originally produced in aluminum in 1965, and now freely available in various plastic embodiments, the vuvuzela has been the distinctive sound of the 2010 Football World Cup.
Taking organizers by surprise, audio engineers initially struggled to filter the overwhelming drone from their commentary pick-ups. The vuvuzela was an instant trend, and every match has been accompanied by the constant drone from the viewing stands.
Some call it insidious, other hypnotic.
Regardless of your opinion (or the fact that Brazil also has a version of it), the vuvuzela is quintessentially South African.
It has now been banned from both Eden Park and the Wellington Trust Park for both of the Springboks Vs All Blacks encounters. New Zealand organizers are saying that any “trumpet” is banned, including vuvuzelas.
But it is no coincidence and it is surely and squarely aimed at the South African version. There are also signs that they will be banned from the entire Rugby World Cup in 2011.
In one breath, it is quite easy to say good riddance to these intrusive items.
But one can’t help but feel the NZRU did not want these in the hands of the Boks fans, as this sign of team support might just be motivational, and therefore advantageous to the Springboks. Just like swing low emanating from the stands.
If Australia produced a plastic didgeridoo, and fans voiced their support with that distinctive sound, would it be advantageous to the Wallabies or would it be banned as well?
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (153)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- Brumbies vs Reds: a lesson for the other provinces (4)
- Chiefs vs Bulls: Super Rugby live scores, blog (14)
- Rocky Elsom axed from Wallabies (56)
- The burning question: Beale at 15 or 10? (119)
- Hola Argentina, and welcome to the Rugby Championship! (21)
- White welcomes Reds’ rugby battle tactics (81)
- Rebels want fast start against Hurricanes (4)
- Brumbies vs Reds: a lesson for the other provinces (4)
- Chiefs vs Bulls: Super Rugby live scores, blog (14)
- Hola Argentina, and welcome to the Rugby Championship! (21)
- Irish coaches looking to head Western Force (15)
- Dull Super Rugby coaches equal dull rugby (50)
- Coaching, not lack of depth, the issue for Australian rugby (30)
- Super Rugby round 14 preview (8)
- Explore:
- All Blacks, ARU, Football World Cup, NZRU, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, vuvuzelas, wallabies


July 9th 2010 @ 6:43am
johno said | July 9th 2010 @ 6:43am | Report comment
Vuvuzelas have also been banned from all Rugby tests in SA, I think you’re reading a bit to much into it.
July 9th 2010 @ 7:36am
Seiran said | July 9th 2010 @ 7:36am | Report comment
Are they really? They certainly weren’t banned at the Bulls semi final in the past S14.
I think the TV stations have realised how much these horns have a negative affect on viewers and have made the correct step in banning these horns in NZ.
Hopefully they have also been banned in Oz.
July 9th 2010 @ 12:29pm
Lee said | July 9th 2010 @ 12:29pm | Report comment
The semi final and final of the S14 were played at a football venue, hence the vuvuzelas. They are banned at rugby grounds.
It will be interesting to see if they are at the Soccer City game against the ABs…
July 9th 2010 @ 12:37pm
Socboy said | July 9th 2010 @ 12:37pm | Report comment
They have been banned it seems
http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/all-blacks/3898215/All-Blacks-get-vuvuzela-free-Soccer-City
July 9th 2010 @ 9:05am
Richard said | July 9th 2010 @ 9:05am | Report comment
Those blasted trumpets with there constant buzzing have been incredibly annoying during the WC telecasts. About as musical as a swarm of wasps around the microphone. Where’s the ebb and flow of the roar of the crowd, the rythmic chanting of the outer, the choral accompaniment of the cheer squad choir? All drowned out by that intrusive tinnitus, constantly droning away, blotting out the commentary and detracting from the game. Not only should they banned, but people who bring them to the ground should be made to eat them.
July 9th 2010 @ 10:54am
Karlos said | July 9th 2010 @ 10:54am | Report comment
I think a spear through the heart would be the best outcome for anyone wanting to produce a plastic didgereedo. Cant believe you even thought it.
July 9th 2010 @ 12:14pm
TembaVJ said | July 9th 2010 @ 12:14pm | Report comment
I have a bit of a love hate relationship with them. On TV its very annoying but sitting in the stand when thousands of them go off is a feeling that you cannot explain. Broadcasters have the tech to filter it out anyway.
Rugby is a game requiring a lot of communication unlike soccer so it can be bad for the game.
I think anyone that loves going to live matches must experience the vuzela at least once in their lives, it awesome. Not nearly as loud as they sound on TV.
July 9th 2010 @ 12:30pm
Mr Mac said | July 9th 2010 @ 12:30pm | Report comment
Stash
” from the chords of the Last Stand.” – Whats that?
Do you mean the Last Post?
July 9th 2010 @ 1:03pm
stash said | July 9th 2010 @ 1:03pm | Report comment
Mac – I stand corrected on that.
While Auckland and Wellington have both placed a ban on these – and…ahem other plastic trumpets. Christchurch has yet to decide.
Yet the game in Christchurch is against the Wallabies – so I can’t get see too many Vuvus being sold for that one.
July 9th 2010 @ 1:06pm
TembaVJ said | July 9th 2010 @ 1:06pm | Report comment
Christchurch has banned them too Stash
July 9th 2010 @ 1:49pm
sixo_clock said | July 9th 2010 @ 1:49pm | Report comment
It beggars belief that anyone could use a Vuvuzela for any longer than 3 seconds before becoming bored. That an entire competition could be drowned out by them says a lot about how much attention is being paid to the on-field action or how diverting the game is. Rugby requires for most of us all of our attention because of the nature of the game. Soccer has a reputation that the crowd is there for reasons other than the final score, your guess is as good as…
Different crowds, different games, different responses. Allow them in and see how many are usable after the first ten minutes is probably the better option.
Though kickers would most likely enjoy the background hum, anything but that expectant silence from years ago!
July 9th 2010 @ 2:01pm
darwin stubby said | July 9th 2010 @ 2:01pm | Report comment
if you’ve never been in a football crowd (which clearly you haven’t) how can make any sort of rational judgement – which of course you haven’t …. give me the passion and life of a football crowd over the more staid rugby one any day of the week ..
July 9th 2010 @ 2:19pm
sixo_clock said | July 9th 2010 @ 2:19pm | Report comment
I have never been in a professional game ‘football crowd’ as you rightfully detected. Never will either.
I don’t enjoy watching the game, believing the game to be both inaccurate and clumsy. Furthermore after a Rugby or a League game my seat was still there and not burning. Out of the ground I do not expect to be involved in scuffles. We do not have to build fences to prevent crushing women to death. Our referees are called ‘sir’ (and some of us meant it – at the time). No Rugby players have been shot after a World Cup… I think…. If someone gets hurt he really is hurt before he goes down and on and on. Sounds just like adult behaviour doesn’t it.
Though I did record the Oz-Germany game but ended up playing at 4X to make it interesting.
Still laughing?
July 9th 2010 @ 2:24pm
MVDave said | July 9th 2010 @ 2:24pm | Report comment
sixo_clock
mate if we want to start code bashing let me know…have plenty to serve out to ‘the game they play in heaven’…Ruggers. Not that l could be bothered watching much of it. You posts are ignorant, immature and offensive.
July 9th 2010 @ 2:30pm
sixo_clock said | July 9th 2010 @ 2:30pm | Report comment
Serve away, constructive criticism is always welcome.
July 9th 2010 @ 2:39pm
MVDave said | July 9th 2010 @ 2:39pm | Report comment
the point has been made…your ‘post’ says it all about you l guess. Not really sure why the need on an essentially Rugby blog for such a derogatory outburst on football…probably jealousy or small man syndrome but what ever…keep your ignorance on football to yourself surely there is something worth talking about on Rugby?
July 9th 2010 @ 6:13pm
Alders said | July 9th 2010 @ 6:13pm | Report comment
Pot calling the kettle black?
July 9th 2010 @ 2:35pm
darwin stubby said | July 9th 2010 @ 2:35pm | Report comment
Still laughing ? – after that rant definitely
July 9th 2010 @ 2:41pm
sixo_clock said | July 9th 2010 @ 2:41pm | Report comment
I thought it was quite temperate and measured, glad you are both enjoying yourself anyway.
July 9th 2010 @ 2:46pm
Conor said | July 9th 2010 @ 2:46pm | Report comment
I know this wasnt the main point of the article but IMO, Waltzing Matilda was a great chant to hear from the crowds, and am very dissapointed it no longer gets played. Hearing the crowd in such unison is something that never happens in aus sports and really creates a great atmosphere, i reckon they should bring it back. Some people obviously don’t like it but, the crowds would never have sung it if they didn’t enjoy it.
July 9th 2010 @ 2:50pm
allblackfan said | July 9th 2010 @ 2:50pm | Report comment
I wonder if we can get Paul the octopus to pick the winners at next year’s World Cup (if he hasn’t been frickaseed first!)!
July 9th 2010 @ 2:59pm
stash said | July 9th 2010 @ 2:59pm | Report comment
The first time that the crowd burst into Waltzing Matilda as a response to the haka….it was absolutely spectacular.
The ARU desperately wanted to make it a signature song for the Wallabies – however each rendition done at each game just got sadder and more awkward. I started feeling sorry for the lonely guy with the guitar trying to get the crowd to join in.
Still it was a much better response than when the Wallabies decided to practice with the tackle bags instead of facing the haka. Now that was a terrible idea and the ABs took to the Wallabies that night.
July 9th 2010 @ 3:17pm
sixo_clock said | July 9th 2010 @ 3:17pm | Report comment
The tradition of the Haka rightfully stands alone in world sport though some try foolishly and embarassingly to copy it. Most Rugby people enjoy it, it needs no response other than to return the stare, let them use up the energy. And as you pointed out a spontaneous reaction is more supportive to the players. Shoulder arms and face them, we’ve beaten them before, maybe we can again this game!
July 9th 2010 @ 3:33pm
TembaVJ said | July 9th 2010 @ 3:33pm | Report comment
No one does it like tana
And no one like facing it more then the saffers!!!!
Bring on tomorrow, it does not get bigger then this… Enjoy the game!
Sure there will be plenty to talk about on Monday.
July 9th 2010 @ 9:19pm
sixo_clock said | July 9th 2010 @ 9:19pm | Report comment
Goosebumps! Magic! Cheers.
July 9th 2010 @ 7:06pm
Karlos said | July 9th 2010 @ 7:06pm | Report comment
The song didn’t reflect RU values. The hero in the song for RU people would be the policeman and not the jolly swagman. The whole thing was built on pretence and that was why it died.