World Cup 2010? A lack of goals, negative teams
Roar Guru By johnhunt92, 9 Jul 2010 johnhunt92 is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- 2010 World Cup, dutch football, FIFA, football, Italian soccer, Socceroos, spanish football
Related coverage
The FIFA World Cup is about to end in South Africa. Two impressive teams are left to fight it out for the ultimate prize in world football.
The tournament has been a real success for the South African government and its people. South Africa has always said it could handle a major sporting event, and it has proven that.
Little trouble has struck the tournament despite the doomsday predictions of rolling strikes, power blackouts and rampant crime.
When the football historians look back at this tournament in football terms, the legacy will not be a good one in my opinion on many fronts. Ronaldo, Rooney, Messi and Henry all failed to fire as predicted by the media and themselves.
Hyped up sides like England, Italy and France were woeful, and predictably they didn’t go far. The Jabulani ball has been a disaster, no matter what you say: it lacks rhythm, control and the confidence of the players.
While Adidas blame altitude, surely they could have spent money on protecting the ball from being turned into a beach ball when playing in Pretoria and Johannesburg.
But the legacy this tournament leaves will be the lack of goals and negativity of the teams.
To most purists, Italia ’90 was the worst World Cup, due to the defensive nature of teams and lack of goals (an average of 2.21 over 52 matches). After the group stages of the 2010 World Cup, only 101 goals were scored at an average of 2.10 per game, which was lower than Italy.
At the same stage in 2006, 117 goals were scored at an average of 2.4 goals per game. This figure is part Jabulani, part tactics.
Few coaches played to win, many played to not lose resulting in many terribly boring games (Portugal vs. Brazil anyone?). While the goal ratio improved in the knockout stages, there is massive stain on what should have been a fantastic attacking World Cup.
Even though FIFA will trumpet how good South Africa was, they cannot hide the fact that teams mentalities have changed. It can only get worse unless FIFA acts like it did after Italia ’90.
So the question that begs is, who will win the final?
The Netherlands and Spain will clash for ultimate football glory. Ironically, the Spanish are playing the Dutch “total football” system with every player comfortable on the ball, making them the best passing side in the world. The Netherlands on the other hand, are more pragmatic and while not setting the world on fire, are playing consistent football that wins matches. I tipped the Dutch at the beginning of the tournament to win the World Cup. I see no reason to change.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
The Crowd Says (5) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- 2010 World Cup, dutch football, FIFA, football, Italian soccer, Socceroos, spanish football
July 9th 2010 @ 9:01am
Breen said | July 9th 2010 @ 9:01am | Report comment
I’m not sure what the goal average is now after all but the final 2 games and I agree there have been negative games, but I’m not sure there have been any more negative games then in previous cups. The problem – the unmitigated disaster has indeed been the very idea of introducing a new ball! What on earth logic is there in this? And don’t feed me the rubbish about altitude. Everyone knew where the games were going to be played so what mindless brain-dead money hungry imbecile designed and released a ball that would be unusable at normal altitude and a total embarrassing joke at any kind of higher altitude? An inexcusable screwup only possibly surpassed by the cursed vuvuzaleas. Lack of goals? 95% because of the ball.
July 9th 2010 @ 11:55am
Brian said | July 9th 2010 @ 11:55am | Report comment
leave the vuvuzelas alone… what they ever do to you?
July 9th 2010 @ 5:06pm
Mick said | July 9th 2010 @ 5:06pm | Report comment
I don’t care if their is a lack of goals if the goalkeeper is in the game make saves & scrambling for near misses but the number of shots missing by a considerable margin by quality attacking is unbelievable
July 11th 2010 @ 5:52am
Ian said | July 11th 2010 @ 5:52am | Report comment
The JABULANI GARBAGE ball DESTROYED the World Cup! I am NEVER buying another Adidas product again. Whatever happened w/ the good old soccer ball we all grew up playing with! Ban Adidas from EVER providing the World Cup ball!!!
July 29th 2010 @ 1:58pm
Jesse said | July 29th 2010 @ 1:58pm | Report comment
I finally got to play w/ Jabulani at a 6-a-side pick up game tonight. I can safely say that Jabulani is the worst ball I have ever played with! I am 30 years old and have played organized football since I was probably 6 years old. I have never played with such a bad ball. Nothing else to say. Thnak you, Adidas, for ruining the World cup!