Is Sir Alex playing his cards close to chest?
By Noel Bay, 21 Jul 2010 Noel Bay is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- football, Manchester United, Sir Alex Ferguson, World Football
Surely there’s value in the market, as opposed to what Sir Alex proclaims. With main rivals in Europe and at home (barring Chelsea for now) having added significant value to their teams, it is surprising that the Red Devils’ maestro has not dipped deep into the transfer market.
Is there really no one worth buying or no one good enough to make the first team at Old Trafford? That cannot possibly be true, as any fan of football would know.
Barcelona splashed out on one of the arguably top three strikers in the world and recently brought in Adriano from Sevilla.
Real Madrid have not faired any worse by bringing in Angel Di Maria, who has been slated for great things to come.
Manchester City needless to say, have done wonders to their title aspirations by bringing in David Silva, Jerome Boateng and Yaya Toure. Not forgetting they are very much in the mix for the Serb, Alex Kolarov and as some people believe, Inter’s Balotelli.
Liverpool have done well to capture Joe Cole on a free while Arsenal have brought in Maroune Chamakh and Koscielny.
For the first time, can we say that Chelsea and Man Utd are alike by not having added anyone of significance to their squad?
The return of Essien is a good new signing, as would have been the return of Owen Hargreaves, although a dark cloud hangs over this prospect. Chelsea, I am sure, will strengthen by replacing the depleted midfield after the departure of Ballack, Deco and Cole.
Ramires’ name has been thrown into the hat, as has Kaka, although this acquisition may prove a little harder.
Man Utd’s signing of Chris Smalling and Javier Hernandez are surely for the future.
As Sir Alex will know, Hernandez is no Rooney, and will take at least a season or two to settle in. And so will Smalling, as we saw with Johnny Evans needing time to blend in, as well.
If this is going to be one of Sir Alex’s last seasons in charge, why does he not go full force to purchase a player that could carry the team on his shoulders?
Surely only Rooney has that ability after CR departed.
A playmaker of Sneijder’s capability would suit the team, who need to think about replacing Paul Scholes. And then there is the right-back situation.
Gary Neville is way past his best and Rafael is not ready yet, judging by the number of times he goes forward and leaves the back exposed.
Philip Lahm would fit in nicely and he is only 26 yrs old.
Greg Van Der Wiel could be an option. Although young, he has the aptitude and ability to play at an elite level. Links with Balotelli or Fabiano seem far-fetched as there shouldn’t be a need for any more strikers.
There is value in the market, for sure. The question is, is there the money?
If reports are true, Sir Alex should have at least 40-50 million to spend from the sale of CR. Unless these reports are false, and Man Utd are in serious debt, there is no reason not to strengthen, especially if your rivals across the board are going hard at it.
A playmaker and a right-back is what the Red Devils need if they are to regain their place at the helm of Europe.
Hopefully Sir Alex is playing his cards close to his chest and will spring a surprise or two to delight fans all over the globe.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- Fans want a club, not a name, that fills them with Pride (129)
- The war that’s not a war (128)
- Too many doubts over new A-League club (101)
- Magic EPL finish as Manchester City triumph in tightest of title races (93)
- Is this the end of the football salary cap? (63)
- Manchester City, ‘Uniting’ the sporting world (60)
- Destiny as Chelsea finally win the UEFA Champions League (60)
- Dual signings give Mariners A-League boost (12)
- Would a video referee work in football? (103)
- Oman the Socceroos’ focus, says Kennedy (18)
- There’s life In England’s lower leagues (20)
- Chelsea teach Barca and Real an ugly football lesson (20)
- Solving the issue of the long A-League off-season (17)
- Abbas wants A-League excitement at Sydney FC (25)
- There’s life In England’s lower leagues (20)
- Chelsea teach Barca and Real an ugly football lesson (20)
- Solving the issue of the long A-League off-season (17)
- Oh my god! They’ve killed Kenny (12)
- Is Chelsea’s Abramovic finally satisfied? (15)
- Is this the end of the football salary cap? (63)
- Supporting a loser will make you love sport (27)
- Explore:
- football, Manchester United, Sir Alex Ferguson, World Football


July 21st 2010 @ 8:44am
Lu said | July 21st 2010 @ 8:44am | Report comment
Man city are idiots.. they are the sole reason for such an inflated market.. these players are not worth that much money, in transfer and in salary..
Sir Alex is a wiley old fox. He knows football is now a business as much as it is a sport.. and players playing for money don’t lead to championships.. and I’m pretty sure he’s learnt his lesson with Berbatov..
City’s moneybags last season couldn’t get them into the top 4, while United’s “aging, depleted squad” finished 2 points behind the champions..
Theres more to football than money
July 21st 2010 @ 12:26pm
Dan said | July 21st 2010 @ 12:26pm | Report comment
No it isn’t, since Real Madrid payed way over the odds for Luis Figo, things have gone crazy since then
July 21st 2010 @ 5:11pm
Kevin said | July 21st 2010 @ 5:11pm | Report comment
Then I wonder why the club is in so much debt. Probably that’s the reason why Fergie is reluctant to purchase any more players.
July 22nd 2010 @ 9:33am
JR said | July 22nd 2010 @ 9:33am | Report comment
Sorry, there is not more to football than money. If you don’t spend you don’t win, and that can be shown over and over by statistics (I know there are exceptions, that makes no difference to the general argument).
Man U have a huge debt, and the pound is weak, and finance is very expensive. If they had money, they would spend it, you can be sure about that.
I would buy a house if the market weren’t so inflated. By definition, I am just not rich enough – and neither is Man U.
July 21st 2010 @ 12:31pm
Dan said | July 21st 2010 @ 12:31pm | Report comment
I think that the issue is more that perhaps the Premier League is losing a bit of its lusture. Why would WS leave Inter Milan when they have just won the treble for the first time ever, they aren’t broke and they are a club on the up. United may be able to offer him more money, they cant offer him SIGNIFICANTLY more money so why move? plus there is the “aging” squad, and that nobody knows when fergie is going to retire, and who will replace him when he does. United is a risky prospect. oh and Rafa probably wouldn’t sell him to united out of spite anyway (remember Hinze?)
July 21st 2010 @ 3:28pm
Eddie said | July 21st 2010 @ 3:28pm | Report comment
Man U are in serious debt, what do u think all those people wearing green and yellow scarves at old tradford last season were protesting about?
You can’t spend money to buy new players if you don’t have any. Unless your Liverpool and sign free transfers.
July 21st 2010 @ 4:53pm
the all rounder said | July 21st 2010 @ 4:53pm | Report comment
‘Adriano’ from sevilla is not one of the three best strikers in the world.
July 21st 2010 @ 4:55pm
Chris K said | July 21st 2010 @ 4:55pm | Report comment
I think you need to read that line again