Springboks to hammer small Wallabies side
By Bokkie, 21 Jul 2010 Bokkie is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, Dewald Potgieter, Flip van der Merwe, Juan de Jongh, Peter de Villiers, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations
140 Have your say
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- South Africa Springboks news
No rest for the wicked. The Springboks get little reprieve from their disappointing tour of New Zealand as they prepare to continue their Tri Nation’s defence at Suncorp Stadium in Brisbane on Saturday night.
The Wallabies will be looking to make the most of the Springboks’ disappointing form during the opening stages of the tournament and get their campaign off to a perfect start.
The Springboks have made nine changes to their squad for Saturday night’s must win game, four of the changes in the starting fifteen.
Ruan Pienaar comes in for Ricky Janurie, who falls out of the match 22 completely after poor performances during the two losses to the All Blacks. Gio Aplon replaces Jean De Villiers on the right wing, while Sharks’ loose forward, Ryan Kankowski, takes the place of Francois Louw.
BJ Botha is promoted to the starting side ahead of CJ Van der linde, who will come off the bench.
The remaining changes on the bench sees the inclusion of Juan De Jongh, Flip van der Merwe, Dewald Potgieter and Francois Hougaard.
Springbok coach Peter De Villiers said on Tuesday that his selections are a reflection of the fast paced nature of Suncorp Stadium: “Statistics show that Suncorp has the fastest playing surface in Super 14 and we have to be prepared for a faster game,” he said.
“We have two tough games behind us, but if we stick to our structures and use our opportunities I believe this team is capable of getting a result.”
The Wallabies announced a fairly predictable squad, with perhaps the only surprise being the inclusion of Drew Mitchell in the starting side after he was dropped from the squad by Wallabies coach Robbie Deans for under-performing in the June tests against England and Ireland.
Matt Giteau made the squad, despite speculation he would not be preferred over Reds inside centre Anthony Fainga. Rob Horne gets his first Tri Nations start at outside centre, while Adam Ashley Cooper starts at fullback.
James O’Connor will be starting on the right wing in the fourteen jersey, as a result.
The Springboks have not been successful at Suncorp in the past, conceding seven losses in a row at the Brisbane venue – the latest being last year’s 21 – 6 loss. Overall, the two countries have met on 71 occasions, with the Springboks winning 43, the Wallabies 27 and one draw.
So the teams have been announced and the stage is set.
Who is going to win and why?
History suggests the Wallabies. But it would seem history is wrong. The Springboks are wounded and angry after they were hammered by the All Blacks, amidst controversy. A statement which in itself may be controversial, depending on which team you bat for, figuratively speaking.
The inclusion of Ruan Pienaar in place of Ricky Janurie means the Springboks can play the game at a higher tempo and give Morne Steyn the space he needs to unleash the likes of Habana and Fourie. We can expect a lot of up and unders during the opening stages of play from the Springboks.
But I am sure we will see more running from the Boks as the game continues.
The Springboks will be looking to exploit weaknesses in some of the Wallabies less effective defenders. I believe the Boks have stuck with Olivier at 12 because he likes to run hard and straight and he will be aiming to run straight down Quad Coopers channel.
Cooper is not the best defender in world rugby, missing more than 30 percent of his tackles during the Super 14 and often being forced to make a move to fullback during set piece defence.
The Springboks’ big hard running forwards will be looking to simply overpower their smaller Wallaby counterparts.
Ruan Pienaars quicker service should suit this purpose and go a long way to ensuring a significantly improved Springbok performance. Gio Aplon will be a handful in attack and provide the pace that has been lacking.
The Wallabies on the other hand only have history to suggest that they have what it takes to win. Brilliant individual players such as James O’Connor and Adam Ashley Cooper are unlikely to win the game on their own.
The Wallabies simply lack the personal to compete at the collision zone because they are just too small. The All Blacks showed that beating the Springboks meant taking it to them upfront.
I don’t know that the Wallabies are capable of doing so.
My pick: Springboks by 45 to 10.
Big strong forwards will win the battle upfront and Ruan Pienaars service will prove the difference in attack and allow the Boks to capitalize on their considerable size advantage and the Wallabies weaker defenders.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (153)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- Brumbies vs Reds: a lesson for the other provinces (5)
- Chiefs vs Bulls: Super Rugby live scores, blog (14)
- Rocky Elsom axed from Wallabies (56)
- The burning question: Beale at 15 or 10? (119)
- Hola Argentina, and welcome to the Rugby Championship! (21)
- White welcomes Reds’ rugby battle tactics (81)
- Rebels want fast start against Hurricanes (4)
- Brumbies vs Reds: a lesson for the other provinces (5)
- Chiefs vs Bulls: Super Rugby live scores, blog (14)
- Hola Argentina, and welcome to the Rugby Championship! (21)
- Irish coaches looking to head Western Force (15)
- Dull Super Rugby coaches equal dull rugby (50)
- Coaching, not lack of depth, the issue for Australian rugby (30)
- Super Rugby round 14 preview (8)
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Dewald Potgieter, Flip van der Merwe, Juan de Jongh, Peter de Villiers, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations


July 21st 2010 @ 3:02am
Hanzo said | July 21st 2010 @ 3:02am | Report comment
45 points to 10!?!?! Please remember to quote this score come Sunday morning when your dissecting a third straight loss for SA.
I recall the all black forwards being smaller than their SA counterparts. Size isn’t everything.
July 21st 2010 @ 2:19pm
Warren said | July 21st 2010 @ 2:19pm | Report comment
Hanzo,
Sorry, bugbear of mine:
“you are” or “you’re”.
Never “your” in this context.
July 21st 2010 @ 3:16am
nicksa said | July 21st 2010 @ 3:16am | Report comment
lol!!! u could swear the boks are playing a high school girls team!
playing in brisbane after 3 weeks on tour, this is gonna be very hard for the boks to win…
July 21st 2010 @ 7:31pm
mickh said | July 21st 2010 @ 7:31pm | Report comment
Sadly, of late, the Wallabies often resemble a high school girls team.
July 21st 2010 @ 6:53am
estee rine said | July 21st 2010 @ 6:53am | Report comment
This is a MUST game for both teams. Boks to get back on track, and
W’s to show talent that emerged in Super 14 is for real.
Also, Deans can’t hide if things don’t go well. Sure, a few lingering injuries, but
the horses are there, even though stable is sparse.
Jools-USA
July 21st 2010 @ 6:54am
katzilla said | July 21st 2010 @ 6:54am | Report comment
“hammered by the All Blacks, amidst controversy”
The only controversy is the selections and poor performance of over rated forwards.
Your predictions have been spot on so far so im sure this one will go your way too……………..
July 21st 2010 @ 5:45pm
Ben J said | July 21st 2010 @ 5:45pm | Report comment
I would say that the same forwards were anything but overrated as they performed quite well during the Super 14. Did they perform below par in New Zealand ? Definately. Are they all useless now? Probably not. Let’s keep some perspective.
July 22nd 2010 @ 7:35am
katzilla said | July 22nd 2010 @ 7:35am | Report comment
Heres Perspective.
They came to NZ the best forward pack in the world, everyone including NZ media spoke of their forward dominance, and that the NZ forwards would struggle to compete.
They were slow around the field and their ‘Big Men’ were pushed back behind the gainline.
In the end 7 of their 8 were dominated by their opposites.
Is that not over rated?
“I would say that the same forwards were anything but overrated as they performed quite well during the Super 14″
Lol. Super 14? Stephen Donald was one of the best 10s in the s14 last year, that went well for him didn’t it?
S14 Form does not equate to test form. Infact it just further enforces my point about over rated forwards as it gave some kind of over inflated view that the Boks forwards would be physically imposing because they were in the S14.
Hence the term ‘Over Rated’
July 22nd 2010 @ 7:46am
Lee said | July 22nd 2010 @ 7:46am | Report comment
But most of the Boks forwards that came to NZ this year, were the same ones who took part in all 3 tests last year against the ABs.
I wouldn’t say overrated, just that they failed to perform here. You must admit that the packs performance the last 2 weeks in NZ was a far cry removed from their performance in the Tri Nations last year or even against France this year.
July 22nd 2010 @ 7:56am
Ben S said | July 22nd 2010 @ 7:56am | Report comment
I don’t think there’s ever a fair comparison, Lee. The SA pack last season played rugby under different laws, and with players like Smit and Matfield a year younger. Steenkamp and Louw weren’t Bok regulars either. Also, the SA pack brutalized a French pack that brutalized them last season, and in turn were further brutalized by an Argentine pack. There will never be a best pack in the world, as an upset is always around the corner, so in that case I agree that it’s fairer to say that the SA forwards failed to perform.
July 22nd 2010 @ 1:54pm
katzilla said | July 22nd 2010 @ 1:54pm | Report comment
Yes Lee last year they were highly rated and performed well. Hence there rating was well deserved.
This year they came to NZ with the same high rating and performed poorly.
Over rated.
That may change as the year goes on. Who knows?
July 22nd 2010 @ 1:59pm
Rusty said | July 22nd 2010 @ 1:59pm | Report comment
its a good point – so in converse then. The ABs arrived for the first game in Bloem last year as highly rated due to ’08 and were then put to the sword and the following week in Durbs. Overrated?
July 22nd 2010 @ 10:16pm
katzilla said | July 22nd 2010 @ 10:16pm | Report comment
Most definately Rusty, sections of that team were highly over rated and found wanting in that tour. What was found to be the most highly over rated about the ABs and NZ rugby in general was that our depth in crucial positions was ‘Over Rated’
We still havent fixed that problem either and that could still hurt us.
July 23rd 2010 @ 5:33am
Ben S said | July 23rd 2010 @ 5:33am | Report comment
I don’t think the SA pack travelled to NZ with the ‘best pack in the world’ tag, katzilla.
July 24th 2010 @ 12:21pm
katzilla said | July 24th 2010 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
Fair enough, it is something thats hard to judge. But they were certainly more highly rated then the ABs.
July 21st 2010 @ 7:03am
Short-Blind. said | July 21st 2010 @ 7:03am | Report comment
Bokkie your second last sentence makes you look like a DILL. The Wallabies had the best defensive record during the June inbound tests, are fresh, playing at their favourite ground etc etc. Yes the forward pack is a little small but I dont think the tired lumbering Bok tight 5 will offer much past the 60 min mark. The new Bok inclusions make the team better but not enough to win. Wallys by 7 in a tight game.
July 21st 2010 @ 7:17am
Seiran said | July 21st 2010 @ 7:17am | Report comment
Interesting how this fairytale fails to point out the obvious lack of fitness in the Bok pack as witnessed in the past two matches. What the author forgets is that without the ball, the Boks will be running sideways and will require game fitness.
Adding a couple of lighter forwards is still not going to drag along the likes of Smit and his other tubby, old team mates.
The only thing I can agree with in the fairytale is that yes, AAC and JO’C can’t win this match on their own; that’s why they have Cooper, Giteau, Genia, Mitchell and Horne to back them up. The forwards also have the returning Moore (bench), Robinson and Sharpe. All these players are talented and can play hard when required.
45 to 10 is a joke…. Not even Morne can kick 15 penalties in one match
July 21st 2010 @ 3:10pm
kovana said | July 21st 2010 @ 3:10pm | Report comment
Im sure steyn can land 15 Drop goals…..
July 21st 2010 @ 7:28am
jus de couchon said | July 21st 2010 @ 7:28am | Report comment
Whatever the result betweemn Aus and Boke the Tri Nations dont look as strong as past teams. An ordinary All Black team wipped S.A and next week an ever over acheiving , though limited , Aus team will compete.
I draw comparisons with past Southern Hemishere teams who would beat in a canter any of this bunch of pretenders. Frustratingly a poor England side might miss the opp come 2011 against some pretty ordinary teams from down South.
July 21st 2010 @ 9:51am
Arky said | July 21st 2010 @ 9:51am | Report comment
lol – be lucky….
July 21st 2010 @ 7:48pm
kevkom said | July 21st 2010 @ 7:48pm | Report comment
I thought this blog was for people who actually watched rugby!
What’s the basis of ‘ordinary’ – there are some ordinary players making a statment for being world-class – e.g. Read and others such as Weepu and Muliaina stepping up come test time. Arguably soem ‘boks not stepping up from S14 such as Spies.
And what does that make SA if the ABs have put 8 tries on them and take the points 10-0?
July 21st 2010 @ 7:32am
cookie said | July 21st 2010 @ 7:32am | Report comment
Don’t like the look of the wallabies much.
O’connor isn’t really a winger just as beale isn’t and I still prefer barnes to git.
The forwards lack mongrel and discilpine.
Weak spots in 2, 3, 4,8, in particular.
Time for sharpe to add some agro…
Higginbothom should have been given a run… after all are they not after speed, aggression and a running rugby player?
July 21st 2010 @ 7:52am
jus de couchon said | July 21st 2010 @ 7:52am | Report comment
Time you Aussies went for more depth and emulated that other team down there and signed up a few more Islanders.
Imagine Gits etc lined up with a few Samoan Heavy weights. Good combos.
July 22nd 2010 @ 12:44pm
Dan said | July 22nd 2010 @ 12:44pm | Report comment
Nah, all they need to do is sign Jared Hayne and Greg Inglis from the NRL
. In fact I’d go so far as to say that if the NRL was a Union comp the wallabies would have had a heck of a lot more titles under their belts…
July 21st 2010 @ 7:57am
CraigB said | July 21st 2010 @ 7:57am | Report comment
Bokkie – What odds would you like on the Boks winning by 35+?