It’s Wallabies game on against the All Blacks
By Spiro Zavos, 26 Jul 2010 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, Berrick Barnes, David Pocock, IRB, Jaque Fourie, Peter de Villiers, Phil Kearns, Quade Cooper, Rocky Elsom, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri-Nations Tests, wallabies, Will Genia
173 Have your say
Related coverage
In boxing terms, the Wallabies won a clear-cut points decision against the Springboks in Brisbane on Saturday; as opposed to the knockout of the Springboks at Auckland and TKO at Wellington inflicted by the All Blacks.
Part of my confidence leading into this match was related to the Brisbane hoodoo for the Springbok, and in fact for other visiting international rugby sides. Greg Clarke, the excellent Fox rugby caller, gave a statistic that the Wallabies have now won 40 of their last 46 Tests at Brisbane. This includes eight consecutive Test wins against the Springboks.
Suncorp Stadium has the best playing surface anywhere in the world. The ground, which was built to host State of Origin matches, has a great design for watching rugby matches of both codes. The ball-in-hand game that the Wallabies (finally) adopted for the Test is perfectly suited to the venue.
So the hoodoo, the perfect surface to play running rugby, the Springboks’ brain-dead attack on the IRB referees (ensuring their vigilance for the inevitable Springboks foul play), and the fatigue factor involved with the Springboks getting smashed in the two previous weeks by the All Blacks, created the sort of perfect rugby storm that virtually ensured a Wallaby victory.
Helping this outcome was the arrogance of the Springboks in the way they scheduled travel plans which virtually ensured their tiredness was accentuated on Saturday night. It’s hard to believe but at 4 a.m. on the Sunday morning after the Wellington Test, the Springboks left for Brisbane. The lethargic way they played at Brisbane suggests that they had not recovered.
The All Blacks, incidentally, were in Melbourne on Saturday night which allowed their coaching staff to be at Suncorp to watch the enthralling Test live.
The other piece of arrogance is the refusal of the Springboks to change their game from the kicking, thugging, and then run the ball as a final resort type of game that was so successful for them last season.
As everyone in the rugby world knows, except the Springboks apparently, the tackle interpretation has changed from last year and now favours (correctly) the attacking and not the defending side.
So the first two times Ruan Pienaar got the ball at Brisbane he kicked.
Then we had Jacque Fourie commit a dangerous tackle on Richard Brown. He was correctly given a yellow card for this, and has been suspended for four matches. Fourie, like Botha and Burger (who did some un-noticed eye-scrapping in the Test), has form. He was suspended last season for a similar offence.
When I heard Phil Kearns on the Fox commentary say that ‘maybe a penalty’ should have been awarded for the dangerous tackle, I wrote down in my note book: ‘Someone should tell Kearns to shut up.’ This was commentary that was on a par with that of Peter de Villiers for its ignorance. If you make a dangerous tackle, you get sin-binned.
Last week I got plenty of bagging mainly from South African supporters for suggesting that it seems to be part of the Springboks game plan to perpetrate some form of thuggery early on in a Test to intimidate the opposition. Three acts of thuggery in the early moments of the first three Tri Nations tends to suggest a pattern.
There were a number of aspects of the Wallabies’ game that were good. For one important thing, they showed more legitimate mongrel than they have for some time.
Rocky Elsom, I thought, played his best game for the Wallabies. He made some mistakes with the finishing off of his runs. He is not a skillful player as far as passing or kicking are concerned. But his tackling was hard-shouldered and effective, and his running hit the right lines and gave the Wallabies great go-forward ball.
His match statistics were terrific: three linebreaks, 16 runs for 114m, three off-loads, seven tackle busts, four lineout wins. No wonder he looked exhausted, physically shattered in fact, when he faced the cameras after the Test.
The scrum held up, just, against what is not a particularly strong Springboks scrum. At Melbourne, the All Blacks, who do have a strong scrum, will try to do to the Wallabies at scrum time what England did to them. If they get on top at scrum time then the Wallabies could be in for a hard night.
The lineout with only one loss held up better than the All Blacks at Wellington. The forwards stopped the rolling mauls, except a crucial rumble on their try line which resulted in a Springboks try to Gurthro Steenkampf.
Quade Cooper played a perfectly under-stated game, rather like that of Daniel Carter at Wellington. There was no need for him to make sizzling breaks. He took on the line occasionally but contented himself with linking up with his backs and forwards to keep the pressure on the Springboks tacklers.
The threat of his running and the Springboks’ attempts to thwart the gaps created chances for Will Genia. Genia once again demonstrated that he is now ready to be ranked with the greatest of the modern Wallaby halfbacks, a golden line from Ken Catchpole, Des Connor, John Hipwell and Nick Farr-Jones.
With Cooper’s suspension, my guess is that Deans will play Berrick Barnes in Cooper’s place at Melbourne. He must give him the instruction to give away the stupid kicking game that Waratahs coaching staff imposed on him and the other backs this Super 14 season.
David Pocock had a blinder. He exposed the Springboks’ tactical stupidity of not playing a ‘fetcher’. Pocock made a crucial tackle on the Wallabies try line and then forced a penalty by driving through the ensuing ruck. He got turnovers, in the McCaw manner. And by just being there he forced the Springboks forwards to get to many rucks and mauls they were trying to avoid to conserve their flagging energy.
So the Wallabies go to Melbourne with spirits uplifted from their great victory.
They have won in Melbourne against the All Blacks, a victory which resulted in them clawing back an All Black lead at half-time. But that All Blacks side, in 2007, had just made the tough trip back from South Africa a few days earlier.
Unlike the Springboks, a side on the slide, the All Blacks are a side on the up. And so, of course, are the Wallabies. So it’s game on in Melbourne!
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
The Crowd Says (173) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (153)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- Brumbies vs Reds: a lesson for the other provinces (5)
- Chiefs vs Bulls: Super Rugby live scores, blog (14)
- Rocky Elsom axed from Wallabies (57)
- The burning question: Beale at 15 or 10? (119)
- Hola Argentina, and welcome to the Rugby Championship! (21)
- White welcomes Reds’ rugby battle tactics (81)
- Rebels want fast start against Hurricanes (4)
- Brumbies vs Reds: a lesson for the other provinces (5)
- Chiefs vs Bulls: Super Rugby live scores, blog (14)
- Hola Argentina, and welcome to the Rugby Championship! (21)
- Irish coaches looking to head Western Force (15)
- Dull Super Rugby coaches equal dull rugby (50)
- Coaching, not lack of depth, the issue for Australian rugby (30)
- Super Rugby round 14 preview (8)
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Berrick Barnes, David Pocock, IRB, Jaque Fourie, Peter de Villiers, Phil Kearns, Quade Cooper, Rocky Elsom, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri-Nations Tests, wallabies, Will Genia



July 26th 2010 @ 8:23am
Vincent said | July 26th 2010 @ 8:23am | Report comment
Pocock had a blinder as did Elsom, its good to see them playing to their potential!
July 26th 2010 @ 8:42am
TembaVJ said | July 26th 2010 @ 8:42am | Report comment
Well done to the wallabies, they answered many questions this weekend.
On the bright side for the Springboks, we are getting some good practice playing with only 14 men on the field. Plus blooding new players for next year with all the bannings going on. By the end of this 3N we won’t have any top players in and they will all be getting some much needed rest!
The Boks looked much better, very interesting to see what happens this weekend, but we have been saying this from the start of the comp.
July 26th 2010 @ 11:41am
ilikedahoodoogurusingha said | July 26th 2010 @ 11:41am | Report comment
“On the bright side for the Springboks, we are getting some good practice playing with only 14 men on the field.”
LOL…..great to see that you can have a sense of humour about it Temba…..I wish more posters were the same.
July 26th 2010 @ 12:35pm
TembaVJ said | July 26th 2010 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
Yeah you have to have a sense of humour when things go this bad…
To think my happiest Monday of the 3N will be next week, when I get to sit and watch you lot argue about this Saturday game.
Will we see another Irish ref on sat? I think all refs should be from one country at least it will be consistent. That country might as well be Ireland… if thats case ill send the boks on a river dance course.
July 26th 2010 @ 12:51pm
ilikedahoodoogurusingha said | July 26th 2010 @ 12:51pm | Report comment
“To think my happiest Monday of the 3N will be next week, when I get to sit and watch you lot argue about this Saturday game”
Unfortunately I think you will be proved right…..I hope we can be as gracious, but I some how doubt it!
Let’s hope SA can return to some sort of form for the remainder of the series.
July 26th 2010 @ 8:50am
mungo said | July 26th 2010 @ 8:50am | Report comment
There were those who said the W were going to get monstered by the SBs after 2 massive games against the ABs, now we hear the Ws arent going to be able to hold against the ABs, Im predicting a W win as long as they keep ball in hand, As Spiro said if Barnes gets the nod he has to be told to not KICK the thing, AAC was obviously told that prior to this last match and hiopefully he’s a convert to more running rugby and wont kick instinctively.
July 26th 2010 @ 8:51am
CK said | July 26th 2010 @ 8:51am | Report comment
Beale at fly half? Are you serious? He is playing well at reserve 15, leave him there. Why make continuous changes? Everyone wanted to rush him in as the next saviour when he was at Joey’s, and at 18 he cracked; he’s still only played a handful of tests; why can’t he just be blooded from the back until he’s matured?
As for mine, bring Barnes into 10, leave the midfield as is and stop tinkering unnecassarily with combinations.
I notice there’s been some use by the press recently of the phrase “x has arrived as a world class player…”. I think until Mr X has had more than one good game, maybe the press should relax on that a little bit?
the Wallabies have a long way to go yet, but at least they’ve shown what they can do if they work as a team.
July 26th 2010 @ 9:28am
Hayden said | July 26th 2010 @ 9:28am | Report comment
Couldn’t agree more CK regarding the over tinkering with combinations. Switch Barnes for Copper and leave the rest alone.
July 26th 2010 @ 10:58am
Even looser said | July 26th 2010 @ 10:58am | Report comment
Ditto.
The major thing we need is combinations and the confidence it brings. Swapping guys around against the white hot AB’s ain’t the time to do that.
July 26th 2010 @ 8:53am
Terry Kidd said | July 26th 2010 @ 8:53am | Report comment
Warrenexpatinnz thatis a very good point about the Docklands playing surface . It has been pulling apart under AFL players feet so how will it contend with twp packs, each over 1 tonne in weight, pushing against each other? Will we see quite a few scrum penalties for collapsing when it is simply the ground giving way beneath a props feet?
If so, it may nullify the expected AB scrum dominance.
July 26th 2010 @ 9:06am
Brett McKay said | July 26th 2010 @ 9:06am | Report comment
Terry it could force uncontested scrums too, as a worst case. I have to admit I haven’t watched a whole lot of AFL this year, can any Melbourne or Victorian Roarers confirm the state of the Docklands surface??
I’m with you too on Barnes straight into flyhalf, surely that the path of least resistance for the rest of the backline..
July 26th 2010 @ 11:45am
ilikedahoodoogurusingha said | July 26th 2010 @ 11:45am | Report comment
I’ll let you know first hand what it looks like on Saturday Bret!!
July 26th 2010 @ 9:25am
warrenexpatinnz said | July 26th 2010 @ 9:25am | Report comment
Yep Terry I think that there should be a combined teams discussion on this very issue during the week with some trial scrums. This could be the first rugby test ever were we actually start with uncontested scrums if the comments from Hawthorn’s players and coaching staff is correct. Areas around the logo’s and mid field were the worst however it is going to be a big ask for the referee to determine where is good and where it is bad.
July 26th 2010 @ 8:57am
johnny-boy said | July 26th 2010 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Hmm – just back from finishing the last slice of humble pie. It sure does pay to talk this Wallaby team down. I was shocked at Maafu’s improvement. Sure his scrummaging still needs more time but his tackling and hitting of the rucks was very impressive. He dished out a fair bit of pain and fatigue on the oppostion. Could become very valuable. Brown was good but needs to learn explosiveness and you couldn’t go past Rodney Saiolo as a better example. Not huge but incredibly damaging and scary and feared (even by the Boks I suspect). Force = mass x acceleration so it’s not so much the speed at which you hit but the rate of increase in speed as you make contact. Mumm played well but Simmons really looks the goods. Faainga also a surprise. Throw these boys a challenge and they’re eating it. It makes me laugh when people say the Wallabies are copying the All Blacks by tackling low. Like running rugby, Australia b…. invented it ! See TPN.
Great to Elsom finally leading from the front. I’ll take Giteau at 12 any day. Just starting to regain his mojo and running lines as well. Sweet. I chuckled when AAC got the ball in space and immediately thought about the up and under, paused, re thought it and then went for a run. Twice. Yeeha. I’ll also take O’Conner on the wing/2nd fullback any day. Anybody who says he is too small should try to emulate his tackle on Matfield. Awesome. Perfect technique – eh Qaude. Quade may need to cut loose more because when he is supressed and frustrated, he does try to take his childhood demons out on someone on the side, tho preferably not front on. OJ is right, he may end up losing respect rather than plaudits amongst his peers for this. Channel this anger in to front on, squat low, then explode defence bro. Hell you can do everything else, why not give it a go ! And I do wish the Wallabies could prepare themselves to receive the ball in space from ridiculous situations from Quade, cos it’s probably gonna happen ! A sure sign of a cowardly bully is when you can dish it out but can’t take it and Schalk Burger must take 1st prize. I’d love to see one of the All Blacks or Wallabies dish it out to Satan when he returns to gauge his reaction. Pocock sensational. He’ll have McCaw thinking. Barnes will be an excellent replacement for Cooper and will know that if he kicks all day he will be out of the team just as quick as he got back in.
Fantastic defence and I thought the Boks played better than previous weeks and when they were able to get their game together for a few minutes last week and stuck it to the All Blacks, the All Blacks again suddenly looked surprisiing fragile, as they do. They’re are so used to control and dominance and comfort they struggle if that is challenged. It’s in their DNA. They are brimming with self confidence at the moment, which makes them even more vulnerable.
The Wallabies have nothing to fear but their own fears, and egos. If only they could get some decent coaches who believed in them (they might just have to take this on themselves) and the selections just right … Still, we know that is probably the Wallabies one and only decent performance for the Tri-Nations and it’s downhill from here. Woe is us.
July 26th 2010 @ 5:12pm
Physics nerd said | July 26th 2010 @ 5:12pm | Report comment
Great points Johnny-Boy – Agree with it all except the acceleration thing.
The speed at contact does matter: Momentum = velocity x mass or more aptly, Energy at impact = 1/2 x Mass x Velocity squared.
As Energy is proportional to V squared (ie Twice the speed = 4 times the energy) speed at contact is very important. Acceleration (through leg drive), as you point out, is important after the point of contact, but will not result in a bigger impact.
July 26th 2010 @ 9:10am
Terry Kidd said | July 26th 2010 @ 9:10am | Report comment
Another good point Brett, and uncontested scrums would make for a whole new ball game …. geez, just when you think you have it sussed other Roarers show just how much crap you have spruiked. Lol, bring on Satruday night !!!
July 26th 2010 @ 9:15am
Brett McKay said | July 26th 2010 @ 9:15am | Report comment
Terry I don’t imagine there’s a whole lot of precedent for uncontested scrums on the back of an unrooted playing surface, for the record, but yeah, it would certainly change the dynamics of the game. Imagine trying to keep the ball in a scrum after no contest!!
And I learn something new on The Roar most weeks, you can’t underestimate how closely some people on here watch their sport (and I thought I watched things closely – ha!!)
July 26th 2010 @ 10:31am
Working Class Rugger said | July 26th 2010 @ 10:31am | Report comment
Uncontested scrums would certainly alter the game. Hopefully, it doesn’t come down to that. Regardless of how much some commentators (notably Fox) whinge about it the scrum is a integral element . However, it is a possiblity. There have been a number of serious knee and hamstring injuries occur on the Etihad surface during this years AFL season. Considering the pressure’s that occur in a Rugby game most particularly the scrum the risk of serious long term injury are very real. Anyone remeber the Wallabies at Wembley and its dodgy surface. From highlights this year Etihad appears to be worse. Both coaching teams need to make a decision. Whether risk it and hope everything works out but if it doesn’t endure possible long term injuries that could hurt their campaigns or elect to go down the un-thinkable and opt for uncontested and diminish the contested somewhat but reduce the risk. Though saying that several of these injuries have occured while simply running.
Why isn’t this game being played at AAMI Park. Yes, I know its smaller but its purpose built and its surface is far more capable of supporting Rugby.
July 26th 2010 @ 10:37am
BennO said | July 26th 2010 @ 10:37am | Report comment
“Terry I don’t imagine there’s a whole lot of precedent for uncontested scrums on the back of an unrooted playing surface, for the record, but yeah, it would certainly change the dynamics of the game.”
Didn’t Dunning snap his achilles in a scrum when the wallabies played at Wembley (or soccer ground) with a really loose surface? Probably couldn’t prove cause of course, but would circumstantial evidence be acceptable?
July 26th 2010 @ 1:26pm
Brett McKay said | July 26th 2010 @ 1:26pm | Report comment
Patrick Smith unloads on the Docklands surface in The Australian today. Obviously his is an AFL voice, and it was a touch surprising that there was no mention of what a rugby Test might do to an already questionable surface, but suggestion that “players could not hold their footing no matter what sort of stops [as in moulded or screw-in] they employed” are cetrainly a worry for what might happen come scrum time…
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/sport/dont-mention-the-woe-afls-faulty-barcelona-defence/story-e6frg7mf-1225896768996
July 26th 2010 @ 7:31pm
mother teresa said | July 26th 2010 @ 7:31pm | Report comment
it would make australia the laughing stock of world rugby;but what price a win?
dont think it will be keeping nz up at night
July 26th 2010 @ 9:37am
ohtani's jacket said | July 26th 2010 @ 9:37am | Report comment
Considering how good a defender Jacque Fourie is, nothing about his tackle suggets he’s a thug. If he’s a thug then so is Cooper.
Ruan Pienaar had a poor game but the Wallabies couldn’t field his early kicks and their counter attacking skills are almost non-existent. The Springboks tried to attack with the ball in hand in this Test because the Wallaby defensive line was continously offside (much like they were in that 2007 Melbourne Test) and they weren’t giving the tackled player a chance to release the ball. The reason I keep mentioning this is because the Boks were hammered on the penalty count and on the rare occasion that they were in the Wallaby 22 it took seven or more phases until Clancy called the Wallabies up. Hopefully, the All Blacks will do a better job of cleaning out the rucks.
July 26th 2010 @ 9:55am
cinematic said | July 26th 2010 @ 9:55am | Report comment
Yes the Wallabies don’t like attacking from broken play. I expect a lot more tactical kicking from the AB’s this weekend. A change to a grinding game plan, targeting the Wallaby scrum in particular.
Less running from everywhere because the aerobic fitness of the Wallabies forwards is far superior to the Boks. A pity Cooper’s gone.
I expect a very close one.
July 26th 2010 @ 11:52am
el gamba said | July 26th 2010 @ 11:52am | Report comment
We did look very shaky under the high ball, I suspect that NZ might have noticed this. We are a different team to S.A. and I think that we would be silly to expect the exact same tactics from the AB’s as they applied to S.A. This is where the fun starts!
July 26th 2010 @ 5:20pm
Justin said | July 26th 2010 @ 5:20pm | Report comment
Nicely balanced comments OJ
July 26th 2010 @ 5:29pm
ohtani's jacket said | July 26th 2010 @ 5:29pm | Report comment
Well, with all the talk that goes on around here about thuggish Boks and cheating Kiwis, someone has to point out that the Wallabies are eager little beavers themselves. I’m shocked that there’s not much outrage over Pocock. Shocked! I thought the Wallabies played in the spirit of the game, or is that cricket?
July 26th 2010 @ 8:23pm
sheek said | July 26th 2010 @ 8:23pm | Report comment
OJ,
Pleeeeaasse….. we Aussies are as pure as driven snow…..
July 26th 2010 @ 7:34pm
mother teresa said | July 26th 2010 @ 7:34pm | Report comment
OJ,QUITE RIGHT MATE,you have a keen eye
July 26th 2010 @ 9:52am
Vincent said | July 26th 2010 @ 9:52am | Report comment
I wouldn’t say J Fourie is a thug but continued illiegal acts by the team make these sort of acts thuggish.. once or twice can be mistakes or errors of judgment, any more than that is an atittude.
July 26th 2010 @ 10:15am
Shauny said | July 26th 2010 @ 10:15am | Report comment
All reports I read & hear are saying that the Boks are playing last years rules in the tackle situation and that is why they are having huge problems at the breakdown. Now as far as I know the rules were changed this year and this is confirmed by everyone saying that the boks are playing last years rules.
In the S14, the tackler HAD to release the ball carrier and allow him to place the ball before playing it, this included ANY defending player that assisted in tackling the ball carrier. NOT just the first defender.
HOWEVER come 3N’s Irish ref’s don’t interpret the same way and on countless occasions the Wallabies and the All blacks (read Pocock & McCaw) have tackled or assisted, have not released the ball carrier to place the ball and then played the ball directly. So from all accounts the Boks are playing S14 rules which should have been carried into 3N’s however the manner in which the Bulls & Stormers walked the S14 has led to this back tracking of rule interpretations. On 2 occasions (vs Wallabies) where the Boks have applied the same tactics they were penalised ???? WTF
There can be no explanation given as to why BJ was carded on a first offence without a warning when he even made an obvious attempt to make the ball available. Then you get Pocock giving numerous penalties away in the same “red zone” killing or stealing the ball deliberately and not receiving a card.
Zavos conveniently forgets incidents such as these & even fails to mention that Coopers tackle was even worse than Fourie’s. I don’t condone either tackle, however have no respect for writers that can’t comment on both sides fairly.
I make no excuses for the poor displays by the Boks, players look tired, uninterested and unenthused. Their tactics are seriously lacking and the coaching staff look like…well how did Canon put it…
Don’t be mistaken though, non of these players are all of a sudden bad and I am pretty confident with a few minor personnel tweaks and tactical amendments the Boks will be back!