Massacre at Mohali: Australia set for Indian ambush
By Vinay Verma, 26 Jul 2010 Vinay Verma is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Ashes, Cricket, India, Ricky Ponting
There is an ambush awaiting Ricky Ponting’s team in India. It may well be as bloody as the Battle of the Little Bighorn. Will it be Ponting’s last stand?
Will Ponting survive this passage to India and be intact for the Ashes?
The first Test is at Mohali, outside Chandigarh and this is India’s fortress. Since the first match against the West Indies in December 1994, nine Tests have been played and, except for the first, India have never lost here.
It is a good batting surface with even bounce and there have been five drawn encounters.
Australia has played at Mohali once and were soundly beaten by 320 runs in 2008. Ponting got two and five, out to his nemesis Ishant Sharma both times.
Hussey and Watson both got fifties in the match but Australia did not score enough runs. Dhoni, Tendulkar, Ganguly and Gambhir all scored heavily as India scored 469 in the first innings.
India’s spinners took 12 of the 20 wickets and the quicks, Khan and Sharma, the other eight. Australia’s batters may hold their own as India’s quicks are struggling.
However Tendulkar and Sehwag will be salivating at the prospect of the buffet to be served up by Johnson, Bollinger and Hilfenhaus.
Is there a Crazy Horse among these bowlers? Not according to India’s spearhead Zaheer khan who had the following to say after the drawn first Test at Bangalore in 2008: “They know they can’t take twenty wickets and they are on the back foot,” Khan said. “They couldn’t get me or Bhajji [Harbhajan Singh] out. So we are in with a big chance. They are under pressure – we know that.”
Then Australia had Johnson, Lee, Siddle and Watson in the bowling ranks. So we can expect that India’s mindset will not have changed. And this time India plays first at Mohali and then at Bangalore.
On the evidence of the two tests against Pakistan at Lords and Headingley Australia are on a hiding to nothing. Zaheer Khan will exploit any hesitancy in Australia’s batting and Harbhajan will do his best to get under Ponting’s thin skin.
India’s bowling has just taken a mauling at the hands of the Sri Lankan lions but even then they look better than the pussycats that bowled at Lords and Headingley. If North and Watson are now our strike bowlers then Miss Piggy is Bo Derek.
But it is the batting of India that will be scramble-seaming the minds of Johnson and company. Sehwag averages over 50 against Australia and has a strike rate in the seventies. He has three hundreds in 15 matches and a high of 194.
Sachin Tendulkar has a higher average against Australia, 56.08, than his career average of 55. He has been scoring hundreds since 1991 when he was a sixteen year old. The last time he played Australia was the Nagpur test of 2008 where he scored 109 in the first innings.
Rahul Dravid has a lower average against Australia (41.2) against an overall career average of 53. However, batting at three, he has scored more runs against Australia than any other country.
He only has two hundreds but both have been big; in the first he was run out for 180 in the Kolkata classic when he and VVS stopped Steve Waugh’s juggernaut. The second was his 233 at Adelaide when replying to Australia’s massive first innings of 556 (Ponting 242). On both these occasions India won.
Dravid also has seven scores of more than 70 against Australia. Dravid told me in an interview in March this year that he loves testing himself against the best and Australia, for his entire career, has been the best. So The Wall is up for the contest.
Gambhir, Laxman and Dhoni are no mugs with the bat either.
This is a series that may be bigger than the Ashes. The pity is that it is an afterthought when it should have been the main event.
This will showcase two short men. Both giants of the modern game with 25,000 Test runs and 84 Test hundreds between them.
The irony is that these heavyweights may be playing in empty stadiums and the 2010-11 Ashes are already sold out. Thankfully it is being shown live on pay TV.
If Australia cannot get their bowling right there will be blood on the Indian fields and it won’t be the Indian’s bleeding.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- Ashes, Cricket, India, Ricky Ponting

Will said | July 26th 2010 @ 9:26am | Report comment
What is the point of this article? That Indian series was nearly two years ago. Sharma is now half the bowler he was then. Singh is on the decline. As always in India, the toss is crucial. But Australia must fancy their chances against the Indian bowlers.
It is unwise to right the Australians bowlers off based on a two test series during which they had one day of bowling in a warm up game, with 2 bowlers in Hilfenhaus and Johnson coming back from moderate breaks.
I know that hyperbole is the order of the day in the media these days, but just once I wish a bit of logic and common sense was applied when discussing cricket. Fact is, we had 2 bowlers coming back from injury in foreign conditions without much bowling under their belt.
Our batsmen came up against a top notch bowler in Asif and one in Aamer, who in the right conditions, was a handful.
All is not lost for the Australians.
Put it like this, Australia’s future looks a lot brighter then India’s. At least we have some bowlers.
Fisher Price said | July 26th 2010 @ 10:08am | Report comment
No mention of Australia’s ever-collapsing batting, WIll?
Spell or no spell, Johnson is overrated by home fans.
I agree, Vinay. It’s going to be interesting to see how Australia fares in India.
Vinay Verma said | July 26th 2010 @ 10:22am | Report comment
Fisher Price,I was replying to Will as you were posting. I understand Will’s reaction and I could make excuses too but then I would be failing in my anaysis. I do believe Australia has a good structure and there is talent but the young ones have to be given their chance. Smith,Khawaja and Hughes are the future. Ponting needs to score consistent runs and he is at the end rather than the start of his career. Steve Waugh faced the same scrutiny. It is nothing new. Australia has a proud history and there is no room for sentiment. I wish Ponting can answer his detractors but if he can’t then maybe it is time. So too,with Hussey. Great servant but every time he bats now he is on trial. This happens at the start of a career and towards the end.
Vinay Verma said | July 26th 2010 @ 10:17am | Report comment
Will,the point of the article is to be brutal and not hide the deficiences in Australia’s bolwling. It is irrelevant to talk about Sharma or Harbhajan.Australia has to worry about what it can control. Hilfenhaus is the only bowler that can give Australia cause for optimism.
I have been a great advocate for Johnson and he looks as if he needs more time in the nets. A test match is not the place to iron out kinks.I question if Tro Cooley is earning his money. If Australia had come up against a side with more accomplished batters Pakistan would have scored 400 in their first innings in Headingley.
“We had two bowlers coming back from injury” Well,in that case it was a mistake to pick them. I do not intend to be a cheer squad for Australia or for that matter any team. My brief is to tell it like I see it. I also respect your right to your opinion.
Of course,all is not lost for Australia but if they don’t fix the bowling then the future is at least cloudy.
Tristan Rayner said | July 26th 2010 @ 11:27am | Report comment
A tough article on the lads Vinay, you certainly haven’t minced words. Agree with the majority of the article though – our bowlers are lacking venom and India is hardly the place to be going with mixed form and under pressure.
To be honest though, very few would even know where Australia are playing next. Even if we are flogged most punters will only be interested in how that affects the upcoming Ashes and use the results to confirm their like/dislike of certain players.
Vinay Verma said | July 26th 2010 @ 11:52am | Report comment
Tristan,I know Ponting is a realist and even he must be tiring of flying the flag for Johnson. Punter has been loyal to his teammates most of his career. He put up with a lot of Symond’s indiscretions but in the end everyone has to be responsible for their own actions. Now with players being paid a decent wage it is only right we expect them to be more accountable. I think the Age of Entitlement is now over.
Tristan,for me growing up as a young boy my heroes were all Australian cricketers,courtesy of the ABC. The Harveys,O Neills,Lindwall,Grout and Benaud. I have been here for 40 years and have seen the Chappells,Lillees,Waughs and Warne.It has been a pleasure and a privilege. Ponting is up there as one of the best since Bradman. So was Greg Chappell and Lillee is the greatest bowler I have seen,more so than Warne. So in the end I make my observations with the good of Australian cricket at heart. But I will not be blinded by sentiment.
formeropenside said | July 26th 2010 @ 11:38am | Report comment
What the hell? Why is Australia playing yet another Test series v India? Didn’t we just do this a year or so ago? Aren’t there enough Test playing nations to fit into the Schedule?
Vinay Verma said | July 26th 2010 @ 11:53am | Report comment
fop,Money! Money! Money! Even Ponting has questioned the wisdom of playing on the low,slow pitches. He has said it is not ideal preparation for the Ashes.
Brett McKay said | July 26th 2010 @ 12:39pm | Report comment
and let’s be honest Vinay, India are only interested in Test cricket now to preserve their Test ranking. This was originally a five or seven game ODI series until a few months ago…
Vinay Verma said | July 26th 2010 @ 1:10pm | Report comment
Brett,of course India is doing it to preserve their Test ranking. But they may not be number one by the time Australia gets there. Australia is now four and just ahead of England. If England beat Pakistan comprehensively they may even supplant Australia. How the mighty have fallen!
JohnB said | July 26th 2010 @ 12:48pm | Report comment
An alternative analysis would be that Australia’s bowling at Mohali was pretty threadbare in 2008 – a very new Siddle, an almost gone Lee, a still pretty new Johnson, Shane Watson and Cameron White. This time it would be 3 of Hilfenhaus, Bollinger, Johnson and Siddle, with Watson as back-up, Hauritz and possibly Smith. Not the best attack ever for those conditions, but markedly better than 2008. India’s on the other hand looks to have gone backwards since then, as has been pointed out.
And while it’s fine to applaud the records of the Indian batsmen, and quite reasonable to say that Ponting and Hussey are on the way out (and Katich is no spring chicken either), it’s not unreasonable to point out that Dravid and Tendulkar are past 37 and Laxman approaching 36. At some point, in the not too distant future, India will lose 2 or even all 3 of them, leaving Yuvraj Singh (good in limited overs, a question mark in tests) as the only established middle order player. That’s more of a problem than Australia has in my view.
Vinay Verma said | July 26th 2010 @ 1:08pm | Report comment
JohnB,sure the alternate anaysis make sense. My take on that is that India’s bench strength in the batting is stronger. Rohit Sharma for Laxman,Virat Kohli for Dravid and Raina for Tendulkar. But we are talking about three months time and unless Australia get their bowling right it could be ugly in Mohali. And really I am talking about Australia getting their act together rather than worrying about India.
Prar said | July 26th 2010 @ 1:48pm | Report comment
I think perhaps you may have read the script wrong.
Ponting has his one (and only) hundred in India in Bangalore- venue of the 2nd Test.
The Mohali pitch is generally one favouring the faster bowlers- not a raging turner. And we all know how Ponting and co. ,with the exception of Clarke- fare against quality spin on turning tracks.
So- a fast bouncy track at Mohali and a good batting track at Bangalore vs. a tough team is perhaps just the preparation Ponting and co. require.
Vinay Verma said | July 26th 2010 @ 3:12pm | Report comment
Prar,you are right about Ponting’s only ton in Bangalore. This was also where Clarke announced his arrival. Mohali has more bounce than other Indian venues but still not as much as Brisbane,Melbourne and Perth. Mohali is probably the best prepared pitch in India and it favours strokeplay.
Pras,good players should be able to adjust and if it is a close series Australia will be well prepared. I have a feeling though that India’s batting will be the difference.
Prar said | July 26th 2010 @ 3:38pm | Report comment
Yes. Well I meant that a tough test like that may be just the ideal preparation for the Ashes- unlike what others including Ponting may feel.
Better than having a knock at the nets.
Vinay Verma said | July 26th 2010 @ 3:44pm | Report comment
Prar,good to have your opinion and I hope we hear from you again. I am curious with your line “you may have read the script wrong”..was this addressed to me or JohnB. If it was to me let me know where I erred.
Prar said | July 26th 2010 @ 4:02pm | Report comment
Oh sorry- yes it was addressed to you.
Well, the way you started the article…. “There is an ambush awaiting Ricky Ponting’s team in India. It may well be as bloody as the Battle of the Little Bighorn. Will it be Ponting’s last stand?”….it sounded that going to India may be the worst possible thing for Australia.
I was just thinking that it may not be too bad after all.
Vinay Verma said | July 26th 2010 @ 4:11pm | Report comment
Prar, I was actually highlighting the inadequacy of the Australian bowling. Read the last line of my article…but you are right,it is better than the nets..
Will said | July 26th 2010 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
Vinay Verma
Johnson is our one bowler who you can classify as a ‘potential match winner’. He has over 150+ test wickets. He is also a potentially destructive lower order batsmen. His capable of bowling 150 km/hr +. We saw against SA in 2008/09 what he can do.
We saw it last summer as well against Pakistan and New Zealand.
There is no doubt that Johnson’s style isn’t suited to English conditions. That is just the way it is. Johnson is suited to the harder and faster decks. He also needs a lot of bowling under his belt. Throwing him in against Pakistan under foreign conditions with minimal lead in time was never going to end well.
It seems to me that perhaps you are an Australian fan who didn’t like the results in England, or you were disappointed in the teams performance and now you are letting emotion get in the way of logic.
Right now we have Johnson and Hilfenhaus returning from various lay-offs. Bollinger also doesn’t have a happy hunting ground in England. These guys don’t like the conditions in England. It is unwise to right them off based on this.
Harris is right now in rehab and will provide extra depth to the bowling. The future looks bright for the Australians with the likes of Paine and Smith impressing in England. Furthermore, Phil Hughes and the young Pakistan-born batsmen look like 100+ test players for Australia. Callum Ferguson will also return to action sooner rather than later.
Ponting isn’t done with yet, his a champion of the game, and I wish people would support rather than right him off.
I prefer to look to the positives. We came into the series under-done and we still drew 1-1. Pakistan’s bowlers in Asif and Aamer were superb under Englsh conditions, full credit to them. They deserved their win in the 2nd test, but I was impressed by the character the Australians showed.
Australia will benefit from these hard contests against Pakistan and India.
I’m confident of Australia’s immediate future and the future of the side post-Ponting’s retirement.
The Ashes will be home sooner rather then later, and then we will hold the gold.
sheek said | July 26th 2010 @ 8:37pm | Report comment
Will,
Johnson’s problem can be named in two words – ‘Jessica Bratich’.
When you have a woman in your life as beautiful as her, you wouldn’t have your mind on the cricket, or anything else, either……….!
Vinay Verma said | July 26th 2010 @ 2:19pm | Report comment
Will, I like your passion but a few corrections,if I may. Firstly my job is to analyse. Secondly I am a fan but not so much that I will gloss over what I term deficiencies. I admire Dravid too but he has not scored a ton in three visits to Sri Lanka. Neither has Tendulkar or Laxman in the last ten years in Sri lanka. The only one to score a ton in this time has been Sehwag.
I question the wisdom of picking bowlers coming off injury or as you say “guys that don’t like conditions in England” Cricket is an International game and players have to adapt.
Of course the future looks bright but that is expected. Australia has always been a strong cricketing nation. Ponting has been a great player and he may yet have some runs left in him. But criticising and support are two different things. Ponting has the support but he also has to perform. I can assure you Ponting will go before he is pushed. I know how proud he is.
Drawing the series with Pakistan is as good as losing it. Pakistan were a shambles and Australia got caught short. This happens from time to time but the batting has been fragile in quite a few innings over the last 10 Tests.
Yes, Australia showed character in coming back but this is a given We EXPECT all Australian sides to show character. I would worry about the Ashes after India not before.
Will said | July 26th 2010 @ 3:56pm | Report comment
If we don’t pick Hilfenhaus and Johnson then who do we pick? Harris is injured, Hauritz is injured. Picking Hifenhaus and Johnson was the right move, the days before the Ashes start is fast approaching sub-100. These guys were under-done in foreign conditions. It is not a surprise at all that the likes of Bollinger and Johnson struggled. Both have had very little cricket. They had to play, with a view towards November, and because they were 100% fit but under-done with regards to meaningful cricket.
I’m simply emphasising the point that our bowles do not like the softer, slower English decks and /or they still struggle mastering the duke ball. It doesn’t mean they cannot bowl, it just means that there is still work to do. Still, I come back to my original point, this team was underprepared with one warm up game of 2 days. Still, we need to take the positives out of the performance and move on.
Australia is still a formidable side at home, but still inconsistent away from home – that is too be expected with a side that is still finding its way.
Vinay Verma said | July 26th 2010 @ 4:08pm | Report comment
Will,the great sides learn to win away from home. I accept your reasoning and this side has potential. But we must not be blind to the problems. I hope that Johnson can recover his radar and I would like Bollinger to prove me wrong. And I would like nothing better than to beat the Poms. But Will,come November the POMS may actually be one step higher than Australia on the rankings. It won’t be a pushover.
Will said | July 26th 2010 @ 3:58pm | Report comment
And Vinjay.
I hope that Australia regains the Ashes this summer. And then we will hold the gold.
Lolly said | July 26th 2010 @ 7:35pm | Report comment
If Johnson bowls like a goat in India, I’d be happy for him not to start in the Ashes. Harris would be a better call if he is fit as he can generally bowl the ball in a spot that he wants it to go. And he can hit.
Vinay Verma said | July 26th 2010 @ 8:00pm | Report comment
Lolly,what I have noticed with Johnson is that it takes him a lot of bowling before he finds his mojo. You can bowl hours in the nets but it is different to match time. In the nets there could be two or three bowlers and you don’t build the same intensity and concentration as in a match. I don’t know where Johnson will get match time before he goes to India. Maybe he should look at playing for a county for two months and get the miles in the legs.
Siddle,I think will recover before Haris and he too,will not have any match practice. I think there is only one warm up match in India.
Does Australia risk Lee? Nannes and Tait are outside possibilities. But I think Tait is being saved for the shorter forms.I would like to see Tait play Tests and bowled in bursts of two to three overs. Ponting would love that.A reverse swinging yorker at 160KMH will have the Little master jumping.
Lolly said | July 26th 2010 @ 8:40pm | Report comment
I can’t see him going to England and with his reputation there, would anyone be willing to pay a lot of money for him?
Vinay Verma said | July 26th 2010 @ 11:08pm | Report comment
Lolly,because I criticise Johnson it does not mean he is a dud. He is not bowling well. He CAN bowl well. I am sure keen judges in England will know he is good value and only needs more bowling. I am sure there will be counties willing to sign him. Especially since three or four of England’s finest will be on Test duty.
Lolly said | July 27th 2010 @ 1:10am | Report comment
He’s been here twice though and the bad memories of him are far stronger than the good memories. I don’t know how much people would want to pay to have him in their squad and he’s not likely to want to go for peanuts.
Fisher Price said | July 29th 2010 @ 12:25pm | Report comment
Lee! Brett Lee? Are you serious. He’s finished. Been rubbish for many years, actually, but (in true Pontingesque style) talks himself up a lot.