Wallabies loss was one frustrating game!
By Frank O'Keeffe, 1 Aug 2010 The Crowd is a Roar Pro
231 Have your say
Related coverage
I just came back from the Melbourne Bledisloe Cup Test between Australia and New Zealand three hours ago. How am I feeling at 12:35am in the morning? Well I’m hurting big time! BIG TIME!
I was looking forward to this game for months and to get such a result hurts. Australia likely won’t regain the Bledisloe Cup this year, and it’s been many painful years.
I went to the game with a Swedish friend of mine, who to his credit seemed to grasp the fundamentals of the game, despite this being his first live game.
A few months ago, I showed him the Sydney Test from the 2000 Blesidloe Cup series on YouTube (it’s shown there in its entirety). He seemed to enjoy the game and all the quick scoring, but I warned him, “Don’t expect such scoring in the game we go to. There aren’t many games that have such quick tries and weird scores.”
Boy was I wrong!
A few minutes in when Carter had his kick charged down, I couldn’t believe Australia’s luck. Such a lucky score against the All Blacks!
I had such a good feeling after that moment.
I also sat next to a South African man who has lived in Australia since 1986 and noted to him, “Nass Botha wouldn’t have his kick charged down.” He said, “No it would be down our end of the ground, and if a flanker did charge up to him quickly, he’d tap him on the shoulder as he ran by… didn’t like to tackle though.”
Shortly after Australia returned the favour and I couldn’t believe the game I was watching.
There were two areas of main concern from my standpoint in the crowd. Firstly, Australia were having trouble re-gathering kick-offs, and if Rod MacQueen were Australian coach he’d have torn his hair out watching this game. It was one of his things: you win every kick-off!
The second thing was the Wallabies were falling off their tackles, although I do appreciate it’s difficult to bring Brad Thorn down.
McCaw’s try came from a great tactical kick from Carter, similar to how the All Blacks won the Sydney Test last year, only then it was with a penalty.
With the exception of Berrick Barnes, I don’t think many Australian players would think to make a clever weighted kick like that.
I still don’t know how the ball squirted out from the side of the ruck as I didn’t have the advantage of watching it on TV with replays. But it did and McCaw scored.
It seemed like the referee, Joubert, was having a bit of an influence near the end of the second half, and it started killing the game for me.
At halftime, I didn’t know what to make of the game. My astute Swedish friend asked me, “Are the All Blacks playing well or have they just been fortunate?” He knew enough of rugby to ask me this question. He saw how much possession Australia had, and reminded me Australia had the ball more than New Zealand.
I honestly didn’t know the answer. I’m at a total loss to explain how the game went New Zealand’s way so much.
The only one thing that stood-out to me was Australia’s ineptness at the kick-off, which actually hurt the side tremendously.
The All Blacks were certainly playing well, but they were scoring tries quicker than I’ve ever seen them score, in a game where Australia seemed to be playing well? It made no sense and still makes no sense to me.
The things I’ve come to associate with the Wallabies when they’re losing just weren’t there.
For example, I’m not a fan of Matt Giteau’s kicking in general play. And last year he ran laterally many times to his detriment.
Last night he seemed fine to me. It’s as if the Wallabies were taking off where they left against South Africa by keeping the ball in hand. He made a good break early on in the game. He missed a few kicks he should have got, but it wasn’t a matter of win or lose. He played well, I felt.
There was one period just after the halftime break when the Wallabies tried going sideways before going forwards. Aside from that they struck me as actually playing quite well.
Before the game I was wondering where Australia would score their tries, and to their credit they scored two tries after plenty of effort. It was satisfying that they didn’t give up after they were well and truly beaten, unlike last year in the 3rd Bledisloe Cup game.
I don’t know how much Drew Mitchell being red-carded cost Australia, but it seemed to me like two tries were scored by stretching the Wallabies from one end to the other. My South Africa acquaintance noted, “Look how they’re using the width of the field.”
David Pocock and Rocky Elsom stood out the most for me out of the Wallabies, a bit like last week. Pocock looks like a mountain over ball, and just as I can appreciate how hard it is to bring Brad Thorn down, so too can I appreciate how hard it is to move Pocock.
I left the game feeling absolutely terrible and aghast at how Australia lost that game by such a huge margin.
Giteau hardly kicked, Genia seemed to play well and got good ball, Pocock was excellent, Rocky made some yards, Ashley-Cooper showed guts… what was missing? Why weren’t Australia competitive?
Australia haven’t won in New Zealand since around 2001 I think. So it’s unlikely Australia will win the Bledisloe Cup. They haven’t held the Cup since 2002. As a fan I’m hurting.
What’s worse is I think Australia had a chance to win some silverware in 2008/09. In 2008 Australia were so close to winning the Tri Nations in Brisbane, but they fell away for 15 minutes and New Zealand won.
In 2009, I did not rate the All Blacks a great side. Players like Mils were out of form, and Stephen Donald seemed a liability at five-eighth. The All Blacks were pretty below their par against South Africa last year, and if I can get away with saying this: they were below their best against Australia. It’s just that Australia were worse.
This year the All Blacks are starting to look good again, and for once they might actually be timing things right for the World Cup.
In five of the Wallabies last eight games against New Zealand Australia have led at halftime. Australia fell away for many reasons.
I just don’t know what to make of that. It fees like they should have won at least one Test.
If I was Robbie Deans I’d ask two questions of his players:
1. What do you think we need to do to win the Bledisloe Cup, and I don’t want to hear anything that hasn’t worked in the last two/three years?
2. What do we need to do to do it?
The thing about Bob Dwyer’s World Cup Wallabies is Dwyer challenged his players to be the best players in their position. By his estimation you needed about five players who’d make a World XV.
If New Zealand have a better second row in Brad Thorn, what makes him better? Why aren’t you like him? What aren’t you doing to reach that standard? If you’re just hoping to contribute to the game, go away, you have to be the best. That’s the Dwyer way.
I don’t get that sense with these Wallabies, which is perhaps why Dwyer said a couple of months ago that Australia can’t win the World Cup, because they have no players who’d make a World XV.
Look I’ll stop there. It’s now 1:17am in the morning.
That was one incredibly frustrating game and I am one incredibly frustrated fan!
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (198)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (172)
- Brumbies 2012: New coach, new players, new attitude (128)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (61)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (27)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (18)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- Bledisloe Cup, new zealand all blacks, robbie deans, Rugby Union, wallabies

Viscount Crouchback said | August 1st 2010 @ 4:16am | Report comment
A few points…
1. The Australians simply don’t have the cattle. I felt sorry for the poor young pups sent on by Deans in the second half. It was the rugger equivalent of a posting to Stalingrad in December ’42.
2. Robbie Deans has been rumbled. He’s like the product of a bizarre experiment in which a Kiwi sheep farmer is locked in a room with a library of self-help manuals for a year and then told to go and coach the Wallabies.
3. Rocky Elsom isn’t a captain. It’s painfully obvious that he’s an introverted soul trying to be something he’s not, which manifests itself in embarrassing incidents such as the one where he started screaming at Craig Joubert like a teenage girl.
Hayden said | August 1st 2010 @ 6:04am | Report comment
Agreed on all points. At one stage Elsom was arguing with Joubert after he had just penalized the ABs and then marched them a further ten metres.
I’m almost starting to feel sympathy for Deans, but then again he gets paid more in one year than I will likely get in my life, so how bad can it be.
There’s some kind of gnat up Mitchell’s behind. He looks like a cocker spaniel that shaved off his fir to try and make himself look intimidating. I wonder if he is back in Robbie’s good books now?
Rockin Rod said | August 1st 2010 @ 9:22am | Report comment
Totally agree Elsom isnt a captain, their is still time to give it to another player so Rocky can get angry and concentrate on his own job
Mungehead said | August 1st 2010 @ 9:51am | Report comment
Worth comparing against McCaw. As he admitted himself after the match, he has his work cut out for him going up against Pocock these days. But his captaincy is as good as ever.
Pocock for captain?
Rockin Rod said | August 1st 2010 @ 10:04am | Report comment
Well if its about moving forward it has to be. He is going to be EWF captain when Sharpe moves on and they have groomed him for Wallaby captain by making him Aussie 20s captain with Horne, genia cooper etc in that team. He position will never be under threat as their is daylight between him and our next best 7
taylor bridge said | August 1st 2010 @ 10:19pm | Report comment
Rocky , just be happy to push in the second Row. Pips on the shoulders and a swagger stick arent you.
joeb said | August 1st 2010 @ 2:23pm | Report comment
Viscount Crouchback, when you say “Australians simply don’t have the cattle,” think back to this year’s Qld Reds and Western Force win over the Crusaders… we do have the cattle but last night as Horan and Crowley were saying we just weren’t hungry enough in the forwards… we simply didn’t perform up to par… and not picking on the ref, but at least one of the ABs’ tries came from a blatant forward pass… we were our own worst enemies, made some silly errors, yet again… would’ve brought on Burgess for Genia in the 2nd half, as the nuggety Qld half simply wasn’t in the contest last night…
Got no probs here with Elsom’s leadership – poor bugger can’t do it all on his pat malone; the other forwards need to pitch in…
But the way the ABs played their kick-offs was brilliant, angled at the 10 metre line with thier forwards rampaging thru leaping up and slapping it back to retain posssession, classy intelligent stuff…
Hayden said | August 1st 2010 @ 11:23pm | Report comment
joeb – you shouldn’t confuse the occasional top rate performance in the S14 with consistent international standard. Last year, the Highlanders crushed the Bulls – does that make their players international standard?
bennalong said | August 1st 2010 @ 3:05pm | Report comment
Meanspirited comments
ThelmaWrites said | August 1st 2010 @ 10:46pm | Report comment
M’lord
1. I can’t bear to read about Stalingrad, for both the sufferings of the Russians and wintry fate of the German soldiers. So with due respect, the young pups had a better outcome than befell those in Stalingrad.
2. Robbie Deans has better understanding of rugby than you portray. But keeping to World War II analogies, sometimes I think he’s attempting “a bridge too far” like the airborne assault on Arnhem.
3. Agree, Elsom is not captain material. You can’t learn it, or if you can, it’s too late and too dire. We need someone not only articulate but also crafty to the point of deviousness.,
No offense meant by my comments, m’lord.
ThelmaWrites said | August 1st 2010 @ 10:49pm | Report comment
Shaun said | August 1st 2010 @ 4:33am | Report comment
I think that Australia have something in their team that can develop. Yes they were convincingly beaten but they never gave up. A few soft tries can wreck havoc and as we all know , it’s almost impossible to play catchup against a team like the All Blacks. I still believe that both Sa and Aus can perform much better and take it to them. To start they have to maintain 15 players on the field. The focus was just not there.
The All Blacks are really not as good as people are making them out to be . Don’t get me wrong , they’re a good side but still not the greatest. The Aussies have the potential to build on what they have and will be a force to be reckoned with , come WC. Your team has nothing to be ashamed of – its all in the building stages – lesson learn’t for a young side. Keep building on the platform you have, never say die and you’ll still reap huge benefits with those guys.
In the modern game – every player has to arrive every game and there is no place for ill discipline. Look into the first time tackles, Kick offs and better positional play. Challenge better in the lineouts. Genia is a brilliant player but seemed to be very mediocre today – they knew who they had to mark. Knowing he was being marked out of the game it’s up to another player to spark the resurgence – that did not happen. It all comes down to inexperience.
Just my thoughts !!
Rickety Knees said | August 1st 2010 @ 8:35am | Report comment
Shaun, I agree. The AB’s played at a level last night which we did not match and in doing so they put pressure on our basic skills which faltered at crucial times. This is a young side and with Cooper, Palu, Alexander, Horwell and TPN to come back into the side, we will be more competitive. In the past I have criticised Mitchell in that for every great play there is often a corresponding howler – last night this was graphically illustrated.
Make no doubt about it this is a great AB side. Unfortunately the RWC has changed the nature of test Rugby – virtually every game now becomes a precurser to it. As far as the Wallabies are concerned nothing could be a better lead up to it than this sort of football lesson and the second half performance showed that the Wallabies are rising to the challenge.
I believe that the Wallabies will build a greater steely resolve and that a full strength side (and yes we have the “cattle’) have a great chance of winning the RWC.
ohtani's jacket said | August 1st 2010 @ 8:51am | Report comment
If I were the Wallabies, I wouldn’t dwell on this game for particularly long, but they’ve got to concentrate on what they can do *next week* not next year.
The Wallabies already went down this road in 2006/07 of claiming that they were getting closer and that they were going to surprise everyone at the World Cup. This is all going to end very unhappily if the Wallabies don’t start buckling up.
bennalong said | August 1st 2010 @ 3:07pm | Report comment
Yup!
Fix the restarts
Contest the lineouts
Allan said | August 1st 2010 @ 5:12pm | Report comment
I agree with you Shaun. Maybe there is only a small difference. Just unfortunately in a large number of areas. Having said that it might be beyond the current team to clean up that many aspects of their game all at once.
The big thing for me was the AB defence. I don’t watch much rugby nowadays but they were looking like the Crusaders earlier in the decade. Can’t remember which years but it was back when Todd Blackadder was captain and I think one season they were undefeated. By only committing 2-3 players to a defensive breakdown they can have more in the defensive line and also because there is only 1 row of players in the ruck/maul the whole line is virtually on the gain line. Does anyone ever stand behind the rearmost foot etc etc any more?
It must take good judgement and communication to pull this off but it certainly frustrated the Wallabies. I think they did well holding on to the ball for extended periods but it must have felt like they were never going to break the line. I hate to say it but maybe a little more judicious kicking may be required.
I would be interested if other people remember the Crusaders in the same way. Highly paid advisory position available to anyone who knows why the Crusaders changed their game plan
Ben S said | August 1st 2010 @ 4:53am | Report comment
I think that Australia has the players to do better than they have over the past three seasons, VC. For three seasons the side has looked aimless and badly coached. Look at the improvements that Henry wrought out of the All Blacks. I can’t think of one aspect of their game that the Australians have improved (scrum I hear you say?) under Deans. That can’t all be the fault of the players.
–
Shaun, people have been saying that this side has been ‘building’ for three seasons now. The Australian side had 35 caps per man on average. At some point ‘building’ has to translate into results.
Ben said | August 1st 2010 @ 6:45am | Report comment
Ben S i tend to agree with you…..Somethign deans is doing is just not getting through…..we are lite in certain positions ie the front and second row…but have an embarassment of riches out wide….The disapline is just not there…its hard enough as it is without the mindless blow ups…Cooper and Mitchel and Barnes chip into carter. For me when barnes did that the game was gone.
I think Deans is obviously a fine coach, but i dont buy we dont have the cattle to be very competitive (look at the super 14) so somethign he and the coaching staff.
That sort of attitude cant just appear on the day…it has to be in the camp and training as well.
Perhaos Rocky is not the man as well……Genia seemed to havea better balance between respect and he got into his players when they palyed poorly and especially when tey did stupid things..I wonder if Rocky gave the boys a bollocking after that, especially Mitchell and Barnes.
Something has to change….I am as one eyed as they come and this will not do.
darwin stubby said | August 1st 2010 @ 6:08am | Report comment
In respect to Deans I found the following interesting (in answer to a question from Growden) :
Q
You’ve come from an environment where there is an abundance of good players, to one where there is a considerable shortage. Were you surprised by the lack of depth in Australian rugby?
A
There’s nothing I’ve experienced here I haven’t experienced before. It is very much same challenges, different faces. When I started with the Crusaders, we were stone cold last, and then we chipped away, and got to where we got to.
Now I wonder what a certain Wayne Smith would think of that answer – because I’m pretty sure he was the coach who transformed the Crusaders and Robbie took over a winning outfit …. interesting the Mr Deans finds it necessary to buff the CV.
The Wallabies were outplayed last night and the scoreline probably flattered them – 2 forward passes (throws probably a better description) in the lead up to 2 of the 2nd half tries …
hanzo said | August 1st 2010 @ 7:05am | Report comment
Deans’ was Smith’s assisstant at the Crusaders so he can take some credit, He does say when he started not when he started as head coach. I think your reading too much into it.
darwin stubby said | August 1st 2010 @ 7:14am | Report comment
assistant or manager ? – big difference I would have thought … either way he certainly didn’t build from scratch at the Crusaders that’s got to be credited to Smith
Danny said | August 1st 2010 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
Robbie’s record stands and is magnificent but he shouldn’t make comments like that. I doubt O’Neill picked him on his record as a savoiur, but if he did then maybe he erred.
The comment should be put in proper context but wont help his return to NZ, if indeed that route is still viable?
There are some jobs you just don’t take.
Jeremy said | August 4th 2010 @ 3:30pm | Report comment
The difference is that the Crusaders has a pool of players who’d sell their grandmothers teeth to get into a red and black jersey.
Sonny Bill Williams turned down squillions in earnings to head to NZ in the hope of starting for the ABs in the RWC 2011, what’s the club he wanted to play for? Canterbury and the Crusaders. He’s going to find it tough to get a start there because there are some really hungry players in the background.
There’s so much pressure from the lower ranks that you have to be pretty much the best player in the world at your position (arguably Carter and McCaw) to be considered a guaranteed starter. That’s the difference, there’s no hungry players chomping at the bit to get out and knock the likes of Gits, Barnes, O’Connor etc out of the team.
There’s a story about Deans grooming Carter. Carter rocks up as a young player to the Crusaders. ‘What do you want to do here?’ asks Deans. ‘Take Merhten’s spot’ says Carter. Bear in mind Merhts was the All Backs preferred #10 at that stage. Deans says ‘Good answer’ and proceeds to show him how to be better than Merhts. Next thing you know, Carter’s racked up 1000+ test points and is on track to be the world’s leading points scorer well before his career ends.
But the Wallabies are a different kettle of fish. Giteau might as well have tenure. Sharpe just keeps turning up and doing just enough to not get dropped (although I think he’s a decent bloke). Most of them know there’s noone there to put pressure on them so what can Deans do??
Cattledog said | August 4th 2010 @ 8:40pm | Report comment
Jeremy, I think you’ve hit the nail on the head. We do need 3-4 players fighting each other for position. Sadly, that’s currently lacking.
However, there’s light at the end of the tunnel and my belief is we will be in that position in about 2-3 years. We have had some outstanding schoolboy teams over the past years and these guys will soon be putting their hands up (some already have).
We will be very competitive come the world cup but I think our best will be post this period. Perhaps 2015 will be the watershed.
darwin stubby said | August 1st 2010 @ 6:11am | Report comment
One other thing – that’s now 30 mins of rugby in total over 2 games the Wallabies have played against 14 men and notched up a grand total of 3 points – that a telling stat
BennO said | August 1st 2010 @ 8:21am | Report comment
I think they play like they think if they don’t score in the next 10 (after an oppositions yellow) they’ll never score. They lose their heads completely.
M.O.C. said | August 1st 2010 @ 6:40am | Report comment
Try to ignore ignore what the Wallabies may have done to lose this game, because the one thing that no one has mentioned, and is the answer to the authors numerous questions about how Aussie lost – is Richie McCaw. Seriously the guy was absolutely everywhere on the field, tackling, running, cleaning out, diplomatically talking to the ref (learn from this Rocky) and inspiring his troops.When he plays like he did last night and with the effect this has on the ABs ,very few teams could ever win – I would say that thatgame was probably one of his best performances to date.
kovana said | August 1st 2010 @ 6:41am | Report comment
That red card was un-called for. Ref had too much of a influence on this match. 51’000 people paid money to see a full competitive match between 15 on 15 men.
These refs seem to think people want to come and see them with their pedantic rulings. The refs are killing the game.
Mungehead said | August 1st 2010 @ 9:57am | Report comment
Like Joubert said, he wasn’t responsible for the effect it had on the game once he had warned that a particular offense would warrant a yellow next time. But I do think the threat of a yellow card was using a sledgehammer to break a nut. I advocate marching a penalty 10 metres instead, and save the yellows for repeat offenders.
Sam Taulelei said | August 1st 2010 @ 7:26am | Report comment
Frank
I was there last night as well and felt the Wallabies were so programmed to keep the ball in hand all night they failed to see the space behind the All Blacks that an accurate kick would have exploited. The All Blacks on the other hand mixed their game up well, stabbing kicks in behind the Wallaby line, kicking long toward the corners and putting width on the ball.
Neither side played as well last night as they had against SA previously and I think they are so similar in their approach to the game and willingness to run that it’s almost like playing against yourself in a training run.
Although we won I felt flat and not ecstatic after a big win like in 2003, can’t even begin to imagine how you Wallaby supporters are feeling but I was extremely disappointed as I truly believed they would respond to the challenge and we would be in for a good battle. Even without Drew Mitchell’s red card the All Blacks were well in control that the result was never in doubt and it was just waiting to see the size of the margin.
Second half effort was better from Australia but 7 tries to 3 is a pretty damning statistic. Another clean sweep this year is not something that would enthuse me as like any other sportsfan I want to see close contests so I honestly want the Wallabies to start winning these games again. The Wallabies being the All Blacks whipping boys does nothing for the prestige of the Bledisloe or any good for the game here and for NZ.
C’mon Wallabies!
Ben S said | August 1st 2010 @ 7:41am | Report comment
I noticed that Nonu has been putting in more chip kicks this 3N than before, Sam. Not every kick has been well thought out though.
Mealamu continues to astound. He’s playing like he used to in 2003. The same applies to Muliaina. Obviously there’s a lot of confidence in the team, and it reverberates around those two. A lot is spoken about McCaw and Thorn etc, but when those two play well so does NZ. They drag the team forward.
The Australian side still seems to rely on individual brilliance rather than crafted team work. They could be in for a tough time over in SA.
bennalong said | August 1st 2010 @ 3:09pm | Report comment
‘One man down’ is a pretty damning statistic, wouldn’t you say?
Jerry said | August 1st 2010 @ 3:23pm | Report comment
The Wallabies played better with one man down though!
ohtani's jacket said | August 1st 2010 @ 7:30am | Report comment
It was such a strange game. With each new beer, I kept thinking, “is it me or is this game drunk?”
Rocky Elsom had a shocker. Why he saw fit to argue with Joubert is beyond me. Early on, Joubert was penalising the All Blacks for the type of things people are forever complaining about and Rocky blew it with his meltdown over the ball being thrown away. Elsom was lobbying for that penalty and suddenly it’s the Wallabies who are doing it. How absurd is that? There was a final warning about it and Elsom didn’t tell his players.
Apart from that, the Wallabies’ tackling was poor. It seemed as though every All Black was making extra meters and the Wallaby backline simply cannot defend. Kearns had a right odd chuckle over how Rokocoko couldn’t stop Mitchell from scoring at the start, well the All Black backs couldn’t have had an easier time scoring if there were seven Tahus in the backline.
It was a game where everything that could go wrong went wrong and the All Blacks got some freakishly good luck, but you can’t run with this All Blacks’ side. The All Black backline is too good to run against and the All Black forwards link up with the backs better than any forward/back combination in world rugby. Perhaps South Africa will be able to choke us in Soweto, because that’s the only way I can see us losing.
Ben S said | August 1st 2010 @ 7:44am | Report comment
Somebody like Jane makes a hige difference. You simply can’t make mistakes around him. Another factor seems to be how tuned in the All Black players are. They never seem to lose concentration. Just look at McCaw’s try. Th entire team basically never drops their head, they’re always on the look-out – obvious as that sounds.
There were periods when Read and Donnelly were getting driven back in the tackle, but Mealamu kept picking the pack forward. If SA smash the tackle area then they could put some pressure on NZ because despite their ability and intelligence, players like Woodcock, Donnelly, McCaw and Read aren’t particularly big men, or particularly damaging carriers, yet for periods today they were getting over the gainline with ease. If SA could halt that momentum then they’d be closer to a win than they ever were in NZ.
ohtani's jacket said | August 1st 2010 @ 7:48am | Report comment
One thing I’ll say for the All Blacks is that I didn’t really get Rod Macqueen’s comments about this team being on the verge of greatness but I do now. This All Black side may be an even better attacking side than the 2005/06 team. Strange how both eras began with a big win in France.
Ben S said | August 1st 2010 @ 7:58am | Report comment
There are constants in the backline from the 05/05 season, and even earlier: Weepu, Carter, Smith, Rokocoko, Muliainia (and Sivivatu), and then players like Nonu and Cowan, who obviously weren’t regulars in that period, so the same core has been in the All Black group for a good few seasons now. It stands to reason that they would mature as a group given that history, and also the fact that they suffered against SA like season. There’s nothing like adversity to improve a rugby player . The current rules suit NZ too. It’s wonderful stuff for the neutral.
Rabbitz said | August 1st 2010 @ 8:58am | Report comment
OJ,
It struck me as a the “Ghost of Gregan”. Trying to influence a ref on the field – incessantly.
The AB’s simply belted them. They had no answers. They have the cattle they just don’t have the intelligence.
They seem completely task focused. They can’t play what’s in front of them because they can’t think – they have been so indoctrinated to follow a specific game plan they can’t see opportunities.
The time is ripe to teach a few of these blokes a lesson. Sack them, tear up their contracts, send them back into the real world so they can wake up to themselves and start THINKING.
(Oh and Mitchell should be told that he needs a few seasons of club rugby before he can even attend a wallaby match, even as a spectator).
Frankly the Collaroy Cougars Under 12′s have better lines and better game awareness.
bennalong said | August 1st 2010 @ 3:11pm | Report comment
Big ears, small brain!
Eagle said | August 2nd 2010 @ 5:55am | Report comment
This is really one of the better AB rugby sides. It reminds me of the years when Mehrtens, Lomu and Cullen where playing. There is a great coherence and very good combinations. The team seems to feel that the coach have arrived at the best combinations and have confidence in each other. It is so obvious how they constantly encourage each other.
It is very different in SA at the moment, with “policy selections” and lack of a real leader in the coaching group.
Unfortunately I do not see the Boks, operating with their handicaps, reversing the status quo in Soweto. We could put individual stars on the field, but lack the cohesion.
Eagle said | August 2nd 2010 @ 5:59am | Report comment
If you want to talk about luck, then it is certainly running for McCaw. How many side entries can he get away with? Lots.
Geoff Brisbane said | August 1st 2010 @ 7:41am | Report comment
Give credit to All Black loosies against a competetive loose trio they just ramped up their game and what can you say about the tight 5? I note that Genia and the emphasis post match talks about only having 14 men on the field which is true but why did that happen?, Mitchell was off the field when both captains were warned, had nobody informed him when he came back on or at halftime? Stupid small things are what costs games although the intensity and skill level shown by the All Blacks was a sight to behold. Christchurch becomes more scary for the Wallabies.