Cobus Wessels given yellow card for Mitchell mistake
By Spiro Zavos, 6 Aug 2010 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Cobus Wessels, IRB, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies
124 Have your say
Related coverage
On Tuesday, the rugby writers around the world received a less than informative IRB media release with the headline: Tri Nations Match Official Change. The release went on to confirm that Cobus Wessels, the South African assistant referee in the Wallabies – All Blacks Test in Melbourne, had been replaced as assistant referee for the Christchurch Test.
A New Zealander, Keith Brown, is to take his place. Wessels will be the television match official.
The release noted that the re-arrangement of officials followed a ‘routine review’ of match officials in Melbourne, and that the change had been approved by SANZAR.
There was not enough information here for my liking. I sent an email to the appropriate IRB official asking “why has Wessels been stood down?”
On Thursday, we all received an answer to this question. The IRB apologised to Drew Mitchell for being given a yellow card (his first for the match) for an illegal tackle on Richie McCaw.
During the Test the ‘tackle’ was missed by the television producers. I saw it later and what it amounted to was a slight hit on McCaw after he’d passed the ball. It’s history now that Mitchell was given a second yellow card for stopping a quick line-out being taken by the All Blacks.
And two yellow cards equals one red card. So Mitchell was off the field for 47 minutes all up.
The IRB referees boss Paddy O’Brien said that Wessels “saw something that did not happen … All we are saying is that referees need to be accountable.”
Hear, hear. Wessels is often seen raising his flag when he runs as an assistant referee. Too often in my opinion.
There has been a spate of yellow cards this Test season. The All Blacks’ Ben Franks was given one for a so-called shoulder charge which was more of a premature tackle.
Tacklers are taught to drop their shoulder before going into the tackle. Franks did this. Sometimes, though, the runner rushes into the tackle instead of bracing for it, rather like a driver trying to beat a red light.
When this happens, tacklers often find their shoulders making contact before they can get their arms up to wrap around the runner.
I’d like two changes to the way all this is being refereed.
First, the red card system should be abolished. It’s a bit like capital punishment – too severe, even if the person is guilty, and overwhelmingly unjust if the person is not. The rugby league system of putting a player on report should be used.
Second, before a yellow card is handed out, the referee and the video referee should look at the incident on the video replay system. This would ensure that incidents are avoided like the Mitchell debacle where the Wallaby winger, according to O’Brien, “put his hands up to avoid a collision with Richie McCaw.”
When Mitchell was first sinbinned, the Wallabies were down, but not out, at 21 – 14. When he returned, it was game over, 32 – 14.
As O’Brien points out, the yellow card that wasn’t had a “major impact” on the Test. His statement also conceded that several other yellow cards in the Tri Nations series had been ‘soft’ judgments.
And this bring us to an interesting point made by Robbie Deans.
The All Blacks have played three Tri Nations Tests this season and are yet to play against 15 players in the opposition for the full 80 minutes. Deans reckons that if all the Wallabies stay on the field for the entire match, they could give the All Blacks their first defeat in 13 Tests and prevent the sequence of All Blacks victories over the Wallabies inflating out to nine.
Wayne Smith writing in The Australian makes the point, though, that at Christchurch, the Wallabies will have to contend with “their nemesis referee,” Jonathan Kaplan.
I was at Wellington in 2000 when Kaplan allowed injury time to go on for nearly 7 minutes before awarding the Wallabies a penalty which John Eales kicked to win the Test. The mobile phones of the locals at the ground received a message when the full-time whistle was finally blown: “Bugger.”
Since 2000, though, the Wallabies and Australian teams in the Super Rugby tournaments have struggled when Kaplan is refereeing. According to Smith, Kaplan’s relationship with the Wallabies has been “spectacularly rocky.”
I asked a Super Rugby coach about Kaplan’s refereeing style. He told me that Kaplan allows a virtual free for all to take place at rucks and mauls. But as soon as he gives a call like ‘hands off,’ he expects an instant release.
He intensely dislikes foul and snide play. And he does not like being challenged on his decisions.
There is a sort of emperor complex about his refereeing, I would say.
So the Wallabies need to listen carefully and take note of exactly what instructions he gives them and the All Blacks. This means that Rocky Elsom will need to be more switched on mentally than he was at Melbourne.
If this sort of ‘referee/captain’ role made famous, or infamous, by Sean Fitzpatrick and George Gregan is beyond him, Deans need look no further than Will Genia for his next – and probably best – captain.
All this is before us, though.
On Saturday, the Wallabies are facing a confident All Blacks that is playing well. Deans has brought (through necessity) a new centre pairing of Anthony Faingaa and Adam Ashley-Cooper. In the slippery cold conditions of Christchurch, this combination looks to be a good one.
Kurtley Beale at fullback will provide some of the slick passing and running that Quade Cooper has given to the Wallabies this season.
The promotion of Saia Faingaa in place of Stephen Moore at hooker should give the Wallabies a bit more pace and menace in the pack. There is no Scott Higginbottom, which is a surprise.
Let’s hope this Test will feature 15 on 15 for the full 80 minutes.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- Cobus Wessels, IRB, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies


August 6th 2010 @ 7:09am
AndyH said | August 6th 2010 @ 7:09am | Report comment
Great write-up Spiro. Agree with your statement: “There is a sort of emperor complex about his refereeing”.
August 6th 2010 @ 8:14am
peteb said | August 6th 2010 @ 8:14am | Report comment
Can you explain what you mean by “emperor complex”? I assume it has something to do with the Emperor’s New Clothes or whatever the fable is called. But what does it actually mean in relation to J Kaplan? That he has no skills?
August 6th 2010 @ 9:00am
pothale said | August 6th 2010 @ 9:00am | Report comment
No – emperors don’t like having their decisions questioned. Spiro said Kaplan behaved like this.
August 6th 2010 @ 12:58pm
jeremy said | August 6th 2010 @ 12:58pm | Report comment
I don’t have a problem with it. Rugby’s one of the few ballsports where the referee’s word is law – League, AFL, NFL, and soccer/football players all feel the need to remonstrate with the referee whereas rugby players are pretty much expected to heed everything he says. Look at Joubert marching Elsom and McCaw around the field last Saturday…
Kaplan’s so-called ‘Emperor’ complex is a manifestation of the fine end of that control. I find him very precise, direct, and impersonal – he’ll call the captains by name, but won’t stand backchat, repeat infringements or players not listening to what he says. Teams know where they stand.
His approach may frustrate the hell out of teams, especially Australia who favour a more controlled ruck / breakdown and open, running game, but it’s consistent, and he certainly doesn’t fear players – I think he’s probably penalised McCaw more than any other ref.
My prediction: with Kaplan reffing, Elsom’s leadership in the first half will be a factor – if the Wallabies intend to attack like in second half of the last game (ball in hand, constant rolling forwards attack followed by quick clearances to the backline) he will need to be very, very patient because the ABs will get in there and disrupt the hell out of the rucks. Elsom will need to bide his time, wait till the second or third infringement by the ABs loosies then have a quiet word to Kaplan and ask to be given a fair go. If he gets angry and frustrated like with Joubert, Kaplan will flip the penalty round without a second thought.
August 6th 2010 @ 1:18pm
TembaVJ said | August 6th 2010 @ 1:18pm | Report comment
Jeremy, this is just another chance for Spiro (blogger) to have a dig at SA, rev up the saffers and get the numbers up… its a cheap trick he learned 2 years ago. It gets them every time.
August 6th 2010 @ 11:42pm
JoJo said | August 6th 2010 @ 11:42pm | Report comment
Agree 100%. Business is Business.
August 6th 2010 @ 8:08am
Dingbat said | August 6th 2010 @ 8:08am | Report comment
Spiro, I know you don’t like to question authority, but let me know what you think if this:
August 6th 2010 @ 10:02am
stuff happens said | August 6th 2010 @ 10:02am | Report comment
V. interesting & revealing Dingbat & a good commentary. It also shows that rugby is such a hard game to ref well . Roland just wasn’t alert enough throughout the game.
August 6th 2010 @ 10:48am
Colin N said | August 6th 2010 @ 10:48am | Report comment
Or Joubert, or Clancy for that matter, because presumably the All Blacks employed similar tactics in their other games. Or equally you could probably penalise an offence at every breakdown.
August 6th 2010 @ 11:20am
Jerry said | August 6th 2010 @ 11:20am | Report comment
“Or equally you could probably penalise an offence at every breakdown.”
For either team more often than not.
August 6th 2010 @ 11:19am
Jerry said | August 6th 2010 @ 11:19am | Report comment
See my response above – half of the things he raises, he’s just got wrong and he misses a bunch of Bok infringements.
A few examples of what he’s got wrong.
In the example at 1:40, Owen Franks does nothing wrong. It’s not a tackle, ruck or maul when he arrives so where he joins from is irrelevant. Mealamu and Smit bump into each other but Keven then goes round the back and joins legally, unlike John Smit who joins from the side.
In the next example he points out Franks goes past the ruck to clear out. That’s true, but he somehow misses that directly prior to this John Smit is trying to hold Franks back from hitting the ruck at all.
And in the next example it’s Smit again! Tony Woodcock goes to ground in a tackle and at 2:25 Smit steps behind the tackle on the All Black side to try and prevent AB players from entering the tackle ruck/area. He does it pretty half heartedly sure, but what’s his intention in taking that step?
The 4th example is fair enough – but it’s only the All Blacks that do this sort of thing, right? Oh, hang on – what’s happening to Brad Thorn at 2:46 in this vid from last year?
And what’s Bismark doing at 3:13?
And again at 3:19?
You could make a similar analysis from either team in most matches, I suspect. In fact…
– this is a vid by the same guy who made the original analysis of AB breakdown play – let’s see what he’s missed?
What’s Richard Brown doing at 1:06?
And what’s Elsom doing at 3:13? Surely not exactly the same thing he hauled Donnelly up for in the other vid?
Or what about Brown at 4:30?
I couldn’t be arsed going through much of those other vids, but if I can find examples from less than 5 minutes of youtube clips, imagine if I’d gone through the whole matches?
August 6th 2010 @ 12:24pm
SamSport said | August 6th 2010 @ 12:24pm | Report comment
You are right. Lets not forget that the All Blacks have always been good at clearing opposition players out of the rucks. If a body is somewhere they dont want it they move it, rather than stand around do nothing, then cry about it after the game. The All Blacks are no more or less guilty of breakdown indiscretions than anyone else, they just try and deal with whatever the opposition throws at them.
August 6th 2010 @ 5:44pm
johno said | August 6th 2010 @ 5:44pm | Report comment
Boet I don’t see anything wrong in what Bismark is doing, there was actually an AB player that ran into him from the wrong side and pushed him pass the ruck and the 3:13 – 19 incident is all because of an AB hitting the ruck from the wong side, so no, you fail to prove your point again
The Brad instance the springbok player was legal since THorne was part of a tackle and within one metre of the ball. The SA player cleaned him outby entering from the correct side of the ruck
I missed that one at 2:25 completely, maybe it’s because smith didn’t do anything at all. The correct term would be clutching at straws I think
The Wallaby 1:06 incident is irrelevant the player was part of the tackle and got cleaned out it had no influence on the game, it ma be construed as dirty play or a cheap shot though.
I just can’t see the 3:13 incident but I do agree with the 4:30 incident it was clearly already a ruck, there were about four or five bodies present. Pocock should have been blown up. But then again he should have been yellow carded.
August 6th 2010 @ 8:09pm
Jerry said | August 6th 2010 @ 8:09pm | Report comment
Ok, you’ve just showed you know bugger all. I’ll post the link again, cause the above link is wrong.
There’s no law that says you’re allowed to drive clear of the ruck on a guy – what happens to Thorn is illegal, just as it was when an AB does the same thing.
And Bismark grabs Mils round the neck without the ball and throws him to ground- there was no ruck, the ball was still loose. It’s obstruction, plain and simple. He and Andrew Hore kind then hold each other while running back, but neither actually interfere with each other (though Hore could be said to be holding him). Bismark then ends up over the All Black tryline not bound to anyone, whereupon he pushes Tony Woodock sideways to the ground. If you can’t see that you’re just not looking – it’s exactly the same thing pointed out in the 4th example of the original video.
The Smit one is harmless, he doesn’t interfere with anyone, it’s just an example of the guard dog position – you know, like the very first example in the link you posted? The example of Rocky at 3:13 is the same thing – all teams do it, that was my point.
August 6th 2010 @ 11:22am
Even looser said | August 6th 2010 @ 11:22am | Report comment
Of course Richie is going to get away with everything that Richie can get away with. Combine that with his abilities as Captain & athlete and there you go.
Tape shows just how inept the Ref & assistants were. Got to hammer it into these blokes that all we want is a fair contest.
August 6th 2010 @ 6:04pm
johno said | August 6th 2010 @ 6:04pm | Report comment
So by your definition it’s not cheating, it’s merely getting away with cheating, which is something completely different…right
August 6th 2010 @ 12:10pm
sixo_clock said | August 6th 2010 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
It is rubbish throughout, look more closely.
August 6th 2010 @ 8:10am
TrueblueOzzie said | August 6th 2010 @ 8:10am | Report comment
Dribble. Dribble. Dribble. I am sick and tired of us making excuses for poor performances by our boys. We go from new team to injury issues to the ref being the problem now. I don’t see the kiwi’s complaining as much when they lose e.g. Barnes in the World Cup. Let’s stop the complaining and demand our boys put the effort where it is required, ON THE FIELD, instead of in the media.
August 6th 2010 @ 9:14am
Harry said | August 6th 2010 @ 9:14am | Report comment
Well I agree its all excuses for losing to a better NZ side which is playing some great rugby and clearly setting the benchmark … and one of the things they do extremely well is play the ref and interpret the rules better than their opponents. Its up to Aus and SA to get smarter.
Umm, don’t know what planet you were/are on if you think NZers didn’t whinge much about refereee Barnes’ performance in the RWC QF.
August 6th 2010 @ 8:20am
Terry Kidd said | August 6th 2010 @ 8:20am | Report comment
All good points raised in that clip Dingbat …. hard to pick up at game speed but there is no doubt about the offside play, diving over and entering illegally …. obviously helps to speed up the AB ball, disrupt ruck defence and kill turnover chances.
I wonder if the referees get to see these types of game analyses?
August 6th 2010 @ 8:51am
Dingbat said | August 6th 2010 @ 8:51am | Report comment
Oddly, I agree with Spiro. Video replays should be used more often during play. We saw in the soccer world cup how ludicrous it is when the whole stadium and every viewer knows the ref and his assistant made a blatant cock up – England’s disallowed goal over the line. It is completely unacceptable to expect the human eye and brain to react accurately and keep pace with the modern game – refs need and deserve more video help. On a slightly different note, Roland (Irish) refs an entire match poorly and Spiro overlooks it. Wessels (Saffa) makes one cock up and Spiro dedicates an article. Ah, bless you Spiro.
August 6th 2010 @ 8:39am
TrueblueOzzie said | August 6th 2010 @ 8:39am | Report comment
.Terry, without sounding insulting, do you need to ask such a stupid question. The refs don’t give a toss what we have to say. They control the game and we mere mortals must live by their interpretations. The question that should be asked is how the players should react. Rocky’s response to suspect calls last weekend was verging on the ridiculous. He was being a bully. He should have been sacked as captain immediately. It is evident from his display last weekend and his demure during the week (as reported by all media outlets) that he is feeling immense pressure from the captaincy. Therefore he shouldn’t be captain.
August 6th 2010 @ 8:45am
Bryan Mitchell said | August 6th 2010 @ 8:45am | Report comment
PB, Please take note after telling me how stupid I was a few weeks back.
“The IRB referees boss Paddy O’Brien said that Wessels “saw something that did not happen … All we are saying is that referees need to be accountable.”
August 6th 2010 @ 8:49am
Terry Kidd said | August 6th 2010 @ 8:49am | Report comment
Trueblue I asked because I missed a lot of those things when I watched the games, but now that I have been alerted to them then no doubt I’ll recognise it for what it is in the future …. hopefully the refs get the same coaching/assistance between games.
As for Rocky’s captaincy, I agree that he got offside with the ref last weekend, especially when you compare his approach to Richie’s approach. I also believe that the captaincy doesn’t rest easily on his shoulders but believe that he reluctantly accepted the role sort of as last man standing at the time.
I don’t think it would be a good thing for the team for him to be sacked as captain but I do think it would be a good thing for him to voluntarily stand down as captain. As for a replacement captain, then either Pocock or Genia would be my choice and I would be happy with either.
August 6th 2010 @ 9:36am
Gary Russell-Sharam said | August 6th 2010 @ 9:36am | Report comment
Deans should review Elsom as the Captain, this burden is obviously effecting his game I would hate to think that something else could make himk play so poorly. Caplan is the referee that they are playing under at Christchurch and a simple solution is to play as the referee interprets the game. Its the same for the ABs so there is no disadvantage. If you can’t adapt to play how the ref wants you to play you shouldn’t be in the side, especially at this level. It doesn’t take to many brains to do this but seeing as how some of our players struggle with adapting that would seem to say that these boys are not over endowed with surplus intellect.
August 6th 2010 @ 10:12am
Southern Waratah said | August 6th 2010 @ 10:12am | Report comment
Firstly cheers to Spiro for this article, its the difference between the roar & main stream media.
Being at the game and seeing the hit Drew made on McCaw I couldn’t believe that it was a yellow card, clearly not a shoulder charge, clearly not dangerous. After watching the game on TV the next day the Ch7 commentary team now owe Drew Mitchell an apology for proclaiming him as undisciplined, neither offence was worthy a yellow card.
Johno’s YouTube link says it all & one would only hope that referees get to review matches and look into what’s happening in amongst all the bodies going everywhere in a fast paced game.
In terms of yellow cards I’m still struggling to understand what is constituting a should charge in Tests, last year Palu was carded for a legitimate tackle on the Irish full back Rob Kearney who basically ran into the biggest guy on the park & got smashed the result being Palu receiving a yellow card, 15 minutes later Kearney shoulder charged Rocky Elsom as he went to score a try and wasn’t binned for it.
Ben Franks “Shoulder charge” was in the same manner as Palu, front on with arms coming up to complete the tackle.
I’m glad to see Wessels binned for this game, hopefully its part of a wider review system being undertaken by the IRB of Referees.
August 6th 2010 @ 10:46am
Damo said | August 6th 2010 @ 10:46am | Report comment
Yeh all this talk of Psychologists for player attitudes (eg. Wallaby ‘winning ‘ culture) Do referees get personality tests?
– to assess their – Need to be powerful, ‘respected’, bowed down to, “obeyed”, etc
One recent SAFA ref had an intense need to groom his facial hair for his big night in the S14 arena. It’s one thing for a player to treat game as if it’s an audition for the Evil Prince in Shrek 3 but – the referees?
Seriously are these guys selected from the correct set of personality criteria?
Some seem to have a need for stardom or relevance or some other characteristic that gets in the way of facilitating good rugby.