Expansion necessary to save Wallabies
By kingplaymaker, 13 Aug 2010 kingplaymaker is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- ARU, Melbourne Rebels, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Super 15, wallabies
138 Have your say
Related coverage
Ask any Wallabies supporter the reason for the team’s recent troubles and you will receive almost any kind of deluded response.
Robbie Deans has gone from being one of the finest coaches in the world to a hideous third-rater, perhaps even capsizing his charge intentionally as a consequence of New Zealand origin. Matt Giteau somehow manages to poison the entire Wallabies performance from the all-commanding position of inside centre. The team, unlike other top rank professional rugby players, lose their heads and discipline at the slightest provocation. More reasonably, they are ravaged by injuries and what remains is a limping skeleton of the presumably world-beating ensemble when fit.
If all the Wallabies were healthy and Graham Henry were coach, they would suddenly master the All Blacks of course?
The earlier reasons are manifest nonsense. Robbie Deans is clearly a world-class coach at the helm of resources so drab that not even the greatest coaching magician could conjure them into gold.
The last excuse, that the players are all injured, has the largest element of truth and is therefore the most dangerous. Granted players like Quade Cooper, Digby Ioane and Wycliff Palu would improve the current team significantly, but teams always have injured or suspended players. New Zealand are currently missing Sitiveni Sivivatu and Ali Williams and have lost half a side worth of first choice players overseas. The fact remains that even with a fit Wallabies outfit New Zealand look far more impressive in playing strength as will South Africa once they adjust to a new style of play.
Australian rugby must face the deep, terrible truth behind the current crisis: a significant demise in the number of high quality players the game is producing.
It’s uncomfortable to face such a fundamental problem as the players produced by the game as a whole simply not being talented enough, but it is necessary to do so.
A question was pointed out recently which every Wallaby fan should ask themselves before condemning Robbie Deans again.
How many Wallabies would make the All Black starting 15? Honestly? Let’s say Rocky Elsom, Will Genia, maybe Benn Robinson. A total of three is optimistic. How on earth is Deans or even Merlin the wizard supposed to beat an opposition almost every single player of which is superior to his own?
(That Deans could get his side within 10 points of them is something of a miracle of coaching).
This was not always the case. The teams of the 90s would have several players in the All Blacks, even a world 15. There is obviously a decline, and it is due to the limited number of career opportunities the game presents with only four Super teams.
The number of professional places four teams offer is ridiculous for a country with aspirations to be the best in the world. Players do not simply appear in fully formed perfection and often need high level exposure in order to develop. Four teams can only provide that exposure to a very small number, and if a player cannot make his way into a team his career is effectively finished.
With double the number of Super teams, more contracts could be offered to young players who otherwise go off to the NRL, the game would grow as feeder clubs led directly into contracts with the mother team, and eventually the two or three extra world class players necessary to make the Wallabies a potentially world-beating team would emerge.
The only alternative to Super rugby is a hypothetical national competition which would provide far more places. However, the ARU has committed itself to the current format and with the expanded season running until august it’s hard to see how such a national competition could run long enough, pay large enough salaries to attract young players to the game and overall be a major force. At best it could be a minor addition which would make a small difference.
As a result, given that Super rugby is here to stay, the solution is for several more Super teams to provide more places for young players and generally to expand the game in geography and supporter base. I would suggest that now some expansion into markets outside the heartlands has taken place, it is time to shore up New South Wales and Queensland. Teams in Western Sydney and the Gold Coast should be established immediately, instantly doubling the number of professional contracts that can be offered in these player-rich states.
There is a tremendous hullaballoo raised whenever a Super team is set up as if it is some tremendously difficult feat. In fact is no more than a rugby club, the only different problem it faces being the travel expenses to the other member countries. This should not be so much of an obstacle as the competition is increasingly based on significant numbers of matches against other Australian teams rather than New Zealand or South African opposition. Not only that, but the extra length of the season, which should be extended even further by the way, will lead in itself to much greater revenue from crowds and eventually television.
The Melbourne Rebels have shown a model for how to found a new team. One third foreign players, one third up and coming Australian players and one third rugby league converts. This kind of team can be competitive until the franchise begins to develop its own young players from the environment it represents who will then fill the places. Backed by private equity and corporate sponsorship and with a long season, a team like this can easily be a financial success.
There is no reason why this model cannot simply repeated. In addition to the two teams mentioned a further one should soon be added in New South Wales, with final expansion to Adelaide and Newcastle.
The ARU must create another Sydney and Queensland team straight away, and should allow South Africa and New Zealand to have as many teams as they in their own segment of the competition should they stand in the way.
Otherwise one day even the proudest Wallabies supporter’s excuse-making faculties will run dry.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Where is Deans in the pecking order of rugby coaches? (404)
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (267)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (245)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (229)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Quade Cooper misses Wallaby squad selection (209)
- What happened to all the rugby enforcers? (3)
- Manu Samoa squad to tour South Africa for June Tests (2)
- Looking at the weekend’s Super Rugby games (1)
- IRB Law 12: The forward pass (2)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (229)
- Who can still win the Super Rugby title? (45)
- ‘Lucky 29′ journey into despair (part one) (10)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- ARU, Melbourne Rebels, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Super 15, wallabies


August 13th 2010 @ 1:10am
Ben S said | August 13th 2010 @ 1:10am | Report comment
Pretty facile article full of facile (and oddly melodramatic) statements:
‘How many Wallabies would make the All Black starting 15? Honestly? Let’s say Rocky Elsom, Will Genia, maybe Benn Robinson. A total of three is optimistic. How on earth is Deans or even Merlin the wizard supposed to beat an opposition almost every single player of which is superior to his own?’
I doubt that Rodney So’oialo would have made many other Test sides when he was the incumbent 8 man, doesn’t mean he didn’t do a job for the All Blacks. I suspect that only three or four Italian players would make the starting Scotland XV and yet Italy has generally had the wood over Scotland in recent years. Individual excellence is not a natural adjunct of team success.
If you’re going to make comparisons at Test level then go down further and examine the Super 14 ladder. Australian rugby had as many finalists as NZ rugby and more sides who finished in the top half of the table. Why? Because rugby is a team sport. Seems pretty odd to me how some people are hanging onto the Deans card, when that flush busted out last November.
August 13th 2010 @ 1:21am
Ben S said | August 13th 2010 @ 1:21am | Report comment
Anyhow, beyond the stereotypical cliches I agree re: foreign players, however the key to that scenario is selecting the right players. Greg Somerville strikes me as a very astute signing, but it would be hard to attract such talent/experience across the board.
One other scenario that tends to be overlooked is Australian players playing in either the Currie Cup or the ITM. Ben Daley, for example, was clearly way, way out of his depth during the Summer, so why not go and do what Luke Rooney is doing?
August 13th 2010 @ 8:18am
Brett McKay said | August 13th 2010 @ 8:18am | Report comment
and Ben this is a question I raised a few weeks ago. If Sydney and Brisbane club rugby is as good as we’re told it is, why are guys like Christian Lealiifano, Josh Tatupu and Rooney (ITM Cup) and Daniel Halangahu (CC) looking for better comps in NZ and SA. There might be more, too. Matt Toomua was brought into the Wallaby Spring Tour last year on the back of steering Western Province around..
August 13th 2010 @ 1:00pm
Cliff (Bishkek) said | August 13th 2010 @ 1:00pm | Report comment
Hi Brett
Not usre if this is correct but I understand that Deans was instrumental in getting Matt Toomua to Western Province and I think he will come ahead in the next year after the experience.
And you are right – maybe our fringe and up and coming players should aim for overseas “short term” or “two year” contracts. Experience – and it would be better if NZ or SA. What are those countries National rules on Foreign Players?
But I think the article has merit – not certain that the teams should be S14 or S15 – but there needs to be a structure in place – similar to the NRL – where each NRL club has feeder clubs to the NRL.
For mine, the Sydney & Brisbane Comps are not good enough comps for test and fringe players. Rugby at Club level is still B-B-Q and Private School Viewing and is run as such. There needs to be a structure and as I said yesterday to Sheek there are too many interests who are not interested in IMPROVED RUGBY IN AUS – AT THE EXPENSE OF THEIR SYDNEY OR BRISBANE COMP / CLUB.
The ARU needs to make a stand. Now all of this will never make Aus coming out on top of the ABs & SAs all the time – we have too many other winter sports to distract young talent – that will never go away.
But at the moment I think we have nothing to offer – and I think Aus Rugby is slowly sinking. I hope that I am wrong
August 13th 2010 @ 1:17pm
Brett McKay said | August 13th 2010 @ 1:17pm | Report comment
Cliff, I also believe that was the case re Toomua, that Deans (or ARU HPU people) played a part..
Sheek and KPM and I touch on the need to do something down a bit lower. Sheek particulalry reminded us tha the last time the ARU tried to make a stand against the clubs on the national comp, it cost O’Neill his job. That of course isn’t reason not to develop a proper solution, and as most posters here today agree, a proper solution is needed more than ever.
(as a starting point, I’d reckon the clubs would fall into line pretty quickly if their ARU grants were dependant on it, but that might just be me. I’ve stated before it’s easy for me to say these things as I have no club ties.)
I don’t particularly mind what the solution is even, and I’d be happy with the 5 S15 teams playing more, or a ARC-type comp. Whatever. The point is, at this time of year, we need SOMETHING above club rugby.
August 13th 2010 @ 4:54am
CizzyRascal said | August 13th 2010 @ 4:54am | Report comment
First of all, Australian Rugby Union can’t look at the as a nursery for young players. It has to build up its own development structure. Maybe they can steal the NRL blueprint as that seems to be working very well.
The Gold Coast sport market is saturated. They will soon have an A-League, NRL and AFL side. Sydney could probably put up one more side though.
On the point of bringing in foreign players, maybe 10 is too much, but 5-6 would be a good number. They add something different to the competition.
August 13th 2010 @ 8:47am
kingplaymaker said | August 13th 2010 @ 8:47am | Report comment
Cizzy if not the Gold Coast then another in Brisbane. Besides, even if there are other codes in the Gold Coast it doesn’t mean Rugby can’t outperform them in its own heartland.
August 13th 2010 @ 6:12am
darwin stubby said | August 13th 2010 @ 6:12am | Report comment
Is this really meant to be a serious article ? ….
August 13th 2010 @ 6:52am
Hayden said | August 13th 2010 @ 6:52am | Report comment
The cart put way ahead of the horse, methinks. It is somewhat wishful thinking to believe that creating a Super franchise will see enough players materialising from out of thin air to make them competitive. The point is that both NZ and SA’s success is built on a solid domestic competition, and until Australia has that, they will never have a firm foundation from which to build on.
Right now, with them ITM and Currie Cup, NZ and SA still struggle to field five consistently competitive sides, so quite where the players are going to come from for expansion is a mystery. Personally, the last thing I want to see is Aussies infiltrating the ITM to any extent, and I am sure most Saffers would agree re the Currie Cup.
There is no quick fix. The game must grow domestically first, or else whither and die.
August 13th 2010 @ 8:44am
kingplaymaker said | August 13th 2010 @ 8:44am | Report comment
Hayden this is the only clear way to grow the game.
How could a three month domestic competition pay salaries to compete with the NRL?
August 13th 2010 @ 6:55am
sheek said | August 13th 2010 @ 6:55am | Report comment
Well done KPG,
You can take the heat off me for a while! Agree with the broad thrust of what you say, but already Ben S & DS have stuck the knife in!!
The fans have smelt blood. They want Deans’ head, & won’t be satisfied until he’s chopped. Nothing else matters. Incoming…..
August 13th 2010 @ 7:18am
Ben S said | August 13th 2010 @ 7:18am | Report comment
Au contraire, sheek. I hope Dingo stays on for as long as possible. I really do. On a more serious note, following the loss to Scotland I was quite positive re: the Wallabies. I felt that were that game to be replayed another 99 times Scotland would still have only won the one game, but Deans is now months down the line and the side looks as badly coached, disorganised and confused as ever. Anyway, this argument has been done to death. I hope for your sake, as a genuine fan, that you don’t have to observe another 3N wooden spoon and a crummy European tour.
August 13th 2010 @ 7:27am
darwin stubby said | August 13th 2010 @ 7:27am | Report comment
don’t worry the answer to all the wallabies woes is on the horizon – Vickerman is coming back in June next year
August 13th 2010 @ 7:24am
darwin stubby said | August 13th 2010 @ 7:24am | Report comment
Hardly put the knife in – it’s a genuine question … this has nothing to do with Deans – some like him some don’t and it’s certainly right to question his record …
but this article really ignores the fact that SANZAR runs super rugby not the ARU … unless of course this is promoting the ARU withdraws from super rugby leaving it to NZ and SA … if that’s the case I can’t see how a 10 team domestic competition that will be in direct competition with the NRL will produce the funds to pay an influx of overseas players as well as taking all the young kids developed by the NRL – with the NRL powerless to do anything, given the NRL will have a far larger TV deal than anything a domestic rugby competition will be able to sign
August 13th 2010 @ 7:34am
sheek said | August 13th 2010 @ 7:34am | Report comment
Ben S & Darwin,
My comments weren’t directed to either of you personally, although I understand how it looks that way. The comments were general, aimed at a far wider base of supporters.
I agree with KPG we need a national comp some time into the future. But of more immediate concern is building the player participation base, & fixing up the structures.
August 13th 2010 @ 7:42am
darwin stubby said | August 13th 2010 @ 7:42am | Report comment
that’s 100% correct – the base needs to be addressed – the top down approach won’t work and just continually adding super rugby teams, diluting the quality of the rugby on offer, is a recipe for disaster .. at the very least in the short term the super sides need to have a youth team competition operating as per the toyota cup … also the ARU needs to re-instate the Aust A programme and get back involved in the pacific nations cup – that’s where all the young guys should be blooded
August 13th 2010 @ 8:42am
kingplaymaker said | August 13th 2010 @ 8:42am | Report comment
darwin every match brings income, and NRL salaries are very low.
With the conference system it would be easier to have more teams, as most of the matches would be inter-australian.
There are plenty of overseas players who don’t actually demand very high salaries.
August 13th 2010 @ 1:51pm
EP - Rugbywits said | August 13th 2010 @ 1:51pm | Report comment
I spose the idea is that the third teir comp wouldnt be a direct competition with the NRL salaries.
But it would at least give something to people who are looking to improve enough to make it into a super rugby team or a Wallabies jersey at some point.
We do need a teir between clubs and super rugby.
There are a few ways it could be done – the ARC which is a big money drain because you create generic clubs and generic teams that take time to build a fan base.
Another way that could be looked into is a bit of a champions league style club tournament.
Partially funded by the ARU and run by the ARU.
The top 3 teams from Sydney and Brisbane – top 2 ACT and VIC teams and top WA team should all play a midweek tournament against each other.
Yep, there are definitely reasons at to why that wouldnt work. But I think it would slowly lift the overall level of club rugby in Australia as a whole. Maybe would take 10 years to take a full effect, but im happy to let the ARU show more vision and foresight than either the Libs or Labor. Please plan for the future.
With a champions league comp there is lucrative money to be made by clubs who make it into the comp (winners prize?)
and there is the extra attendance and sponsorship that can be generated by participating in a midweek league.
The sponsors of the clubs can definitely be more National based companys rather than just local club ones.
August 13th 2010 @ 1:58pm
JF said | August 13th 2010 @ 1:58pm | Report comment
The best the clubs have come up with in over 100yrs is for the Brisbane champion to play the Sydney champion in a one-off game at the end of the year – a game that no one cares about – especially Syd Uni. Do not look to the clubs for solutions – dead end.
August 13th 2010 @ 8:34am
kingplaymaker said | August 13th 2010 @ 8:34am | Report comment
Sheek it seems so obvious really: the NRL can offer 16 squads worth of places, the ARU 5. Now who’s going to make off with the talent? In this context it’s not even about beating the NRL, just getting that small extra number of good players to make the Wallabies a winning team.
I really don’t understand why it’s such a big deal adding more Super teams. Surely more matches means more revenue which is good for everyone?
August 13th 2010 @ 8:48am
CizzyRascal said | August 13th 2010 @ 8:48am | Report comment
And where are all these fans going to come to support these new sides? Where are the finances to set up these sides?
August 13th 2010 @ 9:01am
kingplaymaker said | August 13th 2010 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Cizzy there are plenty of fans: W.estern sydney and the Queensland are swarming with them. Private equity and the ARU are fine to fund such teams.
August 13th 2010 @ 10:35am
joeb said | August 13th 2010 @ 10:35am | Report comment
Sheek, the fact remains Deans is not doing a terribly good job… with players on the bench why doesn’t he use them? Why for instance did Genia play 75 minutes in the first Bledisloe – Burgess only got 5 mins at the end – and the full 80 in the second Bled/TN? Why is O’Connor preferred over Lachie Turner on the wing? Why is Barnes – yes, bad error in the 1st Bled, charge-down that led to their reply charge-down try, but still – now sitting out the entire game…? At first Deans seemed a masterstroke by the ARU, but the fact is a homegrown coach would be doing a better job… bring back Connolly – there was a good coach/player relationship there, a true rapport. Serious. Can you seriously see us winning another TN/Bled test this year? I mean this is becoming comical…
August 13th 2010 @ 7:21am
sheek said | August 13th 2010 @ 7:21am | Report comment
In an accompanying article on The Roar, Luke Doherty explains how the NRL is looking at 2 from 4 excellent bids for expansion.
The 4 bids are located in WA, Central Coast, Ipswich & Central Queensland.
One thing about the sporting landscape in Australia, is that the other 3 codes are on the march, either already expanding or looking to expand.
Yes, rugby will have the Melbourne Rebels in super rugby but all the other indicators, especially playing numbers, are of great concern. The great youth catchment areas of Australia – the greater west of Sydney, Central Coast & south-east Qld – are being lost to rugby at a rapid rate.
There is a theory about the land that Australia can’t support 4 football codes infinitum into the future, either with players or media exposure or sponsors or merchandising sales.
So guess which footy code is closest to the abyss….. ? And all we worry about is the national coach….. ??
August 13th 2010 @ 7:56am
extreme13 said | August 13th 2010 @ 7:56am | Report comment
I’d just like to be the first to welcome QUADE Cooper to the mighty Parramatta eels
August 13th 2010 @ 8:28am
oikee said | August 13th 2010 @ 8:28am | Report comment
Just watched him on foxsports, he really looks like a rugby league player. He would make a good replacement for Lockyer in origin.
August 13th 2010 @ 10:45pm
SA said | August 13th 2010 @ 10:45pm | Report comment
never really understood that term. he is a rugby player who has great vision and skill. he looks like a rugby player
August 13th 2010 @ 8:34am
mitzter said | August 13th 2010 @ 8:34am | Report comment
I’ll be very surprised with the world cup next year – maybe after that
August 13th 2010 @ 3:06pm
The Link said | August 13th 2010 @ 3:06pm | Report comment
clear strategy from the manager to bump up the ARU cash
August 13th 2010 @ 8:25am
Johnson said | August 13th 2010 @ 8:25am | Report comment
I doubt the ARU has any real vision or desire to change anything.
The Wallabies lose their ninth straight match to the All Blacks – there are deficiencies in the team.
But the coach says its ok because this year doesn’t matter
The ARU says it doesnt matter – the players can go and have a run in Park footy
I’m sure the ARU will be happy to slash the price of tickets to the next Bledisloe – because the match doesn’t really mean anything – and the players are of 3rd Division subbies standard
I’m guessing not – JON and his team will have a media strategy in place to spin it around and flog tickets in the last week
I’m over it!
August 13th 2010 @ 10:39am
Red Rooster said | August 13th 2010 @ 10:39am | Report comment
Johnson – It all points to culture – or lack therof
August 13th 2010 @ 8:32am
Brett McKay said | August 13th 2010 @ 8:32am | Report comment
KPM, I think the case for re-establishing the ARC is probably stronger now than ever, and I agree with all your points about limited opportunities. After the Melbourne Bledisloe, a mate was asking me why there was so big a gap between the two sides, and in the end I could only conclude that rugby in Aust is on par with league in NZ.
If you imagine for a moment that the NRL is actually the NRU, and the Wallabies are picked from 16 teams playing on four days every weekend, and with good TV and media presence, all of a sudden the Bledisloe becomes rugby’s Ashes.
I’m really glad the calls for the national comp ae coming back, and there is no doubt that building the professional player base is a major factor in the furture of Australian rugby. Great topic..
(just a small thing, the Rebels were never looking for “one third [of their squad] rugby league converts” – they hoped for, and got a couple, but they were never looking for massconversions. Bringing ex-pats home was a bigger focus. On the Rebels, did anyone else get ARU-orginating email invitations to become Rebels members in recent days?? Curious use of the ARU database, I thought…)
August 13th 2010 @ 8:39am
kingplaymaker said | August 13th 2010 @ 8:39am | Report comment
Brett the reason I suggested more Super teams rather than a long national competition is not that I think a national competition is a bad idea, but rather that the ARU seems terrified of having one and seems much more likely to commit to Super expansion.
There is the point that now the Super season will run until august, when would a national competition occur? and even if it did how would it with so few matches be able to pay players enough to lure them to union, when doubtless NRL salaries (over a long season) would be higher?
That seems to me the flaw in the national competition idea, unless it would be the ONLY elite competition. And as the ARU seem determined to keep Super rugby as the major elite vehicle, it might be necessary to bring it closer to a national competition in coverage.
August 13th 2010 @ 9:15am
Brett McKay said | August 13th 2010 @ 9:15am | Report comment
I don’t disagree with any of that KPM, and admittedly, the extended Super season does make an ARC-type comp difficult. I’d be happy if the five teams resumed after the S15 final and played for the Australian Championship, to be honest. Full H&A, two games each weekend, top two in the final, it’s all done in 11 weeks. I’ve even got a mocked up draw somewhere. I called it the Sheek Shield
I only bring up the ARC push again to ensure we’re not modifying Super Rugby for Australian benefit only. There’s already enough suspicion from out SANZAR partners as it is..
August 13th 2010 @ 9:38am
kingplaymaker said | August 13th 2010 @ 9:38am | Report comment
Brett give the other SANZAR teams whatever they want and they’ll be happy i.e. say to South Africa ‘you let us have as many teams as we want and we’ll let you have as many teams as you want.’
August 13th 2010 @ 11:25am
RedsNut said | August 13th 2010 @ 11:25am | Report comment
Re the ARC.
From what I understand (and that may be wrong) the academy guys don’t play any matches, just have training sessions.
If each state’s acadamey played matches, wouldn’t that give them an oportunity to “walk the walk”
Perhaps as curtain raisers to the S15 matches.
Look at the talent that came to the fore during the ARC. How long would it have taken them to come to the public’s eye were it not for the ARC.
August 13th 2010 @ 8:48am
Gavin Norman said | August 13th 2010 @ 8:48am | Report comment
From what I understand, the League converts approached Macqueen & co, rather then them actively pursuing them.
August 13th 2010 @ 8:46am
Gavin Norman said | August 13th 2010 @ 8:46am | Report comment
I think you’re painting a very negative outlook.
Just be patient and wait until next year, as some important factors come into play:
- The Melbourne Rebels. Arguably the biggest sporting market in Australia. Should of had a franchise back in 04, I wonder what the Rugby landscape would of looked like if that happened?
- A World Cup year. If, and I mean if, the Wallabies win the World Cup, the ARU must use every means to capitalize off the success.
- The proposed national provincial or under 20s competition, might be up and running. Finally giving you kids a pathway (especially in WA & VIC).
Although VIC Club Rugby is “quality”, it’s probably not on par with Sydney/Brisbane. So you’re lucky to have that. We’ve lost a lot of talent down here (heading North), due to their being no pathway.
August 13th 2010 @ 9:04am
kingplaymaker said | August 13th 2010 @ 9:04am | Report comment
Gavin the Melbourne franchise is a start, but it still only offers one more team’s worth of places. More are necessary.
August 13th 2010 @ 9:19am
sheek said | August 13th 2010 @ 9:19am | Report comment
Gavin,
I will be surprised if the Wallabies aren’t better next year. Especially with injured players back, & the experience gained by those this year.
So if that happens should we just heave a sigh of relief, & forget about the torment our game’s been through these past 5 years?
Unfortunately, this happens all the time in our history. We have 4-5 lousy years, then have 1-2 good years, & kid ourselves that everything’s okay.