Another Cats versus Saints finals nailbiter
By John Salvado, 4 Sep 2010 John Salvado is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- AFL, AFL finals, Geelong Cats, St Kilda Saints
It should have come as no surprise that Friday night’s opening to the 2010 AFL finals almost as gripping as last year’s grand final. Similar wet weather – at least in the second half. Same teams at the same venue. And pretty much the same players. But a different result – just.
The only two Geelong players missing from last year’s premiership team were retired skipper Tom Harley and injured talisman Max Rooke, who were replaced by Mathew Stokes and Josh Hunt.
The Saints had made four changes in personnel from the heartbreaking grand final loss, with Ben McEvoy, Brett Peake, James Gwilt and Robert Eddy the inclusions.
Conventional wisdom has it that Saints goalsneak Stephen Milne’s wastefulness in front of goal and Justin Koschitzke’s largely anonymous display were among the reasons why the Saints came up 12 points short last year.
Both began Friday night’s match like they were eager to atone, Koschitzke among the best players on the ground in the opening term and Milne booting three goals in an eye-catching six-minute cameo in the second quarter.
Due in no small part to their early efforts – although tellingly Koschitzke failed to touch the ball for the remaining three quarters – the Saints were 33 points up early in the third term and seemingly set for their first-ever finals win over Geelong.
But a Geelong team shooting for a third flag in four years were never going to lie down easily.
With skipper Cameron Ling putting the clamp on St Kilda prime mover Brendon Goddard and Cameron Mooney and Stokes stepping up in attack, Geelong got the margin down to single figures early in the final term.
The Cats dominated play in the final stanza but could manage only a wasteful 1.7, while St Kilda’s sole score was a goal from Adam Schneider after excellent lead-up work by Milne.
Then with 61 seconds remaining came the final dramatic moment.
Ling looked to have kicked the goal that would have put the Cats in front for the first time since the opening quarter, only for the score to be disallowed because of a contentious off-the-ball free kick when Mooney was deemed to have pushed Gwilt in the back.
The Cats protested but to no avail.
St Kilda’s 12.11 (83) to 11.13 (79) victory earned them a week’s rest and a saloon passage into the preliminary final.
Geelong will take on either Hawthorn or Fremantle in a sudden-death semi-final back at the MCG next Friday night.
© AAP 2012Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
The Crowd Says (11) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- AFL, AFL finals, Geelong Cats, St Kilda Saints

MattakII said | September 4th 2010 @ 10:15am | Report comment
Cats done over by the umpire…
JB said | September 4th 2010 @ 10:30am | Report comment
No they weren’t. Saints played well and were up and deserved the win, Mooney blew their chance to get the win by giving away a free kick. The ump still has to pay the free kicks even in the last 2 minutes.
Football Fan said | September 4th 2010 @ 10:46am | Report comment
In comparison to what was not being paid (for both teams) throughout the match and up to that moment, that free kick should never have been given.
beaver fever said | September 4th 2010 @ 11:32am | Report comment
The free was there, but in the context should not have been paid, it’s more than possible that the umpire thought the ball was going to end up back in a pack of players and paid it to clear up the rugby type scrums. It happens many times when big packs of players form that the umpire seemingly pays a dubious free, (quite often to free up play it seems), this may have been one of those times, it just happened to coincide with the ball being knocked free to Ling.
Bad luck to Geelong, it is increasingly looking like the end of their era, but Geelong fans can hardly complain about the run they have had.
Beast-A-Tron said | September 4th 2010 @ 1:41pm | Report comment
And Mooney shouldn’t have got that earlier goal that was touched.
1 goal 7 behinds shows how wasteful the Cats were in the last quarter. If they deserved to win, they would have converted one of those 7 behinds into a goal.
Can’t find the stats just now, but in the last quarter the Cats had over a dozen inside-50s for a poorly scoring conversion rate of 1.7. The Saints had just 1 (maybe 2) inside-50 which they converted truly.
The Saints deserved their win; they were the better team.
Axel V said | September 4th 2010 @ 11:06am | Report comment
Geelong were robbed.
BigAl said | September 4th 2010 @ 1:56pm | Report comment
No they weren’t !
Mister Football said | September 4th 2010 @ 2:40pm | Report comment
Free was there. I prefer those sorts of tackles to be paid in the back every time. The ump blew the whistle before the Ling kick, so it’s just a bit of bad luck.
Geelong kicked 1.7 in the final quarter, so no use looking at the ump.
Redb said | September 4th 2010 @ 4:52pm | Report comment
Cats hard done by, but lost it anyway through poor kicking in the last qtr.
Steve said | September 6th 2010 @ 10:09pm | Report comment
I’m not sure how that decision can be described as ‘off the ball’. The ball spilt free from Gwilt’s attempted handball as a result of the tackle.
To those questioning the free kicks let go during the game, have a look at the replay (tomorrow morning on Fox Sports 1). Frees to Johnson & Stokes that resulted in shots at goal, as well as the dubious decision with the Mooney goal says to me that Geelong got their fair rub of the green too.
There was also a free kick paid to Lenny Hayes that was a carbon copy of the Mooney/Gwilt tackle.
The 1.7 kicking is also a furphy as there was at least three points that were punched through by St Kilda defenders after long kicks to the goal square. St Kilda’s kicking in the 1st, 2nd & 3rd quarters kept Geelong in the game to be honest. The Cats may have been wasteful in the last but St Kilda almost blew in earlier in the piece.
It’s also typical of Geelong to be ungracious in defeat. Hopefully the finals will play out to a St Kilda Collingwood GF.
Chris Dever said | September 7th 2010 @ 12:40pm | Report comment
Geelong are a great team but please stop whingeing.
I don’t hear any Cat’s supporters whingeing about the extra 5 points they enjoyed in last year’s Grand Final because of a goal umpiring mistake.
This ‘might’ have given the Saints the buffer they needed for the Flag as they had virtually stopped playing when the last Cat’s goal was kicked.
Wasn’t there another goal umpiring mistake in the Qualifying Final & the Saints appeared to have been robbed once again????
There was still a minute on the clock even if the Ling goal stood and that ‘could’ have been enough time for the Saints to score.
Ross Lyons is a legendary coach and a gentleman.
Decisions often even out over the match and umpiring the lightning quick modern day football is the last job most people could handle so sit back & enjoy the spectacle of what is the greatest game on earth.
Go Sainters!!!!!