The altitude/attitude win the Wallabies had to have
By Spiro Zavos, 6 Sep 2010 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Pretoria, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies
212 Have your say
Related coverage
Make no mistake the Wallabies’ near-death victory over the Springboks at Pretoria is one of the most important victories the national side has had in recent memory.
If the Wallabies had lost, and it was a close-run thing, Robbie Deans would have been obliged to make some massive changes to his squad.There would have been calls, too, for his head even though this type of execution was never on the cards.
Given the lack of talent below the top fifteen, especially with seven potential starting Wallabies out injured or unavailable, Deans would have been forced to virtually start from scratch to make these changes. This would have meant nearly three seasons of team-building would have been lost.
I would equate the victory at Blonfontein to the win the 1990 Wallabies achieved against the All Blacks in the third Test of the series, after losing the first two Tests and earning the description of the ‘woeful Wallabies’ for their troubles.
Bob Dwyer’s hold on the Wallabies coaching job was under threat from a Queenland push for John Connolly. Dwyer also threatened to drop a number of the stalwarts who starred in the RWC 1991 triumph – Nick Farr Jones was one – if the All Blacks got up again.
Deans’ Wallabies have now won two of the three Australian victories in South Africa in the Tri Nations era. At Pretoria the Wallabies recorded their first victory at altitude for 47 years.
The last time the Wallabies won at Blomfontein was in 1933. History has been made and the Wallabies should be congratulated for succeeding when other great sides have failed.
The importance of the victory, therefore, cannot be over-emphasised.
The Springboks fielded eleven players from their RWC 2007 triumph. This was no make-shift team or a rotational team. They were trying to prevent five losses in a Tri Nations season for the first time. And they had a goal-kicker, Morne Steyne, who kicked every goal, one of them from half-way.
The play of the Wallabies in the first 30 minutes was about as perfect as an Australian side will ever play. Everything was done at pace. The ball was passed in front of runners. The backs made skilful choices with their kicking game. Deans’ philosophy of ‘playing what is in front of you’ was expressed to perfection.
I thought at the time, though, that when the Wallabies were leading 31 – 6 with minutes to go before half-time they made a mistake in twice rejecting kicks at goal. The option of a 5m scrum turned sour when they were penalised for going early into a scrum. Not long after this, following a tremendous run and chip from Victor Matfield, Jacque Fourie powered across for a try.
What should have been a 34 – 6 scoreline became 31 – 13, with the Springboks 18 points behind but with some momentum going into the second half.
They were relentless in reducing this Wallaby lead to an unlikely Springboks lead. When Steyn banged over a penalty to make the score Springboks 36 – Wallabies 31, South Africa had scored an astonishing 25 points to nil.
Saia Faingnaa then had his brain storm, lifted a Springboks runner and smashed him to the ground to be given (correctly) a yellow card. Despite this, the Wallabies with fresh legs from Luke Burgess and Berrick Barnes stormed back for a stunning try to Drew Mitchell off a skilful in-pass from Barnes.
The Wallabies were now in front. But could they hold on? You had the feeling that if this game got away from them they would be scarred for years.
Then came some Keystone Cops play from Kurtley Beale.
He had dropped a bomb from Francois Hougaard a little earlier. Then he passed a ball from a turnover won by David Pocock (one of six) over the dead-ball line. Now he slipped into a pass and head-butted the ball to Adam Ashley-Cooper who was ruled off side.
Steyn banged over the penalty. The Springboks now led 39 – 38. Surely a Test that was as exciting as any ever played could not take another turn?
We turn now to the referee Wayne Barnes. The 34 year-old English lawyer had a superb game. His rapport with the players was excellent as he spelled out from time to time exactly why he made the decision he did.
With seconds remaining, the Springboks went into a flop/sealing off regime which was made even more frustrating by the way the ball was held in the back of the ruck for many seconds at a time. I hate this form of time-wasting because it violates two fundamental principles of rugby: first, the use-it or lose-it rule; and second, the rule that the continuous contest for possession is fundamental to the rugby game.
As the Springboks started their flip/seal tactics I heard Barnes warn them about sealing off the ball. The warning was disregarded and Barnes ruled, correctly, that an offence had occurred.
The rest is history.
Beale banged over a huge goal. The whistle went. The Wallabies had won a famous victory, and a victory the Wallabies had to have.
Admittedly, as posters have pointed out already on The Roar, the Springboks were playing their third successive Test. They had started off flat, as they did also at Pretoria.
Some of the Springbok stars of RWC 2007 seem to be finished.
Bryan Habana was booed by the home crowd before being hooked in the second half. John Smit was a passenger for the first half, although he lifted in parts of the second half. He is so vital to the Springboks for his captaincy it would not surprise me if he played next year as a prop, once more.
It seems unlikely that the Springboks can afford to play with their three huge backrowers, none of whom are fetchers or diggers. Pocock had a field day. Probably Spies is the one who will go when Brussow comes back.
There are problems for the Springboks at fullback, on the wings and in the defence of the centres. The team of RWC 2007 is now looking an unlikely RWC 2011 winning side. You would think that changes in the forward, backs and the coaching staff have to be made.
The Wallabies are in the position of having a number of experienced forwards coming back for consideration for the next Test. The youngish backline has proved itself in the toughest rugby environment possible.
For the Wallabies, therefore, it is onwards and upwards. They have broken an altitude/attitude hoodoo. Their world ranking is number 2, displacing the Springboks from this position by their win.
Now they get a chance to improve their recent record against the All Blacks at Sydney on Saturday night. What a Test to look forward to.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- Pretoria, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies


September 6th 2010 @ 8:31am
M.O.C. said | September 6th 2010 @ 8:31am | Report comment
Either way you cut it the Wallabies won yes, however they scraped it in by the barest of margins after kicking a penalty from what 47m out? in the 80th minute? after leading easily at halftime – the “implosion” title from Spiro’s last artical could just as easily by used this week as well – I love the fact that Wallaby fans are excited suddenly after having nothing to cheer about but beware the false dawn.
Before getting too carryed away, I think a team can only play as well as the opposition allows them – considering the Boks forgot to show up for the first half, I would be looking more at what happened in the second half to judge the Wallabies performance and if that is the case, uh oh for this week.
September 6th 2010 @ 8:53am
DCR said | September 6th 2010 @ 8:53am | Report comment
The Wallabies and Deans proved me wrong earlier in the tri-Nations comp when they won a game. Now they have won two and I predicted none. More fool me. Deans has done wonders with the forwards. Who had heard of Maafu, Faingaa, McCalman and Slipper in February (only 6 months ago, remember) other than their parents. Now all are full-blooded Wallaby forwards baptised against the World Champions at home, at altitude no less, and victorious. And to think another near loss would have been considered unacceptable now. You have got to hand it to Deans and his coaching colleagues for their high standards which are flowing into the spectator’s hearts. Ever since their humbling at the hands of the English front row the pigs have been terrific.
As for the backs, ball in hand they are now becoming something else all together; wide, fast, reactive, skillful (at least for an hour). The team on Saturday was close to the best backline attacking lineup we have ever had. Everyone of them can step, beat a defender with speed or footwork and pass. But they have a huge flaw. Apart from Genia, Ashley Cooper and OConnor they have big dart boards on their chests saying run at me, I won’t hurt you. And duly so for two weeks we have watched big fast Boks run straight at Cooper and Giteau. Sometimes they have to do it on a second play, but the goal was simple get the tacklers out of the way then a pass or two and whammo, easy street. Five out of eight tries in two weeks pretty much followed the same approach. Deans ought now to have seen enough to realise no amount of tackling practice is going to turn Cooper into a Terry Randall. So he has some scary options. Drop Cooper. Unlikely. Drop Giteau for a harder defensive 12 (Faingaa), possible, restructure the defensive backline when defending the line, ala in league and send Cooper to the blind side wing, probable, but will take some powers of adaptability for the rest of the backs, or just hope the backs score more points than the opposition can run in!
Two final points. The Wallabies have to learn how to play when they are in front. It has been so long since they lead test matches by good leads that they clearly don’t have plan. I’m at loss myself what it should be. If I had the time I would dig out some old tapes.
Lastly, on the refereeing, generally the northern hemisphere referees have left the southerns for dead. Rollands performance last week certainly tested that theory. Barnes’ performance along with Kaplan’s effort a few weeks ago have been unbelievably good. Tapes of those games should be sent to all Australian and New Zealand referees and they must be able to repeat after me “he was was only trying to clean out, it is alright”, “the ball is just caught up in his jersey”, instead of blowing the bloody whistle. Maybe another solution is to put ear plugs in the ref’s ears so they don’t have to listen to the incessant refereeing from the players. It seems to me once a player opens his mouth to tell the referee what to do that player automatically is out of the game!
September 6th 2010 @ 12:21pm
jameswm said | September 6th 2010 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
DCR having Barnes at 12 hedges your bets a bit. He’s a very good defender and a playmaker, if not at Giteau’s level. He’s been very positive when he’s come on.
I’d like to see him given a go at 12 with this up-tempo style.
So re the RWC – can anyone tell me who in the big 5 are in the same pool? Obviously two teams are.
September 6th 2010 @ 1:17pm
Peter K said | September 6th 2010 @ 1:17pm | Report comment
I would have JoC at 12, he can really tackle AND attack, then have a traditional winger on the wing.
September 6th 2010 @ 9:19pm
jameswm said | September 6th 2010 @ 9:19pm | Report comment
Yeah, but you still need a bit more size.
September 6th 2010 @ 12:31pm
Justin said | September 6th 2010 @ 12:31pm | Report comment
DCR – If we are talking about Deans as a selector then I have to disagree. Maafu should never have been picked and still shouldnt be. Most Roarers have been calling for his and Browns head for months and I have been staggered it has taken this long to give BMcCalman a run. Mumm still gets a run and is as tough as a marshmellow, though at least Marshmallows have some use!
Credit to him on Slipper, he looks the goods. Lets not forget though that this team is still leaking points like no other in history. We used to be the best defensive side in the world, now we up about the worst.
September 6th 2010 @ 9:08am
jeremy said | September 6th 2010 @ 9:08am | Report comment
It was a fantastic win – away from home, a mammoth effort, in a cauldron of Springboks supporters, and a great psychological lift for the Wallabies. I’m an ABs fan, enjoyed the game, and am interested to see what happens in Sydney now; also what does it spell for a potential semi-final in Auckland 2010? If the Wallabies can break a 47 year hoodoo at altitude in fortress South Africa, what can they do in New Zealand?
A note of caution; right now the biggest threat to the Wallabies is complacency – assuming that because they won one hard match at altitude, they will prevail in any game. Too many times we’ve witnessed this self-confidence go horribly wrong through chance, an unpredictable opponent, and momentum – look at nearly every World Cup involving the All Blacks. A win is a win; but the Wallabies must learn how to win consistently and predictably. Deans needs to be saying: This is the start of the climb, not the peak. This is a taste of what’s needed in order to get there.
Congrats on the win and hope the winning ways continue (apart from matches involving the ABs of course)…bring on Sydney.
September 6th 2010 @ 9:11am
Willy said | September 6th 2010 @ 9:11am | Report comment
Jeremy – Assuming both teams top their Pools, the All Blacks and Wallabies won’t meet until the World Cup Final.
More likely to be Aust v France and NZ v South Africa.
September 6th 2010 @ 9:56am
kingplaymaker said | September 6th 2010 @ 9:56am | Report comment
I would bet Australia beat France and New Zealand South Africa. One question though, which side of the draw are England on? Because Australia and France often mentally collapse against them.
September 6th 2010 @ 10:10am
Colin N said | September 6th 2010 @ 10:10am | Report comment
England, providing they win their group (which is an interesting one with Argentina and Scotland in it) are due to play France in the quaters, providing New Zealand win their group. If they win that then they could play Australia.
September 6th 2010 @ 10:19am
kingplaymaker said | September 6th 2010 @ 10:19am | Report comment
Colin that’s terrible news for both Australia and France. Of the top of my head, didn’t England knock out Australia in 1995, 2003 and 2007? Australia seem to implode while playing them, and France do even more spectacularly.
Great news for New Zealand though, as both Australia and England could knock out their nemesis team France who in any case they wouldn’t meet until the final.
September 6th 2010 @ 12:14pm
Jerry said | September 6th 2010 @ 12:14pm | Report comment
Apart from in pool play, of course!
The good thing about the French being in our pool is that IF (big if) both the AB’s and French get to the final, they’re likely to have already played their final the week before. Shades of 87, 99 and 07 – they always seem to play like crap after they’ve had a big emotional knockout win.
September 6th 2010 @ 9:10am
Briolex said | September 6th 2010 @ 9:10am | Report comment
Have missed most of the Tri-Nations match as was not too sure about the wallabies, however decided to stay up on sunday morn to watch this,
initially i thought i was watching a replay of the previous weeks match however finally realized that it was the actual match. I was so thrilled with the first half, the wallabies played rugby that gave me a lot of relief (the wallabies were delivering in the toughest of cauldrons), however the second half had me shaking my head.
I believe that the wallabies are world class and are capable of matching it with the All Blacks in the battle of the heavyweights this weekend.
Should be a great game
September 6th 2010 @ 9:20am
Colin N said | September 6th 2010 @ 9:20am | Report comment
“initially i thought i was watching a replay of the previous weeks match however finally realized that it was the actual match.”
Ha, I started watching the game around the same point as last week and thought exactly the same thing.
September 6th 2010 @ 9:10am
JB said | September 6th 2010 @ 9:10am | Report comment
Sprio,
What a game! I agree with KPY and MOC as well – the competition for possession (typified by the back rows of each team) and the running rugby put all other football codes to shame and if this style of play gets canned, it will be beyond belief.
An amazing stat of the game was that the possesion was in the boks favour at half time AND they spent longer in our 22! This is incredible, and the 1st ten or 15 minutes of the second half was dominated by the boks. We also made more than twice as many tackles, and conceeded more penalties!
I thought McCalman had a great debut, our kicking in general play was almost flawless (Genia bombing out on the full aside) and the poise of Beale and others to keep calm with 14 men on the field and still score was outstanding. I wonder if Faigaa’s brain explosion will have any impact on future selection?
Consistency is the key now, with the absence of Carter possibly negating the effect of rushing back from the Republic to play the ABs. GO WALLABIES!
September 6th 2010 @ 10:07am
kingplaymaker said | September 6th 2010 @ 10:07am | Report comment
JB another point is that if Super rugby is played this way (and of course the Australian teams are reasonably competitive), then rugby could make a comeback in domestic competitiveness too.
September 6th 2010 @ 4:55pm
Working Class Rugger said | September 6th 2010 @ 4:55pm | Report comment
KPM
We can only hope. The overall standard of the S14 lifted significantly this season. The real question is will it continue next year. Personally, I think much of the play we have seen in the 3N’s will translate providing us with a fanatastic competition. It’s something particularly in Australia desperately needs. Next we need proper FTA coverage. The highlights show is a decent start but with the current standard of play the game really needs to expose as many people as possible to Rugby.
September 6th 2010 @ 9:28am
jiggles said | September 6th 2010 @ 9:28am | Report comment
It will be a different ball game next weekend with the ABs. they are currently so far ahead of the rest of world rugby it is ridiculous. only with a win over them in sydney, and a win in HK will convince me we are finally on track.
If that kick went 5m to the right, it could be a very different feeling today, lets all remember that.
September 6th 2010 @ 9:53am
warrenexpatinnz said | September 6th 2010 @ 9:53am | Report comment
But it wasn’t so lets remember that, ‘if, what, maybe’ is all good and well but watching Rocky hold that Plate up and seeing him smile almost had me man hugging myself.
September 6th 2010 @ 10:05am
kingplaymaker said | September 6th 2010 @ 10:05am | Report comment
jiggles the Wallabies were only points off and that was away in Christchurch.
The ABs have Carter and although Cruden could play just as well, Carter is as valuable to the ABs for psychological strength as for his play.
I don’t think it will favour the Wallabies if they race ahead like last week-the ABs can play a fearsome second half and it would be better not to get to a nerve-jangling large lead too early.
‘only with a win over them in sydney, and a win in HK will convince me we are finally on track’ That’s ridiculous: you can beat the ABs once and lose once and still be on the right track. If you beat them twice you’re virtually the best int he world, not just on the right track.
September 6th 2010 @ 10:22am
Jerry said | September 6th 2010 @ 10:22am | Report comment
“jiggles the Wallabies were only points off and that was away in Christchurch.”
Yeah, they were only ‘points off’ – that’s how matches are determined, by which team scores the most points. It’s kind of meaningless unless you specify how many points.
In fact they were 10 points off, which, coincidentally, is the entire amount of points the Wallabies scored in the match. They could have won if they’d managed to score more than twice as many points as they actually did. WOW.
September 6th 2010 @ 11:23am
jiggles said | September 6th 2010 @ 11:23am | Report comment
KPM the Wallabies offered nothing at all in Christchurch.
Yes it was a ‘tight game’ if you look at the score bored, but I suspect that had more to to with the prevailing weather conditions then the opposition.
In Christchurch the wallabies attack was hopeless, and did not threaten the NZ line once. however cooper wasn’t running the show in that test so it could of been a factor (I wont say it was a factor has he is still untested against the ABs).
for my mind I usually expect home victories. Not winning against the ABs at home since 08 has shown us how poor this team can be at times. very very inconsistent. I do not really buy into the travel weary excuse either. They are professional athletes who live and breathe Rugby 24/7, and the fitness work for this test should of been done and in the bank around january this year.
A Win in HK will be even better, but I do not expect it, not just yet anyway from this wallabies side. The ABs should be tougher to beat at a neutral venue then in sydney, however as the saying goes if you want to be the best you have to beat the best.
So yes i stand by my comment, A Win this weekend in sydney is a must and anything short of it will confirm my opinion that this side is still not there, not by a long shot. The Wallabies, if they win in Sydney, must then show that they can do it twice in a row and it wasn’t a flash in the pan when the ABs are missing their chief playmaker in Carter.
September 6th 2010 @ 11:37am
JB said | September 6th 2010 @ 11:37am | Report comment
We’ve belted the World Champions at home and beaten them on the high veldt. Everyone knows Melbourne was bad, but there have been few other games where the Wallabies have lost so comprehensively in the last few years, with the most dissapointing loses suffered against England and Scotland. Clearly consistency is a huge issue and the mental battle against the ABs will be a challenge. But to say that “if it was 5m different” is to put yourself in Growden’s field of negativity. It’s a bit like saying we were 2 points of a grand slam. Pointless.
September 6th 2010 @ 12:55pm
Mr Grumpy said | September 6th 2010 @ 12:55pm | Report comment
JB, you have a short memory.
The 33-6 loss last year in Wellington was a shocker. Even Deans said the team had given up.
This loss ranks with the Scotland debacle two months later.
Australia has to win at least one of the two next matches against New Zealand to stop reminding fans they are the Wobblies.
On a side note – the Wallabies scored consecutive four-try bonus points in South Africa, the second time the team has achieved this in the Tri-Nations. Australia last achieved this in 1997.
September 6th 2010 @ 1:12pm
Jerry said | September 6th 2010 @ 1:12pm | Report comment
How did Australia do it twice in 97 when they only played one TN match in SA?
September 6th 2010 @ 2:20pm
Mr Grumpy said | September 6th 2010 @ 2:20pm | Report comment
Thanks Jerry.
It was the second time Australia have notched consecutive four-try bonus points in the Tri-Nations.
In 1997, the Wallabies scored four tries in their 32-20 win against South Africa in Brisbane and four tries in a 24-36 loss at Carisbrook.
September 6th 2010 @ 3:18pm
Jerry said | September 6th 2010 @ 3:18pm | Report comment
Ah, I see.
Is it really that long since it happened for Aus? Extraordinary.
September 6th 2010 @ 1:27pm
bayboy said | September 6th 2010 @ 1:27pm | Report comment
Belted the World Champs at home are you for real?
They won on a last minute penalty goal after all but throwing the huge lead away.
I would say the Wallabies got lucky
September 6th 2010 @ 4:44pm
JB said | September 6th 2010 @ 4:44pm | Report comment
Sorry Bayboy, i meant belted them at OUR home (Brisbane)… Although we did belt them in the 1st half. The number of opportunities that were created was great. Another seperate point – I think that any criticism of Elsom taking the scrum a couple of minutes before half time is poor form – if we score 7 points off that, it’s called putting nails in coffins. It was a funny penalty (Slipper pinged for losing his footing) that could have been re-set any number of times…
September 6th 2010 @ 11:56am
jiggles said | September 6th 2010 @ 11:56am | Report comment
we also lost on the High veldt in similar circumstances the week before. Australia should not of let south africa back into it like they did, and really shouldn’t of had to rely on a 55m kick at goal to win it.
The point I am trying to make is that this team still has a lot to prove, and dare I say it, the South African team we beat is a shadow of its world champion self, and unless they make some large changes, or rethink their tactics, is a team on the slide in a big way (but thats probably a discussion for another time).
I do not think I am being negative, and certainly not to the extent as that grumpy bloke from south of the border. I feel I am being realistic in saying this game was metres from being a completely different result literally, and we shouldn’t gloss over the obvious deficiencies that still exist in the wallabies game plan.
September 6th 2010 @ 12:56pm
kingplaymaker said | September 6th 2010 @ 12:56pm | Report comment
But remember if they do beat the ABs twice then they are the best team in the world.
Do they need to be the best team in the world to be progressing?
The team is still young and wracked by injuries. I think one win will be progress.
Not that I think they have the complete range of players to be better than the ABs, but that’s another story.
September 6th 2010 @ 1:32pm
bayboy said | September 6th 2010 @ 1:32pm | Report comment
It doesn’t mean that at all KPM,
When they can turn around and beat the ABs 10 times straight as well as wipe the Boks 3-0 in one season whilst also winning all their June tests then you can say they are the best in the world.
Need I remind you that whilst Cruden may be the only freshie to start, Henry and co have stated on numerous occasions that they will be blooding players from Sydney in to the NH tour.
Whilst they will not want to lose to the Wallabies this test is nowhere near as important for the ABs as it is for Australia, a loss will hurt but it certainly won’t be the end of the world nor will it prove Australia to be the best team in the world. 2 Tri-Nations wins in a row compared to 5 and a undefeated home June Series……
September 6th 2010 @ 1:59pm
jiggles said | September 6th 2010 @ 1:59pm | Report comment
A Win this weekend, and In HK, does not mean they are the best team in the world at all. It means they are finally on track to be come the team we all hope they can be.
September 6th 2010 @ 9:38am
warrenexpatinnz said | September 6th 2010 @ 9:38am | Report comment
The win was great and it made me feel so bloody good watching the guys jump around like mad men, estatic. Unlike the formeropenside and other negative nellies I accept the win for what it is, we beat the second ranked side in the world, at altitude and in their own country. Wins like that don’t happen often.
There is still plenty of room for improvement and this side is certainly capable of getting much better but all up it was a test win which many doubted this side incapable of doing.
September 6th 2010 @ 9:43am
AJ said | September 6th 2010 @ 9:43am | Report comment
KBs header was almost as sweetly hit as his penalty kick.
September 6th 2010 @ 10:13am
DT said | September 6th 2010 @ 10:13am | Report comment
Spiro
Beale headbutted the ball to de Villiers, who set off downfield and passed to Pietersen. KB made the covering tackle and AAC came into the ruck from the side, thus the penalty.
I thought AAC had a great defensive game, and even pased the ball a couple of times. He’s very enthusiastic. Question is, what do we do when Digby comes back? JOC’s doing a pretty good job on the wing, likewise KB at fullback and AAC at 13. Good as he may be, Rob Horne didn’t impress much in his tests this year (certainly not to the degree AAC did on Saturday).
Then there’s Hynes (in for injured Mitchell this week). It seems Deans will find a place for JOC no matter what, but where and at whose expense? No-one deserves to get hooked right now, they’re developing some good combinations.
What a pity we don’t have the same depth of real skill and talent in the forwards as we do in the backs.
September 6th 2010 @ 10:17am
soapit said | September 6th 2010 @ 10:17am | Report comment
PROS:
most of first half.
forwards being able to use the ball and not just tuck it under the arm
good use of tactical kicking.
having a player who can kick pressure penalties from tough areas (puts more pressure on the opposition not to offend and gives you better posession)
CONS:
passing on points on offer (i guess one kick was from pretty wide out though)
inability to execute for a large period when SA turned up the pressure (dropped passes and bombs, passes going to ground or out of play, no forwards going to a ruck leaving the backs there to do it alone and then turnover the ball)
the execution one is the biggy. even with their extra effort in the second half SA would not have been close if aus had not made so many clangers when offered their more limited amount of chances and kept up their standards from the first half. maybe they were getting tired?