Back from the Dreamtime into a dream?
By Brett McKay, 7 Sep 2010 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Rugby Union, South Africa, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies
Related coverage
I’ve returned from a week looking at big rocks in the middle of Australia, and I’ll get the travel recommendation out of the way early: if you haven’t ventured in the red centre of this big country, you really should. It is just an amazing part of the world.
Of course, being hundreds of kilometres from anywhere, where today’s newspaper is actually yesterday’s (and where hotel broadband rates make Telstra’s look like a bargain), means that keeping up to date with the goings on in the sporting world was a little difficult.
After the previous weekend’s performance in Pretoria, where the Wallabies squandered 14-point leads not once, but twice, I was keen to find out what the fallout was.
The main points of interest seemed to be thus:
* Captain Rocky Elsom apparently gave the boys a good old-fashioned dressing room spray after the loss, which is great to hear, as Elsom has been criticised in some quarters for his lack of obvious emotion after games, and
* The Wallaby assistant coaches, Captain and Lieutenant Obvious, laid down a fresh challenge in the 2010 edition of the Stating the Bleeding Obvious Awards, by calling on the Wallabies to “show more consistency” after their Loftus Versfeld showing, where they surrendered a 23-year-victory-draught-ending lead twice.
A high point in clear thinking, I’d imagine.
Nevertheless, I was confident going into the Bloemfontein Test early Sunday morning. I had a really good feeling about the changes in the forward pack, that the recall of Stephen Moore and Mark Chisholm, and the promotion of Number 8 Ben McCalman to the starting side made a lot of sense.
Come the first half, I found myself forgetting about a fresh cup of tea once again, as the Wallabies raced out to a 31-6 lead within half an hour or so. Bonus points were secured before my bleary eyes had even stopped squinting at the TV.
So, some brief observations.
Rocky Elsom was outstanding, and played probably his best game as Wallaby captain. He was willing in the contest, and seemed to be back to his best with his wide running game.
His try from a James O’Connor break, which sealed the bonus point, looked to be out of determination that he wasn’t going to be run down for the second week in a row. It was a just reward for a storming game, and it was great to see a satisfied man lift the Mandela Plate post-match.
This might be a big call, but in Ben McCalman, the Wallabies may just have found their next long-term No.8. Wycliff Palu will inevitably return for a period once fit again, sure, but at only 22, McCalman looks to be that aggressive, hard-tackling presence at the back of the scrum that Richard Brown tries desperately to be, but just hasn’t quite mastered.
Admittedly, I need to lay a disclaimer here, that McCalman was one of my Next Breed subjects back in March, and I am just as excited about getting one right (and on that subject, Dave Dennis, what’s happened?) as I am about a young guy from central NSW coming through.
It will be interesting to see how he slots into the already Wallaby-laden Western Force backrow rotation next year, and more so, when or if the Waratahs might try to bring him home.
Now for the humble pie bit.
I’ve been saying for quite some time now that James O’Connor and Kurtley Beale in the same side make me nervous, but there’s no ignoring this: they were both outstanding in this game, and both seem to be getting better with every game in their current roles.
While Beale will ultimately be remembered for kicking the winning penalty goal, O’Connor was very dangerous on the counter, and had a major hand in two of Australia’s tries as well as netting one himself. If this roaming wing role is the one from which O’Connor can reach his undoubted potential at international level, then good luck to him.
This was the classic game of two halves.
Australia dominated play for 39 minutes, went to sleep just on halftime, and were then completely outplayed by South Africa until the 79th minute of the game, by which time a 25-point lead had disappeared and yet another heartbreaking loss looked inevitable.
However, some laziness from the Springbok forwards in trying to close out the game presented Beale with his opportunity for glory. From just inside halfway and on a decent angle, Beale stepped up under enormous pressure, both at the ground and from many a lounge room back in Australia.
I still haven’t seen the kick from front-on, but from side on it was only ever going to be a question of whether it was straight enough. As the flags went up, there was a triumphant, if muted, early morning celebration in my house not seen since Brett Holman’s cracking goal for the Socceroos in their World Cup clash with Ghana.
If, in twelve or thirteen months time, the Wallabies go further in the Rugby World Cup than expected, we may well look back at this game as the turning point.
This could be the game where Australia finally learned how to grind out a tight win in the most hostile of environments, where previously they might have folded and suffered yet another frustrating and inglorious loss.
I learned an enormous amount about Aboriginal history and the Dreamtime on my trip out to Uluru last week, but I suspect this current Wallabies squad is starting to create some history of its own.
Their next big test comes this Saturday in the final Bledisloe Cup match in Sydney, and not for the first time I find myself saying that the Wallabies are now only as good as their next game. With Dan Carter out injured, there may not be a better chance to beat the All Blacks.
The Wallabies are starting to give fans a reason to believe again though, and they deserve all the optimism that comes their way this week. I just hope this isn’t all some cruel dream.
Recommend this story.
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
The Crowd Says (87) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (153)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- Brumbies vs Reds: a lesson for the other provinces (6)
- Chiefs vs Bulls: Super Rugby live scores, blog (14)
- Rocky Elsom axed from Wallabies (61)
- The burning question: Beale at 15 or 10? (122)
- Hola Argentina, and welcome to the Rugby Championship! (21)
- White welcomes Reds’ rugby battle tactics (81)
- Rebels want fast start against Hurricanes (4)
- Brumbies vs Reds: a lesson for the other provinces (6)
- Chiefs vs Bulls: Super Rugby live scores, blog (14)
- Hola Argentina, and welcome to the Rugby Championship! (21)
- Irish coaches looking to head Western Force (15)
- Dull Super Rugby coaches equal dull rugby (50)
- Coaching, not lack of depth, the issue for Australian rugby (30)
- Super Rugby round 14 preview (8)
- Explore:
- Rugby Union, South Africa, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies


September 7th 2010 @ 10:44am
reds fan said | September 7th 2010 @ 10:44am | Report comment
geez, can we get over the League buying fixation? bloody hell. its like a broken record.
September 7th 2010 @ 11:00am
Blinky Bill of Bellingen said | September 7th 2010 @ 11:00am | Report comment
Dead right it is.
If these blokes wanted to play Rugby they would be already doing it.
Far better IMHO to search within the current playing stocks for rough diamonds. Polish them and bring them through.
September 7th 2010 @ 11:27am
RedsNut said | September 7th 2010 @ 11:27am | Report comment
Couldn’t agree more. Look at what emerged from ARC
September 7th 2010 @ 11:13am
kingplaymaker said | September 7th 2010 @ 11:13am | Report comment
Blinky Bill the rough diamonds in the relevant positions everyone above thought of were the following: Chambers, Horne, Vuna, Rooney. Three out of those four are not from union ranks, they are league converts, sadly second-rate ones.
September 7th 2010 @ 11:17am
Damo said | September 7th 2010 @ 11:17am | Report comment
Hey Red, it’s not a “League Buying Fixation” It’s a discussion about plugs and holes. Prejudice based on unfortunate events is prejudice nevertheless.
The discussion began with a broadly acknowledged deficit of backs with size/strike power. It is not about poaching NRL contractees. It’s about strengthening the Wallabies across the park.
The fixation (ie a firm stance held without logical support) seems to be yours.
To turn the “record” again- If an Australian player like Inglis was contracted to the Harlequins or Munster he would be offered a spot in the squad.
So what’s the difference?
Prejudice about league crossing (because the 3 Amigos didn’t deliver a World Cup)?
Fear of a code war?
Player pay blowout?
Uncertain ability (eg. defense at 13)?
I’m not telling you. You tell me. What’s the difference?
September 7th 2010 @ 11:30am
reds fan said | September 7th 2010 @ 11:30am | Report comment
It’s about giving opportunity to union players. People who have chosen to play union. The guys who ARE playing union.
You guys talk about league players as though they are part of the one player pool. they aren’t. They choose to play league cos they love it. There is no prejudice. Just the facts. You talk as though they should come if union snaps its fingers. But they dont, and its because they enjoy league (which is a fine game in its own right).
September 7th 2010 @ 12:05pm
kingplaymaker said | September 7th 2010 @ 12:05pm | Report comment
‘It’s about giving opportunity to union players. ‘ Like Cooper Vuna of Newcastle Knights, Luke Rooney of Penrith Panthers and Will Chambers of Melbourne Storm? At least if they are going to be lured as Chambers and Vuna were then union could at least lure the good ones.
September 7th 2010 @ 12:38pm
reds fan said | September 7th 2010 @ 12:38pm | Report comment
the good ones get paid too much to bother.
September 7th 2010 @ 11:44am
Jiggles said | September 7th 2010 @ 11:44am | Report comment
Hi Brett,
Glad to hear your trip to the red centre was enjoyable, truly a remarkable part of the world that not many Australians ever see, which is a shame.
1.What a difference young Ben McCallam made. He didn’t shirk the hard stuff one bit, plus he has the handling skills to play number 8. It will be a good thing if he can continue that form and be a genuine option to Palu. Incumbent players play that much better when they know the coach has a viable option if they do not continue to perform.
2.I to was very sceptical about JOC at wing. I thought (well still do) he was a natural 12, and it would be detrimental to just stick him on at 14 for ‘experience’ when he should be in club land plying his trade as a 12. He has been playing very well so I will happily eat my humble pie, well done to the young lad!
3.That was Chisholm’s best wallabies match by far. He finally put those big gym junkie arms to use and made a bit of an impact. Was solid in the line-outs and the shove in the scrum. Good stuff. However he really needs to back it up. And I hope he can prove me wrong 2 weeks in a row, like JOC did.
4.KPM was going on about the lack of true strike runners, apart from Mitchell and to a lesser extent AAC. Well normally I would agree but Coopers passing game has been so pin point accurate as of late that no matter who he puts into a gap, they are bound to make solid metres. JOCs foot work also adds another dimension on the wing I feel, and that’s the reason he bamboozled Habana so easily the last couple of weeks.
5.Following on from 4, the back line seems to have good balance atm so no need to change for the sake of changing, let the combos develop a bit.
6.If we do need to make backline changes, in the form of strike runners – Hynes, Davis, Chambers and Ioane when they return are the blokes to pick. Ioane plays very big. By this I mean he plays like he is a 110kg monster back, not the 95Kg he really is. Hynes was the form 15 for Australia in Super 14, in saying this he is only a 15 so he should play there or not at all. He is very weak IMO on the wing – he needs the space to work with. Chambers was the form 13 over Horne, and on Horne I do not understand why he has gotten such big raps. He has never impressed me really. Davis is a pure speed merchant and has improved out of sight this year. His positional play and defence work has gone from useless to very solid, here’s hoping he develops further next year, you cannot coach speed after all.
7.In saying all this if we loose this weekend it will be cause of the forwards. The Bok pack gained the advantage line 90% of the time. This worried me immensely, as if they had a competent backline to finish off the momentum (i.e. a 5-8 like cooper) the score line would be a little different.
8. Finally, that win will mean little if they cannot step up this weekend. It will be won and lost in the forwards, and the Wallabies pack has to be on form 110% to match this very fit and mobile NZ pack, especially the NZ back three combo.
September 7th 2010 @ 11:59am
kingplaymaker said | September 7th 2010 @ 11:59am | Report comment
To be honest Jiggles, if they had got James on to run the ball at 10, moved Steyn to 12 to kick the goals, then it’s best not to think what might have happened. But the nature of their plan was different.
I completely agree Chisholm and Mccalman were good, though they must be subject to some responsibilty for their pack being mown down by the opposition’s..
September 7th 2010 @ 1:37pm
Brett McKay said | September 7th 2010 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
G’day Jiggles, it really was a great time out here, and as you would know, I sincerely hope people take my travel advice..
Points 1-5 of yours I completely agree with. I’ve said before that I could watch Cooper’s long passing all day, and it’s only getting better since I first said that back in June. Impossible not to run onto.
On 6. yes, these guys you mention are options, and may well come into calcs, but as you allude to you in the opening sentence of the point, I don’t think the ‘need’ is there..
7. Of course it’ll be the forwards fault – you must be a back too!!
8. Completely agree, that’s exactly what I mean by them being “only as good as their next game”
September 7th 2010 @ 12:20pm
M.O.C. said | September 7th 2010 @ 12:20pm | Report comment
Where has this RL player recruitment drive come from? my goodness, get some confidence in your own players – why even look at other codes to fill spots? Just because a player is good at one sport does not mean they can translate those skills into another arena. When will the rugby public realise this, and how disrespectful to all other RU players in this country to suggest a player in another code is better than they are at their code of choice. Other than Brad Thorn, no other RL player has really had an real impact in union. Tuquiri was ok at best, the others were worse. Would Folau and Hunt be in the Australian AFL team after one season? – no way, why then would Inglis or Hayne walk into the Wallabies?.
September 7th 2010 @ 1:04pm
Brett McKay said | September 7th 2010 @ 1:04pm | Report comment
MOC, I’m really not sure where it’s come from, or even why, given the nature of the backline play in South Africa. I’ve said in the past that Inglis and Cooper Cronk are the only current NRL players I’d chase if handed two blank ARU cheques, but currently, I don’t really see the need to chase either of them. When you look at the current squad of 28, add the 8 or 10 out injured and a few extra young bucks on the fringe and Cambridge-graduating locks, all of a sudden you’ve got 40 players of pretty decent quality to select from.
That doesn’t really strike me as a problem, let alone something that one or two NRL players are going to make any difference to…
September 7th 2010 @ 1:37pm
PastHisBest said | September 7th 2010 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
KPM seems to be the main protagonist, ably supported by Damo in this particular thread.
September 7th 2010 @ 5:51pm
Peter K said | September 7th 2010 @ 5:51pm | Report comment
Andrew Walker and Jason Robinson were very successful converts as well. Actually better in Rugby than league IMO.
September 7th 2010 @ 12:24pm
LeftArmSpinner said | September 7th 2010 @ 12:24pm | Report comment
brett, great piece as always.We may well look back and say, this was the start. I agree and I hope that we are right. However, we may also look back and say that it was just fools gold!!!!
I am warming to O’Connor as a winger. He brings more to the play than my favourite, Turner and his speed. I am thinking that Speed, as uncoachable as it is not as useful as footwork and evasive skills.
I am very happy that rugby is now producing entertaining matches and that we have finally been on the winning side of the ledger. But there is still plenty of water to flow under the bridge.
But with a backline of such potency, much or it comes from the long accurate passing that they are pulling off, we are in for some fun!!!
September 7th 2010 @ 1:58pm
Brett McKay said | September 7th 2010 @ 1:58pm | Report comment
cheers Leftie. There’s just a lot to like about the perfomance of several players now, and it certainly makes a nice change from being picky over things we in the armchairs have no control over.
Let’s hope the Wallabies finish the domestic seaon off in style in Sydney, and more importantly, that Sydney is there to see it…
September 7th 2010 @ 1:31pm
warrenexpatinnz said | September 7th 2010 @ 1:31pm | Report comment
The transformation of the Wallabies as a team in South Africa was immense and isn’t what you saw on the scoreboard but more what your saw in the combinations, the team work.
Beale and O’Connor looked like they were having a ball and that enthuisasim reverberated throughout the whole side and with Cooper’s passing they were let loose into space which was sadly missing during the ABs games.
The Wallaby squads age lent itself to needing that one big confidence boost as the skills are certainly there but the self belief wasn’t, which when you lack that it creates doubts, drop balls, bad timing and the negativity grows.
It doesn’t mean the Wallabies are going to be the supreme kings overnight but it certainly makes those passes crisper, that confidence of the player inside and outside them that much better. These guys have broken a long standing hoodoo in Aussie rugby, something that sides supposedly better than them in years past couldn’t acheive so come this Saturday that AB shadow which hangs over them may not exist in part or at all.
September 7th 2010 @ 1:31pm
inkosi said | September 7th 2010 @ 1:31pm | Report comment
If anyone missed it (where were you?) Highlights…
http://www.greenandgoldrugby.com/video-mashup-wallabies-win-on-the-veldt/
September 7th 2010 @ 1:33pm
Who Needs Melon said | September 7th 2010 @ 1:33pm | Report comment
G’day Brett.
I’m with LAS – great piece as always. Some sort of mystical connection there: It’s Beale. It’s the dreamtime. It’s the vibe…
We must all of course be careful not to go completely over the top on this one. Last week I wrote an article highlighting the positives and stated that “We came within a whisker of winning that game, and if we had, I’m pretty sure these blogs would be full of praises for the team. After all, we haven’t won there for about fifty years and almost all of us had written the team off before the game started”. This week these blogs ARE full of praises and I’m tempted to write an article on the negatives! Although I won’t because I can see we are all well aware of the negatives.
From my perspective, it’s MUCH easier to take someone who has genuine creativity and flair and reduce their mistakes through repetition and experience than to take experienced, ‘safe’ players and try to make them have creativity and flair. So I’m happy for us to stick with the young, risky players. I’m sure Beale (for instance) will not make the same mistakes he made in last weekends match.
Take the gems, add some polish over the next 12 months and they’ll come up nicely.
Nup. It’s the vibe.
September 7th 2010 @ 1:46pm
Brett McKay said | September 7th 2010 @ 1:46pm | Report comment
Melon, I’m glad you stopped that line at “It’s the vibe…”!!
Great post, it’s going straight to the pool room
September 7th 2010 @ 1:37pm
Damo said | September 7th 2010 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
Agreed LAS about speed . Plenty of wingers have done well without Olympic level pace. There are many ways to beat another winger. (REminds me of the joke -why do wingers score so many tries?) Speed is just one factor. Stepping and swerving inside passing, chip over top, and just running at pace before the other guy knows it’s on. AND that thing KPM and I have been shouted down about – SIZE.
MOC – The point of the discussion above was not about a “recruitment drive”. (BTW -The recruitment drive never sleeps) It was about finding some size in outside backs.
Anyway, we have a great squad and I look forward to seeing them proving KPM and I wrong if we leave GI in the other army.
(A: Because they are marked by other wingers)
September 7th 2010 @ 2:14pm
M.O.C. said | September 7th 2010 @ 2:14pm | Report comment
My point Damo is that it is time to put the recruitment drive to sleep! History tells us that it does not work and history also tells us that there are enough players in the current pool to assemble a fine team anyway. If Australian rugby hisotrically has one thing going for it, is that it produces fantastic outside backs. You don’t need to purchase them on the black market for crazy money, just because league currently has some good one, look in your own backyard and you will find plenty who already play the game
Sometimes it is best for the codes to live and let live – you wouldn’t try to seduce your best mate’s hot wife would you?..