What the Wallabies win really means
By jeremy, 2 Nov 2010 jeremy is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, Bledisloe Cup, Hong Kong Bledisloe Cup rugby Test, Quade Cooper, Richie McCaw, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Tri Nations, wallabies
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- Tri Nations Tournament news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- Wallabies v All Blacks news
- 2013 Wallabies squad news
On Saturday night I was at a family dinner, of all places, confidently predicting an All Blacks triumph against the Wallabies in Hong Kong. “The Wallabies haven’t demonstrated that they can close out a tight match yet,” I recall saying.
“And I don’t think they’re capable of coming back from a deficit to beat the All Blacks; the ABs defence is just too damned solid,” I continued.
Channel Seven had kindly moved the match off 7Two and 7 Mate in Melbourne, screening it at 1.30am, so I was forced to excuse myself from the table every four minutes to check live scoring.
When the All Blacks got out to 24 points, I walked back to the table full of confidence that we’d see an 11th straight victory and the Wallabies would be in yet another world of pain.
Returning to the feed three minutes from time, I was astounded, and as I watched, James O’Connor pulled his iPod earbuds out, channeled Justin Bieber, and won the game for the Wallabies.
Stunned? I was gobsmacked. Nearly everything I’ve been spouting on The Roar for the past three weeks was incorrect. The Wallabies *can* close out a game. They *do* back themselves. They *can* penetrate. They *are* building. They *still* have the ability to wait until the death knell, then sneak in a dirty little final try to steal the game.
Uh-oh, when’s the World Cup? Couldn’t we have played it at the end of the Tri-Nations this year?
With the cold light of a monsoonal Melbourne Sunday, I’ve had the opportunity to review the match and the replay, and the wider impact of this Wallabies win. And here is my top 10 list of outputs/inferences from the win.
1. The Wallabies have passed daylight on the IRB rankings.
This win means a lot in terms of split on IRB ranking points – Wallabies are still second, but only just! The margin between the two teams was slashed (by my calculations) from ~ 9 points to ~5.4 points.
2. Both sides take deep breath – it’s not that big a deal outside of Australia and New Zealand.
And it’s not.
There’s been such a lead up to this match that we forget there are other teams to play on each of the tours. England are in for a beating, because nothing arcs up an All Blacks team like a narrow loss.
The Wallabies also need to settle for the tour ahead; it didn’t end in Hong Kong.
3. Normal Bledisloe coverage to resume.
Despite loving watching the All Blacks win, there’s little satisfaction in a whitewash. We’re in for some cracking, ‘everything’s riding on this one penalty’ final matches in upcoming Bledisloes. I welcome this high pressure, high temperature environment, as it makes hardened performers of all involved.
4. Depth is a real problem for both sides.
With Carter or McCaw missing from the line-up, the All Blacks are down about five men and ten points. But the same can be said for Cooper and Bam Bam – these two players missing from the Wallabies would have an equivalent effect.
Weepu’s absence from scrumhalf was noted (thanks Alby) but there’s no-one approaching Genia in ability, either.
5. The torch is about to pass… from McCaw to Bam Bam.
There, I said it.
I hope it doesn’t pass before the RWC, but about three weeks afterwards. I can’t see McCaw with any more tricks left to give, and he’s slowing down. His heart, courage, and intensity are absolutely magnificent.
But Bam Bam seems to get better with every match, and what he delivers even at this age is approaching dominance.
Richie McCaw is still in my mind the best captain in the world and one of the players to ever grace the game of rugby; but he’s up against a Zimbabwean with one hell of a brain, brawn, and the evil little book of tricks that can only be gleaned from the dark arts of forwards play between the Tri Nations teams.
6. It was ‘the win Robbie Deans had to have.’
Baby steps, but steps in the right direction – he’s managed to instil the ever-necessary confidence into the players, and they appear to be able to back themselves out of a tight spot, something sorely missing three months ago.
His doctor will be pleased; Dean’s blood pressure would have returned almost to pre-2010 levels by now.
7. It was ‘the loss the All Blacks had to have.’
In some ways, a loss like this acts a short-circuit for any unintentional build-up of expectation. It’s certainly a wake up call for the fans – myself included – who realise that 2011 is not a sure thing, and may help to adjust public expectations (although not likely).
Graham Henry will be irritated, but not despondent about the loss.
I actually think in the scheme of things that this loss will do more for the development of both sides than the opposite result would.
Additionally, it means the All Blacks slip a bit back off the pedestal, and the Wallabies come under increased scrutiny by opponent teams in opposing WC contender unions. Look at how England chumped the Wallabies in 2003 and 2007; all teams are equally as vulnerable as one another in the RWC.
It only takes a single drop-goal.
8. Writing the ABs off at this point, on the basis of this game, is foolish.
I suspect this isn’t ‘news’ to many Roarers; it’s a fantastic outcome for Wallabies supporters but in the scheme of things it’s a return to the expected pattern of behaviour for both teams.
But the fair-weather supporters that disappeared two years ago will jump back on the bandwagon chanting ‘Aussie, Aussie, Aussie!’ and rebuilding the traditional enmity between the countries.
That is, until the next loss, then they’ll switch back to cricket until the next Ashes loss, tennis until Stosur or Hewitt drop off again, and Formula One til Mark Webber crashes out one too many times.
9. How the Wallabies respond to a win is just as important as how they respond to a loss.
So many times we’ve seen a team get up for a massive, unexpected win against a formidable opponent, then fall over sideways twitching when their next opponents step up in a similar way.
The tour up north is not a short, easy jaunt against weak teams. It’s time for the Wallabies to demonstrate consistency and to focus on the task at hand – getting to the World Cup with the skills, knowledge and tools to beat the All Blacks.
It would be an unmitigated disaster to lose to any of the NH teams.
10. Quade Cooper is destined for notoriety.
His unprovoked attack on McCaw in McCaw’s tackle on O’Connor in the closing moments of the game indicates a streak of nastiness four foot wide running from his eyebrows to his toenails.
Admittedly McCaw could’ve released earlier; it was the game-winning try, and Nonu has been similarly aggressive to opponent players in the past. But this act alone reconfirms my opinion of him – that he’s a nasty, arrogant little piece of work.
To act in that manner in victory indicates his lack of respect and lack of class.
He’s not an ambassador of Australian rugby, he’s a very naughty boy.
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Have you seen the new Wallabies jersey? Want one of your own? We're giving away a brand new 2013 Wallabies jersey to one lucky Roarer, click here to go in the running to win.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (267)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (245)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Quade Cooper misses Wallaby squad selection (209)
- Quade shouldn’t be fly half against the Lions (184)
- What gives with Israel Folau? (184)
- Super Rugby teams will skin the Lions (87)
- Super B to the rescue for rugby? (42)
- Picking your ‘First V’ for the Wallabies (58)
- Looking forward to the 2015 Wallabies (18)
- Philippines avoids relegation, stays in Asian Five Nations top division (4)
- Lions cheat-sheet: the Wallaby game plan (143)
- AAC: the man for this moment (27)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Bledisloe Cup, Hong Kong Bledisloe Cup rugby Test, Quade Cooper, Richie McCaw, robbie deans, Rugby Union, Tri Nations, wallabies



November 2nd 2010 @ 5:27am
AussieWallaby said | November 2nd 2010 @ 5:27am | Report comment
Jeremy, point 10….get over it! That is what makes great rivalries….what did you want him to do? pat mcaw on the head?
I rate what cooper did up with the ’4 more years’ banter which Gregan dished out back in 2003….That is true passion!!
The Kiwis have always passed on cheap shots to us..its good to have one back on them…and mentally this will hurt them! let the choke begin =)
November 2nd 2010 @ 5:56am
kingplaymaker said | November 2nd 2010 @ 5:56am | Report comment
Having never met Quade Cooper or RIchie Mccaw I can’t say which one I think is the evil person!
Amazing performance by Cooper though, and Beale. Those two can win any match between them. In fact, have their ever been two more creative players in the same team together? By which I don’t mean strike runners, but creative playmakers.
November 2nd 2010 @ 6:26am
Mike said | November 2nd 2010 @ 6:26am | Report comment
Bound to be Cooper – Anyone breaking into a house and stealing laptops is evil
November 2nd 2010 @ 6:28am
kingplaymaker said | November 2nd 2010 @ 6:28am | Report comment
Especially when they’re completely intoxicated.
November 2nd 2010 @ 7:03am
CraigB said | November 2nd 2010 @ 7:03am | Report comment
“His unprovoked attack on McCaw in McCaw’s tackle on O’Connor in the closing moments of the game indicates a streak of nastiness four foot wide running from his eyebrows to his toenails” – please. look at Saint Ritchie jump on O-Connor after he has scored. Granted not much in it, but it was not needed
November 2nd 2010 @ 10:07am
M.O.C. said | November 2nd 2010 @ 10:07am | Report comment
You might watch the replay, McCaw tackled JOC legally around the waist 1-2 metres before the line and released him after he scored. There was no late “flop” or “hit” as you suggest, Cooper is just a grub trying on some gamesmanship – this is borderline acceptable amongst the older players who have paid their dues, but he might want to pull his head in a bit.
November 2nd 2010 @ 3:47pm
matty dee said | November 2nd 2010 @ 3:47pm | Report comment
Ah la Woodcock
November 2nd 2010 @ 8:23am
Chris of Vic said | November 2nd 2010 @ 8:23am | Report comment
I don’t think it was about what Ritchie did to O’Connor, I think that it was probably the fact that Ritchie just got under his skin. If it was my job to be targetting Cooper, particularly running at him in attack, I’d also be having a word in his ear at every opportunity. Every time you put him down or ran through him, you’d let him know about his pedigree, build, hair do, sexual persuassion, whatever; just good old fashion sledging. And we know that Ritchie is the ultimate in speaking quietly with maximum effect (and that’s a compliment!). It appears Cooper needs to work on his mindset, but in attack there aren’t too many better too watch.
November 2nd 2010 @ 10:23am
allblackfan said | November 2nd 2010 @ 10:23am | Report comment
why bother? In 2012 he’s likely to be Parramatta’s problem child. Maybe they can teach him how to tackle!!
November 2nd 2010 @ 10:38am
soapit said | November 2nd 2010 @ 10:38am | Report comment
good to read a opinion piece from a kiwi (especially one that extends beyond the kiwi team itself).
pretty much agree on all points except minor quibble with 2 points,
i don’t think burgess is actually that far behind genia so long as he’s got cooper outside him. cooper gets the backline organised so quickly which is why the halfback can then clear it so quickly.
and cooper might not be a saint but he’s doesnt seem to be up there with nonu. nonu is always slipping in choke holds after the whistle (when the ref isnt going to change his call) and still i wouldnt say he has a mean streak 4 foot wide. just a bit of a prick but doesnt always hurt to have one in ur team. if only cooper actually was tough.
and yes pocock is challenging. he is just so strong so it’s nigh impossible to dominate him in a tackle or in cleaning out. the rest of the pack feed off this and step up their toughness. he’s crucial to the pack by his own actions and the effect he has.
November 2nd 2010 @ 10:50am
Jason said | November 2nd 2010 @ 10:50am | Report comment
Point 4: Depth is a problem, but it is completely unrealistic to expect that one can have a replacement for the world’s best players sitting on the bench and have them perform to the same level. Donald has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt he does not have the calmness and composure necessary for Test level rugby.
Point 5: In terms of turnovers, McCaw definitey lost that crown last year to Russouw. Pocock and Russouw are made for the position; powerfully built and low to the ground, arriving second at the tackle contest they are brilliant at contesting the ball. The competition between them two will be fantastic to watch. McCaw has changed his game; what he adds beyond the tackle situation is immense, especially in his support play and in that respect he is still light years ahead of any other open side flanker.
Point 7 is possibly more true than point 6. Sooner or later the Wallabies were going to beat the All Blacks again and the Test in Hong Kong will have raised some concerns from the coaches.
Point 8: Writing any team off is a mistake. Any team can have a bad day and in the knockout part of the tournament, be bundled out.
Point 10: Cooper is destined for nothing but a suitable career in league. His tackling is possibly worse than Ronan O’Gara’s. It’s that useless. At least O’Gara has the excuse he is giving away ~20kilograms in the collision. Cooper is just soft.
November 2nd 2010 @ 11:31am
Blinky Bill of Bellingen said | November 2nd 2010 @ 11:31am | Report comment
Graham Henry’s use of Donald should come as relief to Robbie Dean’s to prove that even the best coaches do ‘a Tahu’ from time to time.
Henry will have learned from this and become an even more dangerous coach.
November 2nd 2010 @ 12:02pm
kingplaymaker said | November 2nd 2010 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
Blinky Tahu was ten times the talent Donald has. He also left rugby just when he was starting to get the experience to succeed at it. If Deans was wrong with Tahu, it was putting him in the team before he had learnt how to play rugby union.
November 2nd 2010 @ 12:10pm
Blinky Bill of Bellingen said | November 2nd 2010 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
………….and playing him in the high velt, and at outside centre, and having him start.
November 2nd 2010 @ 1:00pm
Even looser said | November 2nd 2010 @ 1:00pm | Report comment
Timana Tahu certainly had potential but was / is mentality fragile.
November 2nd 2010 @ 12:05pm
kingplaymaker said | November 2nd 2010 @ 12:05pm | Report comment
Jason except Cooper set up all four tries with the most dazzling creative display from any fly-half for many many moons.
Granted, his defence was terrible, but there’s also the argument that his back row should have protected him more. They must have known Nonu would be fired at him all afternoon.
November 2nd 2010 @ 11:49am
M.O.C. said | November 2nd 2010 @ 11:49am | Report comment
Wow, I thought I had heard it all but I have never heard of NZ being accussed of having “perfect hair”. JOC and Giteau will be so jealous.
November 2nd 2010 @ 12:12pm
mickh said | November 2nd 2010 @ 12:12pm | Report comment
There is little chance of the Wallabies getting ahead of themselves. In the hazy fog of defeat some All Black fans on this site have missed some glaring hints as to how then Wallabies approached the test on Saturday night.
First, the Cooper shove of McCaw. In my opinion this was a direct in your face response to the kick in the nether region Richie delivered to Cooper 5 or 10 minutes into the second half. Cooper cleaned him out good and proper and Ritchie lashed out with his boots to Quade’s groin. Look at the replay it’s as plain as day.
Secondly, James O’Conner’s interview at full time (probably missed by most Kiwi fans whist getting back to their feet after fainting). At the end of the interview he said “let’s get this tour started” STARTED! Not, let’s all go home now cause this was the only game we cared about. He said Let’s get the tour “started”. Easily overlooked by supporters with Black and White eyes and an indication that the Wallabies would have preferred not to have played this game either.
Thirdly, No need to have a dig at our broad sporting spectrum. You wish you had so many top name teams and individuals.
What appears to be diplomatic and balanced article at first, slowly unravels into a petty dig at not only the Wallabies and their supporters but the entire Australian sporting landscape. Get over over it boys. We have a long tour ahead.
November 2nd 2010 @ 12:19pm
djfrobinson said | November 2nd 2010 @ 12:19pm | Report comment
Sorry Mick
I would say most New Zealanders really don’t care about the Australian attitude. They will look internal towards the faults of our team. This game was won and lost on 2 things, the tour team policy of the selectors, and the Australians wanting to win this game more.
Simply put. Australia wanted to win more then New Zealand and they did.
As for big names New Zealand has a population of 4.5 million against Australias 22 million it’s not a major surprise that Australia has far more big name players then NZ.
November 2nd 2010 @ 12:34pm
mickh said | November 2nd 2010 @ 12:34pm | Report comment
“As for big names New Zealand has a population of 4.5 million against Australias 22 million it’s not a major surprise that Australia has far more big name players then NZ.” – Do we? who would have thought given the parochial voice from across the ditch that we can faintly hear over our lattes on a quiet Sunday morning on Bondi beach .
The only reason we get all puffed about playing the All Blacks is because they are number 1. Not because they from New Zealand. If Zimbabwe was Number 1 our focus would shift to them and we wouldn’t care about you either. I never said anything about Kiwi’s giving 2 hoots about what Aussies think. You made that one up.