Proof that ODIs have a place in the game
By johnhunt92, 5 Nov 2010 johnhunt92 is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- 50 over cricket, Australia cricket, Cricket, one day international cricket, Sri Lanka, Sri Lankan cricket, Twenty20
One-day cricket has taken a battering in recent times: boring, uninspiring and too time consuming are reasons usually associated with the decline of the 50-over format.
However, Wednesday’s one-day match was living proof of why this is the better form of shortened cricket. Hopefully it has breathed new life into the concept.
With the 50-over match, the momentum can change real quickly compared to Twenty20, and provide a wonderful contest. Australia started well, then in the middle lost their way before steadying and giving Sri Lanka a modest score to chase.
Sri Lanka started poorly, blasted Peter Siddle and Mitchell Johnson, fell victim to Xavier Doherty’s beautiful bowling before romping home with a few nerve racking moments. Only in Test cricket and the 50-over form can these momentum shifts be possible.
I have passionately written about the superiority of the 50-over form. For me, Twenty20 is too predictable. If a team bats first and hits 150-plus, it is unusual for them to lose the contest.
With a 50-over match, even a 300-plus score is not safe any more as there are more overs for a team to get settled and chase it down.
Who could forget that 2006 ODI in which Australia hit 434 only for South Africa to chase it down in the last over? I could not imagine a side hitting over 200 batting first and losing the contest in a Twenty20 contest.
As a sports fan and lover of cricket, I say, as Jimmy Reid, a famous union man, once said in a speech to Glasgow University: “Reject the values and false morality that underlie these attitudes. A rat race is for rats. We’re not rats. We’re human beings.”
Forget the Twenty20 rat race; ODI’s are where the real drama and purist short form cricket is.
Reject the false morality of the Twenty20 values.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (41)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- England win first Test by five wickets (5)
- Gilchrist says his playing days are over
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (42)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Aussie Hussey defends IPL after fix claims (2)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (42)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Brad Haddin must not be selected for Australia again (8)
- Is Australia finally warming to Michael Clarke? (7)
- Explore:
- 50 over cricket, Australia cricket, Cricket, one day international cricket, Sri Lanka, Sri Lankan cricket, Twenty20


November 5th 2010 @ 7:01am
Vinay Verma said | November 5th 2010 @ 7:01am | Report comment
John,the next step for Twenty20 is Lingerie Cricket.
November 5th 2010 @ 1:07pm
Brett McKay said | November 5th 2010 @ 1:07pm | Report comment
John, while ever there is context and purpose, there is a place, I completely agree. Seven game series is pushing all the boundaries of all these, but three games like we’re seeing with Sri Lanka is a good fit.
I still maintain that there is no need for T20 Internationals, it doesn’t pass the context, purpose or place argument. It should just remain the domain of domestic and franchise formats…
November 5th 2010 @ 8:38pm
John Hunt said | November 5th 2010 @ 8:38pm | Report comment
Couldn’t agree more Brett. T20s should be for counties/states/regions to recoup losses.