Bollinger bowled over by strange team selection
By Brett McKay, 25 Nov 2010 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Ashes, Australian Cricket, Cricket, Doug Bollinger, England cricket, Usman Khawaja
The Australian selectors have done it again. Fresh from naming every second Sheffield Shield player in the country in a failed public event, they’ve sprung one last surprise before the Ashes kicks off in earnest.
Michael Clarke proved his dodgy back is fine-ish with a couple a light net sessions, and will therefore deny young New South Wales tyro Usman Khawaja a Test debut.
There’s no doubt the team will feel more confident with the vice captain taking his place in the batting order, though Khawaja would not look out of place at this level.
However, Doug Bollinger, the man whose preparation for the Indian series last month was hindered, and then ruined, by Cricket Australia’s insistence that he stay on and play the final of the Champions League Twenty20, has somewhat surprisingly been left out.
Victorian quick Peter Siddle has won the third seamer’s spot, and he’ll return to the Test team after succumbing to back stress fractures late last season.
I’d reckon Dougie would have been fairly aggrieved to hear he’d missed out, and particularly the explanation offered that he just didn’t have enough overs under his belt going in the opening Test of an Ashes campaign.
Bollinger bowled 20-plus overs in the NSW-Tasmania Shield game in Sydney last week, which was his return from the injury suffered in India. Of course, Bollinger wanted to return in the previous game for NSW, but was left out and rested on advice from CA medical staff.
So here’s a guy that wanted to play one week, was held back a week by his employers so as not to risk re-injury, and now these same employers are telling him he’s missed selection because he hasn’t bowled enough! That will do me…
I thought Cricket Australia’s insanity had reached new heights with the whole Selection Idol debacle, but this trumps even that.
Bollinger was almost a lone star in the Australian attack this time last year, and now he’s on the sidelines all because of the unique logical workings of the cricket administrators and selectors in this country.
It makes you wonder just how much they really want the Ashes back.
Peter Siddle has done nothing wrong, obviously, and his recall is a just reward for a successful return from injury himself.
But it’s fair to say that unless he plays one of the games of his life this week in Brisbane, the general view is going to be ‘that should have been Bollinger.’
Strangely though, the same theory of workload doesn’t seem to have been applied to Michael Clarke.
After injuring his back in the NSW-Victoria Shield game two weeks ago, Clarke has been undergoing intense physio work and trying to prove his fitness since. But even this week, his workload has been kept deliberately low, and questions will undoubtedly remain about his fitness. And thus, the perceptions of double standards for batsmen and bowlers will remain.
On arrival up in Brisbane yesterday afternoon, I was pleased to see sunny skies and only patches of cloud. The forecast rain and showers didn’t eventuate, and for that I was very glad.
The ‘Gabba wicket didn’t look anywhere near as green as I was expecting, and although it still has an appearance that Don Burke would enjoy, it wouldn’t at all surprise me to see the side who wins the toss batting first.
That said, showers are still set to play a part during this game, and the forecast of localised showers remains for all days of the Test.
It would be a great shame if weather played too big a part in this Test, as Brisbane traditionally sets the tone for the entire Ashes series.
Nasser Hussein still refers to his ill-fated decision to bowl first in Brisbane in 2002/03 as the biggest regret of his captaincy, and similarly, England’s campaign was almost doomed from the moment Andrew Flintoff fielded Steve Harmison’s first delivery of the 2006/07 series at second slip.
It’s hard to see this current England team making these same mistakes, so settled a unit are they, and they will be super-determined to twist the knife even further into a vulnerable Australian outfit.
Conversely, Australia needs a First Test win to reinforce their own belief and confidence levels, but also to extinguish the increasingly doubtful Australian public of their abilities.
It will undoubtedly be an enthralling contest.
Recommend this story.
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (41)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- England win first Test by five wickets (5)
- Gilchrist says his playing days are over
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (42)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Aussie Hussey defends IPL after fix claims (2)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (42)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Brad Haddin must not be selected for Australia again (8)
- Is Australia finally warming to Michael Clarke? (7)
- Explore:
- Ashes, Australian Cricket, Cricket, Doug Bollinger, England cricket, Usman Khawaja


November 25th 2010 @ 5:53am
Fisher Price said | November 25th 2010 @ 5:53am | Report comment
Spot on. There’s certainly a double standard being applied here.
Perhaps the selectors would be better off steering clear of the overs-under-the-belt justification, and simply saying they feel Siddle is the better bet – which seems to be what the inner sanctum think.
November 25th 2010 @ 6:04am
Brett McKay said | November 25th 2010 @ 6:04am | Report comment
quite right, Fisher, and I’ve often wondered why some things have been said publically – like this – when surely a cliched “We just feel Peter is bowling very well in the moment, he’s looking good in the nets, he’s been performing strongly for Victoria, blah blah blah..” would have been a safer option.
Cricket people aren’t stupid, they know Bollinger wanted to play, but was held back. It doesn’t take too much dot joining to work out why…
November 25th 2010 @ 7:24am
LK said | November 25th 2010 @ 7:24am | Report comment
Geez, I hope the Siddle selection doesn’t bite us. Not that he is bad, but Bollinger is more explosive. Even if he hadn’t done the hard yards, isn’t there North, Watson, Katich to take up the slack with some overs?
November 25th 2010 @ 7:41am
jameswm said | November 25th 2010 @ 7:41am | Report comment
The selectors and captain can’t get past what happened in SA 18-24 months ago. Yes, an unheralded trio did well there. But times change. Siddle’s simple and hard working style of bowling suits Ponting’s captaincy. Bollinger is a wicket taker. Siddle might do OK, but I can’t help but think Bolly would have done better.
I have only seen Clarke moving gingerly so far, and he doesn’t seem overly confident. Still, it’s an injury he’s had for a long time, so he should know how to manage it.
And then there’s the toss. We already know Punter will bat first regardless of the conditions. Both got it right – if it’s overcast, bowl, and if i’s sunny, bat.
November 25th 2010 @ 8:43am
MrKistic said | November 25th 2010 @ 8:43am | Report comment
I think you’re right there jameswm and that’s the key difference with Clarke, it’s the same process he’s gone through many times now so if he says he’ll be right, they’ll believe him.
Of course the Ponting inner sanctum cannot be denied, which is why Siddle is in. There’s plenty of comments bagging Siddle on here at the moment but his recent bowling for Victoria has been good. Of course he probably doesn’t have Cam White in his ear telling him to just bowl fast and short when playing for the Vics. I see Ponting has offered his same brilliant advice to Mitch Johnson again lately. We all know how well that worked out for Brett Lee in the test arena.
And you’re spot on too Brett, the level of bull excrement that the selectors and Ponting trot out around these selections is getting out of hand. Just name the team and leave it at that. We all know, or at least wish, that the players you’re naming are the best 11 players available to take the field. Perhaps if they believed that themselves they wouldn’t have to keep justifying their actions so loudly.
November 25th 2010 @ 7:56am
Alec Swann said | November 25th 2010 @ 7:56am | Report comment
One fewer left-armer means less rough for off-spinners to bowl into.
Perhaps the Aussie selectors aren’t as daft as you would have us believe.
November 25th 2010 @ 9:30am
jameswm said | November 25th 2010 @ 9:30am | Report comment
so will they make Mitch bowl round the wicket a lot?
You’re saying the right armers create a better rough spot for our leftie Doherty?
I guess – but I think you’re crediting them with too much intelligence. Dougie shapes it away from the left handers with the new ball and used to have Langer eating out of his hand. He’s the perfect one to remove Cook and Strauss.
November 25th 2010 @ 8:01am
Lolly said | November 25th 2010 @ 8:01am | Report comment
They could have left Johnson out for Bolly and played Siddle. I hate waiting to see which Johnson has turned up. It’s turning me into a wreck.
November 25th 2010 @ 8:30am
Hutchoman said | November 25th 2010 @ 8:30am | Report comment
Bewildering selections, yet again.
This looks like Stuart Clark all over again. Wickets, tick. Average, tick. Gets the job done, tick. So why does the bloke with the best figures in the country not even rate in the top three? Hmmm …
November 25th 2010 @ 8:38am
Rickety Knees said | November 25th 2010 @ 8:38am | Report comment
“Dougie take care mate – we want you to rest up for the Ashes” – “Sorry Dougie mate, you just haven’t bowled enough overs”
Monty Python lives on!
November 25th 2010 @ 9:58am
Brett McKay said | November 25th 2010 @ 9:58am | Report comment
if only we could laugh at it though, Rickety…
November 25th 2010 @ 8:50am
Phil said | November 25th 2010 @ 8:50am | Report comment
This decision to include Siddle over Bollinger is in my opinion a worse decision than including Marcus North. At best Peter Siddle is a poor mans Brett Lee, if I was English I know who I would rather be facing. To me Ricky Ponting is the equivalent to what Phil Waugh is at the Waratahs – controlling the show to suit their own agenda. The inclusion of Doherty & Siddle is testament to this. I hope it pays off.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
November 25th 2010 @ 9:26am
Brett McKay said | November 25th 2010 @ 9:26am | Report comment
Hi guys, I’ll come back to your comments shortly. Strauss has won the toss and will bat, and looking at the deck (from a distance), it doesn’t a seem a bad toss to lose. Pitch is still green, not quite as green as I was expecting, but still one that you would give serious consideration to batting first on anyway…
Teams on their way out..
November 25th 2010 @ 9:32am
jameswm said | November 25th 2010 @ 9:32am | Report comment
Agreed Brett – good toss to lose.
Are we going to have a live blog on here?
November 25th 2010 @ 10:19am
Brett McKay said | November 25th 2010 @ 10:19am | Report comment
seems as good a place as any James!
Looks like a good batting deck already, not much sideways movement and pretty true bounce and carry. Hilfenhaus is getting the odd one to seam, but Siddle is already looking rather, well … straight…..
HA! as soon as I say that, Siddle nicks Trott up with one that moved away…
November 25th 2010 @ 10:23am
MrKistic said | November 25th 2010 @ 10:23am | Report comment
Straight, true, but he is bowling a bit fuller this year. And almost had Trott at 2nd slip just now.
November 25th 2010 @ 9:55am
Brett McKay said | November 25th 2010 @ 9:55am | Report comment
well, getting the English captain first over, and having the Poms 1/0 is just about a dream start!!
INterestingly, Michael Clarke is stationed at mid-off, and not in his usual cover position…
November 25th 2010 @ 10:09am
MrKistic said | November 25th 2010 @ 10:09am | Report comment
Yep, Clarke walked out onto the ground very gently too while the others came trotting on. Not his usual self yet.