Something has to give for Australia in Ashes hunt
By Alec Swann, 10 Dec 2010 Alec Swann is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Andrew Strauss, Ashes, Australian Cricket, Cricket, Ricky Ponting, Test cricket, The Ashes, Tim Nielsen

England celebrate as Australia's Xavier Doherty is bowled by England's Graeme Swann. AAP Image/Dean Lewins
“We’re going terribly, we’re going awfully, I can’t believe they said that, and I’m not sure we’re going to turn up on Friday.” As predictions go, this must rank as one of, if not the, best pieces of crystal ball gazing I’ve come across.
I’m sure that Tim Neilson, in his response to negative coverage of his team’s efforts at the Gabba, was attempting to portray a heavy line in cynicism, but he should start buying lottery tickets in vast quantities with that kind of ability and put down his coaches hat for good.
Not only are the Australians, as Neilson acutely observed, going terribly, they actually – Michael Hussey and Brad Haddin the notable exceptions – didn’t turn up on the aforementioned Friday.
And the result is that they face a mountain to climb if they are to reclaim the urn.
It would have been easy, as both Ricky Ponting and Andrew Strauss did, to play down the influence that any momentum claimed in Brisbane would have had on the second Test.
After all, England had to dig out a draw and, as poorly as Australia bowled in the second innings, these things do happen.
But with the evidence of five days in South Australia fresh in the memory, it is clear that both Ponting and Strauss were taking all of us for fools.
England had obviously assumed the ascendancy and Australia had neatly slotted into the role of whipping boy.
That must have been what transpired over days four and five in Brisbane because if you can think of a better explanation then I’m all ears.
Form is a fleeting thing, it comes and goes without much in the way of warning, but I’m still at a loss to fathom out how one side can go from control to virtual submission in a week and the other can press the accelerator and assume dominance of a rarely seen magnitude in the same time frame.
The Adelaide Test was a complete reverse of the bad old 1990s when any Mark Taylor/Steve Waugh (delete as appropriate) led side drubbed whatever English XI stood in their way.
Under-par first innings, rack up a massive total at will and then let your spinner loose to pick his way through whatever resistance is offered.
And if that doesn’t provide a threatening wake-up call to the Australian selectors then I don’t know what will.
There comes a time when something has to give and the few days before battle recommences at the WACA is that time.
Constant chopping and changing does nobody any favours but I fail to see what option the powers that be have. Andrew Hilditch and co are in the position that no gambler wants to find himself in – they are chasing their losses.
To stick could lead to ruin but to twist holds no guarantees of the desired outcome.
So what to do? Recall Johnson? Hauritz? Hughes? Hilfenhaus? All of them?
Australia are teetering on the edge with their eyes down rather than up and, as things stand, there doesn’t appear to be any way out of a mess that has been, for the large part, self-inflicted.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
The Crowd Says (8) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- Andrew Strauss, Ashes, Australian Cricket, Cricket, Ricky Ponting, Test cricket, The Ashes, Tim Nielsen


December 10th 2010 @ 5:23am
mickh said | December 10th 2010 @ 5:23am | Report comment
They need to retain most of the team that played in Adelaide. Perhaps drop North and Doherty.
They then need to play like they have already lost the Ashes. Forget about thinking that they need to dig in and fight. Forget the stirring pre-match battle speech go out and play like they just don’t care.
Then and only then with clear heads, loose limbs and the shackles of expectation expelled will they stand a chance in this series.
December 10th 2010 @ 6:28am
Rabbitz said | December 10th 2010 @ 6:28am | Report comment
Frankly, I believe they already play like they don’t care. CA will still pay them and there is no risk of being dropped due to the boys club, so why would they care?
December 10th 2010 @ 5:31am
Brendon said | December 10th 2010 @ 5:31am | Report comment
All commentators have missed the biggest factor in this series and that is the preparation of both sides. All this talk about who should play is irrelevant. Australia had the worst managed preparation for a home Ashes test series in living memory and England have had their best in decades.
England last played an international 2 months before the 1st test at the ‘Gabba and got to Australia early and played 3 first class games in the lead up. Australia went and played a 2 test and 3 ODI series in the toughest country to tour – India and then came home and played 3 meaningless ODI matches against Sri Lanka in the leadup. Go back and compare each’s team preparation for the 2006/07 tour and look at the results.
Arm chair experts and newspaper hacks can blather on about this and bad selections and bad form but these problems can be solved before a series starts through good good preparation. Bad form and selections are usually a result of of bad preparation and thats what we’re seeing with Australia.
December 10th 2010 @ 6:49am
DingoBob said | December 10th 2010 @ 6:49am | Report comment
I couldn’t agree more Brendon. If the Ashes do go the way of the English then CA have a lot to answer for, not just the selctors and players, and it will be up to the media to highlight the fact.
December 10th 2010 @ 7:52am
Lolly said | December 10th 2010 @ 7:52am | Report comment
Even the players pointed that out at the time. CA appear to be locked into playing either ODI’s or tests every year in India to keep the BCCI happy. And the players are just going to have to wear it.
Strange that England got exactly what they wanted in terms of preparation and the Aussies got an arse-kicking in India – Mohali has shot this team down in flames, it was like the straw that broke the back in terms of failure – and a one days series with Sri Lanka instead. I’d say it shows the relative power of the coaches in all this on top of the stupidity of CA.
This is not a confident Aussie side and hasn’t been for a while.
December 10th 2010 @ 8:07am
Brett McKay said | December 10th 2010 @ 8:07am | Report comment
spot on Brendan, and England were very deliberate in the scheduling of the first class games prior to the first Test, so as to avoid the situation in 06/07 where their couple of token tour matches were turned into two-day 14-man practice sessions.
We all know the saying about a failure to plan, and that’s what CA look to have on their plates currently…
December 10th 2010 @ 11:54am
EP - Rugbywits said | December 10th 2010 @ 11:54am | Report comment
Well all I can say is that I’m glad Callum Ferguson passed 100 just before lunch.
He appears to be in some form on top of the 100 in the shorter game and then another 112 in the first game of the season.
Also he played well in the T20 Champions League as his first real competitive cricket in a long time.
So thats a good sign. I’d love to give him the rest of the year in the Shield game to iron out the few technical difficulties in his game that showed up against the moving ball against Eng A though. That may not be possible due to our current senior team’s lack of grit, but it would be good.
Khawaja seems like a guy with great temperament for a team too. His runs have dried a little since his double ton earlier in the year, but his overall average is great. Also, the speculation about being in the Aus A, then the Test team/squad and then joining NSW again would probably interrupt the best preparations for any match. Hopefully we either leave him alone or pick him. Im sure, from what I’ve seen of him, once he knows where he stands he will prepare accordingly and remind opposition bowlers his wicket is not on sale.
December 10th 2010 @ 12:55pm
AJ said | December 10th 2010 @ 12:55pm | Report comment
Firstly well done to England,they deserve more praise than our team does critcism.
Well said Brendon but I would even take it back even further ,to the previous ashes or even vs.RSA when worrying signs were emerging such as Johnson going missing,bowlers unable to clean up the tail,brittle middle order batting collapses etc.Shouldn’t Ca etc have begun strategising towards this series then?Isn’t that what they did leading upto 2006/7?
Hopefully now they will realise that selection strategies are a different beast altogether from when we were no.1 and could carry out of form players, and had numerous high quality options available on the waiting list.