Can’t bowl, can’t bat, can’t toss a coin now, either
By Brett McKay, 17 Dec 2010 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
117 Have your say

Australian captain Ricky Ponting (centre) and wicket keeper Brad Haddin (right). AAP Image/Dave Huntv
Ricky Ponting can’t take a trick currently. Having been out-batted and out-bowled in Adelaide, he’s now been out-tossed on Day 1 in Perth. Having taken the gamble to play four quicks, and having made the near-unprecedented decision to bowl first, he promptly lost the toss to Andrew Strauss and was sent in on a greenish WACA deck.
Then, just to rub salt into the wounds, Australia were all out for 268 with around an hour of yesterday left to play.
And if that wasn’t enough, a late deflection off Strauss’ handle and glove fell annoyingly short when Ponting appeared to be letting it come to him.
I’m not a big gambler, admittedly, but if I see Ponting in a casino any time soon, the house and mortgage is going against him.
After the first half an hour of woe in Adelaide last week, I really thought the Aussie team’s fortunes couldn’t sink any lower, but when Shane Watson fell just after Drinks in the first session, Australia had sunk to 4/36 and were still digging.
While England bowled well, and with the recalled Chris Tremlett the pick, they weren’t bowling hand grenades.At least four and maybe five of the Australian wickets were to shots that probably didn’t need to be played.
It really was one of those days where nothing went right.
Tremlett struck in his first over of the day, bowling Phillip Hughes. Hughes played all around a straighter one that hit the top of off stump, and which on replay showed he was trying to play through mid-wicket. I’m not sure if I’m alone on this, but every time I see Hughes getting out – and his dismissal in Hobart for Australia A was another one – it just gets uglier and uglier with every replay.
Ponting himself came out with intent, and looked like he was a man on a mission.
Despite getting off the mark with an edge through or over the vacant fourth slip, he played a cracking pull shot that gave a hint of things to come. But then he sparred at one from Jimmy Anderson that he really should have left, only to see Paul Collingwood dive high to his right, to pull in the undisputed catch of the summer.
When Michael Clarke unnecessarily wafted outside off to give Matt Prior catching practice and Tremlett his second wicket, I was starting to wonder at 3/28 if I’d been somehow transported back to Adelaide last week.
It really was déjà vu all over again.
Watson then wore a full ball from Steve Finn on his front toe, and found reason to refer a plumb LBW decision up for another look. Unsurprisingly, and much like Police Academy re runs, the ending didn’t improve with additional views.
Mike Hussey and youngster Steven Smith saw Australia through to lunch, and even looked to be putting together something of a partnership, only for Smith to push forward with hard hands just after lunch, and for Strauss to pocket a handy catch at first slip.
Tremlett, with three of the first five Australian wickets to his name, was having quite the return after several years on the English fringes, and was proving to be a massive handful for the Australian batsmen.
Hussey and Brad Haddin started on yet another rescue mission in the second session, and while both took their time to get going, they had added more than 60 together by the second drinks break of the day.
Hussey was hitting his straps again, and as has been the case all series, was quick to put away anything wayward from Finn. However, he too fell back to old habits, and found himself guiding off-spinner Graeme Swann through to Prior.
Though a noise was definite, Umpire Billy Doctrove ruled not out.
Strauss might have had a mini heart attack when Prior immediately and solely referred the decision upstairs, but Hotspot showed a thick edge, the ‘keeper was excused, and Hussey was on his way.
Haddin and Mitchell Johnson would negotiate Australia into, and then out of the Tea break, with both playing some impressive shots. Johnson took a liking to Swann especially, launching several trademark slog sweeps at and over the midwicket fence.
Shortly after Tea though, Haddin became another to fall victim to the play-a-shot-you’ll-regret-later curse and a lack of footwork saw him parry an Anderson delivery high toward Swann at second slip. Perhaps inspired by Collingwood the teammate or Collingwood the team, Swann took an overhead “speccy” that wouldn’t have looked out of place at the MCG in September.
At 7/189, thoughts of 220 even started becoming difficult.
But the Australian tail would offer a gritty determination, with Johnson and Siddle, and then Siddle and Hilfenhaus taking advantage of the best batting conditions of the first day. Hilfenhaus showed an enterprising array of shots he’s not generally known for, and 220 firstly, and then 250 both came and went in style.
When Swann finally claimed him, most Australian fans around the ground would have been happy with 268, considering the carnage witnessed in the first half of the day.
Strauss and Alistair Cook saw England through to stumps, and they’ll resume today on 0/29.
For Australia, they must make the most of the morning conditions, as did England on Day 1.
For them to have any chance in this match, you’d expect at least three Englishmen would need to back in the pavilion by Lunch.
Ryan Harris looked most likely to break through late last night, and he drew the Strauss deflection that fell short of Ponting. Johnson too, showed good signs of improved action and shape, which admittedly wasn’t setting the bar real high after his Brisbane display. It was good to see him moving the new ball, regardless, and he’ll have to do all that and more for Australia to get their Ashes campaign back on track.
England has shown Australia the way forward in this game, and Day 2 shapes as crucial for the home side.
A result now seems likely in this Third Test, and Australia quite simply must step up to keep this series alive.
Recommend this story.
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (41)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- England win first Test by five wickets (5)
- Gilchrist says his playing days are over
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (42)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Aussie Hussey defends IPL after fix claims (2)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (42)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Brad Haddin must not be selected for Australia again (8)
- Is Australia finally warming to Michael Clarke? (7)


December 17th 2010 @ 5:44am
MyLeftFoot said | December 17th 2010 @ 5:44am | Report comment
and we wondered on what basis Phil Hughes with a 1st class avg of 20 this season got a game,
and got proven right.
and we wondered how a fellow with 4 1st class 100s, and an avg this season of 32 could be called a test number 6,
and got proven right
heck, we wondered why the media seemed to get their way on an underdone Dougie B in Adelaide (thank god he didn’t play in Brisbane)
and got proven right.
Why oh why didn’t the selectors show some respect, to form, to players and to a must with 3rd test in an Ashes series. Why oh why was David Hussey once again ignored, if he’d been walking to the crease at 4 for stuff all yesterday and even a Shaun Marsh has far better current form than Hughes, and importantly, far, far better technique.
December 17th 2010 @ 7:11am
Long On said | December 17th 2010 @ 7:11am | Report comment
I agree completely, what happened yesterday was so predictable yet these selectors could not see it. Sadly most of the media supported Smith and Hughes. The reason for their selection was extremely doubtful and only at a superficial level could you find any justification. Yet they were picked with little controversy, really only on the pages of the Roar was there any disagreement.
We are told what a great thing Shield cricket is and how the quality is so high, yet so often long term form shown at this level counts for nothing. David Hussey looks like following in the footsteps of Jamie Siddons, Stuart Law, Brad Hodge and many others who inexplicably never received the chances they deserved.
It will take a miracle for us to avoid losing now and the crowds that turn up to Sydney and Melbourne will be much smaller because of this. I hope the subsequent financial hole will mean changes are made, though I am not holding my breath. It is getting too hard to watch all of this, I might go and check out the new Baseball league.
December 17th 2010 @ 12:13pm
gazz said | December 17th 2010 @ 12:13pm | Report comment
Hughes was awful. what kinda shot was that?!
December 17th 2010 @ 6:16am
ChrisT said | December 17th 2010 @ 6:16am | Report comment
Getting a bit fed up of articles telling us the Australians are getting themselves out or are suffering with poor form or aren’t getting the rub of the green or are picking the wrong guys blah blah blah. Fact is the English, by playing well, have put the Australian team and selectors under pressure by being better than them. The English are better. Not a hint of an excuse in that is there.
December 17th 2010 @ 7:05am
DingoBob said | December 17th 2010 @ 7:05am | Report comment
Chris
Unfortunately you’ve missed the point. We are Australians and it is not in our convict blood to admit that an Englishman could be better than us at anything.
December 17th 2010 @ 8:34am
Lolly said | December 17th 2010 @ 8:34am | Report comment
Chris, for years the English fans said the same things. In fact, some of them are probably still bitching about Ian Bell or Collingwood’s selection.
December 17th 2010 @ 9:05am
Sports Writer said | December 17th 2010 @ 9:05am | Report comment
Chris T that is a rubbish comment.
Every Aussie can see and knows the English side is better than ours but we can also see our side could be a lot better.
The point is Aussie fans aren’t too happy with the selectors right now because frankly they are making a mess of this campaign.
And the fact is the Aussies ARE in poor form and the Aussies ARE picking the wrong guys.
No one is saying the Poms don’t deserve to win
December 17th 2010 @ 9:47am
Brett McKay said | December 17th 2010 @ 9:47am | Report comment
Chris, I’m not overly thrilled about writing that the Aussies played some shots they might prefer they didn’t, but you saw it yourself yesterday. Yes, England bolwed well, in the first session particularly, bit it was just line and length bowling, there was no vicious swing or seam like what Anderson served up in Adelaide. The fact is they bowled the right line and length to draw the false shots, and apart from Watson, all down to Johnson at least were out playing shots they didn’t need to.
I agree with your point, for what it’s worth, but yesterday was one of those occasions were poor shots did more damage than outstanding bowling…
December 17th 2010 @ 11:09am
soapit said | December 17th 2010 @ 11:09am | Report comment
yeah they’ve put us under pressure but what we are annoyed about is the poor way that the team has responded.
we’ve played teams that are better then us before (not for a long time tho perhaps) but whats expected is that we make a fight of it even if we get beaten.
we should have been able to make the matches a contest for some periods. have we even ‘won’ a session since day 2 of brisbane? thats too much advantage to be saying its just because of one side playing well, the other side must be contibuting also.
and on this i can’t stand how people are saying as soon as the team starts going badly we get on their case. i think if we were losing but making a fight of it the country would be much more behind the team but by ‘losing’ every session and performing at a class below the english in all aspects for 9 days straight now gives us little chance to give them any credit.
December 17th 2010 @ 7:03am
Leftarmspinner said | December 17th 2010 @ 7:03am | Report comment
Great article Brett. I’m not able to watch or listen to the action (thank God) so your detailed description and interpretation is very useful.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
December 17th 2010 @ 10:13am
Junior said | December 17th 2010 @ 10:13am | Report comment
or you can watch 2-3 minute highlights on the news and get pretty much the same “then this happened, then that happened” type of report. they may even throw in a few bonus press conference clips. each to their own leftarmspinner.
December 17th 2010 @ 11:20am
Brett McKay said | December 17th 2010 @ 11:20am | Report comment
cheers Leftie. I guess it’s the times like these when we still keep tabs on the game despite not liking what we see that defines why we all love criket like we do…
December 17th 2010 @ 7:27am
Vinay Verma said | December 17th 2010 @ 7:27am | Report comment
Brett,it is not only Australia’s top order that struggles in helpful conditions. The best batting order in the world struggled yesterday at Centurion. The toss in both cases was critical. Both captains would have bowled first. Yes the Aussie top four could have left the balls alone. But even Gambhir,Dravid,Tendulkar and laxman failed yesterday.
This is a five day match and to writing obituaries (not you) like some broadsheet journos and some posters here is both premature and ill-informed.
There is still enough in the pitch if the aussie bowlers use their brains.By all means bowl a few short ones but it is the followup ball that needs to be executed with skill. Tremlett was superb yesterday. He is not your average plank bofhead quick. He is intelligent and skillfull. Troy cooley should make him compulsory viewing for all the top six excluding Hussey.
December 17th 2010 @ 8:32am
Lolly said | December 17th 2010 @ 8:32am | Report comment
Vinay, Steyn bowled some beautiful stuff though. He’s such a fine bowler. Morkel was a bit wooly to start with but then got up his accuracy.
December 17th 2010 @ 11:49am
Vinay Verma said | December 17th 2010 @ 11:49am | Report comment
Lolly,the point I was making for the benefit of our australian posters was that even the best struggle in helpful conditions and it needs a special bowler to exploit thise conditions. steyn is special…and Tremlett showed he can be special. Can Johnson and Co emulate this?
December 17th 2010 @ 9:41am
Harry said | December 17th 2010 @ 9:41am | Report comment
But Vinay you must admit the Hughes, Clarke and Smith dismissals all showed truly deficient technique, and in Clarke’s case temprament, for Australian test batsmen.
I also saw Ponting and Hussey miss catches yesterday afternoon that should have been taken. So despite the inadequate batting of the top order, the day could have, should have, ended reasonably square with England 2 for 20.
This morning is the last chance and Everything needs to go right for Australia. Already two dropped catches though and Cook looked completely in charge yesterday afternoon.
December 17th 2010 @ 9:43am
Brendon said | December 17th 2010 @ 9:43am | Report comment
Oh, come off it. India have never done well in South Africa and the only reason they can ever beat them in a test at home is when they doctor up a dust top pitch. ie Kanpur in 2008.
December 17th 2010 @ 9:43am
TembaVJ said | December 17th 2010 @ 9:43am | Report comment
Vinay you are spot on with Tremlett, he was awesome yesterday, he sucked in his pray before he struck. His first two wickets fell with a plan.
December 17th 2010 @ 11:14am
soapit said | December 17th 2010 @ 11:14am | Report comment
like a toothless piranha
December 17th 2010 @ 2:42pm
soapit said | December 17th 2010 @ 2:42pm | Report comment
or a bear hunting salmon with a straw
December 17th 2010 @ 9:59am
Brett McKay said | December 17th 2010 @ 9:59am | Report comment
Vinay I did see India were 6/90 at one stage last night, and thought to myself ‘oh well, we’re not alone’..
You’re quite correct though, today is a new day, and the conditions will be very similar again this morning as to yesterday. The Aussie bowlers need to adjust their line quickly, and not get carried away with the bounce and carry. Tremlett yesterday, and Siddle in Brisbane, showed the way to draw out wickets, and that’s all they need to do. There’s no reason why England can’t be drawn into false shots just as easily.
And excellent point on the obituaries too….
December 17th 2010 @ 7:57am
plugger said | December 17th 2010 @ 7:57am | Report comment
My Aussie team (in batting order) would be:
Hodge
Marsh
Voges
Kawajah
M. Hussey (c)
D. Hussey
Haddin (vc)
Okeefe
Lee
Nannes
Dorey
December 17th 2010 @ 9:05am
TheHawk said | December 17th 2010 @ 9:05am | Report comment
Three of those players – Hodge, Lee and Nannes are retired from first-class/test cricket and one (O’Keefe) doesn’t regularly play state cricket.
December 17th 2010 @ 9:44am
Brendon said | December 17th 2010 @ 9:44am | Report comment
And Shaun Marsh doesn’t open in FC cricket anymore.
December 17th 2010 @ 9:52am
chop said | December 17th 2010 @ 9:52am | Report comment
O’Keefe may not play state cricket regularly but he was clearly the best playing from the Australia A game in hobart taking wickets and scoring runs.
The fact is NSW is stacked with good bowling at the moment and it’s showing in their results.
December 17th 2010 @ 9:55am
Fisher Price said | December 17th 2010 @ 9:55am | Report comment
Voges? Dorey? Hilarious.
Lee was crap in his last year of Test cricket. In fact, aside from his first few years, he was never all that.
December 17th 2010 @ 2:50pm
plugger said | December 17th 2010 @ 2:50pm | Report comment
I’d like to see you walk up to Dorey, a 6 feet 9 inch former body guard, and call him “hilarious”.
December 17th 2010 @ 10:23am
Junior said | December 17th 2010 @ 10:23am | Report comment
so nine changes from the current team, only retaining the two players to show any form in the series to date. good stuff harry hindsight? presumably any batsman who doesn’t get a fifty from this fantasy phantom team gets dropped. same goes for any bowler who fails to capture three wickets, yeah? then what happens?
by all means make changes to the team, but by suggesting mass changes, surely you are making a rod for your back if they fail.
December 17th 2010 @ 2:48pm
plugger said | December 17th 2010 @ 2:48pm | Report comment
Yes, nine changes is a mite conservative. I meant 11 changes and would have included Clint McKay and one other batsman, possibly Robinson from WA.
December 17th 2010 @ 8:18am
Jamesb said | December 17th 2010 @ 8:18am | Report comment
I couldn’t believe how loose the Aussie batsmen played, and Huges technic is not suited to an opener. He looks for like a middle order batsman.The batting line-up lacks a couple of experinced quality players, and it showed.
It was a mistake to play 4 seamers, you must select based on 5 days not on 1st innings alone. It is a cardinal sin not to select a spinner. I just don’t think the selectors fell as though Australia has a quality spinner and were prepared to take a gamble. All the great teams have a world class spinner. England presently have two.
Australia is now a mid-table team, not a bad team, but they have fallen back to the 1980′s where they were average to good.
December 17th 2010 @ 9:10am
Sports Writer said | December 17th 2010 @ 9:10am | Report comment
Essentially five seamers with Watson don’t forget.
And with North out and Clarke not 100% I agree a spinner would have been the sensible option
December 17th 2010 @ 12:33pm
Cattledog said | December 17th 2010 @ 12:33pm | Report comment
Since when have we seen anything sensible in the selections!! I’m just grateful I’ve lost satellite connection.
December 17th 2010 @ 8:30am
leftarc said | December 17th 2010 @ 8:30am | Report comment
Two things I saw before a ball being bowled had me shaking my head:
1- When the two teams went back to their sheds after the anthems, the English and Australian teams crossed paths. The Aussies stopped, and the English kept running. Whilst not advocating dropping the shoulder (ok, maybe I am), it was a sign of submission from the Australians.
2- Phil Hughes leaves the dressing room and down the chase onto the ground. In the background, completely oblivious was Boonie (who I think is a selector) munching down on some morno’s. There was no acknowledgement from Boon “OK son, here’s your chance. Go for it”.
It’s going to be long summer.
December 17th 2010 @ 8:37am
Lolly said | December 17th 2010 @ 8:37am | Report comment
leftarc, the Aussie cricket team just doesn’t believe it can win. That was obvious in Adelaide. Actually I thought it was obvious in the second test v India. Mohali kicked the stuffing out of them and the self-belief which was wavering then, has gone.
December 17th 2010 @ 9:46am
Brendon said | December 17th 2010 @ 9:46am | Report comment
On one hand I agree but then again Australia outplayed England in the 1st innings in Brisbane.
December 17th 2010 @ 8:57am
Rickety Knees said | December 17th 2010 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Ponting has lost his Mojo. Clarke is disinterested. Hughes batted like it was backyard cricket and needs a good kick up the arse. There is still a long way to go in this test and the opportunity for redemption. Let us see where we stand at the end of the match – though the omens are not good.
Contrast the difference in the spirit of the two teams and it is not a good look for Australia.
December 17th 2010 @ 11:01am
Marcel Proust said | December 17th 2010 @ 11:01am | Report comment
Hi Rickety,
I think you mean “uninterested”. “Disinterested” means something different: impartial. The umpire is disinterested, for he has no interest in the outcome.
Apart from that, keep up the good work.
December 17th 2010 @ 11:07am
Rickety Knees said | December 17th 2010 @ 11:07am | Report comment
I stand corrected – thanks MP
December 17th 2010 @ 12:36pm
Cattledog said | December 17th 2010 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
Maybe Clarke is disinterested!!
December 17th 2010 @ 9:13am
Fisher Price said | December 17th 2010 @ 9:13am | Report comment
So Punter’s just unlucky then?
I would have thought his cricketing weaknesses were being laid bare approaching the age of 37.
December 17th 2010 @ 11:17am
Brett McKay said | December 17th 2010 @ 11:17am | Report comment
Fisher, tell me you got past the first line before drawing that conclusion?
December 17th 2010 @ 9:25am
jameswm said | December 17th 2010 @ 9:25am | Report comment
Haddin really drives me nuts. It’s one thing to bat in a positive manner, but he just threw his wicket away to a wild shot, after he was set.
As I said over and over, Hughes’ technique has holes big enough to drive a bus through. Picking him was an emotional decision. Smith I think is a terrific cricketer and a bright prospect, but he was not what the middle order needed. I think they picked him because they were planning on playing 4 (5) quicks, and they needed his leggies.
Hussey got a good ball, Watson a pretty good one though he should have dug it out. Ponting and Clarke should be ashamed of themselves.
I wonder if we lose this, then say draw in Melb and the series is lost – if the selectors will consider completely revamping the side and going for something like this – they’d probably wait till after the series before drastic changes I guess
1. Watson
2. Khawaja
3. Ponting
4. Ferguson
5. MHussey
6. Smith
7. Haddin
8. O’Keefe
9. Harris
10. Copeland
11. Best performed of Hilfy/Johnson
December 17th 2010 @ 9:58am
Rickety Knees said | December 17th 2010 @ 9:58am | Report comment
How could you leave Ponting in the side in that situation JWM?
December 17th 2010 @ 10:40am
jameswm said | December 17th 2010 @ 10:40am | Report comment
on the basis that relieved of his captaincy, he would rediscover his world class batting form. I’d rather him bat lower than 3 though.
December 17th 2010 @ 11:48am
Fisher Price said | December 17th 2010 @ 11:48am | Report comment
Ponting should have moved down to five when it was apparent he was struggling badly with the short ball against the West Indies. By the that point, the decline was clear.
I think the horse has bolted now.