What is wrong with Australian Cricket?
By gwynne, 2 Jan 2011 gwynne is a Roar Rookie
Related coverage
In all of the post-mortems into Australia’s dismal attempt to regain the Ashes it appears that the blame has been sheeted home to the Captain, the batsmen and the selectors. Very little attention has been paid to the critical issues hindering the development of both our batsmen and bowlers at the second and third levels of the game and our failed preparation.
Domestic season
The Sheffield Shield competition has been undermined by Cricket Australia’s greed and the obligations they have committed to under the Future Tours Program.
The early season should be the most intense level of the Sheffield Shield Competition with players country wide vying for international selection against the best of the best. All of our outbound tours should be in the February to April period including those to the sub-continent.
Cricketers, like all other athletes, need a proper pre-season in order to perform at their optimum. ustralia’s pre-season was shortened by the unfortunate 2-test tour of India in October. More than this though, the players at lower levels of the game should be training with the national team players in the pre-season especially our up and coming state players much like our Wallabies complete their pre-season with the Super 14/15 teams.
Following the pre-season, our best players need the opportunity to fine tune their games on pitches that best resemble the conditions they are going to face throughout the Summer.
All Sheffield Shield Matches should be held in the country’s test venues. NSW recently played Queensland at Blacktown Olympic Park. The benefit gained from taking the game to the people of NSW of which I imagine less than 100 turned up each day is far less than the possible experience lost by the Queenslanders when they’re asked to step up to national level in future SCG tests.
The changes to the one-day Ryobi Cup competition have also been a complete failure and this competition now represents a distraction with no meaningful practice for one-day international competition.
With the elevation of the Twenty20 Big Bash to main event, one can’t help but feel that this competition is set to be significantly shaved, especially in a non-world cup year to a single round robin competition.
The review of the Sheffield Shield competition will reportedly result in the removal of the final. This may be viewed as a win in the context of the rumoured reduction to 8 games mentioned earlier in the Summer. It is the Sheffield Shield that has been the basis of our success for 20 years. The competition needs significantly improved scheduling as it has been undermined by the lack of international players for too many seasons.
Schedule improvements may actually occur as a result of the introduction of the extended Big Bash in January forcing games to either extremity of the season where more players will be available.
Summer International Timeline
The one-day international portion of the Summer now needs to be completed in as short of a timeframe as possible and prior to the first test. A week between the end of those games and the first test will also allow for another Shield match and more fine tuning. Twenty20 should be left for the end of the International summer so that it in no way interferes with test match preparation and also allows the best of the Big Bash their opportunity for a call up.
Ideally the Schedule would look something like:
October – 4 Sheffield Shield games, 4 Ryobi Cup
November – 1 Ryobi Cup (and final) then 2 weeks of one-day internationals (6-8 games), then 1 Sheffield Shield, then 1st test
December – 3 or 4 tests (depending on 5 or 6 test Summer)
January – 1 Test, Big Bash
February – Big Bash, Twenty 20 Internationals, 1 Sheffield Shield, start of overseas tour to SA/NZ/WI/Subcontinent
March – 3 Sheffield Shield, Overseas tour to SA/NZ/WI/Subcontinent
Grade Cricket
Grade cricket needs to be re-evaluated to ensure all of the development needs of players are met. The Sydney Grade competition this Summer has 10 two-day games. This is 5 less than in the late 90’s and should not be underestimated as a contributor to our batting woes. The patience learned batting for a full day without the run-rate pressure of limited overs cricket holds batsmen in good stead for stepping up through the levels.
An undermined Sheffield Shield competition also reduces the number of elite players playing in the grade competitions around the country.
It is vital that Cricket Australia get the balance right in their domestic scheduling and the finalisation of the 2014-2020 Future Tours Program. The ideal preparation for our players in each form of the game needs to be focused on and some specialisation of the calendar with the appropriate form of the international game following an intense period of Domestic cricket in that same form.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Australia needs to bench Nathan Lyon for Ashes success (84)
- Usman Khawaja’s case for selection (78)
- DIZZY: Australian bowlers look the goods for the Ashes (76)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (58)
- Who will Sam Robson represent: Australia or England? (47)
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (41)
- Rogers’ 214 gives Aussies Ashes boost (40)
- David Warner and Australian cricket’s ‘Siege Mentality’ (17)
- Could Bird be the difference in the Ashes? (19)
- Warner targets media in Twitter rant (4)
- Strauss wants Pietersen fit for Ashes
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (43)
- HENRY: Oh no, cricket is in a spot of bother, again… (8)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (67)
Recommend this story.

January 2nd 2011 @ 10:33am
jamesb said | January 2nd 2011 @ 10:33am | Report comment
Cricket Australia should be blamed for where Australian cricket is currently, at the moment.
I’d probably put a shield game in december.
January 2nd 2011 @ 2:27pm
Will said | January 2nd 2011 @ 2:27pm | Report comment
Australian cricket is just going through a low-cycle in its development. Go back and look at the history of how the Australian sides has performed over 100 years and there are always peaks and troughs.
The young players that will take Australia forward need time to develop, mature and master their skills. Sacking coachs, selectors, captains really wont have any long-term effect.
The public needs to accept this is going to be a work in progress and that there are a few more years of disappointment.
January 2nd 2011 @ 7:27pm
Republican said | January 2nd 2011 @ 7:27pm | Report comment
I still blame the truncated versions of cricket for the demise of not only Australian Test Cricket but Test Cricket around the globe. This has been further evidenced by the very poor performance of the Australian side which with all respect, made the English look far better than they really are.
The old guard are now dropping their guard which is to be expected, while the new breed of player coming through our grass roots ranks are clearly coached to play T20 and ODI, as opposed to Test Cricket.
Why – money, supply and demand, a fickle consumer lacking any appreciation and patience for the subtlety the five day game offers. We are indeed a dumbed down prosaic culture that only responds to quantity rather than quality, or in this case the crass sensationalism and non stop ‘action’ that is T20 in particular. We as the public are the reason the Australian Cricket side has performed as they have – NOT punter, the selectors or anyone else for that matter.
If you look at the Australian Test side and what the selectors have at their disposal, it is a pool of young talent groomed to play the slog game. These new breed lack the discipline and skill required to endure and sustain the rigor of a five day international test.
Test Cricket will die despite the English sides dominance in this current Ashes series. They too are succumbing to the devolution of the Test to the new cross batting slog that dominates cricket culture around the world, producing bowlers just like those of the current Australian side. These bowlers are coached to bowl in sanitized conditions that only contain the agricultural batting foe, as opposed to having the adaptability and skill set to bowl a competent straight down the line batsman OUT, subject to the ever changing conditions Test Cricket demands over a full five days.
Their seems to be a clear trend in Test Cricket that sees the contest over by day 3.5, which exposes the true calibre of player gracing the international cricket pitches of today.
Cheers.
January 2nd 2011 @ 7:55pm
westy said | January 2nd 2011 @ 7:55pm | Report comment
Mobile players 6ft 7 in/6ft 5in/ 6ft 4 in / are playing AFL not bowling for Australia.
January 5th 2011 @ 1:17am
Koops said | January 5th 2011 @ 1:17am | Report comment
Sounds like a Sydney rugby leagueish thing to say, blame the AFL for everything, i have posted some links below, no doubt you will agree with them.
January 3rd 2011 @ 9:49am
Republican said | January 3rd 2011 @ 9:49am | Report comment
westy
Yeah right, they are also playing Basketball truth be told but there is much more to building a well balanced cricket side than simply possessing the stalker element.
Australian batting has been woeful for years despite promising much and if anything our bowlers had managed to carry successive sides lack of batting discipline – until now.
Scapegoating Australian Footy, however tongue in cheek is unhelpful and unlikely to have any influence in derailing Australian Footballs preeminence in this country.
I have just returned from Townsville where the game is going from strength to strength at the grassroots. Even my inherited League family are encouraging their kids to take up the game, fathers included, as they see the value in offering their lads a compromise between sooky Soccer and barbaric League.
Here’s to 2011 and the building of the brand GWS – westy.
January 4th 2011 @ 9:33am
formeropenside said | January 4th 2011 @ 9:33am | Report comment
One of the interesting things about the Shield is Brendan Nash. A Queenslander who never quite made it, and is now the vice captain of the WI with a couple of Test tons, and a 90-odd against Australia last summer.
I am sure there are problems with the current Shield format – and I’d love to see it telecast, and the Test players turning out for their sides – but then someone like Nash makes me think that perhaps the problem is with the selectors. Over the last few years Nash has a higher Test batting average than Ponting or Clarke, and yet he would never have been chosen to replace them in the side (unless he played for NSW, perhaps).
January 4th 2011 @ 10:18am
Koops said | January 4th 2011 @ 10:18am | Report comment
Well according to this Sydney centric “author” it’s all the AFL’s fault.
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/the-afl-is-to-blame-for-the-alarming-lack-of-newcomers-20110101-19ch3.html.
But he does have form in this area.
http://www.smh.com.au/afl/afl-news/afl-is-a-deadend-sport-that-hinders-us-on-global-stage-20100626-zaqz.html
Nice work from the sports editor of the SMH !.
Normal people would argue that it is cricket’s responsibility to step up, rather than the AFL to step down, also it would be interesting to see where cricket would be now without it’s partnership at metro and rural level with football, not to mention what the MCG would look like.
January 4th 2011 @ 11:46am
Koops said | January 4th 2011 @ 11:46am | Report comment
Further to that, what would the Gabba look like, and look at these state by state participation rates for cricket (expressed as a percentage) for males over 15 from the 2006 census
NSW 3.0%
Vic 4.8%
Qld 2.6%
SA 4.7%
WA 4.6%
Tas 4.5%
notice the pattern?
January 4th 2011 @ 4:06pm
formeropenside said | January 4th 2011 @ 4:06pm | Report comment
Well, the Gabba would be much better off without the AFL playing there at all, and still being a real cricket ground with a Hill and a scoreboard.
January 4th 2011 @ 6:12pm
Koops said | January 4th 2011 @ 6:12pm | Report comment
With or without the dog track.
January 6th 2011 @ 7:02am
formeropenside said | January 6th 2011 @ 7:02am | Report comment
Doesn’t matter really, does it? The dog track was always some nice additional seating.
January 6th 2011 @ 5:01pm
Koops said | January 6th 2011 @ 5:01pm | Report comment
Most people would say the dog track was a dogs breakfast, there is plenty more seating now, but i do tend to agree with you regarding a hill.
January 4th 2011 @ 6:31pm
Koops said | January 4th 2011 @ 6:31pm | Report comment
The SCG upgrades recently were built moreso on the back of the Swans rather than one test and a few one dayers every year.
January 4th 2011 @ 6:51pm
punter said | January 4th 2011 @ 6:51pm | Report comment
It’s amazing, you go to the RL, RU, cricket & football tabs & the AFL media men are everywhere
January 5th 2011 @ 1:19am
Koops said | January 5th 2011 @ 1:19am | Report comment
Gee thanks, you think i am that good, but more to the point, and at least i do have one, cricket may well be in a far worse position if football did not partner it across many areas, Blacktown football/cricket is one such area that cricket benifits from partnering football, and may never have been built if this partnership did not exist.