Essendon Bombers hit hard in opening round
By Leigh Eustace, 29 Mar 2011 Leigh Eustace is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- 2011 AFL season, AFL, Brendan McCartney, Essendon, Essendon Bombers, Jack Riewoldt, james hird, Mark Thompson, Sean Wellman, Simon Goodwin, Western Bulldogs
Related coverage
The message from the weekend’s AFL opening round is the same relayed to Gaddafi’s armed forces last week: “Gentlemen, the Bombers have arrived.”
Whilst many praise the efforts of prodigal son James Hird’s return to the club on their sudden revival, it’s clear that the entire football departmental turnaround has indeed turned the Dons from perennial chump to potential champs.
Make no mistake; the influence of Hird is there for all to see.
However, combined with the stamp of two-time premiership coach Mark Thompson, the underrated abilities of Simon Goodwin, fresh out of the game, as well as Sean Wellman and Brendan McCartney clearly offering an upgrade on those previous, Essendon has the tools to make the penultimate weekend of football this year no doubt.
One should never jump to drastic conclusions after Round 1, but the way the red and black disarmed the highly credentialed Western Bulldogs and then went about embarrassing them to the tune of 75 points, to the extent Rodney Eade was left simply bereft of options to stop them, justifies the hype.
And while the Dogs were missing Lake and Gilbee, you could argue that Essendon were missing four of the best 22 in Gumbleton, Slattery, Welsh and Pears.
That fact also adds another layer to the excitement, not only did they win, and win well, but they have good players on the sidelines, who may not be able to crack the senior side once fit.
Premiership sides, they win with depth, good players missing out. The Pies had that last year, they won the big dance, and the Bombers look to have a similar predicament in 2011.
Good signs at Bomberland.
On those Magpies, they must have a strong left leg – they spent two hours Saturday afternoon with the clutch pedal depressed, important because had they had lifted they would have definitely stalled – the reigning premier was idling.
Sure the Power offered resistance with a run on in the third quarter, but to win by 75 points without playing their best has to send shudders down the spines, especially the backbones of those who played Friday night.
We say ‘played’, but for three quarters the scoreboard attendants were hardly required, a sad night for the game. Sure a close game can be likened as a good game, but a good game it weren’t, and questions need to be asked of the two teams who barely participated.
One supposedly on the way down after two flags in three years followed by a demolishing by Collingwood in last year’s prelim, the other destined to fall so close with two grand final losses and a draw in three recent attempts.
The Cats have definitely lost that intimidation, they’re slower, and once you’re beatable, you’ll be quickly overtaken in this caper.
For the Saints, well they weren’t good enough to beat the 2011 Geelong, and whilst two big men down, it was in other areas, particularly north of the middle that they suffered, too Riewoldt-concsious and nowhere near creative enough.
Both teams look top four by default, not ability at this stage.
Adelaide, however, made a statement Saturday as someone to challenge the top four, they’ll win enough at home to make the eight, and offer enough raw talent that they’ll scare a few clubs on the eastern seaboard.
Hawthorn were disappointing, and where fans were hoping a return to the 2008 form would just be served up again on whim and a prayer, unfortunately, and evidently not surprisingly, it seems more of the same 2009, 2010 underachievement.
Just perhaps they really did steal that flag three years ago as opposed to peaking too early. Perhaps.
Melbourne has improved, their supporters can justifiably hold hope for a decent 2011, as can the Eagles fans, there is definite encouragement from the kids who have gotten those 20-30 games under the belt.
North Melbourne will rue injuries this year and 2011 might pass them by before they know it even started. Fremantle will be inconsistent again, that looks a certainty (although with the purple haze when is it any different?) and Richmond still looks a few key parts short.
Thursday night saw Carlton as the third of the big three Melbourne clubs to win on opening weekend, but whilst the Pies looked scarily good, and the Dons looked destined to challenge them, the Blues sadly again might disappoint after so many rewards for so much mediocrity last decade.
On paper, fully fit, this should be the time for those down at Royal Parade. But alas, one Taswegian Coleman medallist was able to lift his heavily underdeveloped team into a position where they could have snatched the four points.
Jack Riewoldt is a superstar of this league, but if the Blues want to be taken seriously, and if Brett Ratten wants to avoid the Centrelink queue in the next nine months, then this is the time they started serving something up, we’ve been smelling what they’ve been cooking for so long I’m concerned the food’s, and indeed their chances, been burnt.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
AFL articles
- Giants prepare to christen new AFL home (201)
- Could an AFL player make it in the NRL? (84)
- My colleagues are wrong: AFL State of Origin is a terrible idea (81)
- What AFL can learn from other sports (73)
- GWS Giants deserves more credit (71)
- Wagga residents, Canberra Raiders furious about GWS grant (62)
- The most even AFL season in years (61)
- Criticising coaches is a delicate business (0)
- Western Bulldogs vs Geelong: AFL live scores, blog (137)
- Mid-season draft opens up land of opportunity (5)
- Herald Sun footy will lose readers from pay wall (27)
- Introduce a mid-season AFL trade period (6)
- Contenders and pretenders for the AFL wooden spoon (17)
- Wagga residents, Canberra Raiders furious about GWS grant (63)
- Explore:
- 2011 AFL season, AFL, Brendan McCartney, Essendon, Essendon Bombers, Jack Riewoldt, james hird, Mark Thompson, Sean Wellman, Simon Goodwin, Western Bulldogs


March 29th 2011 @ 10:47am
TomC said | March 29th 2011 @ 10:47am | Report comment
Bombers will miss the finals.
They had plenty of good wins last season (Hawks, Saints and Dogs, off the top of my head) but ulitimately their list wasn’t good enough to get any consistency. I don’t see how that has changed this season.
The first game for a new coach is almost never a good indication of how their career is going to go.
March 29th 2011 @ 10:52am
Art Sapphire said | March 29th 2011 @ 10:52am | Report comment
TomC – how do you know the list isn’t ‘t good enough if last year’s coach was not good enough to get 100% out of his players and was tactically inept.
Conclusion – Bombers will be a much better team this season and will be contenders to make the finals.
March 29th 2011 @ 3:47pm
TomC said | March 29th 2011 @ 3:47pm | Report comment
…and how do you know the list is good enough?
I don’t think Matthew Knights was a good coach either, but the test of coaches is how they go over a couple of seasons, not one pre-season and round one.
Or have we forgotten Tim Watson and Michael Voss so quickly?
The Essendon that beat the Bulldogs on Sunday was still effectively the same side that struggled for consistency last season. If Hird truly is the budding coaching genius certain wide-eyed Essendon supporters would have us believe, it will in fact take him a couple of seasons at least to make his mark on the team.
It is ridiculous to suggest that we can discard everything we know about this team now that they’ve changed their coach. In fact, Essendon on Sunday looked a lot like Essendon at their best over the last couple of seasons.
What we know about this bunch of players is that they produce occasionally brilliant displays, but tend to lose games they should win.
But hey, I hope Art and Redb are right. The Bombers look great when they’re playing well and it would be exciting to see them in the finals.
March 29th 2011 @ 4:32pm
Art Sapphire said | March 29th 2011 @ 4:32pm | Report comment
TomC – with Thompson as his wingman, Hird has huge advantage as a new coach.
Yes, the trick is to make the players perform consistently.
In the end its coaching that wins premierships.
The cattle Collingwood had on the park was not that much better than the other sides in the comp.
So, in that respect, Knights was never going to be a premiership coach.
Let see where the Bombers are sitting after the Anzac Day match.
March 30th 2011 @ 10:11am
Redb said | March 30th 2011 @ 10:11am | Report comment
Tom C,
As I noted before I’ve seen them 4 times this year already and there is a huge difference in defensive game plan and discipline which did not exist in 2010. Most importantly a big improvement in kicking skills, still not in the Collingwood class just yet though.
Yes offensively the Bombers beat plenty of finals sides but also got blown away at times (2010) purely becuase there was only one side to the game.
The list has been improved on (Heppell, Crameri, Hibberd), very fit, fewer injuries and a side that made the finals in 2009. All thigns considered given the improvement barring injury tehre is no reason to think Essendon are not goodenouigh to be a top 8 side this year.
Knights got sacked for a lot of reasons, but clearly one of them was that he had the list which was good enough to beat top 4 teams and make the finals but could not develop a holistic game plan and fell enough dramaticially in 2010.
Nothing is guaranteed, it is early days but all thigns considered they are better than a even money bet to make the finals this year.
March 30th 2011 @ 11:45am
TomC said | March 30th 2011 @ 11:45am | Report comment
Redb, perhaps the view at Essendon was that they had a list that was good enough to make the finals and be regularly competitive against the top 4, but I don’t think that was the popular view.
After all, in the 2009 season you reference, they finished eighth with 10 wins and got absolutely belted by the Crows. And that has been their only final since 2004.
Its hard to make objective judgements about lists, but frankly on paper Essendon really don’t look very impressive. Certainly names like Heppell, Crameri and Hibberd probably aren’t keeping Mick Malthouse awake at night.
Neither would Gumbleton, Slattery, Welsh and Pears, listed in the article as being (apparently) in their best 22.
March 30th 2011 @ 11:52am
Redb said | March 30th 2011 @ 11:52am | Report comment
TomC,
Firstly, if you are going to benchmark the Bombers against the Pies every time your are not serious with your comments.
The Bombers went into that Crows final without several players due to injury and suspension. I was there at AAMI I know exactly what happened and why. The fact is they still made the 8 after a stirring victory against premiers Hawthorn at the MCG the week before.
You said they would not make the 8 but this list already has, it has improved, they will make the 8.
March 30th 2011 @ 1:14pm
TomC said | March 30th 2011 @ 1:14pm | Report comment
Well, if there aren’t eight other sides good enough to win at least eleven games, then maybe Essendon will make it.
Hell, maybe they will anyway. I’m not saying its impossible. I’m just saying the optimism surrounding the Dons at the moment is based on a good pre-season, one win and a fairytale.
And your argument, Redb, is logically inconsistent. It is ridiculous to claim that the best result in the Knights years is the true reflection of the side, and that the other seasons were aberrations caused by bad coaching.
March 30th 2011 @ 2:11pm
Redb said | March 30th 2011 @ 2:11pm | Report comment
TomC,
Please find the quote where I said this: “It is ridiculous to claim that the best result in the Knights years is the true reflection of the side, and that the other seasons were aberrations caused by bad coaching”
Never said anything like that. A lot of factors in 2010 (one season Tom) contributed to Essendon finishing 14th which is below par for this side. Knights had to get the chop.
The point you’ved missed is that the list is not too bad and with better coaching & game plan and spirit they will in all likelihood reach the 8 this year. 2012 and onwards the next step hopefully.
March 30th 2011 @ 5:00pm
TomC said | March 30th 2011 @ 5:00pm | Report comment
2005, 06, 07 and 08 were also ‘one season’. Combined with 2010 they make five of the last six seasons where the Bombers have missed the eight and six straight where they’ve lost more games than they’ve won.
I’m not quite sure how to respond to your challenge. After all, you were the one who raised the example of 2009, a season when they were coached by the maligned Matthew Knights. You’re the one basing your opinion of the Bombers’ list on that season, rather than any of the others. I’d have thought it was obvious that you’re being highly selective with your evidence.
I prefer to base my opinion of teams on what they’ve accomplished and on what I see. This team has not accomplished anything and so far I haven’t seen anything markedly different from previous seasons. There’s plenty of time left in this season for me to be convinced.
March 29th 2011 @ 11:19am
Redb said | March 29th 2011 @ 11:19am | Report comment
TomC,
Wanna bet?
How many Essendon games have you been to this year? I’ve seen them 4 times first hand and its no fluke they beat the Dogs.
The Bombers have always had the talent in offence, but lacked a defensive game plan and motivated work ethic.
They are not Top 4 material on the evidence to date they will need to keep improving and win away from home, but they certainly appear good enough to make the finals.
March 29th 2011 @ 2:04pm
The_Wookie said | March 29th 2011 @ 2:04pm | Report comment
to be fair the Bulldogs are crap
March 29th 2011 @ 2:21pm
Redb said | March 29th 2011 @ 2:21pm | Report comment
Are they? or were they made to look crap?
Top 4 side last 2-3 years.
I was at the game, they applied a lot of pressure but were just undone by the speed of ball movement and tenacity of the Bombers midfielders.
People forget how important Hille is to Essendon, he was injured for much of 2010. Ryder had a poor 2010. Together they are a good combo.
March 29th 2011 @ 12:10pm
Wayno said | March 29th 2011 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
I’ve thought for a while now the Bulldogs have been a bit over rated by the Melbourne media pundits. Certain finalists for sure but I just don’t think they’re as good a side as everyone keeps saying they are.
March 29th 2011 @ 1:57pm
MyLeftFoot said | March 29th 2011 @ 1:57pm | Report comment
Hard to argue with that after such a meek performance.
Lake to come back in, midfield should lift, but otherwise, hard to see how this team can be competitive against Collingwood at the moment (let alone other top 4 aspirants).
March 29th 2011 @ 1:49pm
BW said | March 29th 2011 @ 1:49pm | Report comment
Flashback! Flashback! Round 1 2008 under new coach Matthew Knights the Bombers smash top-4 from 2007 North Melbourne by 55 points! Bombers are flying up the ladder baby! Come season end, Bombers finished what? 12th?
Come on… it is round 1. Making predictions now and hailing the conquering hero Hird is a very premature.
Having said that, if the Bombers keep this up the Anzac day match will be a cracker!
March 29th 2011 @ 1:57pm
Redb said | March 29th 2011 @ 1:57pm | Report comment
Just becuase the media think history repeats does not mean it will. In fact the Herald Sun has gone out of its way to protray Essendon as going over the top.
The club, coaches and most sensible fans see improvement and know more is needed. But top 8 looked only a possiblity prior to the season, it now looks much more likely all things being equal, eg: injuries,etc.
March 29th 2011 @ 5:51pm
AlfredC said | March 29th 2011 @ 5:51pm | Report comment
A lot of Geelong circa 2007 about the Bombers. Every player had at least 10 touches except L-Murray who was the sub.
Over 10 individual goal kickers. Lots of corridor prescience.
I’m not sure what James Hird has brought?
March 30th 2011 @ 9:37am
TomC said | March 30th 2011 @ 9:37am | Report comment
Kind of a big call, Alfred. Geelong of 2007 were one of the most dominant teams of the decade.
Its worth noting that Geelong made a preliminary final in 04 and a semi-final in 05, narrowly beaten in both games.
They were a much more accomplished side than the Bombers are now.
Whatever Hird has brought, it isn’t 22 new players and a history of recent success.
March 29th 2011 @ 8:50pm
Trev said | March 29th 2011 @ 8:50pm | Report comment
Essendon wont make the 8. They beat us (the Bulldogs) and St.kilda last year with Knights in charge and were’nt a top 8 side then. So Essendon supporters just enjoy this little period while you can cause 2011 will turn sour enough for you soon enough.