Can the wilting Waratahs defeat the rampant Reds?
By Spiro Zavos, 18 Apr 2011 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
134 Have your say

NSW Waratahs Benn Robinson scores a try despite pressure from the Queensland Reds Scott Higginbotham and Van Humphries during their Super Rugby match at ANZ Stadium, Sydney. (AAP Image/Dean Lewins).
On Saturday night, the Reds play the Waratahs in what should be a decisive match in their run to become winners of the Australian conference. The Waratahs need a victory to give them a chance of staying in the race. Both teams need the points to make them finals contenders in the two other conferences.
The pool round of matches is a bit like the practice rounds of a Grand Prix. The teams are essentially playing for pole position in the finals.
The way it works in this year’s new Super Rugby format is that one team from each conference automatically gets one of the six finals positions. The next-highest teams in the rankings, regardless of conference, make the finals.
Now we get to the tricky point. The first two conference winners with the highest points tally are ranked one and two for the finals. These teams go straight through to home semi-finals. The third-ranked conference winner plays at home against number six on the table. Four and five play the other quarter final.
The highest-ranked side gets the home final.
This sounds slightly more complicated than it really is. The idea is that each conference automatically hosts a finals match, no matter how few points one of the conference winners might accrue.
The system enhances the conference format, as does the fact that each conference side plays its opposition conference sides twice, home and away.
Which brings us (at last, I hear some gasping) to next Saturday night’s match at Suncorp Stadium.
The Reds go into this match having won six straight matches, the first time the franchise has achieved this since 1996.
More importantly, they have defeated all four of their South African opponents. It’s a remarkable achievement which suggests the team has the necessary strength in its set pieces (a South African specialty) to mount a strong challenge to win the Super Rugby tournament for the first time.
The point here is that the championship-winning sides invariably have packs that are strong in set pieces and which hunt together in the loose to set up situations for their backs to exploit. Forwards win trophies, not backs.
Another impressive aspect of the Reds this season is that they are capable of playing in different styles to defeat oppositions with different skills.
Against the Stormers at Cape Town two weeks ago, the Reds kicked for position a lot. The point here is that the Stormers are a mobile side, with a huge and effective running back row and a winger, Bryan Habana, who is a lethal short range finisher.
Yet the Stormers couldn’t get their power running game going or set Habana loose because they were playing from deep most of the game.
Against the Bulls on Saturday night, the Reds hardly kicked at all. Quade Cooper put in one chip kick in the first half and one kick for touch in the second half. Will Genia’s kicks were little dinks over the ruck while attacking, to allow Luke Morahan, particularly, to re-gather and burst away.
As the Highlanders showed in their splendid victory against the Bulls in Pretoria, if a side can keep the ball in hand and move it wide with a accuracy and pace, the Bulls are liable to run out of puff. I call this tactic ‘the running of the Bulls.’
The Reds played this game brilliantly. Which brings me to an interesting difference between them and the Waratahs. The Reds seem to be able to work out effective game plans which the players are prepared to put into place.
In other words, they’re a coachable side (a point that Ewen McKenzie makes in most game interviews), with a smart coaching team that has a grasp of rugby fundamentals in working out their game plans.
I reckon they will play the same sort of ball-in-hand game that upset the Bulls against the Waratahs. And the reason for this is that the Waratahs, like the Bulls, have a strong pack that lacks aerobic fitness.
The one question mark about the Reds is that so far this season they haven’t played a New Zealand side. The four they are scheduled to play won’t be easy. But their two toughest matches – the Blues and the Crusaders – will be played at home, a bonus given the Reds’ current streak at Suncorp.
The best that can be said about the Waratahs is that they have defeated all four of their Australian conference rivals.
They have lost two out of three matches against New Zealand sides, with the Crusaders thrashing them and the Blues demolishing them in the first half of last Saturday’s contest. They also are yet to play in South Africa, where their opponents are the Sharks at Durban and the Bulls at Pretoria.
But the Waratahs are not a coachable side, in that you cannot discern a game plan that adapts to the strengths and weaknesses of their particular opponents. A combination of factors may be at play.
The team has a culture of entitlement, with senior players rarely dropped despite poor form, that has defied the efforts of good coaches like Bob Dwyer and Ewen McKenzie to break.
I don’t have confidence that Chris Hickey and his assistant Michael Foley have the nous or the confidence to change things, or to put game plans in place against strong sides. The side has too many aspects of the flat track bully for my liking.
I also believe that the coaching staff made a major mistake in bulking up its loose forwards to the extent that they lack the mobility to enhance a ball-in-hand game, if the Waratahs wanted to play this style.
The coaches don’t understand that New Zealand adage, “The pace of the forwards is the pace of the fastest forward.”
The Waratahs simply do not have a fast flanker since Phil Waugh started to bulk up five years ago. And it shows. Attacks that would be carried on with a support flanker making a telling catch and pass simply die out, or the ball is kicked away.
The impact that Beau Robinson, a Waratahs discard, has had on the Reds is a case in point.
My fearless prediction from all of this is that although the Reds are entering uncharted waters in seeking their seventh successive victory, and despite the risk of potential records unsettling sides, they will have too much momentum, energy, skill and motivation for the Waratahs.
Can the wilting Waratahs defeat the rampant Reds? I don’t think so.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.


April 18th 2011 @ 7:33am
Short-Blind said | April 18th 2011 @ 7:33am | Report comment
Spiro – good analysis that I totally agree with. Most of the points you make were evident at the start of the season despite the Reds opening loss (slow out of the blocks). I go back to my statement made last year. The Tahs cannot win a comp without a world class 10 and a better coach and on field leader. Also their forwards tend to go missing against the top sides. Proven again on the weekend Beale is just not a world class 10 (at present at least) and his attacking game has been cramped by putting him in there. Waugh has been too slow for a couple of season’s now and only plays 60 min anyway. How can your captain only play 60? He shouldn’t be in the team and the non-replacement and sentimental selection of this ‘warrior leader’ hurts them. Replacement captains are thin on the ground. Mumm is not a captain and barely up to S15 standard as a player. Barnes is the best thinker but gets injured too often. Hickey has been a disappointment in that he has been unable to change the ‘valiant losing’ culture of the Tahs (against the top sides and in semis etc) . The Tahs need a real clean out but it won’t happen. The Reds may win a couple of titles before the Tahs sort out their issues.
April 18th 2011 @ 7:34am
mikeylives said | April 18th 2011 @ 7:34am | Report comment
I think you are overcomplicating the Waratahs woes a bit Spiro – Aerobic fitness, too bulky, slowest forward, game plans? All these factors mean nothing if the team has no enthusiasm. In the first half against the Blues, there was no team aggression and no contesting of the ball. Two or 3 guys just standing at the ruck like a rugby league play-of-the-ball : What did they expect would happen – They got smacked.
In contrast, Qld are a team of players that are prepared to put it on the line for their mates.
April 18th 2011 @ 7:37am
Geoff Brisbane said | April 18th 2011 @ 7:37am | Report comment
Maybe they should pinch a couple of players from somewhere i.e NZ.
Still they did wallop the Reds early in the season so anything could happen
So if I have it right and they change the coach, no 10 and a couple of forwards they should be right. And get a new captain.
Doesn’t seem too hard really.
April 18th 2011 @ 7:45am
Dave said | April 18th 2011 @ 7:45am | Report comment
If the Reds play intelligent rugby this week, they will win.
The one concern they may have is that the Tahs have the metal edge over them. The Reds froze up in the first match. They ran one out which allowed the NSW defence to smash them, and also put in many aimless kicks. They played more like the Brumbies and Force than the Reds (side note – Sunday’s match between those two was like watching a couple of geriatrics fight over the remote control. They both wanted it – but it was painfully obvious that neither had the faintest idea how to change the channel even when they had it!).
Although the Tahs defence against mediocre attacking sides is solid – against a team that offloads and changes the direction of attack at speed – they have no answer. The Blues used the same tactics as the Crusaders and were able to to make big inroads at will,
The Reds, Stormers, Blues and Crusaders are the only teams in the competition that have the skill set across the team to play in that fashion. The Tahs (like the Bulls) have a couple of highly talented individuals who can pull off miracles that can win matches – but not the title.
The question is whether or not the Reds get nervous and go into their shell. If they do – NSW can definitely win. If they play naturally and without fear – then they will win comfortably.
April 18th 2011 @ 7:48am
ohtani's jacket said | April 18th 2011 @ 7:48am | Report comment
All it will take is a couple of Waratah wins and a couple of Red losses and opinion will swing back the other way. Remember when the Waratahs were frontrunners and McKenzie was being criticised for forcing his stodgy gameplan on the Reds? Even Rod Macqueen’s genius is on holiday this week. Like sans through the hourglass so are the days of the Roar.
April 18th 2011 @ 8:35am
Short-Blind said | April 18th 2011 @ 8:35am | Report comment
Could Rod McQeen’s genius fix the Chiefs or Canes OJ? Cattle ye old observant one – cattle. Simple thing is the cattle in QLD are running with the bulls (pamplona style) whereas the NSW cattle are mulling around on a dairy farm down Bega way.
April 18th 2011 @ 8:52am
Jiggles said | April 18th 2011 @ 8:52am | Report comment
I don’t mind a bit of the old Bega Cheese
April 18th 2011 @ 9:41am
Short-Blind said | April 18th 2011 @ 9:41am | Report comment
So do I Jiggles but the pace of life down there is slow – just like the Tahs forwards.
April 18th 2011 @ 10:39am
Jiggles said | April 18th 2011 @ 10:39am | Report comment
I have a sneaking suspicion that Tah forwards may also lactate.
April 18th 2011 @ 12:44pm
Who Needs Melon said | April 18th 2011 @ 12:44pm | Report comment
I shouldn’t have laughed at that. But I did.
April 18th 2011 @ 3:23pm
PeterK said | April 18th 2011 @ 3:23pm | Report comment
Verry funny and sadly right on the money by and large.
April 18th 2011 @ 9:40am
Sam Taulelei said | April 18th 2011 @ 9:40am | Report comment
Ha ha, that’s gold OJ and so true.
As for the woes of the Chiefs and Hurricanes Short Blind, no I don’t believe that MacQueen can fix either team. I think that your current national coach amply demonstrates how difficult it is for a foreign coach to relate to a different rugby culture to what they’re used to. The problem with both of those sides, isn’t the cattle or injuries either, there is more than sufficient quality to suggest they should be performing better than what they are.
The better performing sides this year are riding on the back of a good forward pack who can muscle up when they have to or run wide in support, even the Blues are a more consistent side this year and it’s not because of Stephen Brett. The Canes showed against the Cheetahs their attacking potential when they have a good platform to launch from.
April 18th 2011 @ 9:44am
Short-Blind said | April 18th 2011 @ 9:44am | Report comment
Agree mostly Sam except that doesn’t “a good forward pack who can muscle up when they have to or run wide in support” equate to ‘cattle’. The better forward packs have better cattle more suited to the demands of Super rugby. That’s the point.
April 18th 2011 @ 12:55pm
Fog said | April 18th 2011 @ 12:55pm | Report comment
The Canes’ basic problem is that they have their worst ever forward pack collectively (albeit with some good players) and their worst 9 and 10 combination ever. With good coaching they could still be doing better than they are, but they have a foreign (Canterbury) coach who does not appear to be able to organise the available talent in a productive way. In such circumstances, they could have the best back five in the competition (and they don’t) and it would not matter a jot
April 18th 2011 @ 5:03pm
BennO said | April 18th 2011 @ 5:03pm | Report comment
Yeah I know OJ, I mean really who would have thought a bunch of punters discussing recent rugby games would actually write about what has happened in the recent rugby games!?
April 18th 2011 @ 8:24am
ptovey01 said | April 18th 2011 @ 8:24am | Report comment
Waratahs a playing inconsistent football. It has been shown from as early as the first trial game this year that it would be a issue. Reds have grown an extra few legs since the teams last clashed, and should account for the tahs quite easily.
Tahs will loose royaly to the Reds and will be lucky to beat anyone else outside of the Australian conference for the rest of the season.
April 18th 2011 @ 8:26am
The Other Reds Fan. said | April 18th 2011 @ 8:26am | Report comment
The Reds will only have to turn up to win this week-end – probably by 30+.
How does a franchise with access to such a large pool of talent produce such an underachieviing team – year in, year out? The problems run very deep. Players like Beale know that they have to get out. They all look so miserably unhappy.
April 18th 2011 @ 12:26pm
Geoff Brisbane said | April 18th 2011 @ 12:26pm | Report comment
T.O.R.F the Canes have been doing it for years
April 18th 2011 @ 8:28am
Willy said | April 18th 2011 @ 8:28am | Report comment
The Reds are obviously favourites, but I’m not sure it’s as clear cut as some are making out.
Remember that these Aussie derbys tend to be tight affairs, and remember that the Waratahs were VERY effective earlier in the season in slowing down the Reds and stopping Quade’s acrobatics. And, despite the scoreline, the Waratahs were not terrible against a very good Blues team.
I’ll be tipping the Reds, but I’ll be very surprised if it’s not a tight contest that comes right down to the last 5 minutes.
(Although, it might depend on what sort of team the Tahs can put on the park – they’re not having much luck with injuries at the moment!)
April 18th 2011 @ 12:38pm
The Other Reds Fan. said | April 18th 2011 @ 12:38pm | Report comment
The Reds really turned the season around once they started playing Beau Robinson. I think we’ll see him at the World Cup as a back up to Pocock.
April 18th 2011 @ 8:29am
Rugby Reg said | April 18th 2011 @ 8:29am | Report comment
The first three rounds the tahs looked awesome ! were has it all gone?
The reds just get better every week, but the test will come against the blues and saders.
SA rubgy is in serious trouble atm, however lucky for them it is not terminal, they have the talent available.
Oh the the Reds by 20 (30-10)
April 18th 2011 @ 9:17am
terrykidd said | April 18th 2011 @ 9:17am | Report comment
If the Tahs play Halangahu then they will definitely lose. I think the Reds will win a tight one anyway but it will be a lot easier if they have Halangahu’s channel to run at.
Hangers was a turnstile against the Blues and has no idea in defence. An example, when Alby Mathewson scored from close range Hangers was defending right behind the ruck, not just to either side, but right behind it. WTF???? Did he think one of the Blues would try to hurdle the ruck?
Sorry, but that is just plain dumb and not up to scratch …. drop him from the squad, never to play S15 again, regardless of injuries to other players.
April 18th 2011 @ 10:10am
Harry said | April 18th 2011 @ 10:10am | Report comment
Hangers wasn’t worried, bacause that rock of defence, Kurtley Beale was there! Watching this at the pub, I called this was going to happen – you could see the gap – a good 5 seconds before. Well may we mock Beale’s and Hanger’s defence, but where were the 4,5,6 and 7?