The case for real helmets in rugby
By Tenebroso, 8 May 2011 The Crowd is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Berrick Barnes, Guthro Steenkamp, ice hockey, IRB, Neemia Tialata, NHL, Richie McCaw, Rugby Union
Break an ankle, rupture an ACL, dislocate a shoulder and with good medical treatment and the right kind of rehabilitation, a rugby player will eventually be back on the field, little the worse for wear. But that isn’t necessarily so if a player suffers a concussion which, make no mistake, is a brain injury.
Once a player sustains a concussion, he has to cross his fingers that it doesn’t happen again, because if it does, he may be advised to call it a day.
And this kind of injury keeps happening to players at all levels.
Berrick Barnes had to sit in the stands for a while, and now Richie McCaw has had to withdraw from a game citing post-concussion precaution.
Apart from the danger to the players themselves, are we as spectators, to be denied the pleasure of seeing star players perform?
By the time various worldwide comps are completed and the World Cup rolls around, it’s a lottery as to who will be ruled out due to a concussive knock.
Maybe, it’s time the IRB allowed helmets in rugby. But when I make that suggestion, I’m not talking about the kind worn in American football.
I’m talking about the kind worn in ice hockey, which is a much smaller helmet – more of a cap that sits on top of the skull.
There’s been quite a lot of thought put into designing better hockey helmets, particularly in Canada at the University of Ottawa’s impact science lab.
Traditionally, a hockey helmet’s shell is made of vinyl nitrile, a substance that disperses force from the point of contact.
The liner is usually made of expanded polypropylene foam. But a newer design, called a Shock Bonnet, is more flexible, conforms to the wearer’s head, and is separated from the external shell by a set of 18 hollow thermoplastic shock absorbers.
On impact, these absorbers compress to suck up the energy of a hit.
The suggestion of such a helmet for rugby will inevitably introduce the ‘seat belt’ argument.
It was once thought that putting seat-belts in cars would make drivers feel invulnerable and therefore drive recklessly.
But when belts were introduced, it was found that driving patterns didn’t change.
Similarly, introducing hockey-style helmets to rugby wouldn’t result in reckless play because, like Sydney-driving, it’s already on the edge of reckless.
The rugby pick-and-drive is a head-first charge.
But it’s not met head-on, so they’d be no question of a helmet-protected head-to-head contest mainly because rugby players know that that’s a good way to break a neck vertebrae.
A well-designed rugby helmet would protect against the errant knee or elbow in a tackle or at the breakdown.
And those kinds of collisions are becoming more fraught as players get bigger and bulkier.
When you have people like Guthro Steenkamp or Neemia Tialata, both around 1.87m, 127kg, charging into rucks, you don’t want your unprotected head in the way.
However, it must be stated that even the newest and best helmets wouldn’t eliminate rugby concussions.
But neuro-researchers around the rugby-playing world agree that hockey-style shell helmets would certainly reduce their likelihood, and when they did occur, make them less severe.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (161)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (158)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- A Kiwi’s advice to Wallaby supporters (13)
- Confessions of a rugby union traitor (3)
- Brumbies vs Reds: a lesson for the other provinces (8)
- Chiefs vs Bulls: Super Rugby live scores, blog (14)
- Hola Argentina, and welcome to the Rugby Championship! (21)
- Irish coaches looking to head Western Force (15)
- Dull Super Rugby coaches equal dull rugby (50)
- Explore:
- Berrick Barnes, Guthro Steenkamp, ice hockey, IRB, Neemia Tialata, NHL, Richie McCaw, Rugby Union


May 8th 2011 @ 3:31am
BennO said | May 8th 2011 @ 3:31am | Report comment
I see the sense in your argument but it seems it would make it just about impossible to pack a scrum with something like that on your head.
And I’m not sure the seatbelt argument is so easily dismissed. Though illegal, you do see very dangerous head first charges in American football and we do see it in Rugby too (see Bakkie Botha for example) and with a hard helmet on their head it would be very dangerous for opposition players.
May 8th 2011 @ 4:07pm
jeznez said | May 8th 2011 @ 4:07pm | Report comment
completely agree regarding scrummaging and for me that is enough said
May 8th 2011 @ 4:05am
niwdEyaJ said | May 8th 2011 @ 4:05am | Report comment
Are you kidding? Hasn’t all this OH&S crap gone too far already by illegalising rucking? Teach people to tackle properly with good technique and no one gets injured… Sure there will always be the odd accident, but no more likely than getting hit by a bus.
May 8th 2011 @ 6:23am
Jerry said | May 8th 2011 @ 6:23am | Report comment
If you wear helmets, you have to wear all the other padding to protect yourself from other player’s helmets. No thanks.
May 8th 2011 @ 7:09am
M.O.C. said | May 8th 2011 @ 7:09am | Report comment
death by strangulation at the bottom of a ruck due to a pulled helmet chin-strap would be a bit a concern though. In my playing days (80′s-90′s) rugby league-style shoulder pads were illegal for this reason
May 8th 2011 @ 8:14am
mitzter said | May 8th 2011 @ 8:14am | Report comment
My problem with the idea will be the pads that will be needed as well- gridiron pads are only there because of the helmets and i can’t see scrums getting formed with all that.
You dismiss the ‘seat belt theory’ although gridiron does have bigger hits for this reason and I would have to see a BIG difference between gridiron’s concussion rates and modern rugby before being considered and I don’t see you getting that evidence
May 8th 2011 @ 9:07am
sky said | May 8th 2011 @ 9:07am | Report comment
I’ve grown up as an American playing rugby, football, and hockey. A hockey helmet (I’m thinking Gretzky era salad bowl helmets) could reduce bumps taken from knees and elbows at the bottom of a ruck but wont help serious, whiplash-inducing hits.
May 8th 2011 @ 10:08am
Lee said | May 8th 2011 @ 10:08am | Report comment
Here’s an article from the states in regards to helmets in NFL:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704402404574527881984299454.html
May 8th 2011 @ 10:36am
Adam said | May 8th 2011 @ 10:36am | Report comment
I seem to recall an article about American footballers giving rugby league a go and having problems tackling without a helmet on. Watch the NFL and the guys have a tendency to tackle with their heads, even with a helmet you get concussion. Adding helmets and/or pads encourages complacency. With proper control of the ruck in union and shoulder charges in league there is no need for helmets.
May 9th 2011 @ 3:26am
sky said | May 9th 2011 @ 3:26am | Report comment
Adam, I grew up playing linebacker in football and switched to rugby at 16. The hardest thing to do is learn to tackle with your head on the other side of the ball carrier. Football teaches to put your helmet across the body. Never fails, I get kneed in the head once a game. Old habits die hard. O
May 8th 2011 @ 1:25pm
RedsNut said | May 8th 2011 @ 1:25pm | Report comment
Perhaps they should all grow afros, like Radike (not sure of the spelling).
In a report, he claims that in head clash during training, the other guy was KO’d but he was OK
May 8th 2011 @ 2:22pm
apaway said | May 8th 2011 @ 2:22pm | Report comment
The fact that research has revealed more about the potentially damaging effects of multiple concussions is why I think this idea should be analysed more carefully and not dismissed out of hand. A lot of posters point to “reckless” tackling styles in American Football but then again, helmets have always been part of the uniform so I don’t think you can say that the helmets made players more reckless. If an Ice Hockey-style head protection was introduced to rugby I don’t think players will see it as a license to disregard tackling technique.
May 9th 2011 @ 2:34pm
IronAwe said | May 9th 2011 @ 2:34pm | Report comment
That’s not true. Helmets were introduced after a nhumber of deaths occurred. Prior to this, no helmets were worn, and they are now coached to use the helmet as a weapon in tackling.
May 8th 2011 @ 4:16pm
zhenry said | May 8th 2011 @ 4:16pm | Report comment
These Ice hockey helmets are described here as shock absorbers and not to be confused with grid iron helmets.
Sounds like an idea well worth trying.