Reds, Blues shows ‘Tahs how rugby should be played
By David Lord, 14 May 2011 David Lord is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Jason Allen, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, Waratahs
147 Have your say
Related coverage
Jason Allen is the very impressive Waratahs’ CEO, but in this case he’s pulled the wrong rein. In a bid to placate dwindling supporters, he’s called a “fans forum” next Thursday night at the SFS to give them a chance to tell the men-in-blue where they are going wrong, and how to fix it.
What?
If the Waratahs don’t know what’s wrong, they don’t deserve to represent the proud Waratah emblem on the NSW jersey.
But if they haven’t got the message, which places them in the thick category, all Allen has to do is hand every contracted Waratah a tape of last night’s top of the table cracker at Suncorp between the Reds and Blues and make them watch it right through, and keep watching it, until the penny drops.
It was 80-minutes of scintillating running rugby, the way the sport should be played. The best game of the year by far, and a leading contender for game of the decade.
Pulsating. The game they play in heaven.
The night started with the Blues on top of the overall table, and the New Zealand Conference, on 47 points, with the Reds second on the overall, and leading the Australian Conference on 46.
Today, the Reds top the table on 51, with the Blues second on 48, after the Reds won this fascinating end-to-end head-to-head match 37-31, with four brilliant tries apiece.
Quade Cooper’s boot was the difference, landing seven from seven, with four conversions and three penalties to four and one. Luke McAlister missed two three-pointers.
By the clock:
* In the first 36 minutes, the Reds crossed for three tries to lead 24-nil – totally in command, a case of how far?
* In the next 21 minutes, the Reds led 27-24 – the Blues surged, result in doubt.
A massive turnaround. Game on.
Did the Reds turn off, endemic in Australian sides, or did the Blues show enormous courage?
Probably a bit of both, but whatever the reason/s, it had the 30,041 Suncorp spectators on their feet, and millions of television viewers worldwide on the edge of their seats.
Watching Reds’ winger Digby Ioane consistently beat his man and supports with searching runs, often from cold starts, and tackling his heart out.
Watching Will Genia, and Cooper dictate play like traffic cops, both bringing off stunning tackles. That’s expected of Genia, but not of Cooper, who tackled like a man possessed.
The Reds tight five was superb, the lineout jumping of skipper James Horwill and Rob Simmons near perfect.
And the backrow of Beau Robinson, Scott Higginbotham, and Radike Samo were non-stop in both attack and defence.
For the Blues, hooker-skipper Keven Mealamu was inspirational, especially when the Reds led 24-nil. He marshalled his troops.
Locks Ali Williams and Anthony Boric were tireless around the park, and won clean lineout ball.
Halves Alby Mathewson and Stephen Brett were constantly sharp and probing, while replacement centre Lachie Munro was close to being the Blues’ best.
And the class wingers – Joe Rokocoko, and Rene Ranger – were always dangerous but contained, until Ranger ranged up for the Blues’ fourth try after the final hooter to clinch two precious points.
This game had everything, including controversial South African referee Jonathan Kaplan, who to his credit, allowed the play to flow. To his continual discredit, the contemptuous way he speaks to the players will never be acceptable.
Just as the Waratah supporters cannot accept the way their team is playing.
But they’re not in a position to tell them how to play, either. Leave that to the Reds-Blues tape.
Your move Jason Allen.
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- Jason Allen, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, Waratahs

May 14th 2011 @ 2:56am
Sportym said | May 14th 2011 @ 2:56am | Report comment
Damn I want to see this game now. Hopefully it will be replayed at the local tonight here in London.
May 14th 2011 @ 3:05am
Darwin's Jacket S said | May 14th 2011 @ 3:05am | Report comment
Lordy, lordy, lordy.
More overblown hyperbole about an overrated Australian side that happens to be leading the weakest conference in the tournament. This proves nothing. The reds are still to put away a side in New Zealand. Wait until they play one of the top sides, away from home, in the rain, on a Sunday evening. Then the reds will be tested. Up until now, they’ve had an easy ride. They lost to the Waratahs you know, the very team you deride. The hypocrisy is breathtaking!
If I were a Reds supporter, or a Wallabies supporter for that matter, I would be more concerned with the poor defence shown by the Reds than any try scoring capacity. You’re not going to win the world cup by scoring points. Unfortunately for you lot, Deans has no idea about this. All he’s ever done as a coach was to not ruin Carter and McCaw’s ability to win games. He stayed out of their way so they could win a few Super Rugby tournaments.
May 14th 2011 @ 6:39am
Damo said | May 14th 2011 @ 6:39am | Report comment
Is that you Stubbie? Or is it OJ? Come on own up.
Look it wasn’t the game of the decade and he got the points wrong but it was a good game played with a heap of commitment from both sides.
The rubber will hit the road in a couple of weeks when the Richie, Dan and Sonny show arrives in Brisbane. THEN we will get an idea whether the Reds are contenders or pretenders. Knock hyperbole all you like but the game was good. And as for ‘ playing in the rain away from home on a Sunday evening’ why not ask them to play with one eye and a broken leg as well?
May 14th 2011 @ 7:08am
Moaman said | May 14th 2011 @ 7:08am | Report comment
” playing in the rain away from home on a Sunday evening’ ” hehe…reminded me of The Life Of Brian….apart from the roads,aqueducts,,,,,etc ..what have the Romans done for us? !!
May 14th 2011 @ 8:06am
Darwin's Jacket S said | May 14th 2011 @ 8:06am | Report comment
Indeed, it was written in that spirit. I’m glad someone picked up on it!
I guess I’d better make it more obvious next time!
May 14th 2011 @ 8:05am
ohtani's jacket said | May 14th 2011 @ 8:05am | Report comment
Ah, I believe this was a parody.
May 14th 2011 @ 7:25am
Justin said | May 14th 2011 @ 7:25am | Report comment
The Reds have beaten ALL the top sides in the past two seasons.
Get a sniff…
May 14th 2011 @ 7:36am
chester said | May 14th 2011 @ 7:36am | Report comment
They have only beaten the Stormers away from home.
May 14th 2011 @ 8:56am
CizzyRascal said | May 14th 2011 @ 8:56am | Report comment
You’re not going to win the world cup by scoring more points? How then? Is it a raffle?
May 14th 2011 @ 8:59am
Jerry said | May 14th 2011 @ 8:59am | Report comment
By making the other team score LESS points!. Duh.
May 14th 2011 @ 9:00am
Bear said | May 14th 2011 @ 9:00am | Report comment
DJ S. An overrated Australian team??? We don’t need to rate them, we just look at the ladder. Mate, the Reds are top of the ladder. Not the Australian ladder. But the entire ladder. They just beat the NZ Blues. They are undefeated at home in 10 games. They have beated all all all of the top sides in the previous two years. They have scored more points then any team in the competition. They are top of the crop. Is something going on here? Did the Reds do something to you in a previous life?
May 14th 2011 @ 9:02am
Jerry said | May 14th 2011 @ 9:02am | Report comment
How many people are gonna miss the fact that it’s a joke post?
May 14th 2011 @ 9:58am
Stripes said | May 14th 2011 @ 9:58am | Report comment
Unfortunately text doesnt have the ability to produce a sarcastic tone.
May 14th 2011 @ 9:59am
Bear said | May 14th 2011 @ 9:59am | Report comment
my apologies. I just read the post again. Yep, I went a bit overboard.
May 14th 2011 @ 12:13pm
Harry said | May 14th 2011 @ 12:13pm | Report comment
Unfortunately the rather tedious practice of trolling, as practiced on sites like Planet Rugby to the extent that it entirely overruns sensible rugby discussion, is more and more appearing on The Roar. Please please rack off to those places.
May 14th 2011 @ 10:51pm
Chris K said | May 14th 2011 @ 10:51pm | Report comment
If it were anyone but Darwin stubbie, I’m sure we would have picked it up, but due to the condescending nature of pretty much all his comments, you’ll have to forgive us. I guess us aussies don’t have a sense of humour
May 14th 2011 @ 4:07pm
zhenry said | May 14th 2011 @ 4:07pm | Report comment
What’s all this hyperbole about the Blues; Bear? Before we go into that:
The corporate media write up of these games is abysmal. AU journalists are incapable of recognising the existence of NZ teams – For years I’ve read Growdens write ups of AB/WAL games and lucky if he mentions the words AB once, could have been playing Georgia. Part of the AU compulsive obsessive anger dumping onto NZers, (can’t help themselves) continually s…s me.
At least in this DL article there is some resemblance of fairness and even the streaks of hyperbole are less glaring. I mean, it has been his lively-hood.
Getting back to Bear. The Blues are becoming like NSW they have scraped home in their last few games. Despite Brett’s overall form he almost, without exception, gives away at least one try per game by grubber kicking straight into opposing defences: Unacceptable. Chronic, he needs a brain operation. The Blues have been hit by injuries (Reds have most of theirs back) and at moment have about 5 key players missing, Toeava is a big loss.
Early on what about the two Red forward passes before they scored? Kaplan again. The Reds were very punishing defensively but I am concerned at the ‘stand-up hit tackling’ that is taking place (this game; Benson Stanley), mainly by AU and to a lesser extent SA on NZ teams. They seem to be purposely taking out NZ players!
May 14th 2011 @ 10:03pm
IronAwe said | May 14th 2011 @ 10:03pm | Report comment
.
May 14th 2011 @ 10:07pm
Ben S said | May 14th 2011 @ 10:07pm | Report comment
‘At least in this DL article there is some resemblance of fairness and even the streaks of hyperbole are less glaring’
‘The best game of the year by far, and a leading contender for game of the decade.’
May 14th 2011 @ 10:16am
katzilla said | May 14th 2011 @ 10:16am | Report comment
Epic moniker.
10/10 for using obvious bait whoever you are.
May 14th 2011 @ 3:05am
CizzyRascal said | May 14th 2011 @ 3:05am | Report comment
A bit over the top about the game being the match of the decade. Being a neutral, as in not having any national bias, I thought the Stormers-Crusaders game from last week was a better game of rugby.
I’ll go off in another direction to you though David and talk about the criminal use of Rene Ranger by this Blues side. I watched a good bit of him in last years Super 14, then saw him excel throughout the ITM Cup with a weak Northland side that punched above their weight due to their attacking triumvirate of Ranger, Payne and Munro and then saw him score on his run on début for the All Blacks and do well coming off the bench against Australia in Sydney.
This year, while having scored 7 tries, I think even he will acknowledge his poor form, but I don’t think that has been helped by the way Lam has used him. He should be the focal point of this attack. His range of passing is surprisingly good and he has a very good offload in the tackle, not even mentioning his ability running with ball in hand. From watching Northland in last season’s ITM Cup, he and Payne have a wonderful understanding and I’d be trying to wring every drop from that. Yet he seems to be used as a bit part player and someone to finish off moves. Until they utilise his wide array of skills fully, this side will not reach it’s potential.
May 14th 2011 @ 3:12am
Ben S said | May 14th 2011 @ 3:12am | Report comment
‘The best game of the year by far, and a leading contender for game of the decade.’
This ridiculous comment (how many years left until the next decade?), and the entire article lead me to conclude that you, like me, watched the game whilst doing something else, Mr Lord. The second half, despite the Blues come back, was characterised by poor choices from the Blues and basic handling areas. The Reds were very good, and I enjoyed watching them, but the Blues were flaky. Apparently according to you everything was great because the ball was chucked about. Last Lord ‘article’ I bother clicking on.
May 14th 2011 @ 3:35am
CizzyRascal said | May 14th 2011 @ 3:35am | Report comment
I really should be the same, but like Stephen Jones with the Sunday Times, I keep coming back for more and I’m just not sure why.
I appreciate his Lordship writes an article every day, but I think quality over quantity should always be the winner.
May 14th 2011 @ 3:46am
Ben S said | May 14th 2011 @ 3:46am | Report comment
Oh, I jumped off the Stephen Jones wagon a long time ago, CZ. I simply could not read another article about why the starting England team should contain 34 Wasps players.
May 14th 2011 @ 7:18am
Damo said | May 14th 2011 @ 7:18am | Report comment
That seems mighty impolite of you Ben ‘doing something else’ while our beloved Reds were playing their hearts out.
May 14th 2011 @ 7:54pm
Ben S said | May 14th 2011 @ 7:54pm | Report comment
Firstly, I’d like to apologise to Link, then the players, then the squad members, and finally, and most importantly, the fans. Sorry. I just had a lot of work is all.
May 14th 2011 @ 5:16am
jus de couchon said | May 14th 2011 @ 5:16am | Report comment
Good game for sure. The Crusaders /Stormers game was at a higher level of Intensity though. As for Stephen Jones his scribblings are becomming more Irrelevant . Sadly he used to be a good and objective scribe.
May 14th 2011 @ 9:57am
Tissot Times said | May 14th 2011 @ 9:57am | Report comment
Jus de couchon best thing the The Times ever did was charge an online subscription now SJ ramblings are but a faded memory.
May 14th 2011 @ 7:54pm
Ben S said | May 14th 2011 @ 7:54pm | Report comment
Very good.
May 14th 2011 @ 5:44am
kingplaymaker said | May 14th 2011 @ 5:44am | Report comment
David I agree it’s mysterious the Waratahs are bothering with this. Perhaps even though they are going to appoint a more attack-oriented coach next year, they are terrified at the damage to the supporter base that can still be done under the current regime. I think in a market-place as tenous as Australia, the managing board should be able to summarily fire a coach who doesn’t play an attacking game, (unless the rules change to what they were so that it’s impossible to win without kicking the ball all the time).
May 14th 2011 @ 10:21pm
Ben S said | May 14th 2011 @ 10:21pm | Report comment
‘I agree it’s mysterious the Waratahs are bothering with this.’
Bothering with what? What is ‘this’? If you mean the style of rugby they play then I suspect it’s because they don’t have the players to play the way the Reds do. You don’t just turn up and decide to chuck the ball about.
May 14th 2011 @ 5:57am
Taniwha said | May 14th 2011 @ 5:57am | Report comment
I think your points statistics are incorrect…. see below
http://www.superxv.com/table/
Which further shows how poor this article is. Game of the century?! Did you not see last weeks clash between the Stormers and the Crusaders?! Two teams that can score great tries, but actually know how to tackle and defend.
May 14th 2011 @ 5:57am
Fallen said | May 14th 2011 @ 5:57am | Report comment
The article has a few factual errors:
Red are now on the top of the table with 50 points (not 51), Blues are on 49 (48)
Before the game the points were Reds 45 (not 46).
http://www.superrugby.com/GameDay/SuperRugbyTable.aspx
May 14th 2011 @ 11:23am
Ted Skinner said | May 14th 2011 @ 11:23am | Report comment
The millions viewing world-wide seems to be pure fiction.
The S15 games are restricted to Pay TV & it is Friday Morning when this game was played in the European Northern Hemisphere time.
Perhaps Mr Lord could enlighten us how he arrived at the millions’ ” guesstimate”.
I can’t remember ever seeing a Super 14/15 game on the UK Ratings Lists.
http://www.barb.co.uk/
May 14th 2011 @ 1:20pm
hutch said | May 14th 2011 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
4 billion people watch the RWC, didn’t you know that?
May 14th 2011 @ 1:24pm
Working Class Rugger said | May 14th 2011 @ 1:24pm | Report comment
My god are we really going to go down this path again. Why do you even care? Pathetic the both of you.
May 14th 2011 @ 1:38pm
kovana said | May 14th 2011 @ 1:38pm | Report comment
Glad you agree.
May 14th 2011 @ 1:37pm
kovana said | May 14th 2011 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
Pedantic much?
May 14th 2011 @ 6:10am
robert said | May 14th 2011 @ 6:10am | Report comment
it was a good game and a good article..a good opinion piece..let’s see you losers do a write-up than just moan, whinge and complain about other people’s work..
May 14th 2011 @ 6:13am
kingplaymaker said | May 14th 2011 @ 6:13am | Report comment
Yes David don’t worry if you come under attack it’s normally the sign that you’re right! If too many people agree you’re probably in the wrong
Thanks for a very good and enjoyable article, much appreciated.
May 14th 2011 @ 12:16pm
Harry said | May 14th 2011 @ 12:16pm | Report comment
Can i just 3rd that sentiment in that it was a fantastic high quality game and a great writeup by David Lord. A bit of hyperbole is part and parcel of being a Sydney based rugby tragic, just go with it folks.
May 14th 2011 @ 6:21am
Ben S said | May 14th 2011 @ 6:21am | Report comment
‘if you come under attack it’s normally the sign that you’re right!’
Sounds like Gaddafi logic to me…