The fall of Rod Macqueen
By kingplaymaker, 24 May 2011 kingplaymaker is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Danny Cipriani, Melbourne Rebels, Rod Macqueen, Rugby Union
The weekend slaughter of the Melbourne Rebels at the hands of the Cheetahs may seem only a fair and logical fate for a team in their first year. Things surely could never have been otherwise.
All blame must simply be laid on circumstances, for summoning a good playing group and generating team familiarity take considerable time.
But is it inevitable that a team in their first year should be battered from pillar to post and end the season as something approaching a laughing stock?
In a report of the previous obliteration courtesy of the under-performing Bulls, Greg Growden observed ‘It is clear that without Danny Cipriani the Rebels are bereft of midfield ideas.’
The Rebels have lost six matches since Macqueen dismissed Cipriani in order to assert his team’s ‘culture’, and impress his dominance on the young man, the most recent a horrifying dismemberment considering the calibre of opposition.
Everyone had high hopes for the tenure of Rod Macqueen at the helm of a new franchise.
Highly successful in his previous career at the beginning of the decade, it was expected that even after a decade out of the game the great man’s magic touch might still be wielded with the old aplomb.
However, as the hideous descent down the Super table accelerates and the reasons for the first time come under examination, it is ever more clear that one overriding cause lies at the root: Macqueen’s colossal, ballooning ego.
This is often the problem with coaches who have enjoyed significant triumphs in earlier incarnations. Unblemished reputations breed fantastical ideas of their own infallibility and the notion that their every word possesses the truth of revelation and that the world should be eager to listen, however often such pronouncements are given. Bob Dwyer is another case of this.
A man like Macqueen begins to conceive his powers as capable of transforming base metal into gold, unaware perhaps that his earlier results were based on a strong playing group as well as good coaching, and to delightedly relish the prospect of parading his greatness to a younger generation.
This cosmic distance between Macqueen’s conception of himself and reality is exacerbated by another factor: he is in essence a product of the amateur era of playing and coaching.
Most of the players he led began their careers as amateurs and thought in this mould, and yet he is now trying to apply the principles of success from this era to a professional world with utterly different patterns of behaviour and players formed with a new psychology.
This dislocation from professionalism was inherent in his first meeting with the Rebels’ board of directors.
Explaining his philosophy of a successful team to them as if they were children, he proudly wrote a gigantic ‘C’ on the board, and explained that a team’s flourishing depended entirely on ‘Culture’, a word that begins with ‘C’ he would have them know.
This could well be true, but in the amateur era when playing rugby was a personal commitment rather than a career, motivation was far more the sole determinant of success than now.
Obviously a team’s culture is important, but the ‘decent gentleman will prevail’ code Macqueen was reared in has been hardened and transformed by a more ruthless state of affairs where players know their own value, consider rugby a career rather than a moral cause, and find their motivation in a broader variety of factors.
The grand old general’s misguided delusions were evident from the recruiting phase of the campaign last year.
The team was at different times linked with Israel Folau, Greg Inglis, Billy Slater, Manu Vatuvei and Frank Pritchard. Macqueen’s amateurish incompetence and failure to recognise that a modern player when negotiating a contract is making a cold, rational career choice rather than choosing a regiment to fight for led to none of them being signed.
It is the fiasco of the failed Folau signing that holds the key. Macqueen elected to give him as long as he desired to sign, assuming that as he had indicated he would join the Rebels and was a gentleman who had been vetted for inhabiting the correct ‘culture’. Folau would never do anything as vile as choose another job simply because it paid three times as much.
In Macqueen’s amateur paradise, money is simply not a factor in chosing a rugby team, for it is not a career that is being discussed. ‘Culture’ is all that would define a man’s reasons for moving to one team over another.
That Israel Folau might consider sport a career or come from a background less comfortable than the Rockefeller heirs, and perhaps even have others depending on him did not of course penetrate the ivory tower of Macqueen’s thinking. Here is where, for gentlemen and patriots, rugby is a kind of merry jousting competition as far removed from real life concerns and the vulgarity of money as could be.
Not that losing Folau or recruiting, with notable exceptions, a vastly understrength team, would have troubled Macqueen in the slightest.
Rather it gave him a gilded chance to manifest his genius by the mystical transformation of this dirty dozen into a championship winning band of knights flying the Macqueen cultural flag, for all to see.
The returning general would set the world to rights and be praised and lauded to the skies.
This gleaming opportunity must allow its prophet to wing in and out of course so as not to drain or waste his gifts with exhaustion in the slightest.
The long-term commitment to a team of most professional coaches is not his way: ‘I am not a career coach’ he declares, and anticipates to departing the scene in two years having shown all the world what real greatness is with truly graceful effortless.
Danny Cipriani cannot stand in his way. A professional player aware of his value, reluctant to submit to a perverse authority who moved to to Melbourne in the first place to escape another amateur relic in England: he should of course be treated with yet more tough authority and made to prostrate himself before his great coach.
This will set him to rights. No other form of management is possible. If he fails in defence he must be punished and any losses blamed on him.
Ewen Mckenzie’s understanding of a young professional in his willingness to overlook Quade Cooper’s indiscretions and defensive frailities, trusting that when given support and confidence the young man would mature in both areas, is a terrible approach with disastrous results in the eyes of Macqueen, because it betrays and spirit of hierarchy and rugby ethics. The order of the universe might be upturned and anarchy return.
It is important to understand the recent fiasco with Cipriani: Cipriani felt that he had been made a scapegoat for the team’s failings when dropped from the squad and with the immediate signing of Kurtley Beale, designed specifically to replace him.
So his disobeying of team regulations was an entirely rebellious a message to Macqueen that if he was to be blamed for everything the team did wrong and undermined by the breathless acquisition of a player to replace him, he was fed up. Rightly so. His earlier affair with the bottle was wrong, this time however he was correct.
Yet Macqueen’s tough tactics have misfired. He fearfully underestimated the contribution Cipriani had been making to the side, his creativity at the heart of every victory and the entire attacking force of the team. The recent pummellings have made this fully clear.
Macqueen, to assert the power of his personality, has wantonly thrown away six matches and crippled the franchise, now lying 14th in the table, when with Cipriani in full swing there was once talk of making the play-offs.
Yet no one will dream to utter a word against the mythical figure, for he is a great of the game and cannot in any way be responsible for any problem or failure with his team.
The discord that provoking a team to vote one of their own number off a tour will sow is also returning to haunt him and is another factor in the flat, disheartened performances in South Africa. No healthy team wishes to lynch one of its organs, and even those who voted for it will have done so with an unclean conscience.
Having Macqueen’s ‘Culture’ psycho-babble stuffed down their throats twenty-four hours a day may have won them over temporarily, and they surely fear their boss, but the presence of guilt will weigh more and more on minds as time passes.
Now this is not to write off Macqueen for good. A case of authority gone mad, if he can learn to be a professional coach, the subtle new laws of psychology that apply and the accompanying differences in player management, then things may all be well next year.
Indeed, if he could only stop trying to pulverise Cipriani beneath his thumb he might find that Kurtley Beale at 15 and Cipriani at 10 a formidable combination.
For now however, the alchemist has broken his wand and his reputation is in danger of cracking and falling to pieces as well. The great old lord of Australian rugby must humble himself and learn the new rules of a changed world and fast, or he may find that the legend of Rod Macqueen’s greatness is a story from the distant past.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (161)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (158)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- A Kiwi’s advice to Wallaby supporters (14)
- Confessions of a rugby union traitor (3)
- Brumbies vs Reds: a lesson for the other provinces (8)
- Chiefs vs Bulls: Super Rugby live scores, blog (14)
- Hola Argentina, and welcome to the Rugby Championship! (22)
- Irish coaches looking to head Western Force (15)
- Dull Super Rugby coaches equal dull rugby (50)
- Explore:
- Danny Cipriani, Melbourne Rebels, Rod Macqueen, Rugby Union


May 24th 2011 @ 10:01am
sheek said | May 24th 2011 @ 10:01am | Report comment
KPM,
This is harsh. When MacQueen became Wallabies coach in late 1997, things did not start well. In 1999, he went to the RWC with a misfiring team, but they gelled when it mattered.
There’s an old saying about character & success – it’s not how many times you fall down that matters, but how many times you keep picking yourself back up.
Ultimately, the champion is the guy who picks himself back up, learns the lesson & keeps going. Macqueen & Rebels will be fine in the long run…..
May 24th 2011 @ 11:24am
Aware said | May 24th 2011 @ 11:24am | Report comment
Absolutely agree. Rod MacQueen coaced the Wallabies to world cup and other successes with a plan to establish a good platform up front. This article reeks of someone trying to kick someone when he is a bit down. The Rebels are novices in the competition and the fact that they have won any games by now at all speaks volumes for MacQueen’s ability. I for one wish he was still coaching the Wallabies.
May 24th 2011 @ 11:00pm
kingplaymaker said | May 24th 2011 @ 11:00pm | Report comment
Sheek that’s all very well, so long as your own management is not causing you to fail unneccessarily, which was not the case in Macqueen’s previous commands, but appears to be so here.
Remember Macqueen did have access to considerably more money than other franchises from the ARU and large third-party sponsorship deals, none of which he chose to take up. So he really is the one responsible for the team as it is, as well as selecting it of course.
May 24th 2011 @ 10:03am
Eric said | May 24th 2011 @ 10:03am | Report comment
Gee KPM, what did Rod do to you. I think they have done well enough with the cattle they have. It wasn’t McQueen who missed those tackles of Cipriani. I fully agree with dropping the pratt. No commitment to defence, caught stealing a bottle of grog at a nightclub, defying team curfew two nights in a row after being caught the first time.
AND, if you think money is the only motivator for performance, you’re wrong. It might get a signature, but after that motivation comes from more altruistic and personal traits. Give the Rebels time.
May 24th 2011 @ 10:13am
Gary Russell-Sharam said | May 24th 2011 @ 10:13am | Report comment
Kingmaker you make a very good argument. I read every line with interest and while I had not thought of this line of thinking as I have been in the disciple description of followers of Macqueen I have now a pragmatic view of his methods. I do not agree with everything that you have espoused but you have certainly put forward in interesting point view. I will watch with keen interest what transpires re Cipriani etc and the Rebels performance for the end of the this season and next year
May 24th 2011 @ 11:05pm
kingplaymaker said | May 24th 2011 @ 11:05pm | Report comment
Gary thanks very much: in fact I have been suspicious of Macqueen from the beginning on account of the extraordinary pomposity, even arrogance of his statements to the media, but all my fears were only fully confirmed in the last terrible six matches. As far as I can see, he has simply thrown away their season.
May 24th 2011 @ 10:21am
sheek said | May 24th 2011 @ 10:21am | Report comment
KPM,
As for MacQueen getting carried away with his self-importance & image, I dispute this. MacQueen is a very confident, strong-willed individual, but he also believes in the team concept. He’s a great tam man.
He certainly wouldn’t let things go to his head like Clive Woodward, for example, who totally lost the plot with the 2005 British & Irish Lions.
I think the Rebels have bent over backwards trying to accommodate Cipriani. There comes a time when the player himself must be accountable. Interestlingly, it was the player group that decided to leave Cipriani back in Australia when they toured South Africa.
MacQueen did not make this decision by himself. Even Cipriani’s teammates have tired of his continuous errant ways…..
May 24th 2011 @ 11:08pm
kingplaymaker said | May 24th 2011 @ 11:08pm | Report comment
Sheek Macqueen ENABLED the playing group to vote Cipriani of the tour and gave him the choice.
That shows they knew what he felt on the issue and doubtless were afraid to vote against his wishes.
Macqueen himself, in effect, voted Cipriani off the tour. He could not have given them the choice.
May 24th 2011 @ 10:25am
kovana said | May 24th 2011 @ 10:25am | Report comment
“Macqueen’s colossal, ballooning ego.”
Wow.. Cmon KPM.. thats a bit over the top.
May 24th 2011 @ 10:30am
bigbaz said | May 24th 2011 @ 10:30am | Report comment
So, I get this vague impression that you don’t think much of Macqueen.Next year was always going to tell the tail of the Rebels. At the start of this year all and sundry were predicting the Rebs wouldn’t win a game,hows that looking.Character and culture remain two of the most important ingredients of any team,professonal or amateur.Cipriani needs a huge dose of both.
May 24th 2011 @ 10:44am
Behind Enemy Lines said | May 24th 2011 @ 10:44am | Report comment
Short term pain for long term gain. It’s a shame because Cipriani is a huge talent but if it comes at the expense of team harmony it should be nipped in the bud. They’ve got Beale next year and hopefully some local talent will start to come through. No one person is bigger than the team.
May 24th 2011 @ 10:49am
Brett McKay said | May 24th 2011 @ 10:49am | Report comment
Mitch Inman too, BEL. And maybe James O’Connor, depending on whether you buy the paper in Melbourne or Brisbane..
May 24th 2011 @ 10:53am
Darwin Stubbie said | May 24th 2011 @ 10:53am | Report comment
Wow – so are you really trying to argue that this mis-mash of players would be challenging for the play-offs if Cipriani was left in the side … that is non-sensical … this Rebels side are a bunch of journeyman who have massively over performed this season by picking up a cross conference win – anything else is a bonus … they certainly won’t improve too much over the next few seasons – but if they do – then it’ll be at the expense of the other Aust teams
As for Cipriani the trouble started almost as soon as he stepped off the plane – he’s an ok 1st 5, but he most certainly isn’t worth bending over backwards for …. over-rated massively from the day the news broke he was heading down south and if you bother to read any of the rugby blogs on the excellent guardian sports site – then his downfall is certainly no surprise to the standard NH fan … the Rebels would be well off shipping off up north at the end of this campaign and would do a lot worse than line up someone like Donald or Delany from the chiefs
they were linked with not only nearly every league player off contract but nearly every Wallaby off contract also .. most were nothing but bargaining games .. no Wallaby was going to shift and play in a start up side in a W/cup year and the hiring of mass league players would have been an appalling strategy …
May 24th 2011 @ 1:30pm
Brett McKay said | May 24th 2011 @ 1:30pm | Report comment
..and Darwin, it wouldn’t have been the Rebels doing the linking…
May 24th 2011 @ 11:10pm
kingplaymaker said | May 24th 2011 @ 11:10pm | Report comment
Darwin you’ll notice the difference Cipriani made by his absence during the last six games.
They did have realistic chances to sign other players but failed.
May 24th 2011 @ 10:56am
soapit said | May 24th 2011 @ 10:56am | Report comment
after going on about culture so much before they started they couldnt do much else when half way through their first season cirpiani starts consistently putting himself above the team. would have made the whole thing a crock if they just kept letting it slide.
May 24th 2011 @ 11:09am
PeterK said | May 24th 2011 @ 11:09am | Report comment
MacQueen is primarily a successful business man. He applied the practises and culture of a successful business to rugby. So I do feel he understands professionalism, and market forces and lure of the dollar.
However rarely in business (of a decent size) will 1 person be indespensible it is reasonable easy to replace anyone.
That doesnt apply to a rugby team. In a weak team like the rebels the attack is very pedestrian without Cipriani and I feel MacQueen fails to apprecriate this.
KPM you go far over the top implying that the rebels were finals contenders with Cirpriani or that they would of won a lot of the games he missed. With Cirpriani playing the rebels still lost more games than they won.
May 24th 2011 @ 11:13pm
kingplaymaker said | May 24th 2011 @ 11:13pm | Report comment
Peter K I didn’t exactly imply they would have made the finals, but that they were doing a lot better when Cipriani was around. Had they signed two or three more really good players for the season, as they were well placed and funded to do, it’s not impossible they would have made the finals, no.
I think although Macqueen works in business he still has an amateur conception of rugby: for him it’s probably ‘time off’. There’s no evidence he thinks the principles of business management or ethics applicable to rugby.