How much did our World Cup bid really cost us?
By Mike Tuckerman, 27 May 2011 Mike Tuckerman is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- FFA, FIFA, football, Mohamed Bin Hammam, world cup bid, World Football
127 Have your say
Related coverage
We already know Australia’s bid to host the football World Cup cost taxpayers more than $45 million. But in the wake of stunning corruption allegations made against FIFA presidential challenger Mohamed Bin Hammam this week, did the bid cost us more than just cash?
At the start of the week, Fairfax investigative journalists Richard Baker and Nick McKenzie revealed the federal government was not informed by Football Federation Australia of their decision to hire Peter Hargitay and Fedor Radmann as consultants.
Hargitay elicits nine separate references in “Foul,” Andrew Jennings’ lengthy 2006 exposé on FIFA corruption, and the UK-based journalist made an appearance on the ABC’s Lateline during the week in which he slammed the FFA’s handling of the bid.
“You got conned out of lots of money and now you’re still running this crap that somehow Australia nearly got it,” Jennings said of a multi-million dollar campaign which yielded just one vote.
The outspoken journalist alleged that Hargitay told FFA chief executive Ben Buckley to sack former head of corporate and public affairs Bonita Mersiades because she expressed reservations to FFA chairman Frank Lowy about Hargitay and Radmann’s involvement.
It’s an allegation backed up by Baker and McKenzie, who wrote that Mersiades “expressed disquiet about the consultants in emails to the government.”
Despite signing a confidentiality agreement upon her dismissal, Mersiades emailed a former colleague during the week to confirm Buckley told her she was sacked because of pressure from Hargitay – an allegation the FFA later said was “unsubstantiated.”
Whatever the machinations of the dismissal – the explicit details of which are between Mersiades and the FFA – the end result is that Australia has lost a well respected, passionate advocate of football.
And with the A-League in particular struggling to maintain traction in the crowded Australian sports market, surely administrators of Mersiades’ calibre are something the FFA can ill afford to lose.
There’s some irony in the fact such dissent was revealed in the same week Ben Buckley faced the music from angry supporters at Sydney’s fan forum.
Buckley should be applauded for fronting at a time of growing fan anger, even if some of his responses sounded more like Orwellian doublespeak than the thoughts of a man in tune with his audience.
He of course has a new head of communications in Kyle Patterson to fall back on should the message ever got lost, with Patterson’s appointment widely applauded following an 18-year career as a broadcaster with SBS.
But Patterson’s new brief is to control the information coming from FFA headquarters, and as we’ve seen with the axing of Mersiades, the game’s governing body doesn’t take too kindly to those not singing from the same hymn sheet.
So don’t expect someone like Andrew Jennings to go knocking on the FFA’s door for a friendly chat, because I’m sure they’d get short shrift from experienced media man Patterson and his colleagues.
And Australian fans will remain none the wiser about what really went on behind the closed doors of our failed bid, despite the fact Hargitay and Radmann were “paid millions of dollars of taxpayers’ money,” according to Baker and McKenzie.
So how much did Australia’s failed World Cup bid really cost us?
It cost taxpayers plenty of cash at a time when A-League clubs are struggling desperately for revenue, even if the costs of such bids invariably run into the millions.
It cost the FFA a well connected, highly respected administrator in Bonita Mersiades – a woman who at one stage was the Socceroos’ team manager and who has a long association with the game.
And if the FFA tries to close ranks on journalists asking questions about how the bid was funded and how much consultants were paid, ultimately it could cost Australian football its integrity.
Mike Tuckerman is a Sydney-born journalist and lifelong football fan. After lengthy stints watching the beautiful game in Germany and Japan, he has settled in Brisbane and has been a Roar columnist since December 2008. Follow Mike on twitter @Mike_Tuckerman
![]()
Passionate about your football? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily football email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- What A-League matches should be on Friday night FTA? (159)
- Are we supporting the Soccerwhos? (127)
- Scrap the A-League finals and replace it with State of Origin (114)
- Osieck announces Socceroos squad for World Cup Qualifiers (98)
- The mainstream media continues to ignore football (98)
- English football has drama Aussie sport can’t replicate (95)
- The FA Cup final lost its lustre long ago (93)
- Borussia Dortmund vs Bayern Munich: Champions League Final, live scores, blog (81)
- Oliver Torres and Marco Verratti, the next Xavi and Pirlo? (2)
- Football fans need to forgive Channel Seven (44)
- Channel Seven to broadcast Liverpool, Man United friendlies (91)
- We must learn from Guangzhou humbling (48)
- Socceroos need to give up on World Cup (89)
- Assessing the 2013/14 A-League draw (15)
- Borussia Dortmund vs Bayern Munich: Champions League Final, live scores, blog (81)
- Oliver Torres and Marco Verratti, the next Xavi and Pirlo? (2)
- Football fans need to forgive Channel Seven (44)
- Socceroos need to give up on World Cup (89)
- Assessing the 2013/14 A-League draw (15)
- Scrap the A-League finals and replace it with State of Origin (114)
- AS Monaco’s taxing promotion to Ligue 1 (17)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- FFA, FIFA, football, Mohamed Bin Hammam, world cup bid, World Football



May 27th 2011 @ 5:50am
Fake ex-AFL fan said | May 27th 2011 @ 5:50am | Report comment
All excellent points Mike, but I don’t recall many soccer supporters supporting Baker & McKenzie when they first made their allegations. If I remember correctly, the general consensus amongst soccer fans was they were evil, filthy traitors in the pay of the wicked AFL and determined to destroy our wonderful WC bid. It turns out they were professional journalists raising legitimate questions. Go figure.
May 27th 2011 @ 3:33pm
JohnB said | May 27th 2011 @ 3:33pm | Report comment
Baker & McKenzie are lawyers.
May 28th 2011 @ 11:22pm
Axelv said | May 28th 2011 @ 11:22pm | Report comment
lol, Fake ex-AFL Fan using his tin foil hat, no doubt!
May 28th 2011 @ 11:50pm
Fake ex-AFL fan said | May 28th 2011 @ 11:50pm | Report comment
Baker & McKenzie are the Fairfax journos who’ve been running with the story for the past few months. Do keep up boys.
May 27th 2011 @ 6:28am
mds1970 said | May 27th 2011 @ 6:28am | Report comment
The bid cost football a lot more than money.
$46m of taxpayers’ money is one thing, but it also used up a lot of political capital. It burned bridges with other sports. And it squandered the public goodwill the game had built up in 2005/06.
But most importantly, it diverted the FFA’s energies and resources from building a viable A-League. The FFA had done a great job with that early in its existence, but when they got distracted by the bid, which Blind Freddie could see was unwinnable, that momentum was lost.
It was a mistake to bid, one that has cost football dearly. It would have been better for football if the bid had never happened.
May 27th 2011 @ 6:45am
Fake ex-AFL fan said | May 27th 2011 @ 6:45am | Report comment
In hindsight unquestionably true, but I don’t think the idea of bidding was a terrible one. No harm in throwing your hat in the ring, the real problems emerged from the excessively high expectations set that led to people thinking we were a serious chance, combined with the fatal strategic decision to attempt to negotiate with the AFL as if it was soccer coming from a position of strength rather than the other way around. Frank is clearly used to dealing with people as he deals with his shopping centre tenants and it took quite a while for him to realise he was operating in a completely different paradigm. By then it was too late and the whole bid had been poisoned and the bridges burnt.
May 27th 2011 @ 8:46am
Aka said | May 27th 2011 @ 8:46am | Report comment
What do you mean ‘fatal stategic attempt..’ when referring to negotiate with the AFL re:stadiums? Australia had an excellent technical bid. What bridges were burnt that damaged our bid? How was the bid poisoned?
The bid gave Australia fantastic exposure internationally.
And lets face it even AFL fans were starting to dream of what it could do for their sport.
May 27th 2011 @ 9:01am
The_Wookie said | May 27th 2011 @ 9:01am | Report comment
if you think the AFL is going to be even half as nice next time around, you might be in for a surprise
May 27th 2011 @ 9:40am
punter said | May 27th 2011 @ 9:40am | Report comment
Sorry Wookie, with the SOO & the Champions league final on Sunday, we in the northern sates having been paying much attention to what the AFL has to say, please enlighten us.
May 27th 2011 @ 2:18pm
BrissyBoy said | May 27th 2011 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
Speak for yourself punter… Plenty of us up here don’t watch the SOO or the soccer.
May 27th 2011 @ 4:13pm
punter said | May 27th 2011 @ 4:13pm | Report comment
Brissy boy, you are surely in the minority there.
May 27th 2011 @ 9:48pm
Bruce said | May 27th 2011 @ 9:48pm | Report comment
There’s a whole lot more that have nothing to do with AFL.
May 27th 2011 @ 12:17pm
Bondy said | May 27th 2011 @ 12:17pm | Report comment
The Wookie .
There will be no form of negtotiating with aussie rules next time , as i wrote a couple of days ago.
Does the Nation want it ( politicians ) or not.
At every stage aussie rules tried to take some form of control but he was left with egg all over his face and went back to his media with stories of persecicution, to me that was my world cup moment.
May 27th 2011 @ 12:27pm
The_Wookie said | May 27th 2011 @ 12:27pm | Report comment
unfortunately the real world has things like contracts which will still be in force at major stadiums given the AFl has 20-30 year contracts at most of these as a condition of the upgrades to these grounds.
Not to mention that the government still wont have any control over etihad next time. MCG availability was only given after the AFL voluntarily stepped back from its contract for the world cup period…after the response last time I wouldnt be too sure of that happening again.
May 27th 2011 @ 12:19pm
Aka said | May 27th 2011 @ 12:19pm | Report comment
Why? Weren’t they happy with what they negotiated?
May 27th 2011 @ 9:43am
Fussball ist unser leben said | May 27th 2011 @ 9:43am | Report comment
Another day, another football issue and … so much interest from non-Football fans!
And, as a football fan, I honestly couldn’t give a stuff what the illiterates across the non-Football community in Australia thinks about any issue relating to The Beautiful game.
May 27th 2011 @ 5:24pm
JohnB said | May 27th 2011 @ 5:24pm | Report comment
Great troll! The deliberate inconsistencies/errors in using capitals and the grammatical error in the paragraph pretending to disparage the illiterates from other codes gave it away though. Better next time to just play it straight.
May 28th 2011 @ 1:01pm
jeznez said | May 28th 2011 @ 1:01pm | Report comment
Fussball, if I could read them I’m sure I’d be offended!
May 27th 2011 @ 8:13am
agga78 said | May 27th 2011 @ 8:13am | Report comment
Well we do have the Asian cup in 2015, it will capture the imagination of the nation, 16 nations vying for the prize and the tournment we should of first tried to get, then a womans world cup, then we should of gone after the mens world cup, it was Frank Lowys dream to get it in his lifetime and he gambled and lost.
It is too late now to harp on about the world cup bid, now is the time to Focus on the A league, W league and fostering the great youngsters coming through the A league. We have the Asian cup in 2015 and I would like us too bid for the womans world cup for 2019.
Mike and other bloggers on the Roar we really need to start focusing on all the positives in Australian football, like these fan forums which at least have FFA listening to our concerns and hopefully implenting change, the rising quality of the A league which I can see going up a notch again this season.
I am very bullish that the new A league season will see the average crowds start to rise again, remember last season there were midweek games every week almost and this season they have cut them down to the holiday period. I have seen a tweet from Murray Shaw a producer for foxsports and he said he has seen next seasons draw and it is the best in the 6 year history of the league.
May 27th 2011 @ 8:38am
Binnie said | May 27th 2011 @ 8:38am | Report comment
we can start focusing on the positives of football after the FFA have taken accountability and the public know the truth, you sound like you want to sweep these issues under the rug, just like FIFA,
The hypocrosy of australians! FFA are just as bad as FIFA
hiring two crooks like hartigay and radmann and trying to hide it from the government, why didnt the billionare fund it if they were so crucial to the bid. they both have a seedy past that has not been proven in a court of law but i bet all the allegations are true.
Good on Bonita Mersiades! now the truth is out, one day i hope you break your silence agreement and speak out against these crooks representating australian soccer.
May 27th 2011 @ 8:41am
nordster said | May 27th 2011 @ 8:41am | Report comment
on the other hand, some people just want to milk all the negatives for all they’re worth… if its not one thing, its something else… some of us are just excited (and yes, Positive) about the upcoming season.
+1 for agga78
May 27th 2011 @ 10:48am
mds1970 said | May 27th 2011 @ 10:48am | Report comment
Let’s hope so. The midweek games were a crowd-killer – great for telly, but not so easy to get to after work.
And you’re right, there are positives out there. Although my club (Sydney FC) went backwards last year, most other clubs improved on the field – the standard of play in the A-League overall is probably the best it’s ever been. The grand final between the Roar and the Mariners last year was a beauty.
With a later start to avoid a clash with the AFL and NRL finals, less midweek games, and the A-League getting a greater focus without the distraction of a World Cup bid, I agree – there’s plenty of scope for a recovery in attendances this season.
May 27th 2011 @ 12:25pm
Bondy said | May 27th 2011 @ 12:25pm | Report comment
agga78.
Well said.
May 27th 2011 @ 2:29pm
BrissyBoy said | May 27th 2011 @ 2:29pm | Report comment
Yeah, I can’t wait for Uzbekistan v Iran. I’ve been hanging out for that match up for yonks.
May 27th 2011 @ 4:15pm
punter said | May 27th 2011 @ 4:15pm | Report comment
Yes abit like me hanging out for the Lions v the Power or the Dockers!!!! They are lining the streets of Bejing, Paris & Rio to watch these matches. NOT!!!!
May 27th 2011 @ 9:54pm
Titus said | May 27th 2011 @ 9:54pm | Report comment
Would actually be a pretty good game.
May 27th 2011 @ 10:01pm
Joe FC said | May 27th 2011 @ 10:01pm | Report comment
Care to tell us what you don’t like about Uzbekistanis and Iranians?
May 27th 2011 @ 10:56pm
Evan Askew said | May 27th 2011 @ 10:56pm | Report comment
Uzbeistan is inferior compared to the glorious nation of Kazahkstan!
May 27th 2011 @ 8:57am
jamesb said | May 27th 2011 @ 8:57am | Report comment
i agree agga78
May 27th 2011 @ 9:07am
Chris said | May 27th 2011 @ 9:07am | Report comment
“It cost taxpayers plenty of cash at a time when A-League clubs are struggling desperately for revenue, even if the costs of such bids invariably run into the millions.”
What’s the point in saying this? The implication that the $45m would have come the way of the A-League if the bid hadn’t happened is just plain wrong.
“It cost the FFA a well connected, highly respected administrator in Bonita Mersiades – a woman who at one stage was the Socceroos’ team manager and who has a long association with the game.”
Maybe, although there is only rumour and unsubstantiated accusations to back this point up. And at the end of the day, if Mersiades is that important to the FFA, what’s to stop her being re-hired?
“And if the FFA tries to close ranks on journalists asking questions about how the bid was funded and how much consultants were paid, ultimately it could cost Australian football its integrity.”
The FFA is simply acting like every other sporting organisation in the world in that it wants to manage/control its information. The media and the public will always want to know more information that organisations are prepared to share. I’ts just the way it is.
May 27th 2011 @ 10:13am
oly said | May 27th 2011 @ 10:13am | Report comment
I agree, I get sick of people mentioning the $46M and then saying A-League are struggling. It was federal funding and wouldn’t have gone to the FFA for other areas.
Also, if you watched the Lateline interview on Monday, Jennings was making one claim after another without actually having any evidence to back it all up.
May 27th 2011 @ 11:14am
Mike Tuckerman said | May 27th 2011 @ 11:14am | Report comment
I take your point oly (and Chris) but I think mds1970 covered it well when he said the bid “squandered the public goodwill.” The perception is out there among casual sports fans that the FFA mismanaged funds and I don’t think it helps elicit much sympathy for struggling A-League clubs.
May 27th 2011 @ 1:40pm
Ted Mulder said | May 27th 2011 @ 1:40pm | Report comment
Chris, I am that former colleague who received that Merciades email. I am not going to replicate that email here, even though Bonnie has given me permission to reveal the relevant portions wherever I deem it appropriate. It’s enough to confirm that Jennings spoke the truth about the circumstances of her sacking, at least. I have forwarded the relevant portions to those people who are in a position to write about this whole affair. Bonnie thus far has been tied to a confidentiality agreement and she has been ethical enough to respect that agreement. Even to me previously. However, in light of the latest revelations she feels the agreement has become somewhat redundant. I have no doubt all this will become a rollercoaster and Bonnie may find good reason in due course to reveal all she knows. I also hope that, should the FFA finds the situation to become untenable enough with the current honchos to seek a total re-organisation wth new people, Bonnie finds herself re- appointed to her previous role and Australian football will be so much the better for it in the future.
May 27th 2011 @ 9:07am
Tigranes said | May 27th 2011 @ 9:07am | Report comment
it wasnt so long ago that soccer heads got angry when people questioned using Hargitay and Co, with the argument being that these guys opened doors at level we mere Australians could never hope to understand.
May 27th 2011 @ 9:12am
Qantas supports Australian Football said | May 27th 2011 @ 9:12am | Report comment
Does anyone really think that Bonita Mersiades could have delivered us the 2022 Football World Cup if she had her own way..?
May 27th 2011 @ 9:38am
Tigranes said | May 27th 2011 @ 9:38am | Report comment
Well Hargitay and his mates couldnt deliver it could they?
May 27th 2011 @ 11:19am
Qantas supports Australian Football said | May 27th 2011 @ 11:19am | Report comment
So what’s the problem, or you are saying Bonita could have delivered the 2022 WC?.. Hargity was paid to get Frank Lowy access to the 24 men on the WC selection committee that was achieved. It was Frank who could not come up with the bribes (and rightly so).. I don’t think Bonita would have had a clue knowing who to approach.. I wouldn’t put too much faith in her ability to even find the right people to approach.. She is naive; to think it was going to be won just on Australia’s sporting reputation..
May 27th 2011 @ 1:53pm
Ted Mulder said | May 27th 2011 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
What nonsense. You don’t know Bonnie, do you? You obviously have no idea of who she is and what she is capable of and what connections she has. You also have very little idea of her previous influence in Australian football and elsewhere, including the fact that Bonnie was one of the delegation that approached Lowy in the first place to seek his interest in football with the result being the creation of the A-League.
No one, not even Bonnie herself, would claim she could have made the difference between winning or losing the WC bid. What difference she could have made, though, is that Australia wouldn’t have hung all our hopes on two wannabe leeches and saved us millions of dollars in the process. And, knowing Bonnie, she would have been instrumental in producing a much better quality and appropriate WC bid than the laughable production Lowy ended up with trying to win the bid.
May 27th 2011 @ 3:05pm
Qantas supports Australian Football said | May 27th 2011 @ 3:05pm | Report comment
Of course I know who Bonnie is but yes you are right I have never met her; so what? She was too disruptive and self serving that led to her own demise … http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonita_Mersiades
I also know who Les Murray is and have met with him on several occasions, but what does that have to do with anything? Bonnie, was no way in a position to dictate to Frank Lowy and Ben Buckley who was important at FIFA or had any connections with FIFA at all—not least of the in and outs that make it tick.. We all know now that a technical perfect bid book is not going to guarantee you a World Cup is it..?
May 27th 2011 @ 3:47pm
Ted Mulder said | May 27th 2011 @ 3:47pm | Report comment
“She was too disruptive and self serving that led to her own demise … http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonita_Mersiades”
Where do you see the fanciful information that “she was too disruptive and self serving”? She was one of the most capable people in FFA, enough for Lowy to have her there in charge of corporate affairs and public relations ever since the formation of the FFA until the time that Hargitay managed to convince Buckley to sack her.
In her words: “I travelled around the world with Buckley on multiple occasions after Hargitay was appointed: that was my job.
It is also why I know that Hargitay & co were not as effective as they
should have been; it is why I raised this matter with Buckley and Lowy many
times giving them my opinion that we were wasting our money on them; and
Buckley told me personally that he sacked me because of the pressure he was getting from Hargitay and the other consultants to get rid of me. I said it
again to Lowy AFTER I left to try to make him see sense”.
She didn’t dictate anything to Lowy or Buckley, she just tried to make them aware of the calibre of those two “consultants” and she was ultimately proven right.
May 27th 2011 @ 4:39pm
Qantas supports Australian Football said | May 27th 2011 @ 4:39pm | Report comment
Ted—you would have to be a fly on the wall to know what exactly went on between Hargitay and Bonita. Clearly they crossed swords that we know. I saw an interview done by Les Murray with Hargitay and I believe and trust Les Murray’s take on all of this. Do you know exactly how much Hargitay was paid over 2 years of work? From the interview, it was not millions, but far, far, less.
He was only going to collect a large sum “if the 2022 WC was won for Australia”. Hargitay was briefed by Frank Lowy to meet with all the 24 FIFA members of the WC selection committee that he had years of personal contact with. To arrange meetings and sit in with the discussions.
In fact you can read Slippery Jim’s comment here on this blog to gage Les Murray’s take on the job done by Hargitay. By all accounts he fulfilled his brief. Where Bonita could not have achieved no matter how good you think she is.
She was only going to rely on the Bid Book to win the WC. Man the English only had 2 votes on their perfect submission for the 2018 WC. Dosen’t that tell you something..?
May 27th 2011 @ 3:17pm
Qantas supports Australian Football said | May 27th 2011 @ 3:17pm | Report comment
btw it was Jesse Fink who introduced Bonnie to Frank Lowy wasn’t it. I would believe the late Johnny Warren was the one most influential who convinced Frank Lowy to get involved with the A-League. (I also new and met the late Johnny Warren.)
May 27th 2011 @ 3:51pm
Ted Mulder said | May 27th 2011 @ 3:51pm | Report comment
And why do you think that Fink introduced Bonnie to Lowy? Because he thought she could make Frank a great mug of coffee? Johnny Warren was indeed the best advocate to get Lowy interested in the creation of a new professional football league in Australia but he did so with the valuable assistance of some other people as well, including Bonnie.
May 27th 2011 @ 4:49pm
Qantas supports Australian Football said | May 27th 2011 @ 4:49pm | Report comment
Maybe Fink and Bonita are a number; who knows? Do you think Lowy would have taken Bonita seriously if Johnny Warren was not there..? Lowy didn’t even know Bonita existed before then..
May 27th 2011 @ 3:22pm
dasilva said | May 27th 2011 @ 3:22pm | Report comment
No
But it would have been a less expensive lost and we wouldn’t have lost someone who was passionate about advancing Australian football instead of supporting someone who is going to leave straight after the World Cup bid.
May 27th 2011 @ 9:19am
Fussball ist unser leben said | May 27th 2011 @ 9:19am | Report comment
The double standards of Aussies, in particular, is nauseating. Of course, it could be that the majority of Aussies are simply “business naive” (cruel people may simply call such people “simpletons”)?
When one does business in the real world, one factors in “extra expenses” to win the deal. Pharmaceutical companies wanting to market a new drug, will lavish gifts on medical practitioners (from laptops to iphones; from free holidays to new equipment); when large contracts – Government, engineering, construction, etc. – are up for tender it’s “party time” for the seller.
I can cite numerous examples of Australia’s biggest corporations (AWB, BHP, RIO, etc. etc.) – even the Federal Government-controlled corporation Securency was outed for shady deals – politicians (Federal, Stage & local) and businessmen engaging in “shady” deals to gain a lucrative contract or gain positions of power.
The trick is to be subtle … providing pearl necklaces (FFA) and depositing money into Saddam Hussein’s bank account (AWB) is about as subtle as watching Tony Soprano’s goons exchange “envelopes”.
Finally, in relation to Andrew Jennings he keeps throwing lots and lots of mud … yet, as far as I know, not one single criminal charge has been laid in relation to any allegation he has tabled about anyone associated with FIFA.
May 27th 2011 @ 10:30am
Ian Whitchurch said | May 27th 2011 @ 10:30am | Report comment
Fussball,
Im in the oil business. I dont pay bribes. I dont do business with people who pay bribes. And I have contempt for people, like you, who accept a culture of corruption.
Bluntly, when you knowingly accept corruption, you are corrupt yourself.
I pity you for your lack of character, your lack of ethics, your lack of fair play, and all those other things that make the Beautiful Game both Beautiful, and a Game.
May 27th 2011 @ 11:16am
Fussball ist unser leben said | May 27th 2011 @ 11:16am | Report comment
@ Ian Whitchurch
What is your role in the “oil industry” – e.g. do you own a petrol station, or are you a “decision-maker”, who has to negotiate major multi-million dollar contracts – with political leaders (Federal, Provincial or local), supply contractors and customers?
Your business naiveté is admirable and quaint … but, alas, suggests to me your are not and, perhaps, never will be, a decision maker.
May 27th 2011 @ 12:09pm
Tigranes said | May 27th 2011 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
That is a bit of a low blow Fussball, I dont know who Ian Whitchurch is, but that is playing the man and not the ball.
And I dont believe that corruption and bribery are commensurate with a good well run society and country, but Im probably quaint. I suspect you are a supporter of the president of Equatorial Guinea, Obiang, who is blatantly crooked, but from what I can glean, in your books is a good businessman.
May 27th 2011 @ 12:22pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | May 27th 2011 @ 12:22pm | Report comment
@ Tigranes
Have you – or would you – accept any freebie from a supplier?
E.g. would you accept an invitation to a “corporate box” to watch a sporting event? Would you accept a gift – perhaps AFL or NRL Grand Final tickets, or a Swiss watch, a laptop, an iphone – from a potential supplier? Would accept free airfare and accommodation to a Queensland resort from a supplier?
These are all examples of “kickbacks” …
If you answered “No” to all of the above then you are in line to be Australia’s 2nd saint.
May 27th 2011 @ 1:10pm
Football Fan said | May 27th 2011 @ 1:10pm | Report comment
Or perhaps an ethical business operator? or a public servant? You’ve got an angry view of the world, Fuss – I bet you call it ‘realistic’…
May 27th 2011 @ 1:20pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | May 27th 2011 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
FF
I learnt very early in my business life that you have to play by “business rules” to survive. Having said that, I have NEVER contravened any law when conducting my business affairs.
But, given a choice between two different – but equal – products, of course, I would choose the product of the company that “was good to me”.
I wonder, how many AFL-accredited journalists accept free tickets from the AFL? Is that ethical or does that raise issues of “conflict of interest”?
And, would you turn down tickets to a corporate box at a big sporting event?
May 27th 2011 @ 1:28pm
Bondy said | May 27th 2011 @ 1:28pm | Report comment
Ian Whitchurch.
Please, im in the oil business and run by standard ethics ?.
I think Marca Spain’s equivilant to L,Equipe , we dont have a paper completely dedicated to sports , where Marca went with the Front Page the day after the decision of the hosting rights ‘ The Cups Of Oil and Gas ‘.
We in the noble profession give me a break.
May 27th 2011 @ 10:31am
Nathan said | May 27th 2011 @ 10:31am | Report comment
Wait, so the big problem is that Australians are bad at bribery?
May 27th 2011 @ 10:37am
Fussball ist unser leben said | May 27th 2011 @ 10:37am | Report comment
No, the issue is … kickbacks are part of the business world – Aussies should get used to it and stop being naive or hypocrites.
May 27th 2011 @ 2:12pm
Ted Mulder said | May 27th 2011 @ 2:12pm | Report comment
Fussball, and no one named by Jennings has instituted any legal proceedings against him either, which surely would have happened by now if Jennings’ allegations were to be found based on malicious fantasies. Furthermore, no criminal charges have yet been laid against anyone connected to FIFA because FIFA has yet to undertake the appropriate process of investigation into this whole affair.
May 27th 2011 @ 2:30pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | May 27th 2011 @ 2:30pm | Report comment
@ Ted Mulder
It is not for FIFA to investigate potential criminal behaviour … criminal proceedings are brought by “the Crown” or “the State” and:
a) must be investigated by the police
b) dealt with by the criminal law and criminal justice system in the jurisdiction where the alleged offence occurred.
In relation to anyone from FIFA bringing defamation actions against Jennings … well, as far as I’ve observed, FIFA treats Jennings with as much respect as an elephant treats an annoying tick.
May 27th 2011 @ 4:00pm
Ted Mulder said | May 27th 2011 @ 4:00pm | Report comment
“yet, as far as I know, not one single criminal charge has been laid in relation to any allegation he has tabled about anyone associated with FIFA.”
Your words.
When in due course FIFA finds that bribery and corruption has in fact occurred it is up to them to take it further and make it a criminal case via the legal processes.
Well may FIFA regard Jennings as a sewer rat but I doubt they would allow Jennings to publicly slander anyone from their organisation without taking legal actions against him. The fact that they haven’t bothered to do any of that gives me enough proof that there must be some truth in whatever he has claimed.
May 27th 2011 @ 7:35pm
Qantas supports Australian Football said | May 27th 2011 @ 7:35pm | Report comment
Yes Ted that’s why FIFA’s ethics committee are having an internal investigation to see what action needs to be taken one way or the other..
May 27th 2011 @ 9:37am
Fussball ist unser leben said | May 27th 2011 @ 9:37am | Report comment
“Despite signing a confidentiality agreement upon her dismissal, Mersiades emailed a former colleague during the week to confirm Buckley told her she was sacked because of pressure from Hargitay …”.
… so, an allegation has been made that the squeaky clean Ms Mersiades has broken a major term of her termination contract?
In my opinion, when anyone wants to play the “I’m holier than thou” card, he/she better have a character to rival Mother Teresa.
May 27th 2011 @ 11:32am
Mike Tuckerman said | May 27th 2011 @ 11:32am | Report comment
Fussball – Mersiades considered the agreement redundant after Jennings made his allegations on Lateline.
May 27th 2011 @ 11:37am
Football Fan said | May 27th 2011 @ 11:37am | Report comment
Dangerous move, that – Jennings can’t possibly be a signatory to anything so the agreement would stand…
May 27th 2011 @ 11:57am
Football Fan said | May 27th 2011 @ 11:57am | Report comment
I meant to add – allegedly!! allegedly!
May 27th 2011 @ 1:54pm
The Bush said | May 27th 2011 @ 1:54pm | Report comment
Actually in defamation law in Australia adding allegedly isn’t a protection…
May 27th 2011 @ 2:05pm
Football Fan said | May 27th 2011 @ 2:05pm | Report comment
Good thing I didn’t say anything defamatory then, in my post which I now unreservedly withdraw…
May 27th 2011 @ 11:49am
Fussball ist unser leben said | May 27th 2011 @ 11:49am | Report comment
Mike
I think Mersiades is playing a very dangerous game.
As far as I know, Jennings simply made an allegation about the Mersiades sacking – unless he has seen the actual contract or was present during the dealings b/w Mersiades and the FFA, Jennings’ information is simply hearsay.
However, in my opinion, based on what I have read, Mersiades has intentionally breached her confidentiality agreement IF she has, indeed, emailed “in confidence” information.
May 27th 2011 @ 12:13pm
Binnie said | May 27th 2011 @ 12:13pm | Report comment
So it was right for FFA to pay for her silence? in regards to holding information regarding two scumbags the FFA employed without the govt knowledge?
FFA are trying to gag Mersiades because she knows too much dirt, whilist all this time the FFA have been acting like they are squeaky clean.
May 27th 2011 @ 12:16pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | May 27th 2011 @ 12:16pm | Report comment
@ Binnie
You do understand that a contract only exists when BOTH parties agree to the terms.
If Mersiades didn’t like the “in confidence” term she should have asked for it to be deleted and then the FFA would have to say “yes” or “no” … that’s how contracts are negotiated.
And, “in confidence” clauses are pretty standard in employment contracts.
May 27th 2011 @ 2:30pm
Ted Mulder said | May 27th 2011 @ 2:30pm | Report comment
Fussball, Buckley rejected the veracity of Jennings’ claim about Bonnie’s sacking as untrue. In itself that is a breach of the confidentiality agreement the FFA had with Bonnie. He should have either ignored that part of the Jennings interview or cited the agreement and not say another word about it. The fact that he lied about it now should be enough reason for Bonnie to defend her integrity and consider the agreement as redundant. Up till this week she has always maintained the integrity of that agreement, including to friends and colleagues, but the Jennings interview AND the subsequent reactions by Buckley et al has thrown the doors wide open.
May 27th 2011 @ 10:33am
Nathan said | May 27th 2011 @ 10:33am | Report comment
Still looking forward to the coming season; will be good to see if Glory have got their signings right this time.
C’mooooon Glory!