Football’s great but futile ‘best ever’ debate
Roar Rookie By Ben Murphy, 31 May 2011 Ben Murphy is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- Barcelona FC, diego maradona, European football, football, Lionel Messi, Pele, Pep Guardiola, UEFA Champions League, UEFA Champions League final
The manner of Barcelona’s victory over Manchester United in the UEFA Champions League final has reopened the debate on whether or not they are the greatest club side of all-time.
A man-of-the-match performance from their Argentinean superstar, Lionel Messi, has also strengthened the claims of those who argue that he is the greatest player of all-time.
It may be hard to disagree on both fronts. After all, Barcelona, under the guidance of current coach, Pep Guardiola, have now won an amazing 10 titles in the past three years.
Messi has constantly tormented opposition defences throughout this period and he ended the current season with an incredible personal tally of 53 goals and 24 assists in 54 appearances for the club.
Former players and football fans have rightfully been lavish in their praise of Messi’s achievements. Earlier this month, Ossie Ardiles, a World Cup winner with Argentina in 1978, voiced his belief that Messi has now overtaken the likes of Diego Maradona and Pele as the greatest footballer of all-time. Yet his main reason for having such an opinion, that “sport has improved”, can also be seen as an argument against making such a claim.
In the interview with ESPN, Ardiles explained that “the modern game helps goalscorers and the ball players; the pitches are better, the boots are better, the rules have been altered to favour the attacking players… the way the players look after their bodies, the way that clubs and national sides employ so many people to look after their bodies, with what they eat, and just about everything you can think of.”
If modern sport has allowed football to gain an advantage, which it evidently has, then it seems unfair to compare current players such as Messi against Pele, Maradona, Puskas, Cruyff or any other former great. Why can’t players simply be the best of their generation? Surely there would be very few who would deny Messi this accolade, particularly with his recent exploits. But stating that he is the best ever? As Ardiles himself admitted, how good could Pele and Maradona have been if they had been playing today?
Many believe that they would have been just as successful. Conversely, some argue that they did not play their football in such an intense and pressure-filled environment, therefore, might not have been able to handle the demands of modern football. No-one will ever know though, which is why such a comparison should not be made.
However, the media has an obsession with placing the best ever name-tag on an individual and then attempt to convince the public to accept their verdict. Last year, Santos’ 19-year-old Brazilian striker Neymar was predicted to become the greatest Brazilian footballer of all-time.
That’s right, a young man with a handful of international experience and goals, expected to overtake the vast achievements of his predecessors. Perhaps the most intriguing angle on Neymar is that comparisons have already been made between his ability and that of Messi’s at the same age. Many believe that he has more skill and potential than Messi did.
So, if Neymar even comes close to matching the achievements of the man currently lauded as the best ever by those in the know, you can guarantee that the little Argentine will be swiftly cast aside. Just look at what happened to Ronaldinho. He was, during his time at Barcelona, spoken of as possibly the best player ever. Just a few years later, and he is seemingly remembered as an outstanding footballer, but no longer spoken of in the same breath as Pele, Maradona or even Messi.
It is clear that footballers need to be remembered for how they performed within the confines of their own generation. As he demonstrated once again, Messi is currently the best of his generation and should be appreciated and respected for that, not pressured by futile claims of definitive supremacy in the history of football.
Passionate about your football? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily football email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
May 31st 2011 @ 2:16pm
kgb said | May 31st 2011 @ 2:16pm | Report comment
meaningful words, agreed ! but i’ve problem with pele as the comparisons is to be or is not to be between messi and maradona, no place for pele as many pele’s are out there on the pitch but there is one maradona and one messi
May 31st 2011 @ 2:23pm
Qantas supports Australian Football said | May 31st 2011 @ 2:23pm | Report comment
I’m not a Baca supporter but a fan of their Football. There’s no argument to be had—they are simply the best ever..
May 31st 2011 @ 4:17pm
David V. said | May 31st 2011 @ 4:17pm | Report comment
Ain’t that the truth… today’s game is massively overhyped that everything new is hailed as golden.
June 4th 2011 @ 1:24pm
Subrasub said | June 4th 2011 @ 1:24pm | Report comment
wow this is a really nice article well done. I think its a really valid point that players should not be compared across different eras simply because of the many variables that need to be taken into account. The whole notion of technological improvements that may improve modern perfromances as opposed to the whole environment of modern players and the scrutiny they cop and how their lives on and off the pitch is magnified. The idea that a pele or a maradona with modern day treatment and boots etc could play even better or they would not be able to cope with the intense media scrutiny of today and thus would not be as good as how a ronaldo or messi plays today. There are endless arguements for which player or club is the best ever but really it is a futile argument and so your peles, maradonas and messis have to be labelled as the best of their generation because you just simply cannot make a bias free and impartial judgement like in any other sport . On the argument itself i am not a barcelona supporter or someone who loves to watch messi more than any other player but i admire barcelonas football and marvel at messi. I believe barcelona are not the greatest side ever and dont believe messi is the best ever player. I think it is an insult to players such as ronaldo,ronaldinho and cristiano ronaldo or even an alessandro del piero or zidane who have played a lot longer than messi to not even be mentioned in the same breath or considered better. If messi can continue to play like this for a long time then he has to be considered the best of his generation and in the conversation for best ever. My question is where do you draw the line for gen? Surely a ronaldo or zidane or has to be mentioned in this arguement if we are talking about generations.