Is the global style of football changing?
By roarlover34, 8 Jun 2011 roarlover34 is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Argentina football, Barcelona FC, Brisbane Roar, European football, football, Lionel Messi, UEFA Champions League
Having watched the Champions League final in my lounge room with my jaw somewhere near my ankles, I began to wonder, is the method of playing football starting to drastically change?
Teams like Liverpool in the seventies and eighties employed a style that was typical of their days, except nobody could match it.
It involved extremely quick, strong and fast players interchanging intelligent passing with expert finishing. Every time the ball was won instantly, players burst forward, creating options for that killer attack.
The nineties saw a significant increase in the usage of classic speedy wingers to try and get around the back of teams or down the flanks to cross the ball into the strong, composed centre fowards. It was a period where players such as Paul Gascoigne and Alan Shearer would dominate teams with their power and deadly finishing.
The later nineties and early 2000s saw an increase in the tactics of expert defending, closing down of teams and counter attacking football, with Italian sides of that era deploying such tactics to expertise, such as the highly successful AC Milan of the early 2000s. Greece also won Euro 2004 from such tactics.
Over the last couple of years it appears that the game of football is changing for the better on the field. In all honesty, diving actually seems to be decreasing.
Although many may counter this argument after watching the first leg of the Barcelona versus Real Madrid semi final, this was a rare case.
There are considerably less controversial moments involving diving, and having watched many of Europe’s top league’s week in week out, all of the matches contain far less theatrics than they did six or so years ago.
A team which probably best displays this is Argentina – a team which I wholeheartedly despised for many years during the late nineties and early 2000s. Who could forget the infamous over-reaction of Simione after Beckham tapped him on the leg? I can remember screaming with joy after they were eliminated in the group stage of the 2002 World Cup.
At the 2005 Confederation Cup, they were hardly better.
In their game against Australia, they managed to get away with countless fouls and dived throughout the match.
The moment which truly forced my hatred was when one if their players pulled a Socceroos player down on top of him, winning a penalty – ridiculous cheating. Followed by their antics after being eliminated by Germany in 2006, I continued to dislike them.
At the World Cup in 2010, however, they played it clean.
They didn’t cheat, they didn’t dive and they didn’t start a fight after being eliminated. I think this can largely be credited to Messi and his attitude of not diving. When Messi gets fouled on a run, he often stumbles to stay on his feet then continues uninterested in settling for a free-kick. Hopefully this trend continues.
However, the biggest change is in the style of football. Barcelona are pioneers of a new breed of football, a style which revolves around complete team cohesion in attack and defence, keeping the ball for as long as possible, playing passes on the ground and working triangles. Playing out from the back instead of kicking it long is also an important aspect of the style of play. To be able to play the ball out from the back, while under pressure and without losing the ball, is a very difficult task.
This advanced and beautiful style of play employed by Barcelona is started to be copied around the world. It was played by Spain in the World Cup (of course with a similar squad), Chile, Brisbane Roar and lately Swansea.
The fact that this football is being replicated in South America, the English Championship (at the time) and, low and behold, Australia, seems to suggest that the style of football is in a transition period.
Not only is the football of Barcelona being attempted because it is successful, but also because it is lauded by critics, although non-regular watchers of the beautiful game often label it is boring. This is only because their knowledge of good football is typically restricted to long shots and over-head kicks instead of outstanding team play.
This quality of football is been examined and often referred to as the benchmark by Holger Osieck and the FFA, which is why it is been included in the National Curriculum. It is seen as a globally as a yardstick for what good football stand for. This is the kind of education that our young players need.
I recently had the pleasure of meeting a young coach who is working with young teenage players in teaching them how to try and play this level of football. Although they don’t always win, they are always congratulated on their style by both sets of coaches.
We need to adopt a mentality of style before results. I have often witnessed this team go down to teams which contained a striker who scored a bagful of goals because his team would kick the ball over the defence and he would run onto it and score.
He would always be first to the ball as he was more physically developed than the other teams players.
Yes, this football may be successful at the age, but what happens when everyone grows up to his size? The beauty of this new style of football is that size doesn’t matter. Look at Barcelona, an average height of five foot six.
From what I can see, we are entering a new chapter of the style of football, and it can only be for the better.
If we are to follow suit as a nation and preach this style, we need to start putting style ahead of results and for our youngsters so that they can develop into the next breed of Brisbane Roar-like footballers and future Socceroos.
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- NSL lessons vital for A-League’s future (103)
- A-League expansion possibilities (102)
- The FA Cup final lost its lustre long ago (92)
- Can the Victory reach 50,000 and beyond? (91)
- English football has drama Aussie sport can’t replicate (88)
- Don’t be fooled: FFA Cup is too big a risk (78)
- Leave your A-League colours at the door for Australia (75)
- What A-League matches should be on Friday night FTA? (111)
- Are we supporting the Soccerwhos? (95)
- Where are the champions in the Champions League? (17)
- Last-gasp Cahill strike stuns LA Galaxy (2)
- Merrick back in A-League as Phoenix coach (30)
- Leave your A-League colours at the door for Australia (78)
- Ferguson bows out as Man United draw 5-5
- Are we supporting the Soccerwhos? (95)
- Where are the champions in the Champions League? (17)
- EPL Super Sunday 2013: Final day live scores, updates, blog (38)
- David Beckham – the underrated superstar (19)
- Who would be a football manager? (7)
- Bundesliga: can Freiburg ‘do a Gladbach’? (0)
- R.I.P Sir Alex (0)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Argentina football, Barcelona FC, Brisbane Roar, European football, football, Lionel Messi, UEFA Champions League

June 8th 2011 @ 6:30am
nordster said | June 8th 2011 @ 6:30am | Report comment
Style before results really does lend itself well to junior programs. Glad to see FFA embrace this with the new mentality they’re trying to develop around SSG. What’s so fantastic is those kids can also look up at their idols and see that it can win games at the elite level too. Perfect timing for this new direction for Australia’s youth development.
June 8th 2011 @ 7:49am
Futbanous said | June 8th 2011 @ 7:49am | Report comment
What continues to astound me is(& as A Roar fan from the beginning I’ve seen with my own eyes) is that the style can be transformed within a short space of time. I dont claim to be an Ange as far as teaching this method of play,but I do understand the skills of football & what techniques are required to play this way.
Therefore as these basic techniques have always been known,why is it that its suddenly a new style of football.
Theoretically its always been available.
Is it simply that other aspects of the game have developed such as fitness,usage of space,modern defensive/offensive tactics?
June 8th 2011 @ 8:18am
nordster said | June 8th 2011 @ 8:18am | Report comment
i think so … u need those things as a basis to build on … fitness, tactical nous etc. Plus its perhaps a cyclical thing. We are in an era where this style of play is in the ascendency. A club like Barca as the example, which is then probably amplified by the fact that we can now watch such a diverse range of styles with the increasing spread of the game as a global TV product.
June 8th 2011 @ 8:48am
Birkish Delight said | June 8th 2011 @ 8:48am | Report comment
You could see this in the Socceroos game last night. Archie Thompson would try and keep the ball way too long and would keep getting shut down. He had plently of passing options but all he knows is the run at goal and shoot tactic.
June 8th 2011 @ 8:51am
PaddyBoy said | June 8th 2011 @ 8:51am | Report comment
Diving in general from the majority of players is down, but Dani Alves alone has made sure that it has increased across the board
.
I really enjoy the way Barcelona play, but I don’t want it to be adopted across the board. Some teams are rough, some park the bus, some possess and dominate, others lose possession and win on the counter, all makes eatching that much better.
June 8th 2011 @ 9:46am
Roger Rational said | June 8th 2011 @ 9:46am | Report comment
The game has been emasculated and sissified by the corrupt bureaucrats of FIFA. The only reason there seems to be less diving is because no one dares make a tackle any more. Football used to be a test of physical courage as much as skill, but no longer.
June 8th 2011 @ 9:59am
Futbanous said | June 8th 2011 @ 9:59am | Report comment
Fell down a manhole yesterday,found it was a well. Bloke threw me down a rope ,rope broke. Bloke said “hang on I’ll get help”. Replied “dont worry I cant swim”.
Bloody FIFA.
June 8th 2011 @ 10:35am
Phil Osopher said | June 8th 2011 @ 10:35am | Report comment
Nice article. Nice summary of the timeline and period styles. Puts it all in perspective. It often just looks like people running around and chasing a ball u8 style to many who dont get it, at which Id have to say Im one.
Australia is famous for route 1 football and I hope we are changing, or we’ll never get results. I was in your dreaded Argentina at the 2004 olympics, and the locals were in stitches at the Olyroos style of play, mocking the predictablility of the long ball, and laughing whole heartedly when it happened. It was rather embaressing for an Aussie to withstand.
June 8th 2011 @ 11:09am
Fussball ist unser leben said | June 8th 2011 @ 11:09am | Report comment
Nice article and a terrific general analysis of football during the past 4 decades.
However, before we get too carried away by Barca … let’s not forget they were comprehensively eliminated from the UCL 12 months ago by a team that played a football style that was the antithesis of all that Barca espouses.
June 8th 2011 @ 2:52pm
roarlover34 said | June 8th 2011 @ 2:52pm | Report comment
that’s true about Inter Milan.
I think there will always be teams who opt for the defensive style of football and stick to the long ball. This is what makes watching teams like barcelona etc so enjoyable.
June 8th 2011 @ 3:13pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | June 8th 2011 @ 3:13pm | Report comment
To be honest, as much as I love watching Barca play, I really enjoyed the 2 legs against Inter Milan last season since it exposed a MAJOR flaw – in my opinion – in Barca’s game.
Murinho had a team that maintained its defensive structure for 90 minutes and mounted swift and incisive counter-attacks that showed Barca to be quite vulnerable.
And, against Inter Milan, Barca demonstrated they do not have a “Plan B”. Even when Plan A was clearly not working in the 2nd leg, Guardiola couldn’t try anything else. He just persisted with Plan A hoping it would prevail … and, usually, it does.
I love watching the goals from the 1st leg of that UCL Semi Final …
Barca actually went ahead 1-0, before Inter hit back with 3 goals that exposed Barca’s weaknesses:
Goal 1: poor positional defending from the right full back, Dani Alves – he’s a great attacking player but, in my opinion, very vulnerable as a defender
Goal 2: Inter wins the ball deep inside their own half but with 3 simple – but intelligent – passes along the ground Barca’s midfield is exposed and the ball is in the back of the net 10 seconds later
Goal 3: Barca always wanting to play out of defence, loses the ball in a dangerous spot and again the ball is in the net within 5 seconds
June 8th 2011 @ 1:06pm
Uncle Bob said | June 8th 2011 @ 1:06pm | Report comment
It is completely non contact now which I am not sure is a great thing and against what the founders of the sport envisioned. Who is to blame, well, 30 odd years of FIFA meddling.
June 8th 2011 @ 3:20pm
Nathan said | June 8th 2011 @ 3:20pm | Report comment
Thats really not true; its not as rough as it used to be but there are certainly still legitimate ways to put in tackles. You just cant “oops, look at that, I killed the opposing player, but I got the ball, shame that” like you used to.
June 8th 2011 @ 9:39pm
Uncle Bob said | June 8th 2011 @ 9:39pm | Report comment
Hah, it was never like that. The point is, you could contest, now you cannot or people go to ground at the slightest touch and you know the rest of the story.
It is all down to FIFA’s attack on there being any contact. This has in turn created the monster, namely diving. What is the biggest problem with soccer, all the play acting or the hard tackling which sorts out the men from the boys?
June 8th 2011 @ 9:45pm
Titus said | June 8th 2011 @ 9:45pm | Report comment
Sorry Bob, you are completely wrong. Did you watch the game last night? Plenty of contact, no diving. The result was a fast, flowing, skillful game of football.That is what most people want, a balance between the physical and the skillful.
People in Australia get hung up on this diving idea as though it is a constant in every game. You should check you bias and allow yourself to enjoy the game. Trust me it’s worth it.
June 9th 2011 @ 8:45pm
The Cattery said | June 9th 2011 @ 8:45pm | Report comment
I’m with Uncle Bob here. There is a vast difference between today’s game and the game of the 70s and 80s, and there is no doubt that in the modern game, there is too much reward for players that go too easily to ground – it’s an absolute blight.
Thirty years ago, players could go shoulder to shoulder in trying to win the ball.
June 8th 2011 @ 1:14pm
Johnno said | June 8th 2011 @ 1:14pm | Report comment
FIFA those corrupt and nasty administrators, gee i wsh all the countries would form a breakaway organization, a few wanted to join up with the English fa but were sadly outnumbered by corrupt officials who represent these countries the jack warners of this world and bin hammans. they FIFA cant stand them though, are looking at reforming the offside rule more which i think it is good they have talked with field hickey chiefs about how it has worked in the sport of field hickey which has a lot of similarities as well as big difference sot. i hope they eliminate or reform the off side rule even more, so hard to understand even the officials half the matches the players look offside officially anyway.
June 8th 2011 @ 3:21pm
punter said | June 8th 2011 @ 3:21pm | Report comment
Enjoy the article Roarlover. It shows that as football evolves & new tactics come in, this particular period of time has produced the teams that have played the best football. While there will be endless debates about who was the best team result wise in the history of Football and even in the history of the A-League.
There is no doubt that in 40 years of watching football this Barcelona side is the best side to watch & the Brisbane Roar is the most appealing side (pleasing to the eye) ever in the A-League.