Passion for the badge in world rugby
By warrenj, 1 Jul 2011 warrenj is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- 2011 Rugby World Cup, All Blacks, rugby, rugby jumpers, Rugby Union, Rugby World Cup, south african rugby, Springboks, wallabies
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Wallabies news
- Rugby World Cup 2011 news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- South Africa Springboks news
- Rugby 2011 news
- 2013 Wallabies squad news
With the World Cup commencing in just over two months, there are a lot of things that need to be finalised and put into place.
Teams are going through the process of selecting the strong few to play on the biggest stage, coaches are going through game plans and options, players are calculating their strength and endurance to peak at the right time, stadiums in New Zealand are going through the final checklists to make sure the spectators have the best experience, and volunteers are putting their hands up to assist the thousands of people looking for help.
Amongst all these preparations, the kit sponsors of the various teams launch their jerseys onto the world stage. All the big names have a chance to impress the fans – Kooga with a number of teams headlined by the Wallabies; Adidas with a few teams and their flagship team, the All Blacks; CCC has always a presence and their headline of the the Springboks, as well as some other brands.
The World Cup jersey will be the jersey the people remember, and if a team wins, that jersey is cemented in history as the winning jersey, so their may be a lot of things at stake, especially pride. The World Cup jerseys are different from any other jersey as they have to follow strict IRB World Cup regulations.
Each jersey needs to have the World Cup logo on the front breast, placed on the right and the countries national sporting logo placed on the left with the kit sponsors’ logo in the centre, and, of course, no commercial sponsorship allowed.
Most teams and countries have no issue with the arrangement and abide by it without a stir or concern.
The two stalwart jerseys that need some modification with the national sporting logo are the Wallabies and the Springboks. During non-World Cup years, the Wallabies have the Wallaby logo placed on the jersey as well as the national sporting logo. The Wallaby is on the right and the coat-of-arms is on the left.
This arrangement has been around since the first touring days of the men in gold and green and has not been too much of a political or personal issue for players or supporters.
The men who pull over the gold jersey to represent Australia in the arena of rugby are known as, and will always be known as the Wallabies.
The Wallaby logo is completely omitted during the World Cup so as to make space for the World Cup logo and follow the IRB regulations. The Wallaby isn’t moved to another part of jersey and their is no protest to omitting the Wallaby for this tournament. After the World Cup, the Wallaby is reinstated and the game goes on as per usual.
This seemingly simple understanding doesn’t seem to cross over to the South Africa or it’s passionate supporters. I am not claiming that one country is more passionate than the other – they are equally passionate for their respective teams as each other – rather the approach that one group of supporters has compared to the other.
South Africa has had a unique political history which is still relatively fresh in people’s minds, and this may lend to the fact that South African sports supporters are still at ends with the governing body’s approach to sporting culture in South Africa, especially rugby.
The government wanted to ‘unite’ all teams playing under the flag so made it compulsory that all national teams play with the Protea badge on their jersey to symbolise unity.
It took SARU (South Africa Rugby Union) a while to adopt this change, but they did and the Protea badge was placed on the Springbok jersey two years ago.
This meant that the Springbok emblem needed to be moved from the left breast to the right breast.
At the time many people opposed this move saying that the days of Springboks were numbered and it would be a matter of time before the green and gold jersey would be known as the Proteas.
So far, this extreme change has not happened.
This passion for the Springbok emblem was again reignited with the World Cup jersey. As with the Wallaby jersey, the national emblem was kept and the Springbok logo was omitted. This created fierce opposition and the governing body allowed the Springbok to stay but it was shifted to the sleeve so as to meet IRB regulations.
People again are complaining that it’s only a matter of time before the Springboks are renamed and politics has it’s way.
These misguided supporters seem to forget that the Springbok will be placed back onto the right breast after the World Cup and that South Africa isn’t the only team to change the badging of a jersey.
I guess the reason for the extreme passion, is that political interference/influence is dictating how sport should be in the effort to move forward. The South African rugby team has been known as the Springboks for over a hundred years, and it has had many stigma attached to it, most notably being a symbol and sport of the oppressive white rule in the apartheid era.
Things have changed since then and Mandela led this change so as to incorporate South African history into the Springbok symbol, not just white history.
The passion for the badge runs deep and when this badge is threatened, people stand up and speak up against any threat. A badge maybe an embroidery on a piece of cloth but for many it’s a symbol of pride, country and history.
I understand these people and their feelings towards a badge, but no matter what it becomes, it’s the people’s passion that counts.
Even if the Springbok logo is eventually taken off the jersey, the men that wear the green and gold jersey will always be known as the Springboks.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Where is Deans in the pecking order of rugby coaches? (319)
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (267)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (245)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Quade Cooper misses Wallaby squad selection (209)
- Quade shouldn’t be fly half against the Lions (184)
- Could Matt Lucas be a Wallaby bolter? (82)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (164)
- Who can still win the Super Rugby title? (36)
- Deans must forgive Quade: Slack (124)
- SPIRO: Super Rugby TMOs are making too many mistakes (96)
- Rebels’ O’Connor stays on sidelines (11)
- ‘Lucky 29′ journey into despair (part one) (8)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (164)
- Who can still win the Super Rugby title? (36)
- ‘Lucky 29′ journey into despair (part one) (8)
- My open letter to the ARU (17)
- Super Rugby teams will skin the Lions (116)
- Super B to the rescue for rugby? (53)
- Picking your ‘First V’ for the Wallabies (67)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- 2011 Rugby World Cup, All Blacks, rugby, rugby jumpers, Rugby Union, Rugby World Cup, south african rugby, Springboks, wallabies


July 1st 2011 @ 7:19am
Sean Fagan said | July 1st 2011 @ 7:19am | Report comment
Interesting read, but not so sure re the design of the Aust jerseys and the suggestion that the wallaby “has been around since the first touring days of the men in gold and green” – the green/gold was adopted late 1920s, and as best I can tell the only badge used then and subsequently was the Aust coat of arms, all the way thru until (ironically) the 1991 World Cup when a Wallabies logo was added to the right side. Until the 1990s the Aust team were not called the Wallabies unless they toured overseas, and in the view of many that was even confined further to just a UK tour.
July 1st 2011 @ 8:15am
warrenj said | July 1st 2011 @ 8:15am | Report comment
Sean. I may be wrong about the history of the Australian badge and logo, but the point of my article was to raise the issue of public reaction in dropping the logo for the World Cup, especially from a South African point of view. I now that the ‘nickname’ of the Wallabies was given to the Australian team in the early 1900′s when on tour and the gold strip was adopted permanently in the 1960′s. I apologise for the incorrect history of the Wallaby logo, I hope that this soesn’t interfere with the point of the article.
July 1st 2011 @ 8:33am
sixo_clock said | July 1st 2011 @ 8:33am | Report comment
Profound bit of writing Warren, well written.
Rightly or wrongly I believe Rugby Union to be a perfect vehicle for building inclusiveness as we have a very high demand for teamwork first and individual excellence second. This is perhaps what Nelson saw when he sought to merge his image with the ‘Boks. Some of the wiser Saffas also grasped the concept and sought out the Williams’, Habanas, Aplons, Mvovos and Januaries. Who cannot identify with the power, purpose and passion of Ashley Johnson and not identify with him.
If they remain as the Springboks it will be because the badge will turn its back on the past and every player will run to celebrate a try with any other player. If SARU is willing to identify racists and refuse to select them then the deeper thinkers, as Mandela is, will be vindicated and Rugby will have another victory. They will do so only if it is important.
July 1st 2011 @ 8:41am
The Battered Slav said | July 1st 2011 @ 8:41am | Report comment
Who cares.
The Wallaby logo is not sacred, as you can see by the tinkering in design over time.
If it were a sacred emblem, it would be immune to change.
However, like the Reds and Tahs, Wallabyland sees no problem is submitting an emblem to a graphic designer for a spruce up. This is part of the modern game and the Wallaby logo is simply a marketing tool, so I see no issue with its omission along with the sponsor’s name. Perhaps now that they’re not the QANTAS Wallabies at the cup, they can be Australia!!! That’s right John O’Neill, you desperately want them to connect with the Australian people, yet you do not allow them to be called the Australian Wallabies, or even Australia? You sir, are an idiot.
Anyway, back to the point. What is important, I think, is a team jersey rather than the logo. In my opinion, nations should revert back to the classic solid colours, hoops, quarters and other classic, 1st XV style jumpers that used to be the norm. I think that the jersey should be the national colours, in a classic style pattern and should not be tinkered with to appeal to new fans.
Jerseys need to reflect the past and the glorious amateur roots of the game, not try to keep up with the ugliest of mungo fashion to keep the TV viewers eyes from getting bored.
Bring back the Australian Walabies, and bring back the 1st XV jumpers – AND MAKE THEM COTTON WITH A BLOODY COLLAR!!!!!!!!
July 1st 2011 @ 11:05am
timmypig said | July 1st 2011 @ 11:05am | Report comment
And speaking of jerseys …. the All Blacks are rolling out a new Adidas jersey on 30 Jul when they play the Boks at the Cake Tin. To be honest, I dread what’s coming. The ‘all black’ All Black jersey (post ’99) still leaves me cold; I think the classic white collar/black body & sleeves is still the best. But almost every international team jersey has become a muddled mess since professionalism. Super 12 jerseys started going strange, Super 14 jerseys positively awful, Superugby jerseys no improvement. Even club jerseys are becoming too fussy, too colourful, irregular in pattern, weird.
Crumbs … even my old subbies club now has the almost obligatory coloured patch under each armpit – what a Barry Crocker.
Re the Boks and the leaping springbok … that is the Springbok and it should be on the jersey. Put a smaller Springbok below the Protea badge, or above it, or on the other sleeve. Removing a well known team symbol and enforcing the politically acceptable branding is at least as divisive as leaving the old one in place, and I bet the ANC know that … and I bet that’s the whole point, to rub “old rugby’s” noses in it.
July 1st 2011 @ 2:39pm
sheek said | July 1st 2011 @ 2:39pm | Report comment
It would be sad if the Springbok emblem was removed from the South African rugby jersey. I would call it reverse apartheid if this happened! Afterall, the poor animal itself wasn’t responsible for the political shennanigans of its human inhabitants.
It’s a shame the World Cup protocol for national uniforms wasn’t in place all the place. I’m totally oppossed to sponsors appearing on the national jersey. Clearly a case of putting money before principles.
warrenj,
I agree with Sean’s view of jersey colours & the use of the term Wallabies. For most of the ’50s for example, the Wallabies played in green jerseys (ala Kangaroos). It was after the tour of South Africa that the ARU realised they needed to change their jersey colour so as not to clash with either South Africa or Ireland.
So the famous gold jersey only dates from 1961-62.
It also seems that the use of the term Wallabies gradually shifted just from touring teams to Britain, Ireland & France to all touring teams, to any test team. Silly that the test team playing at home couldn’t be called “Wallabies”, but some good ideas only evolve slowly.
But it doesn’t detract from the basic premise of your post.
July 1st 2011 @ 3:05pm
Sean Fagan said | July 1st 2011 @ 3:05pm | Report comment
Many of those old time “Wallabies” & “Kangaroos” (I’m talking those who went on tours in 1960s and earlier) would fire up big time if someone applied that appellation to a non tourist – by that I mean anyone who solely played his Test(s) in Australia wasn’t entitled to the “Wallabies” or “Kangaroos” name, and those that were entitled made very sure the rules weren’t relaxed.
The Rabbitohs’ Clem Kennedy who played for Aust in Sydney in 1946 was told in no uncertain terms by “Kangaroos” for decades he couldn’t go to reunions. He went to his first one in 2008 when they relaxed the rules (and thereafter) as part of the centenary.
Not saying that is all the way it should or shouldn’t have been, just that’s the way it was – being one of those “Wallabies” or “Kangaroos” touring teams was a very prestigious, enviable and limited “club”.
July 1st 2011 @ 4:02pm
Riaan said | July 1st 2011 @ 4:02pm | Report comment
The new Springbok jersey is a joke. Went out to buy it yesterday, saw that it was R650 bucks. Thought that it was a reasonable price at the time, but then I looked closely and Ive completely forgotten that the Bok is on the sleeve! The protea is on the left breast and the world cup logo is on the right. Why cant they (ANC and co) just leave the bok on its rightfull place where it belongs? Are they so petty and cruel? Like Greek Gods. This is racism in reverse againts the white Afrikaaner. Surely they can make an exception for the boks. Soccer may be the most popular sport in SA but Rugby is the heartbeat of the entire nation.
I ended up not buying the jersey, Il be wearing my old real springbok one. I urge you to do the same and protest againts these tyrons (ANC…) No wonder the players dont hold on to their hearts when the national anthem are being sang. They just hold eachother now. Dis definatief die begin van die einde van ons spesiaale Springbok.
July 1st 2011 @ 4:13pm
Nathan said | July 1st 2011 @ 4:13pm | Report comment
R650, wow, how’s that exchange rate going? o.o
July 2nd 2011 @ 12:10am
Stellenbosched said | July 2nd 2011 @ 12:10am | Report comment
The Bok on the sleeve is not the fault of the ANC. Saru tried hard to get the badge re-instated on the front of the jersey, but IRB regulations allow only three logo’s. Plus we are told that the Wallaby is also moved onto a sleeve for the RWC.
I do not know why Canterbury feel they have more right to be one of the logo’s instead of the Springbok. Anyway, I will not be buying the RWC bok jersey. Damn disgrace.
July 2nd 2011 @ 9:42am
warrenj said | July 2nd 2011 @ 9:42am | Report comment
@Stellenbosched. You are correct, that the Wallaby logo has been put onto the sleeve for this World Cup, but this doesn’t seem to be a problem with the Australian public. Your comment backs up my point of my article – the passion for a simple logo/badge runs deep. I am not saying what is correct or not, I’m just saying that the support for a symbol is passionate and loyal.
July 6th 2011 @ 3:08pm
AaronMal said | July 6th 2011 @ 3:08pm | Report comment
Its a great article worth reading, but a here’s a heads up on a couple of points about the Wallaby logo.
The Wallabies Logo was moved to the left sleeve for the 1999 World Cup – the last cup of the greatest Wallaby Jersey.
In 2007 the Wallabies world cup Jersey had a Wallaby Logo on the left sleeve and a sprig of watlle embroided into the right sleeve, for reasons that were never logical.
Just Saying !!