England whitewash India 4-0
By fernal73, 24 Aug 2011 fernal73 is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- Cricket, England, India, Rahul Dravid, Sachin Tendulkar, Stuart Broad
The rout is complete. The English Lions, in their own den, knocked the Indians from their perch of the number one Test team in the world.
The mighty have fallen and hard. Team India nestle at number three behind South Africa.
For one brief session on the fifth day of the last Test, Sachin Tendulkar and Amit Mishra showed what could have been.
Had the Indian batsmen applied themselves similarly in the first three matches, the series result could have been quite different. This was the only batting session – in the entire series – that the Indians did not lose a wicket.
The English bowlers, for the first time in the series, showed signs of frustration. Graeme Swann kicked the turf, repeatedly.
It was also the only time in the series – thanks to the follow-on enforcement – that the English bowlers had to toil in the field for two days or more.
The tiredness was plain. Unfortunately, the Indian fightback did not last.
As before, the Indians lost far too many wickets prior to the second new ball. Team India lost three quick wickets in the six overs before the new ball arrived. The result, from thereon, was a foregone conclusion.
That has been the story throughout the series.
Test cricket batting is about seeing off the new ball and then capitalizing as the red cherry wears out. Team India’s scores, when the second new ball was taken, read as follows:
First Test at Lords:
First Innings: 235/5 after 80.1 overs
Second Innings: 213/5 after 80.1 overs
Second Test at Birmingham:
First Innings: 258/4 after 80.1 overs
Second Innings: 150 runs in 44.3 overs
Third Test at Edgbaston:
First Innings:224/10 in 62.2 overs
Second Innings: 244 (55.3 ov)
Fourth Test at Kennington Oval:
First Innings: 253/7 after 80.1 overs
Second Innings: 266/6 after 80.1 overs
The inability to bat long and hard hurt the Indians.
Rahul Dravid achieved a personal milestone of 35 Test hundreds, going past India’s Sunil Gavaskar and West Indies’ Brian Lara. The moment was tinged with regret, the celebrations muted.
Of the 35 tons, just four came in losing causes, three, however, in this series. Dravid, now, has an idea of what Sachin Tendulkar feels when he scores tons by the dozen; yet the team fails him.
The joint man-of-the-series, with Stuart Board revealed:
“I will have mixed feelings. A sense of satisfaction at the way I’ve played. But when you get a 100 and don’t end up winning, it doesn’t feel nice. I haven’t experienced it too many times in my career.”
The premier off-spinner in the world, Graeme Swann, must have wondered when he would get his chance to get stuck in into the much-vaunted Indian batting line-up.
He grabbed his opportunity with both hands, bowling into the rough created by RP Singh’s foot-marks. Is there a case that England played with 12 men and Team India ten?
Swann’s match figures read 9-208 in 69 overs.
Dhoni’s decisions
MS Dhoni will be aware that every decision of his will be scrutinised minutely. The inclusion of RP Singh in the playing XI was moot.
It was the same during the World Cup. Piyush Chawla was chosen ahead of more deserving alternatives. Is the Indian skipper prone to favouritism?
Dhoni was then lauded – in the wake of Team India’s triumph – for knowing and speaking his mind. He’s now perceived as out of touch with ground realities.
BCCI and change
The BCCI may be the richest cricket board but its running is far from professional.
With Cricket Australia and the New Zealand cricket board revamping their selection set-up, will the abject surrender in English conditions force the Board to stop dragging its feet and become more cognizant of the changing times?
The Board should make sure that cricketers prove their fitness before they take the field in an international game. Warm-up games are a must when they are returning from injury.
The English and the Aussies would never have played Zaheer Khan or Virender Sehwag without making them go through the rigours of a full-fledged game.
Lower-ranked teams like Zimbabwe and Bangladesh set higher standards of fitness (and fielding). India (and Pakistan) look pedestrian and listless in comparison.
The laments listed are hardly new. They persist. Is the BCCI listening?
Soft Debuts?
The clamour to blood youngsters grows louder. The collective failure of the team, in batting and bowling departments, coupled with paucity in bench resources, has only strengthened the impression that the Board’s selection policies are short-sighted.
There is a school of thought (Sunil Gavaskar and Saurav Ganguly) that believes that youngsters should debut at home (read sub-continent) in familiar conditions, I, for one, take the contrarian view.
Sachin Tendulkar (Pakistan), Rahul Dravid (England), Virender Sehwag (South Africa) and Saurav Ganguly (England) made their international Test debuts abroad in alien conditions.
They weathered the storm without much damage to their career prospects.
Are we setting up young cricketers for failure with ‘soft’ home debuts? Case in point, Suresh Raina.
Abhinav Mukund performed creditably in the Windies and England. Not every batsman scores tons on debut.
Marvan Atapattu scored five ducks and 1 in his first six Test innings. Surely, Mukund has done better.
Next, the ODIs.
Virender Sehwag and Ishant Sharma return home. Ajinkya Rahane and Varun Aaron take their place for the ODIs.
The less said about the “walking wounded” on this tour, the better.
Andrew Strauss promised to keep the heat on in the ODIs.
He said:
“It’s an opportunity to take on the World Cup winners. There’s plenty to be excited about. We are very keen to finish the summer again being unbeaten.”
Promises made, promises kept. Should we expect less from this English side?
MS Dhoni, beware the English Lions.
Note: Sachin Tendulkar misses his 100th international hundred, out for 91 in the second innings.
![]()
Passionate about your cricket? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily cricket email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- England are a greatly overrated Test team (167)
- Australia needs to bench Nathan Lyon for Ashes success (84)
- DIZZY: Australian bowlers look the goods for the Ashes (76)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (74)
- Clarke take note: England has some weak points for Ashes (48)
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (46)
- DIZZY: It’s time for the Aussie batsmen to fulfill potential (41)
- Aussies Abroad: Journeymen expats tear up early County season (26)
- Adam Gilchrist bows out Gangnam Style (2)
- Landmark day for women’s sport as cricket cuts a cheque (11)
- Cricket Australia fines Warner (7)
- The Aussie cricket team aren’t THAT bad (42)
- Australians off to win back the urn
- Phil Hughes to meet Ashes mentor (2)
- Aussies Abroad: Journeymen expats tear up early County season (26)
- Adam Gilchrist bows out Gangnam Style (2)
- The Aussie cricket team aren’t THAT bad (42)
- Australians off to win back the urn (0)
- Has cricket corruption been filed in the ‘too hard’ basket? (2)
- Cricket’s all-time alphabetical G team (18)
- England are a greatly overrated Test team (169)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Cricket, England, India, Rahul Dravid, Sachin Tendulkar, Stuart Broad


August 24th 2011 @ 7:39am
jus de couchon said | August 24th 2011 @ 7:39am | Report comment
Awful , awful 4 nil result. Had expected India to do much but they never really turned up. A poor series.
August 24th 2011 @ 10:13am
Matt F said | August 24th 2011 @ 10:13am | Report comment
It was a really poor series. I was hoping for a great contest but clearly England are too good at the moment. India is reacting the same way we did after the last Ashes series. Whilst there are clearly some issues that India need to address, it could be that England are just that much better then other nations at the moment. Maybe Aus v India this summer won’t be the whitewash I feared after all?
I think we’re seeing the effect of the increasing amount of flat, homogenous pitches around the world. The only place really around the world where we see pitches with some grass and good fast bowling conditions is in England. This means their batsmen are better able to deal with a moving ball and their bowlers are better as manipulating the ball as well. This gives them a huge advantage technically over most other nations which play almost exclusively on flat roads where you can play loose shots and get away with it simply because the ball doesn’t move enough to get the edge. Dravid succeeded because he is technically sound and has the patience to wait all day for the right ball rather then getting frustrated and playing loose shots. That’s the way to succeed in England.
August 24th 2011 @ 11:24am
ChrisT said | August 24th 2011 @ 11:24am | Report comment
“Had the Indian batsmen applied themselves similarly in the first three matches, the series result could have been quite different…The English bowlers, for the first time in the series, showed signs of frustration. Graeme Swann kicked the turf, repeatedly ….the English bowlers had to toil in the field for two days or more. The tiredness was plain….”
Hardly mate. First of all Sachin’s knock had more get out of jail cards than any batsman can ever expect and Mishra batted like a man with nothing to lose, which he didn’t, and that’s not a normal circumstance either. Secondly, given the margins of victory and what was left in the English tank, it would have taken more than a few more knocks like these to have changed anything. Thirdly, Swann’s frustration was that of any bowler who sees either scratchy runs being lucked off him or wickets being tantalisingly close. A tired attack doesn’t eek out set batsmen and then rip through a tail on the final day of a four test series. Even a substantial bit of help from the weather gods couldn’t prevent another innings defeat from a rampant England. I don’t think it would have mattered who turned up with them in this mood and form.
August 24th 2011 @ 4:01pm
Linus said | August 24th 2011 @ 4:01pm | Report comment
For that one session, India batted like they should have as the (then) No. 1 side in the world. Yes, the English bowlers were better than their Indian counterparts but it has to be conceded that none of the leading lights showed the application and grit that Rahul Dravid did. Had they done so and come in fully prepared, it could have been quite different. I concede that the Oval pitch was a better pitch for batting than the previous three. However, the English bowlers can be tamed and surely a 1-0 result, like the Sri Lankans before, is what the Indian fans wished for. Lack of preparation and overconfidence did the Indians in.
August 24th 2011 @ 11:32am
ChrisT said | August 24th 2011 @ 11:32am | Report comment
Btw, little aside. Don’t know if anyone else picked this up but one of the contributors to the BBC live text coverage noted that “Sachin Tendulkar, the little master” is a perfect anagram of “Still waiting at centuries milestone”. Spooky.
Spotted one myself. ‘KP” is an anagram of “arrogant humourless git who I love to watch bat”
Well almost