Clarke doesn’t look the part, but can he do the job?
By David Lord, 31 Aug 2011 David Lord is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, Richie Benaud, Sri Lankan cricket
Related coverage
Michael Clarke’s first series as Australian Test captain begins tonight at Galle, and already he’s a ground-breaker before he tosses. He’s the first tattooed skipper of the baggy greens. And multi-tatts to boot.
Whether that’s a claim to fame or infamy will be debated until the cows come home. After all, the Australian cricket captain is the second highest post in the country after the Prime Minister.
Can you imagine a multi-tattooed PM? The mind boggles.
How anyone can destroy parts of their body for the rest of their lives is way beyond my comprehension.
Not a problem with the Pacific Islanders, it’s an integral part of their culture.
But Michael Clarke?
His tatts have me blinking in disbelief. If it’s hard to understand why he has disfigured his body permanently, how can we figure his mind-set?
Will he be a captain like Richie Benaud, or an Ian Chappell, an Allan Border, a Mark Taylor, or a Steve Waugh?
Hopefully not like his predecessor, Ricky Ponting, who lost the captaincy plot and his batting form over the last three years, but is still within whispering distance and ever willing to make suggestions if Clarke’s struggling.
It would be a huge plus for Australian cricket is Clarke can be a Benaud: all pride, and passion, never thinking of defeat, just keen to play positive attacking cricket.
Or Ian Chappell, belligerent towards the opposition, but his team would walk over hot coals for him. Positive attacking cricket his forte as well.
Or a Border, a reluctant captain for 93 Tests, a world record, whose batting was the team’s benchmark, bolstered by his captaincy-coach combination with Bobby Simpson that reaped rich rewards.
Or Taylor’s serenity, never flustered, a skipper with lateral vision and positive vibes, with twice as many Test wins against defeats – a diplomat rather than a cage rattler.
Or Waugh’s steely resolve. If there’s been a tougher more ruthless Test cricketer I haven’t seen him. Winning was everything, playing to save a Test was never an option.
That’s why Stephen Rodger Waugh owns the best Test captaincy record in history with a 71.92% win ratio, from 57 Tests, 41 wins, 9 losses, and 7 draws.
Ponting’s next best with 62.33%, Mike Brearley 58.06%, Bill Woodfull 56%, Viv Richards 54%, with Andrew Strauss and Shaun Pollock sharing 53.84%.
To put Waugh’s percentage in perspective, of the 50 Test captains who have captained their country a minimum 25 times, 37 have 48% or less, win ratio.
That puts Waugh in a class of his own and someone for Clarke to aspire to but he couldn’t be ruthless.
So a mixture of Richie Benaud’s pride and passion with Mark Taylor’s serenity seems more appropriate.
We’ll start seeing what really makes Michael Clarke tick tonight.
![]()
Passionate about your cricket? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily cricket email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, Richie Benaud, Sri Lankan cricket


August 31st 2011 @ 11:00am
Vas Venkatramani said | August 31st 2011 @ 11:00am | Report comment
If Clarke’s tactics in limited overs cricket is any indication on how he’ll manage the Test side, it’ll at least make for good viewing. However, no one needs to point out the difference between setting plans in a game where the batsman has to attack, and setting plans where the bowler has to take the initiative. It’s the latter we’ll find out what Clarke is made of.
The same time, if Clarke attacks, then his bowlers must do the job for him and bowl with discipline to set fields and not spray it. For that reason, Copeland’s apparent selection is the most sensible decision the selectors have made in ages, while Harris’ hit the deck style will reap rewards as long as he’s accurate, while Johnson can tear away without worrying too much about his action or swing. The pace attack looks good.
It’s the spinners though are the quandary. Without seeing much of Nathan Lyon and seeing but not liking Michael Beer, this will be Clarke’s biggest test. Spin will be a crucial element we must harness if we are to succeed this series. Best thing Clarke can do is to invite his spinners to throw it up and potentially buy wickets. Having seen Michael Beer bowl, I’d give the gong to Nathan Lyon, because at this stage, ignorance is bliss.
As for Clarke himself, he has to take over Ponting’s mantle as the middle order anchor. That should be his goal at least. I’m tipping Ponting to have a bumper series without the pressures of captaincy, while I hope Phil Hughes is persisted with now he’s been given the chance to make the top spot his own.
August 31st 2011 @ 2:08pm
Matt F said | August 31st 2011 @ 2:08pm | Report comment
Clarke will be innovative and aggresive, at least he has been in his opportunities so far. We’ve always talked about how good of a captain Warne would have been and he took Clarke under his wing a long time ago. Clarke must have learned some things there.
You’re spot on about the lack of bowling support. In the final Ashes test last summer Clarke was trying everything in the field but there’s only so much a captain can do when his bowlers send down rubbish. Copeland has accuracy and can bowl all day which means Harris and Johnson can be used in short bursts. This is especially important for Harris given his injury issues.
Lyon has played 2-3 shield matches and averages a bit above 40. It’s too early to judge him yet but it’s also too early to be picking him and the same can be said about Beer. Lyon’s looked the goods in T20 and one-day matches but Doherty has proven that good performances in one format don’t always translate to another. I’m amazed O’Keefe hasn’t been given a chance before these two.
August 31st 2011 @ 11:10am
jameswm said | August 31st 2011 @ 11:10am | Report comment
Clarke should never have been made test captain, but we’re stuck with him now.
He certainly has more creativity than Ponting and reads the game better, but that’s not hard.
I’m not convinced he’s tough enough, or has enough respect from his team-mates. Time will tell.
If we can get rid of Neilsen and Hilditch, it’s a big step. Hughes will probably fail, but there are no batting replacements knocking the door down.
I see a big dark haired left arm quick called Mitchell being our possible biggest weapon over the next 5-8 years. But I mean Starc, not Johnson. If he can sort his body out, he will kill it. He is tall, accurate, quick and moves the ball round. He is exactly the bowler that we want Johnson to be.
It’s a shame Harris isn’t younger, because I’d love to watch Starc, Harris and Copeland lead our attack for the next 5 years, with Vics Siddle and Pattinson as backup. Spin wise they need to play Smith as the specialist spinner and bat him at 8.
Anyway back to the point – I seriously doubt Clarke has the toughness or batting ability to make a go of it, and I doubt his priorities, but I guess I hope he proves me wrong.
August 31st 2011 @ 2:08pm
Al from ctown said | August 31st 2011 @ 2:08pm | Report comment
It frustrates me to no end how in this day and age, that people insist on judging others over the fact that they have tattoos. Yeah fine, criticize them if they are out of form or aren’t up to the task as captain, but to dismiss someone’s character as shady or not as mentally equipped than others who don’t have tattoos is really quite shallow in itself. Like them or not, tattoos have become part of our culture regardless if your an islander or not.. It’s body art, an in most cases it represents past emotions or beliefs. Surely ex and current servicemen of this country wouldn’t be critisied the same way if they sported a bit of ink .. Just because a person makes a personal choice to get a tattoo to remind them of something significant in their lives, it doesn’t mean they are incapable of being a leader of any degree.. I once met a CEO of a large company who, underneath was neck to foot full of tattoos… Does that mean he was unable to run the company? I believe Clarke will do fine as a captain as long as all the players on the team aren’t looking over their shoulders hoping not to get dropped next game… Stick with the team for a bit, let them get atleast a little comfortable and they will perform like we know they can… But please lay off the tattoos, it has nothing to do with performance or mentality… It’s 2011 and very normal. Time to stop living in the past….
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
August 31st 2011 @ 2:18pm
AdamS said | August 31st 2011 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
Couple of things David.
1. How do you _know_ no other Captain has tatts?
2. You shoud be old enough to know the old “judge a book by it’s cover” routine
3. Why not let him be a Captain like Michael Clarke before we try to compare him?
And lastly, Ricky Ponting never won test as Captain in his life, his Captaincy only lost tests.
August 31st 2011 @ 4:07pm
Ian Whitchurch said | August 31st 2011 @ 4:07pm | Report comment
Ponting only ever had two plans as Captain – plan A was to toss the ball to Glenn McGrath. When that failed, plan B was to toss the ball to Shane Warne.
August 31st 2011 @ 5:34pm
Brendon said | August 31st 2011 @ 5:34pm | Report comment
And how did that differ from Waugh’s tactics?
August 31st 2011 @ 6:19pm
Ian Whitchurch said | August 31st 2011 @ 6:19pm | Report comment
Read it and weep.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63810.html
Steve Waugh could *use* second- and third-rate players in a way Ricky Ponting couldnt and cant.
September 1st 2011 @ 4:43am
Lolly said | September 1st 2011 @ 4:43am | Report comment
What does that link mean?
A skipper with Fleming, McGrath and MacGill at his disposal is hardly in the same position as Punter with a rotating and mediocre spin attack and a flaky ‘strike’ bowler like Johnson as his main hope.
Jeez, Punter would have bitten your hand off for a bowler as good as Fleming in the past couple of years.
September 1st 2011 @ 7:21am
AdamS said | September 1st 2011 @ 7:21am | Report comment
Not entirely true Ian, he had several other plans involving things like;
Bringing back the nightwatchman after SW had shown it to be a negative tactic and looking pleased when his NW chewed up 3hrs of the following day scoring no runs.
Not enforcing follow ons
Truely inane bowling changes and field settings
Despite having at worst a 50/50 chance of getting it right, making toss choices that the whole planet cold see were incorrect.
Never wining in India
Losing the Ashes
Losing the Ashes
Losing the Ashes
The list goes on.
August 31st 2011 @ 3:18pm
Chris said | August 31st 2011 @ 3:18pm | Report comment
It would be interesting to put captains like Waugh or Taylor in charge of this team and see how they’d go. Both had pretty phenomenal players to carry out their instructions. Pup’s got a lot less talent to work with – I hope people will be balanced in their analysis of his captaincy.
August 31st 2011 @ 3:19pm
Joe Karsay said | August 31st 2011 @ 3:19pm | Report comment
David the second half of your article makes very interesting reading but seven paragraphs on Michael Clarke’s tattoos? I am not a fan of them myself but the horse has bolted on that one my friend.
On to the real stuff. As great a player and captain as Steve Waugh was – his unmatched win loss ratio has a lot to do with the fact that he got Warne, McGrath etc. at the peak of their powers. Of the captains I have seen in my life time (starting with Border) I think Tubby has set the bench mark. He created the winning mindset that Steve capitalised on. He also had a creativity that Border, Waugh and Ponting all lacked. Hopefully Clarke will bring this kind of flair to the role.
While the batting order looks much stronger with Ponting there, I am worried about the influence he may have over Clarke. Clarke has always seemed to idolise his old captain. I also tend to agree with jameswm’s comment “I’m not convinced he’s tough enough, or has enough respect from his team-mates” but hope for the sake of Australian cricket we are both wrong.
August 31st 2011 @ 4:16pm
Ian Whitchurch said | August 31st 2011 @ 4:16pm | Report comment
Twofer before lunch. Looking ugly for Australia.
More. Tour. Games.
August 31st 2011 @ 5:28pm
Benno said | August 31st 2011 @ 5:28pm | Report comment
David, while I normally enjoy your well written articles, this time it has to be said that your personal prejudices against tattoos have nothing to do with cricketing ability, grow up.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
August 31st 2011 @ 5:34pm
Brendon said | August 31st 2011 @ 5:34pm | Report comment
I’m surprised you didn’t yell at Clarke to get off your lawn, David.
First half your piece was classic “in my day” stuff.
August 31st 2011 @ 6:38pm
Ian Whitchurch said | August 31st 2011 @ 6:38pm | Report comment
Four down. Could be worse … Ash could be batting at six. Play. More. Tour. Games.