Adelaide Oval the saviour of Port, South Aussie footy?
Related coverage
- Port Adelaide Power news
- Melbourne Demons news
- Adelaide Crows news
- AFL news
- Toyota Premiership news
- Adelaide Crows news
“Wanna go to the footy at Adelaide Oval this Sunday?” read the text message from a friend last week. “I don’t give a shit about the two teams, but it’ll be good to see footy at the Oval,” it continued. “Then we can stay in the city for some pints” – the final drawcard.
That friend eventually bailed (Father’s Day commitments), but there was no shortage of interest in going to see Port Adelaide host the Melbourne Demons, 17th versus 13th, at the first ever AFL match at Adelaide Oval on Sunday.
So what would otherwise have been an insignificant final round dead rubber between two of the worst performing teams of 2011, played at a faraway stadium that would have been lucky to get near Port’s home crowd average of 20,912, suddenly become a historical encounter; providing a glimpse into the future.
In the end, 29,340 spent their Father’s Day afternoon in the spring sun at the Oval, where Port and the Adelaide Crows are due to play their home games from 2014, at the revamped 50,000-capacity stadium.
30,000 was suggested as the pass mark in the build up to the game, and although the crowd fell just 660 short, it was still 8428 up on Port’s average and significantly more than what would have been had the game stayed at AAMI Stadium.
And remember to factor Father’s Day into the equation. For every family that’s keen to incorporate an afternoon at the footy into their festivities, there’s a family with unchangeable rituals elsewhere, or that stubborn uncle who won’t budge from the couch. Then factor in the Royal Adelaide Show, into its first weekend. And don’t forget; it was a dead rubber between two also rans.
Just short of 30,000, yes, but still a pass.
Adelaide Oval does have the potential to be the saviour of the stagnating South Australian footy scene, and particularly the wayward Port Adelaide.
Like in Melbourne and so many examples around the world, the city move is a necessity to help draw regular crowds. Adelaide Oval, within walking distance from the CBD, is the perfect spot.
While some traditionalists fought against the redevelopment – particularly the cricket fraternity, bemoaning Aussie Rules’ muscling in on their ground – the fact remains that the location and ground is too good to be used for just state league cricket and footy, one Test match, and the odd one-day and Twenty20 international per year. It’s wasted at present – and has been for far too long.
City stadiums are winners because transportation infrastructure is already geared towards getting large masses of people into and out of the city with ease, catering to most surrounding areas.
Then there’s the extra temptation of combing it with other activities – pints at pubs, cafes, movies, nightclubs, or whatever takes your fancy. In Adelaide Oval’s case, there’s both the CBD and North Adelaide for pre- and post-match options.
It’s quite a contrast to the current home of South Australian football; over 30 minutes from the city centre and further away for those in the east. AAMI Stadium is the antithesis of what modern sporting stadiums should provide – parking is limited, traffic in and especially out of the area is painful, there’s little else to see or do around it, it’s too isolated and far away for most in Adelaide, and small crowds in such a large stadium make for a barren, soulless experience.
As football attendance habits changed and fans became more discerning, crowds inevitably fell for the already vulnerable Port, from their tenuous supporter base.
Why commit to the painful experience of getting to AAMI when matches are often live and in HD at home? Why rule out a whole afternoon in traffic when you can instead watch at the local pub?
My generation and younger don’t have the commitment of previous generations, to rule out an hour and more before and after the game to get to the ground. We want the ability to go to the footy but also keep the option of going to a movie, pub or cafe before and after. It’s our impatience. City grounds cater for that.
Ground maximisation in Melbourne led to the record crowds the AFL currently boasts. There’s no reason why it can’t have a similarly positive effect in Adelaide.
For Port it opens the door to expand its fan base, growing beyond its Port Adelaide roots. Port’s problems are numerous and inherent, and while they will benefit financially from the city move, growing their supporter base is much more important to their sustainability.
While some claim the Crows will only hammer home their advantage in the city, as the club for all South Australians – much like Collingwood and co have done at the expense of Melbourne and North Melbourne (see here) – it’s the first step of Port’s push for hearts and minds; as the alternative club for South Aussies. It’ll be difficult, but it’s a start.
Then there is the neutral factor. The easier it is to get to the ground, the more likely footy fans will take up the option of getting their live action fix on a weekly basis.
With the stadium in the city, why couldn’t non-Port fans pop down to the Oval for some footy after work on a Friday evening, combing it with their usual post-work festivities? It’s a realistic option, certainly much more so than the dull drive to AAMI.
Even if they aren’t Port fans or members, they will contribute to the club’s coffers; a chance for South Aussies, so antagonistic toward the other club, to actually help support both clubs.
Yes, the novelty will eventually wear off once Adelaide Oval is hosting weekly AFL action. But new attendance habits could develop, and new fans potentially won over. It’s a move the AFL and Port needed to make.
On Sunday Port claimed a rousing eight-point victory to avoid the wooden spoon and open their account at the Oval. It was a fitting result.
The AFL desperately needs the Adelaide Oval move to work; it needs two clubs in South Australia. The move to the Oval needs to be the catalyst for the growth of Port’s supporter base.
After its first test, the signs are positive.
Follow Adrian on twitter @AdrianMusolino
Adrian Musolino is editor of V8X Magazine, and has written as an expert on The Roar since 2008, cementing himself as a key writer who can see the big picture in sport. He freelances on other forms of motorsport, football, cycling and more.
![]()
Passionate about your AFL? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily AFL email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.


September 6th 2011 @ 7:16am
Ruckrover said | September 6th 2011 @ 7:16am | Report comment
I went with an old school friend, we’re old enough to remember big SANFL games, pre-AFL, when Port was always respected and hated. Sign of the times that we found ourselves supporting Port, no longer so fearsome or hated. We were swept up in the fantastic atmosphere and a brilliant pulsating game of football. Melbourne were good, Port were relentless with their pressure and tackling, the crowd was in full voice. We’d forgotten just how good footy looks at the oval, with the action much closer and viewable than at footy park. And yes the transport in and out was a dream compared to getting to faraway West Lakes.
September 6th 2011 @ 1:40pm
Redb said | September 6th 2011 @ 1:40pm | Report comment
Big factor is the sympathy vote kicking for Port finally. South Aust footy fans will relish more games especialyl Friday night no matter who is playing.
September 6th 2011 @ 8:09am
The Cattery said | September 6th 2011 @ 8:09am | Report comment
29,340 just a pass mark??
It showed the future of footy in Adelaide in stark relief.
We can easily foresee a near future where the Crows average 40+k and Port average 30+k each and every season.
In years when they are experiencing success, add a minimum of 5k to each of them.
The future of Port is secured.
September 6th 2011 @ 10:20am
voodoo people said | September 6th 2011 @ 10:20am | Report comment
Great venue, good for sport in SA. Get it to 50-60k, and then build a cheaper version of AAMI Park 25-30k football stadium next to it on the Uni fields.
Would create a tremendous sporting presinct in Adelaide, closer to the CBD than any other in Australia.
Pretty obvious this is the path the SA Gov should follow, just hope they get on with it.
September 6th 2011 @ 12:09pm
Kasey said | September 6th 2011 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
voodoo, that is a wonderful idea I would love to see a 35-40k- rectangular stadium on Uni#1(walk out the Vic Richardson gates and cross King Wiliam and Sir Edwin Smith to that old fashioned oval just North of War Memorial Dve, but that is the home ground of the storied University Blacks SAAFL team. Someone would have to sort them out a new home, likely Uni #10 over near the archery arena. but by God that would be a perfect ‘sports precinct’ for Adelaide wouldn’t it? Of course, Adelaide United would have to continue to put more bums on seats at Hindmarsh to ‘prove’ that the support is there for football. although the 30-40k capacity would help lure Soceroos games and perhaps the odd Wallbies encounter.
September 6th 2011 @ 11:23am
JamesP said | September 6th 2011 @ 11:23am | Report comment
Agree with everything you have written, but dont forget just a few short years ago the Crows WERE averaging over 40k+ and the Power WERE averaging 30k+
Back to the future….
September 6th 2011 @ 9:05am
Leigh said | September 6th 2011 @ 9:05am | Report comment
Port is not the only AFL club in South Australia with declining crowds and a dodgy bottom line. Amazing how the issues facing the Adelaide Crows are constantly glossed over. Crowdfs falling since 2005, poor list management by maintaining their older players for too long and predicted to make a loss for the second year running. And all this with approximately 70% state support. But hell it is only Port who is struggling.
September 6th 2011 @ 9:08am
stabpass said | September 6th 2011 @ 9:08am | Report comment
Of course people want options, people either want old suburban grounds, where the pub, or home is very close, or a central ground, where pubs, eateries, movies are available, it really has alwas been the case.
Its a no brainer, makes me wonder if the new ground in Perth, which is not exactly close to anything except the casino, will be as popular as Subi.
September 6th 2011 @ 11:24am
JamesP said | September 6th 2011 @ 11:24am | Report comment
The Casono is all you need my friend…
But I agree – they should have just rebuilt the WACA (another successfull cricket/AFL ground combination)
September 6th 2011 @ 9:13am
Chris said | September 6th 2011 @ 9:13am | Report comment
It also depends on what the financial deal is brokered between the football clubs and the Oval. As St Kilda knows, playing at a nice, shiny, new stadium in front of consistently big crowds doesn’t mean you actually make any money.
September 6th 2011 @ 10:11am
Nathan of Perth said | September 6th 2011 @ 10:11am | Report comment
Saw this one on TV, thought the ground and atmosphere were brilliant. Vibrant, loud and that forest of teal flags in the cheer squad’s bay looked great, definitely a better look than AAMI.
September 7th 2011 @ 8:05am
The_Wookie said | September 7th 2011 @ 8:05am | Report comment
this is why i dont advocate the expansion of Adelaide oval. Leave it as it is, let Port play there, with showdowns and blockbusters at Aami if needed. Leave Adelaide at west Lakes – they dont want to move anyway. Put Port under new management. It is surely cheaper to play out of Adelaide Oval than Aami stadium – and it stops the SANFL double dipping with rent AND dividends.
September 6th 2011 @ 10:17am
BigAl said | September 6th 2011 @ 10:17am | Report comment
. . . and it’s ALL Andrew Demetriou’s idea – the guy is a genius at this sort of thing.
September 6th 2011 @ 11:36am
Richard said | September 6th 2011 @ 11:36am | Report comment
I hope that when they redevelop the Adelaide Oval they don’t spoil its ambience. It’s the best ground in Australia to watch cricket, it still has that Sunday afternoon picnic match feel, especially when you’re sitting under the Morton Bay Figs. We’ve lost that feeling at the MCG, which is now a true stadium, but which demands big events to give it soul.
Still, we need South Australian football to re-assert itself. Strewth, I even found myself barracking for Port.
September 6th 2011 @ 1:02pm
seanoroo said | September 6th 2011 @ 1:02pm | Report comment
Every time I watch a game on TV from AAMI the place looks so dark, gloomy and miserable, but last weekends game was the complete opposite even though I wasnt there the vibe and atmosphere filtered through and made the game (which I initially had no interest in) a pleasure to watch. The new redevelopment will be great for AFL and the city of Adelaide but I hope they maintain its character (dont want another soulless stadium). I like the idea of an adjoining rectangular stadium too creating a sporting precinct.
September 6th 2011 @ 1:20pm
The Cattery said | September 6th 2011 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
A 25,000 rectangular stadium alongside the Adelaide Oval sounds like a great idea.
Not just for AU, but could imagine a future NRL and Super Rugby team playing out of there in the future as well, and perhaps even a second Adelaide A-League team.
September 7th 2011 @ 11:30am
PaddyBoy said | September 7th 2011 @ 11:30am | Report comment
Could Adelaide support these (I have no idea). The Rams were a joke and Adelaide doesn’t have a big RL following I thought. Not sure about the state of rugby in Adelaide.
And does Adelaide have the pop to support 2 A-League teams?
I haven’t been to the Oval in ages, but love the stadium.
September 7th 2011 @ 11:35am
NF said | September 7th 2011 @ 11:35am | Report comment
The Rams weren’t exactly a joke they did draw well in there first year albiet being there honeymoon period but it did show the potential they had sure it all went to nothing second year, but I recall Lions/Swans drawing terrible crowds yet the AFL stuck by them if NRL only did the same with Perth/Adelaide. The dividends will eventually come as we saw with the Lions/Swans.
September 7th 2011 @ 11:36am
The Cattery said | September 7th 2011 @ 11:36am | Report comment
Paddy
I don’t know for certain, but the Rams’ attendances weren’t really all that bad, considering that League is such a minor sport in Adelaide.
Can Adelaide support 2 A-league teams? One day in the future, I reckon it will. AU attendances are very healthy, in fact, second only behind the Victory I believe, and through most of the history of the NSL, Adelaide had two teams, with a bit of success too.
September 7th 2011 @ 11:43am
Kasey said | September 7th 2011 @ 11:43am | Report comment
I am not a League authority, but I reckon a RL team could probably survive in Adelaide IF the stadium was the previosly mentioned Opposite AO location. League is a very minor sport in Adelaide, and I would reckon you’d struggle to find many born and bred SAlians who could even tell you the difference between the 15 man game and the 13 man game, assuming of course they even knew that Rugby has 2 varieties. I don’t see Adelaide being a viable place for a 2nd HAL team. Adelaide United’s attendances will likely be about the same as last year, but with no AO games, I cant really see it increasing from where it is by asignificant amount. United were one of the only teams that recorded a mid-week crowd at or above their final crowd average, so less idweek games wont ‘help’ United’s numbers as much as it will the other 9 teams IMO. Ahead of a 2nd ADL team for FFA expansion on the priorities list has got to be W. Syd, Illawarra, Canberra, Tasmania and perhaps even a 2nd NZ team IMO.
September 7th 2011 @ 1:05pm
PaddyBoy said | September 7th 2011 @ 1:05pm | Report comment
I thought that was the issue with the Rams, because I was young, I only remember watching some of their performances, and they were very average (SL I think = no cap). Lead me to believe that there were severe backroom quality issues. I ussumed (incorrectly) that they were more akin to the Bears than the Lions.
Would Adelaide be almost entirely FC supporters though, and I would have thought that there would be other areas that would be head and shoulders above Adelaide 2 in terms of where to put a team (Geelong, Sydney 2, a number of large regional areas).
When will the Adelaide oval be done? Would love to go see some footy there, cricket as well. If it’s in a few years they should be hitting premiership windows after the Port bailouts means they can get some more facilities.
September 7th 2011 @ 3:57pm
JamesP said | September 7th 2011 @ 3:57pm | Report comment
Construction is scheduled to commence after this years cricket season (Adelaide Crows were recently in the press asking for a NAB Cup pre-season game there). SACA expects it to be ready in time for Adelaides match of the 2013/2014 Ashes series. So definitely by 2014 AFL season (i.e. 2 more sesons at AAMI)
September 7th 2011 @ 4:00pm
The Cattery said | September 7th 2011 @ 4:00pm | Report comment
Ready for the 2014 season, so both Power and Crows at Footy Park for next two years.
September 7th 2011 @ 4:20pm
PaddyBoy said | September 7th 2011 @ 4:20pm | Report comment
I’ll hit up the footy there then methinks. SCG for the Ashes I think, there are more poms to yell “Saffa!” at
Would love to see the two Adelaide teams but between the members I doubt I’ll get tickets.