It’s time for the Wallabies to really lift their game
By David Lord, 1 Oct 2011 David Lord is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- robbie deans, rugby referee, Rugby Union, Rugby World Cup, RWC, wallabies

Wallabies hooker Stephen Moore (left) and captain James Horwill (right) sit out the Australian team training session (AAP Image/Dave Hunt)
Wallaby coach Robbie Deans has a far bigger problem to overcome than Russia at Nelson early this afternoon. Kiwi referee Bryce Lawrence.
Of the many pedantic referees who have surfaced in this Rugby World Cup, Lawrence has emerged as the most aggravating, just ahead of Welshman Nigel Owens, South African Jonathan Kaplan, and Frenchman Romain Poite.
So far Lawrence has refereed England 13 – Argentina 9, Ireland 15 – Wallabies 6, and Samoa 27 – Fiji 7.
All three have featured controversial decisions, missed forward passes, and knock-ons, hard-to-fathom penalties, and allowing the leading side to deliberately slow down play by being late to scrums and lineouts.
But not including scrum resets, one of the banes of the tournament, and the code, Lawrence has blown his whistle 197 times in 240 minutes of rugby.
That doesn’t include the time wasted in preparation for lineouts, scrums, and kicking for goal.
Russian roulette refereeing from Lawrence, and no surer way to kill the momentum of a game from everyone’s point of view – players, coaches, spectators, television viewers, commentators, and writers.
Yawnsville.
To a more positive note now the RWC is about to reach the business end, some interesting stats have emerged after three games each for the 20 countries involved.
* The All Blacks have scored the most points with 161, from the Boks 153, England 121, Wales 114, France 110, the Wallabies 105, and Ireland 99.
* The All Blacks have also scored the most tries with 24, the Boks 20, England 17, Wallabies 15, Wales 14, Italy 13, with France and Ireland sharing 12.
* But the Boks have the best try conversion percentage with 19 conversions of 20 tries for 95%.
* France has converted 10 of 12 tries for 83.33%.
* Ireland 9 of 12 – 75%.
* Wales 10 of 14 – 71.43%
* England 12 of 17 – 70.59%.
* All Blacks 16 of 24 – 66.67 – the most staggering stat of them all.
* Leaving the Wallabies dragging the chain with 9 of 15 for 60%.
But there is a plus for Robbie Deans.
Russia is the worst performed of the 20 competing nations with just 35 points from three games, and 2 conversions of 5 tries for 40%.
That should translate to the Wallabies thumping Russia by at least 60 points.
Anything less and the men-in-gold didn’t try hard enough and will be the underdogs against the Boks in the quarters, despite beating them in four of the last five meetings.
It’s overtime for the Wallabies, and Robbie Deans, to stand up and be counted.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- robbie deans, rugby referee, Rugby Union, Rugby World Cup, RWC, wallabies


October 1st 2011 @ 8:20am
katzilla said | October 1st 2011 @ 8:20am | Report comment
I’d say your already Underdogs against the Boks.
The Boks havent been altogether convincing but they’ve definitely improved since this tournament started and have the credentials for knock out rugby.
Mean while the Wallabies have gone the other way, from 3N champions to stuck on the bottom of an Irish Boot.
October 1st 2011 @ 12:43pm
Seiran said | October 1st 2011 @ 12:43pm | Report comment
So the Wallabies have had one bad match. The Boks have struggled against Wales in their opener, and then the same last night. It seems the only ‘improvement’ has been against minnows who you would expect them to beat.
The two tests when the Boks have played half decent opposition, they’ve struggled.
October 1st 2011 @ 7:57pm
SA said | October 1st 2011 @ 7:57pm | Report comment
Same can be said for Australia. Lost to Ireland and unconvincing scrappy wins against Italy and Russia. Cant man up to wet physical games either with injury toll mounting. Not looking too good.
October 1st 2011 @ 8:12pm
Seiran said | October 1st 2011 @ 8:12pm | Report comment
10 tries against Russia is hardly scrappy SA.
October 1st 2011 @ 8:50am
Sage said | October 1st 2011 @ 8:50am | Report comment
Not much in here in reference to the heading Lordy. Yeah, Lawrence has been average and some stats mmm. Not like you. Bring on the quaters
October 1st 2011 @ 9:27am
David Lord said | October 1st 2011 @ 9:27am | Report comment
You are a Sage man – editors do headings, writers do copy.
October 1st 2011 @ 12:32pm
Moaman said | October 1st 2011 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
” You are a Sage man – editors do headings, writers do copy. ” And what do YOU do ,David?
October 1st 2011 @ 12:36pm
Pot Hale said | October 1st 2011 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
Now that’s just plain bold.
October 1st 2011 @ 12:44pm
Seiran said | October 1st 2011 @ 12:44pm | Report comment
ouch!
October 2nd 2011 @ 5:05am
David Lord said | October 2nd 2011 @ 5:05am | Report comment
I read your comments Moaman, and try to fathom what you’re saying. Not making much progress, but I’ll hang in there.
October 2nd 2011 @ 6:16am
Pot Hale said | October 2nd 2011 @ 6:16am | Report comment
He was making a funny based on your statement that editors do headings, writers do copy. So he was asking what do you do to imply that since you don’t edit or write copy, what do you do. See?
October 2nd 2011 @ 10:43am
Sage said | October 2nd 2011 @ 10:43am | Report comment
Nice Poth! I’m aware of the process David, my point was more the article seemed hollow/cobbled compared to what I believe you normally write. Backhanded compliment I suppose but no particular offense intended. PS – sage is also just a cool colour…………
October 1st 2011 @ 9:02am
west said | October 1st 2011 @ 9:02am | Report comment
Springboks got a punishing last night and will pay the price against Wallabies there bodies will be extremely beaten and bruised. They will struggle against Wallabies to win, a person can only handle so much come quarters, then no doubt play a rested All Black team for another thrashing, I say rested because the whole AB team will get a run and will not play the whole 80 and prepare for the quarters and the rest of tournament. If wallabies can weather the storm and play solid rugby stick to basics and run around a sore Habana they should hopefully remove the Springboks. However the All Blacks will prey on…. by then a tired Wallaby.
October 1st 2011 @ 9:04am
west said | October 1st 2011 @ 9:04am | Report comment
Samoa has done Wallabies a big favor by hammering the crap out of Springboks.
October 1st 2011 @ 9:19am
Scot Free said | October 1st 2011 @ 9:19am | Report comment
Gee, thanks, Katzilla. Top comment!
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
October 1st 2011 @ 9:45am
Rugby Fan said | October 1st 2011 @ 9:45am | Report comment
Who do we rate as referees? Can the average supporter (as opposed to the one-eyed fan) agree on who is doing a fair job?
I like the way Wayne Barnes handles matches but he’s already under fire for the James Hook kick, his interpretation of the breakdown, and leaving injured players strewn about the pitch.
Are we basically saying that none of the top referees are up to the job of handling a top World Cup match?
If so, then there’s a fundamental problem with the game. It’s not as if there are a dozen refs elsewhere who would do a better job. If the current referees are doing as good a job as you could reasonably expect from anyone, then we should either accept that or push for a whole new approach.
We could try two referees. They could work in tandem on the pitch or else one might be a set-piece specialist, coming on for scrums and lineouts. We could go for more use of technology.
I don’t like the constant baiting of referees without any concrete ideas on how to remedy perceived deficiencies.
October 1st 2011 @ 9:47am
ohtani's jacket said | October 1st 2011 @ 9:47am | Report comment
Wayne Barnes is atrocious and has directly influenced the result of the last three tests I’ve seen him ref — Brisbane Tri-Nations match, Wales/South Africa and Argentina/Scotland.
October 1st 2011 @ 12:12pm
Rugby Fan said | October 1st 2011 @ 12:12pm | Report comment
You haven’t said who you think is doing a good job.
October 1st 2011 @ 12:50pm
Seiran said | October 1st 2011 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
RF, I don’t think any of the current crop are doing a good job. This doesn’t mean there is something wrong with the code. It’s more a reflection of the IRB and the way in which the ref’s themselves are being coached and managed.
Do ref’s have conferences or master classes to sort out law interpretations?
I also question the way in which ref’s are supervised and reviewed; which is by one of their own, Paddy O’Brian. if anything, they should be getting reviewed by independent review panels made up of influencial coaches and players, current and past.
October 1st 2011 @ 3:08pm
Glenn Condell said | October 1st 2011 @ 3:08pm | Report comment
If Steve Walsh and Stu Dickinson can’t get a gig in front of some of these jokers there is something very wrong.
The basic problem is with how refs see themselves – are they encouraged/instructed to ‘police’ or ‘manage’ a game? Obviously anything done by one team which disadvantages the other illegally should be penalised, but how often do you see play blown up for some stupid thing that had no bloody impact on anything? Accidental offsides with no obstruction, pulling mauls down by (duh!) tackling the maulers, incorrect effing binding, collapse ruled with ball at half’s feet ready to go, no advantage played when it could be (esp for poor minnows), ridiculous yellow and red cards, et al.
Refs ought to be remunerated inversely to the number of pens blown. No, that won’t work, but we need to somehow instil in them the need for a filter to apply to each decision to blow – do I really need to pull this up? How will it look on TV tomorrow? Can I justify it to a review panel? You only blow when you must, not every time you can.
Bring back Peter Marshall!
October 1st 2011 @ 3:56pm
Seiran said | October 1st 2011 @ 3:56pm | Report comment
Did you watch today’s Wallabies/Russia match. Lawrence blew the whistle in the first second of the test, because a Russian player was half a leg over the line before the kicker got the ball away.
What a stupid, pedantic call by Lawrence. So what if the Russian was over the line. It wasn’t the world cup final. It wasn’t going to make a difference to the outcome of this test, so just let the team play some rugby.
October 1st 2011 @ 9:53am
Sprigs said | October 1st 2011 @ 9:53am | Report comment
The loss to the Irish is doing the Wallabies the world of good.
Their opponents can’t help but fall into the psychological trap of underestimating them.
October 1st 2011 @ 11:31am
Blinky Bill of Bellingen said | October 1st 2011 @ 11:31am | Report comment
Well in all seriousness, I think it may just have been the loss we needed to kick our immature backsides and get us moving.
Hopefully we have realized that this is the RWC for God’s sake and all teams are here to win. So switch on boys!!!!
October 1st 2011 @ 10:43am
JamesB said | October 1st 2011 @ 10:43am | Report comment
The weather may have a major bearing on the q-finals. If it rains in Wellington the Boks will beat the Wallabies. The Aussies generally prefer a dry track, and whilst most teams probably do, it would play to their strengths, i.e. backs.
It’s pretty hard to see the Wallabies progressing past the q-finals now, their forwards just won’t be able to foot it with the Boks for the full 80.
Yes, Barnes is atrocious and so is Nigel Owens.
October 1st 2011 @ 12:37pm
Pot Hale said | October 1st 2011 @ 12:37pm | Report comment
Russia bossing the Wallaby scrum at the moment.
October 1st 2011 @ 12:43pm
Pot Hale said | October 1st 2011 @ 12:43pm | Report comment
Berrick Barnes is a class act. Why was he ever left out of this side? Lovely stuff for those two tries.
October 1st 2011 @ 2:26pm
mw said | October 1st 2011 @ 2:26pm | Report comment
Surely Pothale you remember the injury.
October 2nd 2011 @ 6:22am
Pot Hale said | October 2nd 2011 @ 6:22am | Report comment
I do. Was he injured for the all the pool matches?