Related coverage
- Sydney FC news
- Melbourne Victory news
- Central Coast Mariners news
- Wellington Phoenix news
- Adelaide United news
- Newcastle Jets news
- Perth Glory news
- Brisbane Roar news
- Football news
- A-League news
- Melbourne Heart news

Melbourne Victory's Harry Kewell runs away with the ball against Aelaide United in a pre-season friendly in Adelaide (AAP Image/James Elsby)
For last few weeks I’ve agonised over my 2011-2012 A-League predictions, trying to put the 10 clubs in order of how they’ll finish the home and away season, and picking the grand finalists and eventual winner.
At one point or another Brisbane Roar, Central Coast Mariners, Adelaide United and Melbourne Victory have occupied top spot and had grand final berths. Down the other end of the table, Wellington Phoenix, Gold Coast United and Newcastle Jets have all had a spell at the bottom.
The rest occupied the middle of the ladder – not quite good enough for the Premier’s Plate yet still in finals contention.
So when trying to put the 10 in order, what I found was while their exact positions may have changed, there were three clear groups that could be easily distinguished.
Consider it like it’s a Formula One qualifying session. For the uninitiated, F1 qualifying is divided into three elimination sessions. The slower stragglers are eliminated in the first session, Q1. Next its Q2’s job to eliminate a further group of drivers before the fastest go through to Q3 to determine the pole-sitter.
Here is how my A-League 2011-12 ‘qualifying results’ look:
Q3 (1st to 4th):
Melbourne Victory
Adelaide United
Brisbane Roar
Central Coast Mariners
Q2 (5th to 7th):
Sydney FC
Melbourne Heart
Perth Glory
Q1 (8th to 10th):
Gold Coast United
Wellington Phoenix
Newcastle Jets
Now for the justifications…
Of the Q1 stragglers, there simply isn’t the depth of squad, recognised stars who can change a game (Paul Ifill and Jason Culina could be considered such, but injury rules out the latter and hangs over the former).
Any chance Newcastle had of getting out of Q1 could have evaporated with Branko Culina’s sacking on the brink of the season. Without a marquee (unless Jason Culina’s contract can be torn up and a replacement acquired) and losing a coach so late into preparations, the Jets appears to be in some trouble.
However, the three cellar dwellers are more than capable of upsetting the Q2 and Q3 clubs on their day.
Wellington can always rely on strong home form, even when struggling on the park – although the less congested calendar and reduction in midweek games will help other teams’ preparations for the trip across the ditch.
On the Gold Coast, there may be question marks around the depth in the squad and the lack of experience, but Miron Bleiberg is the coach to graft out results.
Newcastle will be buoyed by big home crowds if the close to 10,000 members show up on a regular basis, while owner Nathan Tinkler has the financial might to splash out on much-needed replacement for Culina (if he’s allowed to) or guest players to try and fill the void.
Of the Q2 clubs, Heart, Perth and Sydney have more star power than the Q3 clubs – players such as Fred (if he’s still as good as his Victory days), Shane Smeltz and Brett Emerton can turn matches on their own, and all three clubs have solid squads.
Yet there are serious question marks over all three.
Does Perth have the pedigree and coaching staff to avoid another wasted season?
Does Heart have the depth across the park and the experience in their sophomore season? And what of those rumours that Simon Colosimo is unhappy at the club, adding further doubts on a defensive line-up that looks a tad shaky.
Does Sydney FC have enough attacking options and have they learnt from the failings of last season?
When compared to the Q3 leaders, there are too many question marks around these three clubs. Crucially, one Q2 will miss the finals – a big blow for all three if that’s case given their high expectations.
Then there are the Q3 leaders: the two pacesetters from last season along with the two clubs that have been the most aggressive and impressive in the transfer market.
Brisbane and Central Coast have retained enough of their talented squads to challenge again this season, and they have plugged the gaps well – in Brisbane’s case, with a great mix of young players who can thrive in that environment.
If any club can buck the trend of challenging for back-to-back triumphs, it’s the club that set a new and incredibly high benchmark last season. Under Ange Postecoglou and playing the sort of football they did last season, they cannot plummet like previous defending champions.
Adelaide United has an incredibly strong spine and will greatly benefit from Jon McKain at the back, while there’s great depth across the park and a sense of unfinished business from last season.
As for Melbourne Victory, my tip to go all the way, the combination of Harry Kewell, Archie Thompson, Danny Allsopp, Jean Carlos Solórzano, Marco Rojas and Carlos Hernandez could tear the league apart – particularly the Archie-Kewell partnership.
That line-up is arguably the best and deepest attacking stock the A-League’s ever seen, and even if there are question marks around their defense, they are more than capable of compensating at the other end.
The A-League is a league in three this season.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.


October 5th 2011 @ 7:19am
Midfielder said | October 5th 2011 @ 7:19am | Report comment
Nice break up… think you mat be right…
October 5th 2011 @ 7:57am
ComradeRoar said | October 5th 2011 @ 7:57am | Report comment
I’m sorry but what? I rarely post here but I was compelled by the drivel that has just spilled from your mouth, or keyboard as it were.
“That line-up is arguably the best and deepest attacking stock the A-League’s ever seen, and even if there are question marks around their defense, they are more than capable of compensating at the other end.”
Are you seriously suggesting that the attacking prowess of a team more than makes up for it’s defensive shortcomings? Now this is no insult to MV fans as I believe they will finish top 4 before. But if we take MV out of the equation, that is one of the most ridiculous statement’s I’ve ever heard; to say that the attack of a team will compensate for the defence is ludicrous, I hope in your little bubble no one ever gets it passed the midfield or they’re cooked!
Talk about the poor standard of punditry!
October 5th 2011 @ 8:49am
Cappuccino said | October 5th 2011 @ 8:49am | Report comment
He’s not saying that MV’s attacking quality will compensate for its defence. He’s saying that despite a lack of defensive depth, the starting defenders in Leijer, Vargas, Kemp and new left back Fabio are all good enough anyway. As long as they stay injury free, the victory’s defence actually looks pretty solid this season (although there obvious team strength will be there attack).
October 5th 2011 @ 9:29am
Fussball ist unser leben said | October 5th 2011 @ 9:29am | Report comment
@ ComradeRoar
Yes, attacking prowess can more than compensate for defensive frailties – have you not been watching Barcelona in recent games?
Without Pique & Puyol, Barca’s defending – particularly the midfielders, who are asked to be CDs – has been comical. Hasn’t harmed their results.
October 5th 2011 @ 11:29am
AGO74 said | October 5th 2011 @ 11:29am | Report comment
There is some merit to your argument but using Barca as justification is not really an apples for apples comparison. Barca as we all know are on a different planet. On the flipside, you could suggest that another great attacking team Arsenal can’t score anywhere near as many as they leak at present.
October 5th 2011 @ 12:59pm
Kasey said | October 5th 2011 @ 12:59pm | Report comment
Wasn’t the “If they score 3,we’ll score 4″ theory totally dismantled by SAF as ManYoo overtook the Toon to pip them for the Premier League title in the early 90s(I forget the exact year?)….Wor Kev had a very free flowing game plan for the Magpies, but SAF just wore them down with results. I guess you can’t ever score as many as you need when you need them under that policy.
October 5th 2011 @ 2:22pm
Matt F said | October 5th 2011 @ 2:22pm | Report comment
Yeah the Keegan philosophy looked so good for us up to about halfway. 12 point lead going into february and blew it! Thankfully I was only 7 at the time so I don’t remember that season too well! Though interestingly we only conceded 2 more goals then ManU in that season (95/96) and they scored 7 more then we did so it seems ol’ Kev was all talk.
October 5th 2011 @ 2:26pm
Kasey said | October 5th 2011 @ 2:26pm | Report comment
Speaking of all talk and wor Kev, was that season also the year of his famous meltdown? I’d loove it etc? That made for excelent copy:) I wonder if Aurelio vidmar went to the Kev Keagan school of media for football managers?;)
October 5th 2011 @ 6:40pm
AGO74 said | October 5th 2011 @ 6:40pm | Report comment
Well Kasey – I don’t think Aurelio went to the Kev Keegan school of football tactics. Aurelio is much more comfortable with his ancestral Italian 0-0 or 1-0 roots than the Kev Keegan 4-3 style!
October 5th 2011 @ 8:32pm
whiskeymac said | October 5th 2011 @ 8:32pm | Report comment
i remember that season, and the teams. asprilla…. what a player!
October 6th 2011 @ 1:39pm
Kasey said | October 6th 2011 @ 1:39pm | Report comment
Wasn’t it the introduction of ‘tino asprilla that was deemed(by the media – and some fans at least) to have unstabilised the squad in the lead in to the final rounds of the season, allowing ManYoo to squeak in?
October 6th 2011 @ 2:59am
ComradeRoar said | October 6th 2011 @ 2:59am | Report comment
Hey FIUL,
Yes I have been watching Barcelona recently. Infact ironically, I wrote that comment last night in Barcelona. It was something like 12am when I wrote that and I was a little cranky. None the less, the statement “they are more than capable of compensating at the other end” cannot be construed any other way than… What it says, they are more than capable of compensating (for defence with a potent attacking team). As many people below have pointed out Keegan is one of many managers who have attempted this and have failed. I think also my bitterness is also about this fluff journalism. I’m anxious to get the season started. I’m sick of ‘Theo says roar will be a threat’, ‘Kewell settling in well’, ‘Arnold looking forward to ‘exciting’ season’. This article is no different, it’s all fluff, what’s the point? I realize this is an opinion piece but there is no clear argument, in fact, the article poses more questions than it seeming answers. The only half arsed analysis is “As for Melbourne Victory, my tip to go all the way, the combination of Harry Kewell, Archie Thompson, Danny Allsopp, Jean Carlos Solórzano, Marco Rojas and Carlos Hernandez could tear the league apart – particularly the Archie-Kewell partnership.” which is pointing out facts, yes, that is MV’s forward’s, yes, it will be potent.
“Wellington can always rely on strong home form, even when struggling on the park”
Rubbish, no substance to this statement. Wow, home teams perform well!?
“Does Perth have the pedigree and coaching staff to avoid another wasted season?”
What does this even mean? Thomas Broich didn’t have too much pedigree left, Kosta Barborouses none, and even less people had ever heard of JC Solerzano. Don’t even get me started on the quality of the coaching staff, before last season everyone thought Ange was washed up. That statement has no logic to it.
“On the Gold Coast, there may be question marks around the depth in the squad and the lack of experience, but Miron Bleiberg is the coach to graft out results.”
Is the coach to graft out results? Yes, Gold Coast has had 2 great seasons so far, but that was helped in perticular with a strong attacking line up, Culina was superb in his first season back from Holland and nothing needs to be said about Smeltz and his knack for goal scoring. Djite was also a good player for them, able to create some fantastic through balls as well as being up front to slot in a few of his own. Bleiberg is a ‘good’ manager, but he will be tested this year. The aforementioned statement is hyperbole and makes no specific mention of the challenges facing GC this year, why they are facing them, and who Miron has decided to replace all those other players with. Also, if I hear the word ‘depth’ again, I will explode.
Summarising: an opinion piece which may or may not be accurate but fails to tell us anything new or give adequate information to justify the conclusions reached. There has been a complete failure of technical analysis and relies far too much on cliche’s (and questionably the authors failure to understand the tactical and technical aspect of the game) and as such this article has failed to inform or educate.
October 5th 2011 @ 8:48am
Rellum said | October 5th 2011 @ 8:48am | Report comment
I agree with most of what you have said, except I would swap Perth with Newcastle, even with their change in manager. And the league is a race in three so I would drop them to the Q2 as you put it. I am of the same opinion of ComradeRoar, Victory are not nearly as good as people are making them out to be.
October 5th 2011 @ 8:55am
Rellum said | October 5th 2011 @ 8:55am | Report comment
By them I mean the Victory.
October 5th 2011 @ 9:31am
Fussball ist unser leben said | October 5th 2011 @ 9:31am | Report comment
Well, at least people are “making Victory out to be good”… no intelligent football analyst is even contemplating Heart to be any good at all!
Terrific article by Ned Zelic today and I doubt van’t Schip will last the whole season … maybe Heart will recycle another ex-MVFC and hire Merrick when van’t Schip is moved on?
Source: http://www.footballaustralia.com.au/zelic-opinion-display/We-should-expect-better-from-our-imports/41247
October 5th 2011 @ 9:56am
striker said | October 5th 2011 @ 9:56am | Report comment
Fusball, do you know if saturdys game will be a sellout as people suggest?
October 5th 2011 @ 10:39am
Fussball ist unser leben said | October 5th 2011 @ 10:39am | Report comment
@ striker
No don’t have any details yet but, based purely on the amount of hype surrounding the match, I would expect it to be a sell-out. Big day of racing at Caufield – the Guineas with Black Caviar trying to break some record (my knowledge of Racing has always focused on fillies with 2 legs!), but MVFC has had big crowds on bigger racing days (Derby, Oaks) in the past.
However, for all the seats to be filled, the Medallion Club holders need to turn up, too, and this is just the sort of game that would attract the Medallion Club.
October 5th 2011 @ 10:41am
TomC said | October 5th 2011 @ 10:41am | Report comment
Unlikely to be a sell-out, I’d have thought. 35 to 40k would be a more than acceptable crowd figure.
October 5th 2011 @ 11:30am
AGO74 said | October 5th 2011 @ 11:30am | Report comment
Definitely acceptable!
October 5th 2011 @ 10:18am
Rellum said | October 5th 2011 @ 10:18am | Report comment
Well I now expect the Victory to put 8 past everyone, anything else is a failure
Bring on the Derby, can’t wait to see the boys stick it up the Victory.
October 5th 2011 @ 11:29am
Griffo said | October 5th 2011 @ 11:29am | Report comment
Noticed the new website designs are up
October 5th 2011 @ 12:20pm
Rellum said | October 5th 2011 @ 12:20pm | Report comment
On JVS, I agree that he has been poor in getting the results and style of football the club wants, but the first season is about setting up the club culture so I have been giving him some slack. Pressure is now on this seasons as the club has stated ladder positions and style as expected results for the season. If he is moved on the I would think Ante Milicic or Arthur Papas would be the next in line in the short term.
There is absolutely no chance that Merrick will ever manage the Heart.
October 5th 2011 @ 10:48am
striker said | October 5th 2011 @ 10:48am | Report comment
I recon a full stadium at AAM could have looked better but i suppose the more people the better for the competiopn.
October 5th 2011 @ 10:54am
Fussball ist unser leben said | October 5th 2011 @ 10:54am | Report comment
The game was always scheduled at Etihad – even before the H & Emmo arrivals. MVFC has to play 5 HAL matches at Etihad each year until 2025.
October 5th 2011 @ 5:55pm
Football United said | October 5th 2011 @ 5:55pm | Report comment
is that confirmed. i’ve heard whispers about that after the fan forum and was praying it not to be true.
October 5th 2011 @ 6:00pm
TheMagnificent11 said | October 5th 2011 @ 6:00pm | Report comment
Not sure about 2025 but MV are contractually obliged to play a certain number matches at Etihad.
October 5th 2011 @ 6:04pm
Kasey said | October 5th 2011 @ 6:04pm | Report comment
I’m not a tard, but I’m 100% sure that Fuss is spot on here. As part of the sweetheart deal the Victory get(IIRC they rent the stadium cheaper than Footscray) the tards promised to play finals and 5 ‘big’ games/season at Etihad. It wouldn’t be all bad,but it appears the magic seats are permanently stuck in oval config…so much for multi-use stadia then:(
October 5th 2011 @ 6:33pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | October 5th 2011 @ 6:33pm | Report comment
I spoke to MVFC earlier this year and expressed how disappointed I was that we still play games at Docklands.
Make no mistake – MVFC is well aware that fans much prefer watching football at AAMI Park – but MVFC said the deal at Docklands was signed BEFORE AAMI Park had even been dreamt and the deal with Docklands is simply unbelievable.
However,the deal with Docklands management, involves MVFC not divulging any details about the contract (length, cost) apart from having to play 5 HAL matches each season, plus all finals and all ACL matches.
However, the MVFC person I spoke to did make the general comment that: the AFL takes control of the stadium ownership in 2025.
October 5th 2011 @ 7:17pm
Kasey said | October 5th 2011 @ 7:17pm | Report comment
2025 seems like a likely drop dead date for the contract, Does anybody really think the sweeheart deal the Victory get will be extended when the AFL takes control of the venue? Great news for fans who prefer their football in a rectangular venue, Adelaide were happy to welcome the tards to that particular club, hopefully the better viewing experience will help a little bit to dispell some of the negative media they get in the ultra-hostile media market that is tardistan.
October 6th 2011 @ 1:17pm
Axelv said | October 6th 2011 @ 1:17pm | Report comment
It was misquoted, the contact ends 2015 with Etihad. That’s what Geoff Miles said when a fan asked.
October 5th 2011 @ 10:48am
TomC said | October 5th 2011 @ 10:48am | Report comment
So many unknowns this season, it makes more sense to group teams according to potential rather than try and predict their performance, which I think is roughly what Adrian has done here.
On that basis, the Victory certainly deserve to be in the top tier, seeing as they could comfortably win the title this season if they can get their back four right, and get some form out of their holding midfielders.
All the same, I think its more likely that Adelaide and Brisbane will be the main contenders. To me they look to have more balanced squads. The Mariners also look strong again, but I don’t see as much upside for them.
Sydney definitely look the most likely out of ‘Q2′ to challenge the top teams.
October 5th 2011 @ 11:18am
David V. said | October 5th 2011 @ 11:18am | Report comment
A quick snapshot of each club:
Adelaide United
Strengths: improved depth throughout the squad and no shortage of goals.
Weaknesses: will they play with the same flair now that Flores and Leckie are gone?
Verdict: Potential champions.
Brisbane Roar
Strengths: Postecoglou’s system takes primacy over players, who are expected to fit in. Good record of bringing kids through.
Weaknesses: again, not certain who will score the goals, but then again they did have to replace SVD last year.
Verdict: Can potentially be right up there, otherwise not far off.
Central Coast Mariners
Strengths: solid, hard-working, good team structure
Weaknesses: what can I think of? Lack of finesse up front maybe.
Verdict: See Brisbane.
Gold Coast United
Strengths: Promising youth.
Weaknesses: Will losing too many senior players hurt them?
Verdict: Finals at best, but no more. Brighter future though.
Melbourne Heart
Strengths: *Potential* for Williams, Dugandzic, Kalmar and Alex Terra to spark
Weaknesses: Will any of those find consistency? Heart aren’t the best or worst in any department.
Verdict: FInals at best, but could struggle.
Melbourne Victory
Strengths: Attacking talent, and Muscat’s retirement improves defence automatically (they let in fewer goals last season when he was absent)
Weaknesses: Defence still not the best. Rely too much on individual performances, and Durakovic has to show he’s a better coach than Merrick. Core players not getting any younger and Kewell may not last. Questions about their ability to bring through youngsters.
Verdict: Hit or miss.
Newcastle Jets
Strengths: defence is decent enough, some fair talent.
Weaknesses: Very unsettled no doubt, and a thin squad.
Verdict: if their defence holds up they may be in the mix, but injuries will kill them.
Perth Glory
Strengths: it’s a decent team….
Weaknesses: ….but an awful coach.
Verdict: Have to be up there, otherwise curtains for Ferguson.
Sydney FC
Strengths: if they get the mix right, Carle, Emerton and Bruno will fire. Good young talent.
Weaknesses: that’s a big *if* they get the mix right, recruitment not that spectacular and pre-season has not impressed.
Verdict: Finals at best but no more.
Wellington Phoenix
Strengths: home form, plus Ifill, Greenacre, Brown and Daniel.
Weaknesses: very thin squad.
Verdict: will do OK if home form keeps up. But will struggle badly if injuries take its toll.
October 5th 2011 @ 1:37pm
Qantas supports Australian Football said | October 5th 2011 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
David V—–that’s an interesting snapshot of all of the teams in this years comp. Although I believe GCU FC are going to surprise a few pundits with an excellent year this year and reach the final.
October 6th 2011 @ 12:16am
TheMagnificent11 said | October 6th 2011 @ 12:16am | Report comment
Tend to agree with most of this. Top 4 will include Adelaide, Brisbane, Central Coast and Victory (in not particular order). Heart and Sydney to round out the 6. Fergie to be the first coach sacked. Maybe if that happens early enough and they get someone like Gary van Egmond, then they might sneak the 6. Gold Coast will probably just miss the 6 but well placed to improve next season.
October 5th 2011 @ 12:02pm
Michael said | October 5th 2011 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
Good article Adrian. You can’t make predictions without having some bias. I reckon you’re overly optimistic with Perth, Heart & Sydney. Sydney have played insipid football despite Nicky Carle, and that might continue even with Emmo. Perth have been poor in the past even with a squad that is supposedly good on paper, so that may well continue too. Ned Zelic is right about van ‘t Schip, the results should have been better, no excuses.
Things change as the season progresses too, and a new coach and possible marquee players may boost Newcastle’s position.
It’s hard to fault your top four. Maybe the order will change, but I’d bet that the table will have those four at the top towards the end of the season.
October 5th 2011 @ 1:45pm
TheMagnificent11 said | October 5th 2011 @ 1:45pm | Report comment
Your Melbourne prediction appears to be mainly based on their playing talent. However, Brisbane and Central Coast showed last season that you need a good system to be more than just a top 6 team. I think Melbourne will be top 4 based on what I saw of them in the ACL under Durakovic. They looked to try to keep possession. However, there was no obvious patterns of play. Brisbane have a set way the build-up attacks (I can go into more detail if you want). The opposition know what it is but the movement off the ball to create space is so good that it is still very difficult to stop (only Melbourne and Central Coast achieved that last season).
I’d like to see Melbourne play with Thompson on the left, Allsopp or Solórzano up front, Rojas on the right and Kewell in the hole (Hernandez coming off the bench to add extra creativity when needed). Durakovic needs to resist the temptation to squeeze everyone in. However, there a lot of new faces there and even with a good system of play they will take time to gel (it to Brisbane a while to turn their domination of possession into clear cut chances and goals last season).
October 5th 2011 @ 2:23pm
Matt F said | October 5th 2011 @ 2:23pm | Report comment
Can’t argue with any of what you’ve said really. I came out with the exact same when i did it.
October 5th 2011 @ 5:59pm
Midfielder said | October 5th 2011 @ 5:59pm | Report comment
Mariners signed a new shirt sponsor today… Fozzie will love the name
http://www.footballaustralia.com.au/centralcoastmariners/news-display/Central-Coast-seal-Soccer5s-sponsorship/41507
October 5th 2011 @ 6:10pm
The Cattery said | October 5th 2011 @ 6:10pm | Report comment
Seems a strange sponsorship.
October 5th 2011 @ 6:14pm
TheMagnificent11 said | October 5th 2011 @ 6:14pm | Report comment
Well it’s promoting Soccer5, which gets more kids playing football at Soccer5 where the Central Coast can do promotions and face-to-face marketing, thus getting more people to Central Coast games. And, Central Coast get paid for the sponsorship. Clever bit of business in my opinion.
October 5th 2011 @ 7:04pm
The Cattery said | October 5th 2011 @ 7:04pm | Report comment
Yes, precisely, it appears to be specific to the locality of the Central Coast, so it’s unlikely to be a valuable sponsorship.
It’s a national competition, firms wishing to gain national exposure will pay far, far more than a firm pushing something that’s quite local.
October 5th 2011 @ 7:09pm
Titus said | October 5th 2011 @ 7:09pm | Report comment
I think it is a pretty big Scottish organisation that is looking to get into the local 5s scene, which is huge throughout Sydney and I would assume nationally. Central Coast is just where they are starting out I think.
So not a bad deal for both I would guess.
October 5th 2011 @ 7:10pm
Midfielder said | October 5th 2011 @ 7:10pm | Report comment
TC
They are a big UK sports company wanting rapid growth around Australia … they have signed a long term lease at the Centre of Excellence… given they promote playing 5 a side matches and are quite a sizable company it is a perfect fit…
Soccer5 get exposure to the Australian Football community and that they are at the COE…. the Mariners get a sponsor with big plans and as I said below fits well with our unwritten charter of no sponsors with no alcohol or gambling…
October 5th 2011 @ 8:07pm
Ian Whitchurch said | October 5th 2011 @ 8:07pm | Report comment
It doesnt matter if they are a big or a small company.
What matters is if the cheques clear.
Firepower were pretty big for a while, and Russell Crowe’s best call was to tell them to take a long walk off a short jetty.
October 5th 2011 @ 8:37pm
The Cattery said | October 5th 2011 @ 8:37pm | Report comment
Titus/Midfielder
That is one of the strange aspects about it – most junior clubs are doing 5s for the littlies, all round Australia, so there is a piece of the jigsaw that I’m not quite understanding.
Junior clubs charge decent fees for their fives comps (we’re talking up to about U7 level), and the FFA gets a cut of that, so I don’t quite understand where this Soccer5s fits in.
In South America, you don’t need astroturf to play 5s, you play wherever you can find a flat surface and a bit of space.
October 5th 2011 @ 6:18pm
Ian Whitchurch said | October 5th 2011 @ 6:18pm | Report comment
Sure. But since Fussball is an irrelevant blowhard with a high tolerance for corruption and no clue how to build a code out of obscurity so it grows local roots and local rivalries, it doesnt matter.
Its a good sponsorship, and 5 a side on astroturf will help develop skills – a total win-win. Go Soccer5s
October 5th 2011 @ 6:27pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | October 5th 2011 @ 6:27pm | Report comment
How did I get involved in this?
… I seem to have upset the wannabe Texas oilman, who claims to have never had his palms greased!
But, if I’ve upset a football hater, I’m in a pugilistic mood – so bring it on, I’m happy to be involved
October 5th 2011 @ 7:16pm
Ian Whitchurch said | October 5th 2011 @ 7:16pm | Report comment
Fussball,
In the name of their company, they called Association Football … Soccer.
You know, as in rugger, league, footy, soccer and so on. The term you get really really upset at, claiming only one code has the name ‘football’.