Boxing: Too late to save the sweet science from itself?
By Adam Santarossa, 14 Nov 2011 Adam Santarossa is a Roar Guru
Boxing fans yesterday witnessed the sport of boxing give itself yet another low blow, as the Manny Pacquiao farce gave 150 million people around the world a reason to give up on the sport for good.
Just a few short hours earlier, the UFC strode onto network TV for the first time, and saw that same number of people tune into the event worldwide, giving the organisation’s push into the mainstream a massive shot in the arm.
Pacquiao vs Marquez was a daylight robbery that Jesse James would have been proud of.
As hard as it is to believe that Juan Manuel Marquez wasn’t unanimously awarded the decision by the judges, what is even harder to believe is that not a single judge ruled in his favour.
It’s often said that watching a fight at ringside and at home shows two different fights, but that argument doesn’t stick here.
Most commentators at ringside had Marquez ahead, as did myself and The Roar’s round-by-round blog had Marquez by a round or two.
Most of those that frequent social networking sites appeared to have the same, and judging by the resounding boos that were heard around the MGM Grand Garden Arena when the decision was announced, plenty of the people in the stands certainly had him the winner.
The biggest indication though was the sight of Pacquiao walking despondently to his corner upon hearing the final bell, whilst Marquez celebrated jubilantly.
Even betting organisation Sportingbet decided to refund those who bet on Marquez, given their disbelief at the decision.
The sad thing is that this is not the first time it has happened in the sport, and it sure as hell won’t be the last.
Questions need to be asked.
Greed and corruption continues to kill the sport, and fans continue to turn away.
For so long fans simply put up with it, shrugged their shoulders and said “that’s boxing”. But that was before the emergence of an alternative.
The biggest problem with boxing is that the biggest names are held accountable to no one, and are available to the highest bidder.
They have the ability to choose who they fight, when they fight and in some cases who is judging.
It is not an uncommon occurrence for a fighter to protest over the selection of a judge and have a more favourable one put in their place, as the governing bodies do not want to jeopardise their slice of the fighter’s salary they receive through sanctioning fees.
With the likes of Mayweather and Pacquiao, that’s big money. The fighters have all the control, and their promotional companies have just as much sway.
The big promotional companies wheel and deal, and have enough money and enough pull to keep certain fighters down and allow certain fighters to become protected species.
Not for a second am I saying that corruption was involved in yesterday’s decision, but history has shown a long list of occasions when it has reared its ugly head in boxing.
The biggest example that Australian fans will be familiar with is the controversial decision in the first Jeff Fenech vs Azumah Nelson fight.
Fenech himself has said in interviews when questioned on the decision, “Well, Nelson was a Don King fighter, on a Don King promotion”.
Referees and judges have often found themselves being wined and dined; received significant hotel upgrades and numerous other “sweeteners” by promoters to ensure their fighters get the ample consideration when tallying the numbers at the end of a fight.
Pacquiao received a cool $22 million dollars for the fight, whilst Marquez walked away with $5 million.
The success that Pacquiao has, extensively lines the pockets of many, and with a $100 million dollar fight with Floyd Mayweather on the radar, you can certainly see why I am asking the question. I am not the only one.
A fourth fight between Pacquiao and Marquez will see significant increases to both of those figures, but the question has to be asked whether Juan Manuel Marquez wants to go around again, after he has been given the rough end of the stick on three occasions now.
The fight showed that Marquez has a hell of a lot of fight left in him, and that Manny Pacquiao is very beatable.
Whilst there are many that say Pacquiao is the pound for pound king and some even say he should be called the greatest of all time, there are as many who see him as simply overhyped.
Wins over Top Rank stablemates Antonio Margarito, Miguel Cotto and Joshua Clottey, have been coupled with victories over Ricky Hatton, Oscar De La Hoya and Shane Mosley, all of which who had been beaten by Floyd “Money” Mayweather previously before stepping into the ring with the Pacman.
While Pacquiao has managed two highly controversial wins over Marquez, and another highly controversial draw, Floyd Mayweather defeated Marquez so convincingly in 2009, that none of the judges’ scorecards even had Marquez winning a round.
One positive to come out of the decision is that a Pacquiao victory may finally push the “super fight” with Mayweather closer to reality.
Mayweather may now see some significant chinks in the Pacquiao armour, and move in to not only cash in significantly but permanently erase any conjecture over who is the best in the world.
A Pacquiao loss to Marquez would have certainly dented the box office appeal in the fight, as well as made negotiations difficult in relation to a 50-50 split of revenue difficult, considering Pacquiao would have then been coming of a loss.
But while the circus that is boxing moves onto the next city, the question remains whether the hardcore fans will continue to walk through the turnstiles.
Pay per view sales are down, and numerous fight cards recently in Las Vegas have seen embarrassingly poor ticket sales.
On the other hand, the UFC continues to grow, with record numbers in almost every business area. They have a highly lucrative network television deal, and continue to expand to more and more countries all over the globe.
Boxing’s two biggest drawcards have left Boxing with two bitter blows in a matter of months. First, it was the controversial end to the Mayweather- Ortiz fight, and now this.
I wrote earlier this year that the Mayweather-Pacquiao fight is the one that could save boxing.
Now, it may simply be too late.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Other Sports articles
- Nadal, Serena affirm favouritism for French Open (15)
- Can boxing great Pacquiao return to his former self? (14)
- Durant is a superhero, but not super enough (13)
- Has sports journalism lost its way? (12)
- Will Mayweather vs Pacquiao happen? (11)
- Cheap Seats Podcast: episode four (9)
- ‘Wild’ Will willing: Tomlinson targets American assault (8)
- Nadal and Djokovic chasing Federer
- Aussie Power chasing history at Indy 500
- 2013 French Open: men’s matches to watch out for
- James Te Huna’s back on track for UFC 160
- Five things you’ll see at UFC 160
- UFC 160: Velasquez vs. Bigfoot II – analysis and prediction
- Will the real Bernard please stand up (8)
- 2013 French Open: men’s matches to watch out for (1)
- James Te Huna’s back on track for UFC 160 (0)
- Five things you’ll see at UFC 160 (0)
- UFC 160: Velasquez vs. Bigfoot II – analysis and prediction (0)
- Will the real Bernard please stand up (8)
- UFC 160: Junior Dos Santos vs Mark Hunt – analysis and prediction (2)
- Garcia’s racial comments alude to broader issues (2)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Boxing, Floyd Mayweather Jnr, Juan Manuel Marquez, Manny Pacquiao

November 14th 2011 @ 7:59am
Cee said | November 14th 2011 @ 7:59am | Report comment
Seriously Marquez would of had it in the bag if he showed abit more aggression, i’m sorry but a challenger to the crown has no right in believing he’s solidly ahead in a close fight and sit back in the last rounds. And being told by your corner that you’ve practically won the fight is ridiculous.
I don’t see how Marquez was robbed, he landed cleaner and harder shots yes but Pacquiao landed more and threw more and to the Judges that aggression pays off.
Yes Mayweather beat Marquez convincingly but in that case you have to realise that Pacquiao Beat Hatton and Oscar more convincingly than Mayweather in his first fights in welterweight and jr welterweight.
November 14th 2011 @ 9:16am
bill said | November 14th 2011 @ 9:16am | Report comment
UFC main bout lasted less then a round and was over due to a knock out punch that any boxer wouldn’t have let touch them. despite the result the quality of the fight was much much better.
November 14th 2011 @ 2:55pm
pike64 said | November 14th 2011 @ 2:55pm | Report comment
yes you are right about the punch, but an mma fighter will grapple a boxer to the ground and then ground and pound or make him tap out. they’re not going to trade punches with a boxer when they have more than one dimension to their fighting techniques.
November 14th 2011 @ 5:46pm
Jeb said | November 14th 2011 @ 5:46pm | Report comment
I agree. MMA is boxing plus everything. Therefore the fighters in MMA are the best period. Can’t understand how anyone watches boxing at all when you’ve got a way better product that is fairer and without all the bs that has gone along with boxing since well forever.
That being said the minute long bout wasn’t the best introduction that UFC could have had on fox.
November 14th 2011 @ 9:15pm
Ian Whitchurch said | November 14th 2011 @ 9:15pm | Report comment
Jeb,
If you can explain “without all the bullshit”, then why didnt Fedor Emelianenko ever fight in the UFC ?
November 15th 2011 @ 10:46am
Jeb said | November 15th 2011 @ 10:46am | Report comment
yeah it was a gross generalisation to say there’s no bs in ufc. Of course there is. However it does need to be acknowledged that there’s generally an attempt to put on the matches that the public wants to see.
Other comments have refered to MMA never taking over from boxing. Wake up – it already has. It is bigger in every single way apart from coverage from old school media.
But at the same time the popularity and continued growth of MMA is a good thing for boxing, just like it is for other forms of fighting. Just like snowboarding saved skiing, maybe MMA can save boxing.
November 14th 2011 @ 9:58am
josh said | November 14th 2011 @ 9:58am | Report comment
I agree with cee and bill marquez has to take the title from pacquiao counterpunching and not enough aggresion just doesnt cut it. I dont know why everyone is claiming robbery. I agree pacquiao didnt win the fight but marquez didnt win either so u have to give it to the champion. On another note adam santarossa has it wrong mayweather never fought cotto, margarito, or clottey while pacquiao takes on everybody mayweather seems to duck fighters or waits till he thinks they are slipping just enough then he fights them.
November 14th 2011 @ 12:14pm
Grahame said | November 14th 2011 @ 12:14pm | Report comment
According to CompuBox, “Pacquiao landed 176 of 578 punches. Marquez connected on 138 of 436 punches, preferring, as in his first two fights, to counter punch. Pacquiao had a 117-100 edge in power shots.” IF those are the facts then Pacquiao deserves the points decision.
November 14th 2011 @ 12:23pm
David Villa said | November 14th 2011 @ 12:23pm | Report comment
Great points Grahame, thanks for posting.
November 14th 2011 @ 12:19pm
David Villa said | November 14th 2011 @ 12:19pm | Report comment
Manny won rounds 1-4 & 10/11, arguably 5 & 12 also.
He didn’t win them in the emphatic fashion that Marquez won rounds 6,7,8,9 but he won them nonetheless. That’s a win.
Let’s forget for the moment that he was the incumbent champion, he was still constantly on the front foot, dictating the pace of the fight & trying to take control. He was definitely troubled throughout & often looked like he was scratching his head for ideas. but he was the more proactive fighter, even whilst being hugely off his game.
Marquez performed admirably & arguably has a cause to feel slighted but I don’t think it was daylight robbery as many suggest.
Many of Pacquaio’s scoring blows were in close quarters where it is hard to distinguish to the naked or untrained eye.
Let’s compare this to the farce that is UFC, where big, tough & athletic men simply wield there fists like windmills & hope for a lucky punch so they then pound the face of a prone opponent like a crazed primate. I know which I prefer.
November 14th 2011 @ 12:36pm
David Villa said | November 14th 2011 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
And further to my comment above, perhaps Manny walked to his corner despondently because he was unhappy with his performance, perhaps he was exhausted… Who knows…
November 14th 2011 @ 1:11pm
Ian Whitchurch said | November 14th 2011 @ 1:11pm | Report comment
Nope. Pac-man walked to his corner despondent because he knew he’d lost the fight.
Manny Pacquiao. Not one of the all-time greats.
November 14th 2011 @ 1:26pm
Johnno said | November 14th 2011 @ 1:26pm | Report comment
Manny Pacquiao was the luckiest person the World yesterday. I went and looked at some Phillipines newspapers yesterday and in the comments section replying to the fight many Phillipinos said the pac-man was lucky, and also did not deserve to win and thought the design was disgraceful. But this now sets up a Pac-man V pretty boy Maywather fight potentially, or a rematch vs Marquez, either way boxing will make a lot of money out of the pac man’s next fight.
November 14th 2011 @ 1:55pm
mobo said | November 14th 2011 @ 1:55pm | Report comment
I don’t know the exact rules that dictate scoring but I remember watching a fight in the UFC, Okami vs Marquardt and it was a similar match aside from the fact it was MMA. Okami was the aggressor, scoring more punches but Marquardt definitely hit heavier, albeit fewer. I don’t know if and how many punches landed matters or if it is up to the opinion of the judges but I’d assume it was the amount of punches that got Pacquaio the win. Not that I necessarily agree with that method but if it is a standard then he definitely won. Interesting fight nonetheless.
November 14th 2011 @ 9:01pm
Kento said | November 14th 2011 @ 9:01pm | Report comment
Cracking piece Adam – perfectly said.
November 14th 2011 @ 9:02pm
Ross said | November 14th 2011 @ 9:02pm | Report comment
Hi Adam great read mate… though I disagree with your assertion that MMA will take over Boxing (I enjoy both for the record too).
It will take a long time before MMA eclipses Boxing… & believe me the bigger MMA becomes the more corrupt it will become. Refer to my example below.
Dana White is nothing but a maverick look at what he just did to Carlos Condit who deserves a WW title shot vs GSP… for the sake of dollars he has elevated Nick Diaz… he is a greedy SOB let me tell you no better than Bob Arum.