Kurtis Patterson: more young Blues talent for Australia
By Bayman, 28 Nov 2011 The Crowd is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, Kurtis Patterson, NSW Blues
Kurtis Patterson, image via Cricket NSW
Related coverage
Over the years many have suggested that when NSW hands out the Baggy Blue they also hand over a Baggy Green to save time later. David Hookes, for one, famously expressed this view.
In the case of Kurtis Patterson, though, you could actually see why people may think this way.
In his last few first grade games for St. George he has a couple of hundreds in the bag. Picked for NSW when many young batsmen are wondering if they can still make the school team he has, in the vernacular, ‘stepped up’. For one so young it is an exciting sign.
I missed his innings on Sunday but I had been at the game on the first two days. During that time I had the opportunity to speak to one of the NSW selectors about Patterson.
I asked if the young man was ready for it and was told, “He’s certainly good enough but we would have liked to have held him back a bit. Unfortunately, with injuries and the timing of the Australia ‘A’ game we had to just bite the bullet and bring him in early.”
Patterson has certainly answered my question and absolutely repaid the faith of the selectors – who must be delighted with the result. It seems only yesterday that Hughes made fifty on debut and Maddinson went even better with a first up century.
The NSW production line just keeps on rolling. If people wonder why the Blues produce so many Test players it’s because they continue to produce young talent at a greater rate than any other state. And really, they always have.
Right now the NSW team is probably a “second” XI (no Clarke, Hughes, Khawaja, Haddin, Watson, Starc, Bollinger, Warner, Maddinson, Smith et al).
On top of this there are more than a team’s worth of talent from NSW playing for other states. Perhaps this is really a NSW ‘third’ XI playing now at the SCG but still they score 6/441 (admittedly, WA is also missing several would-be regulars).
Whatever team it is, Patterson can do no more than score 157 on debut (ok, for the pedants out there, he could have got 158). The fact is though, he may well be missing for the next match given the depth in NSW cricket. This will not necessarily be a bad thing.
Clearly, however, he is a talent and will soon be pushing for a regular spot. In a couple of years time it is not impossible to envisage and entirely “Blue” top six for Australia with Hughes, Warner, Khawaja, Clarke, Maddinson and Patterson all vying for a spot – and no, I have not forgotten Katich (I just do not expect to see him back). And Watson is really a Queenslander.
As a proud Redback supporter (or NSW 2 as my selector mate might call them) I just wish SA could produce talent like this on a slightly more regular basis than Hookes, Phillips, Blewett, Lehmann and Ferguson (which covers a thirty-five year period – the Blues have done this in a three year window and I won’t even start on the pace bowlers).
I am, however, very optimistic about Australia’s chances of climbing back up much faster than England might imagine. The new Test selection panel gives me hope and that NSW production line gives me confidence. Now we just have to wait and see.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (41)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- England win first Test by five wickets (5)
- Gilchrist says his playing days are over
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (44)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Aussie Hussey defends IPL after fix claims (2)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (44)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Brad Haddin must not be selected for Australia again (8)
- Is Australia finally warming to Michael Clarke? (7)
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, Kurtis Patterson, NSW Blues


November 28th 2011 @ 9:09am
Brett McKay said | November 28th 2011 @ 9:09am | Report comment
you’ve done it again, Bayman!!
November 28th 2011 @ 9:17am
Matt F said | November 28th 2011 @ 9:17am | Report comment
You know you’re doing well when your comment is made into its own article! Well, that or the comment was just really, really long
There was a good article in the fairfax papers over the weekend from Jake Niall explaining why there’s such a dominance of NSW-men both in the national team and in other state teams.
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/its-no-conspiracy–giants-afl-draft-picks-show-why-victoria-is-light-on-baggy-greens-20111126-1o09p.html
Almost all of the multi-talented teenagers are choosing AFL over Cricket partly because it’s seen as the “safer” option in terms of reaching the highest level, and getting a large income.
November 28th 2011 @ 9:49am
stabpass said | November 28th 2011 @ 9:49am | Report comment
Yes Victoria is underepresented, but then again QLD is as well, as well believe it or not NSW.
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/851/cricketm.jpg/
I might also add that there is a real historical connection between Australian football and cricket which far exceeds any other football code in this country.
Participation rates in the southern states far exceed participation rates in NSW/QLD, but it would be fair to say that many kids who play both in the southern states, choose a safer and usually finacially better option in Australian football.
It is up to cricket to provide this, it is also fair to say that CA does not draw regular big crowds like the AFL does.
I will track down the participation rates, but they have been posted on this site before.
November 28th 2011 @ 11:02am
Matt F said | November 28th 2011 @ 11:02am | Report comment
I’m not blaming the AFL for this, they’re running their code extremely well and deserve the success that they are having. It’s definately crickets job to catch up in this regard (T20 and big money on offer in the IPL may help in this area.)
Thanks for the graph, though Krejza is NSW man who moved to Tas for opportunities so, given we’re talking about the NSW production line I’d include him under NSW. Lyon too only moved to SA a year or so ago from NSW, though admittedly he wasn’t a contracted NSW player. I’d also take Casson out of NSW as he started/grew up in WA. If we’re talking about the ODI/T20 sides then the graph would also change considerably as well.
Tasmania does exceptionally well for its population and has for a while now. When you consider that Wade is a Tasmanian and only moved to Victoria because he was behind Paine they look even better. Maybe it’s the lack of any other professional sport team in Tassie that helps them out?
I’ll concede WA based on that graph, but the only state that’s significantly less then its population is Victoria, which could be exlained by AFL winning the battle for young talent.
November 28th 2011 @ 3:04pm
Wingback said | November 28th 2011 @ 3:04pm | Report comment
Matt F, there are a few mistakes on your table:
Williams and Beer were originally Victoria players;
Krezja was originally from NSW;
Also, shouldn’t you include players who played through the entirety of the 2000s. If you add in; Lee, McGrath, Warne, Langer, Ponting, Martyn, Hayden, Gilchrist (originally NSW player), I think you’ll find that NSW, Victoria and QLD are a bit better represented. WA and Tas are still over-represented though.
November 28th 2011 @ 3:43pm
Matt F said | November 28th 2011 @ 3:43pm | Report comment
It’s not my table Wingback. It was posted by Stabpass, though I’m not sure if he is the creator. I agree that it’s not the perfect table, though it does a decent job in general.
November 28th 2011 @ 6:22pm
stabpass said | November 28th 2011 @ 6:22pm | Report comment
Nope not mine either, i take no responsibility for it either wrong or right.
November 28th 2011 @ 10:22am
The Cattery said | November 28th 2011 @ 10:22am | Report comment
It was a fairly even-handed article by Jake Niall on the weekend. I think it is fair to say that where young talented sportsmen in the Southern states excel at both Australian Football and Cricket, a higher percentage will opt for the former because of the greater percentage of professional spots available, and they can start drawing a decent salary from the age of 18.
But the flip side to that argument, as noted by stabpass below, the participation rates for cricket in the Southern states are much higher than the Northern states, and you’d have to think that that has a lot to do with the close historical connection between the two sports, having shared grounds since the 1870s, etc.
November 28th 2011 @ 11:12am
Matt F said | November 28th 2011 @ 11:12am | Report comment
It could be exlained by the authors point that League and Union generally require different body types then cricket whereas AFL requires similar types, so if you play RL/RU then you’re not suited to cricket so maybe less likely to play cricket. Not nescessarily my view but it’s a point from the article that may explain the figures.
There’s also the bit I just posted to stabpass about the NRl clubs signing up local players at 15 so many kids who may excel at NRL and Cricket are out of the cricket system by 15/16.
November 29th 2011 @ 8:25am
Bayman said | November 29th 2011 @ 8:25am | Report comment
Matt,
I think I’ve just been sledged!!!!!!!
Actually, you’re right on both counts……I am doing well and it was a “long” comment!
November 28th 2011 @ 10:12am
stabpass said | November 28th 2011 @ 10:12am | Report comment
State by state participation rates for cricket (expressed as a percentage) for males over 15 from the 2006 census
NSW 3.0%
Vic 4.8%
Qld 2.6%
SA 4.7%
WA 4.6%
Tas 4.5%
notice the pattern?. The AFL does not have a obligation to CA.
November 28th 2011 @ 11:07am
Matt F said | November 28th 2011 @ 11:07am | Report comment
It’s another good point that you make, though NSW total numbers would be higher obviously. The main issue isn’t so much about total numbers though but what happens to the elite kids. Their are quite a few kids that are talented at both AFL and Cricket but not as many who excel at both NRL and Cricket.
One thing that I forgot to consider when reading the Niall article was that NRLs system is different. Talented juniors are signed up to their local NRL’s junior teams at 15 and go through the junior rep sides so they would already be lost to cricket by then whereas AFL doesn’t draft players until 17/18. This could explain the difference in numbers for the NRL states from 15.
November 28th 2011 @ 11:19am
stabpass said | November 28th 2011 @ 11:19am | Report comment
The real difference is IMO that hundreds upon hundreds of Australian football clubs are also for 6 months on the year cricket clubs, utillising the exact same facilities and in many cases the same parents/adults on comiittees.
That may happen in NSW/QLD, but nowhere to the same degree, this would IMO account for the higher participation rates.
Just a guess but i would imagine that there is higher % crossover between RU and cricket, than RL and cricket in NSW/QLD.
November 28th 2011 @ 11:32am
Matt F said | November 28th 2011 @ 11:32am | Report comment
That might be another reason as well.
I’d agree with you point about RU/Cricket crossover being higher then RL/Cricket crossover, though like you that would be a guess. It would have a lot to do with the old private schools prioritising RU and Cricket as their main sports as well as potentially the cost factor of cricket gear making it a bit more difficult for RL players who generally come from a working class background (though I’ll admit that’s a massive stereotype on my part.)
November 28th 2011 @ 11:39am
stabpass said | November 28th 2011 @ 11:39am | Report comment
Stereotypes are there for a reason … Cheers ; )
November 29th 2011 @ 10:02am
me, I like football said | November 29th 2011 @ 10:02am | Report comment
Total NSW numbers are actually lower
November 28th 2011 @ 10:23am
Vas Venkatramani said | November 28th 2011 @ 10:23am | Report comment
For me, Australian cricket is always at its strongest when the other states begin producing their own share of young talented cricketers. Our dominance in the 90s/00s proves that. It’s when NSW has to carry the baton alone in terms of producing talent (not necessarily the Shield results) is when Australian cricket suffers.
I would love to see the other states bringing up their younger players the way NSW does, because it means they are exposed to the large step between grade and state cricket much sooner and if they cut the mustard, their path to higher honours isn’t far off.
That’s why I’m excited by Queensland’s current fast bowling battery. It reminds me of the days of Kasprowicz, Bichel and Dale (all fine and capable bowlers that represented Australia with distinction). I can’t wait for Callum Ferguson finally fulfilling his talent at SA, and for the next great batsman from WA mastering bouncy conditions, or a good spinner from NSW/VIC. As for Tassie, their good performances in the Shield will be great for Australian cricket in the long run…
November 28th 2011 @ 12:08pm
JVGO said | November 28th 2011 @ 12:08pm | Report comment
The elephant in the room is that GWS will be targetting the production heartland for the Australian cricket team in western Sydney and chasing the same elite athletes. They are already in Westfield HS. For what purpose? None that i can see really other than for the pleasure of Southern afficianados who follow teams representing dreary shopping strips in inner melbourne (who are in effect financing the process). The only way that this can be stopped is by people in Sydney boycotting AFL and supporting the international codes. $200 million is a lot of money getting thrown at boys in western Sydney.
November 28th 2011 @ 3:14pm
Ian Whitchurch said | November 28th 2011 @ 3:14pm | Report comment
JVGO,
I have a better idea. If people turn up to State cricket games, then cricket could pay a decent salary to good young cricketers. Instead, you whine and moan about a code that – get this – has people turn up and pay money to see their games.
Cricket has – maybe – ten days a year that have good crowds by the standards of the various football codes. Until that changes, the good young athletes will make a very professional decision to avoid cricket.
http://www.theroar.com.au/2011/10/08/zeppelins-cassette-tapes-and-test-cricket/ has a bunch of stuff about just how bad cricket’s crowds are.
November 28th 2011 @ 3:23pm
Brett McKay said | November 28th 2011 @ 3:23pm | Report comment
Ian, why do you keep up this apple-oranges comparision betwen Test cricket and the football codes? Do you think the football numbers would be as good if a game of football lasted 6 hours a day minimum for up to five consecutive days??
November 28th 2011 @ 4:28pm
Ian Whitchurch said | November 28th 2011 @ 4:28pm | Report comment
Brett,
Because every time someone pays for a ticket at the MCG, a club gets the money to help make payroll.
Cricket doesnt have as many people coming through the various gates, so they simply cant make payroll.
So rather than be an amateur or , at best, a semi-professional cricketer, am eighteen year old Stephen Coniglio plays Australian Rules Football.
Being in denial about this isnt at all helpful for cricket.
November 28th 2011 @ 4:36pm
Brett McKay said | November 28th 2011 @ 4:36pm | Report comment
I’m not in denial about anything, I saw the Ashes crowds in person last summer. My point is that comparing a three-hour game of football on onw day against one six-plus-hour day of a five day Test isn’t the same thing.
And what are you on about not making payroll – CA is a long way from being in debt!
Young sportsmen may well choose one of the footballs over cricket, but it would have a lot more to do with opportunity than anything else. As has been pointed out countless times, just in AFL alone, there’s now 18 lists around the country, three times as many as there are state cricket squads..
November 28th 2011 @ 5:43pm
Ian Whitchurch said | November 28th 2011 @ 5:43pm | Report comment
Brett,
Yes, cricket cant make payroll. They just cut the pay of Shield cricketers to help fund the BBL.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/07/01/3258298.htm?site=northtas
November 28th 2011 @ 6:42pm
stabpass said | November 28th 2011 @ 6:42pm | Report comment
Brett i dont think the argument is a 6 hour 5 day game to a 3 hour game, but simply a financial comparison.
Not sure what shield cricketers are paid, but i doubt it would be, what the average AFL footballer would get.
Cricket has it’s advantages, ………… play to a later age, O/S travel, international rep etc, but the reality of it is that you may do all of that playing cricket, but in most instances not make a lot of money.
Have had a few makes play county cricket, and travel, but you dont make a great living unless you are a very good player, or name player.
Play AF and you may be turfed out of the system by 22 and then possibly do the cricket thing then.
Its a no-brainer for most kids who are good at both, and have a parent who tells them where the money is.
November 28th 2011 @ 8:10pm
Brett McKay said | November 28th 2011 @ 8:10pm | Report comment
Ian, they did reduce the state contracts, you’re correct on that, but that was because the previous state contracts included the old Big Bash. This season the BBL is contracted seperately, meaning players playing in all three forms will still be paid as they were. Possibly better. That’s not a case that “cricket cant make payroll”, rather they’ve restructured the contracting system.
You’re suggesting that cricket can’t pay it’s player bills and that’s clearly not the case.
November 28th 2011 @ 8:16pm
Brett McKay said | November 28th 2011 @ 8:16pm | Report comment
Stabby, there is no financial comparison, you’ll get no argument from me about that. Cricket can only dream of billion dollar TV deals. Also, the average State cricketer would be well short of the AFL average – from memory, the AFL ave is up near $230K, I’d suggest the cricket ave is comfortably $100K short, maybe even more.
My point against Ian’s comparison is more about the fact that there are so many mitigating factors in why it’s an unfair to compare a cricket Test match to a game of football. For one obvious example, there will almost always be a result at the footy. There’s only a result on one day of a Test, if any..
November 28th 2011 @ 4:55pm
JVGO said | November 28th 2011 @ 4:55pm | Report comment
I think that everyone in Sydney should make an informed choice whenever they accept AFL subsidised merchandise and tickets or support a heavily subsidised team like GWS made up of Victorians that every dollar they spend or sponsorship the AFL gains through their partcipation is at the expense of other international codes (which they probably also get a lot of enjoyment from such as the Wallabies, Kangaroos, socceroos, Aus Cricket team, olympic sports) which have made up the traditional sporting landscape in Sydney. That’s the way i look at it since the backbone of these international teams are generally made up of NSW kids, just like the cricket team. Which is not to say that I give a rats how anyone in Melbourne spends their time in winter obsessing over the AFL while we in Sydney look after other more important business the same as we’ve always done.
November 28th 2011 @ 8:25pm
stabpass said | November 28th 2011 @ 8:25pm | Report comment
Just reading the second last line of your ‘informative post’, I think we really know who is obsessing over AFL !!.
BTW plenty of NSW boys in the inaugural GWS sqaud, i count around 10.
November 28th 2011 @ 11:02pm
The Cattery said | November 28th 2011 @ 11:02pm | Report comment
While you are at it, you should be encouraging all Australians to purchase Australian-made TV sets so that we can retain a TV manufacturing industry before it’s too late.
November 28th 2011 @ 11:25pm
jamesb said | November 28th 2011 @ 11:25pm | Report comment
thanks Brett
Ian always talks about how cricket needs good crowds to get revenue. But what Ian misses the point, which you alluded to Brett is that Cricket does go for 6 hours min for 5 days.
AFL and cricket are 2 different sports. Cricket is not a football code which is over in 2 hours. (exclude 20/20)
November 28th 2011 @ 3:42pm
JVGO said | November 28th 2011 @ 3:42pm | Report comment
Ian, I am spending $500 to turn out to watch the Australian cricket team. Sorry, but I have no interest in watching AFL/squabbleball.
Personally I can’t see why supporters of St Kilda, Richmond, Footscray, North Melbourne, Melbourne, or any of the other teams who have no prospect of winning a premiership for a further 50 years would want to bankroll the AFL shennanigans in Western Sydney.
Seems completely pointless to me when it patently has the potential to debilitate not only their own AFL teams but also national sporting teams who they may like to support (even though they are largely full of NSWman of course).
November 28th 2011 @ 5:46pm
Ian Whitchurch said | November 28th 2011 @ 5:46pm | Report comment
JVGO,
The Saints were a kick away from a flag last year, and there were West Coast supporters who thought the Suns had a better team than they did at the start of last year.
As well, that $500 is roughly a membership ticket at most Australian footy clubs, many of which have tens of thousands of members, and you think that is special.
Ian Whitchurch, who missed three overs of the Hamilton Test between Bangladesh and New Zealand
November 28th 2011 @ 6:26pm
stabpass said | November 28th 2011 @ 6:26pm | Report comment
A bit of respect would be good, there are quite a few sports that i dont have much time for, but you wont find me using child like names for them. ……………………… JVGO said ” Sorry, but I have no interest in watching AFL/squabbleball. ”
For someone with a obvious dislike of Australian football, you sure spend enough time talking about it.
November 28th 2011 @ 7:20pm
Ian Whitchurch said | November 28th 2011 @ 7:20pm | Report comment
Stabpass,
In most sports, when the ball is in dispute, the referee puts the whistle to his lips and gives it to one side or the other.
In Australia football, the umpire decides to wait a bit, and see who wants the footy more, and if it can actually be extracted from the pile of arms, legs and bodies … and reasonably often it is, and clean ball results.
JVGO doesnt realise it, but calling AFL “squabbleball” is a compliment, because there is no better thing to say of a footballer but “when the hard ball is there to be got, he gets it”.
November 28th 2011 @ 3:38pm
SVB said | November 28th 2011 @ 3:38pm | Report comment
It seems to be just about amongst all international sports that NSW has higher numbers. Perhaps state and national representation are seen as a bigger deal in NSW?
November 28th 2011 @ 4:46pm
Matt F said | November 28th 2011 @ 4:46pm | Report comment
Around 1/3 of the population live in NSW which helps. The fact that the biggest sport in the southern states, Aussie Rules, doesn’t have an international stage is also a factor (not counting the IR series which is some kind of hybrid thing.)
November 29th 2011 @ 12:33am
JVGO said | November 29th 2011 @ 12:33am | Report comment
The issue is that Australian football is a middle ground game not as mentally demanding as cricket, not as skillful as soccer, not as physical as league, not as tactical and technical as RU etc.but maybe instead with a little of everything The sporting landscape in NSW is more balanced and the different physical talents and traits can distribute themselves among the different sports. The fact that AFL is a middle ground sport where most really good athletes can excel fairly quickly means it can attract almost any good athlete and it tends to squeeze the other sports out as it has done in Victoria.
November 29th 2011 @ 9:55am
me, I like football said | November 29th 2011 @ 9:55am | Report comment
That’s not true at all, Golf, Basketball, Hockey and Tennis are all sports where NSW is way underrepresented
November 28th 2011 @ 5:01pm
sheek said | November 28th 2011 @ 5:01pm | Report comment
Bayman,
Ironically when I first started following cricket in the late 60s, the NSW dominance of the 50s & 60s had dried up dramatically. NSW would generally languish between 3rd & 4th on the ladder from their previous Shield win in 1965/66 to their next Shield win in 1982/83 (the first contested final).
But the late 60s/early 70s were nevertheless exciting times when we saw champions emerge from SA & more particularly WA. But it’s true, more often than not, when NSW cricket is strong, Australian cricket is also strong.
But I reckon the state system still works well. If one state has an over-abundance of talent, players move elsewhere.
Many great players who learnt their trade in NSW went on to become favourite sons of other states – Don Bradman, Les Favell & Mick Bevan (temporarily) to SA; Bill Brown, Ray Lindwall, Sam Trimble, Jeff Thomson & Allan Border to Qld; Keith Carmody, Bobby Simpson (temporarily) & Adam Gilchrist to WA; a whole army of players to Tasmania.
Two Victorian greats came to Sydney because of their work – Keith Miller & Neil Harvey. Perhaps it’s time for NSW to return the favour & send some champions to help prop up the Vics!!!
November 28th 2011 @ 6:05pm
The Cattery said | November 28th 2011 @ 6:05pm | Report comment
In fairness, Victoria recently won two consecutive Sheffield Shields, and have done ok in the other forms of the game, so they don’t need propping up as such, for whatever reason, Victorians don’t appear to gain national team selection.
November 28th 2011 @ 7:12pm
mds1970 said | November 28th 2011 @ 7:12pm | Report comment
The innings from Patterson was certainly spectacular. I’d been out at the Giant Day Out at Blacktown and only got to the SCG not long before tea – he brought up his century about an over before the break, and put on quite a celebration.
During the tea break, there was an outside broadcast out the back of the MA Noble stand for ABC Grandstand’s 21st anniversary. I went out to have a look at the broadcast and missed the first over after tea – but Patterson got 20 off the over. His 150 came up less than half an hour after tea.
As for how NSW keeps getting Test players selected – I’ve heard it suggested that Victoria picks their teams to win silverware and NSW picks their teams to develop players.
November 28th 2011 @ 10:00pm
stabpass said | November 28th 2011 @ 10:00pm | Report comment
mds1970 said | “As for how NSW keeps getting Test players selected – I’ve heard it suggested that Victoria picks their teams to win silverware and NSW picks their teams to develop players”.
If this is the case, and i dont doubt it, then it adds weight to the argument on here, that cricket can never at the domestic level (shield, etc) hope to match the AFL for crowds, passion, money, pathways etc.
Unless Shield cricket can capture it’s former glories, and i am taking about pre 1970 at least, then footballers/cricketers will follow the well trodden path to football.
November 28th 2011 @ 11:39pm
Lolly said | November 28th 2011 @ 11:39pm | Report comment
Maybe it’s about money but also about the type of sport that people want to play. A continually mobile game that lasts no more than 2 hours or 90 mins of whatever may have more appeal than a match that goes for four days and involves a lot of standing around.
If it was only about money, no-one would ever play hockey. And the Aussies nearly always have a very strong hockey teams both men and women.
November 29th 2011 @ 9:47am
stabpass said | November 29th 2011 @ 9:47am | Report comment
I agree, my son plays both (junnior level) and i can see the kids getting bored out of their brains with cricket at times, they have tweaked the rules to make it more interesting, but the reality is that cricket is sometimes a game for 2 people, played by 22.
I myself have lost plenty of interest in cricket over the last 5 to 10 years, at one stage religiously watching tests from start to finish, i would not dream of doing that now, but will watch some one dayers now.
November 29th 2011 @ 9:34pm
Lolly said | November 29th 2011 @ 9:34pm | Report comment
I played softball and hockey. Softball is nowhere near as ‘stand around’ as cricket, but it was bad enough unless i was catcher or playing an infield position. I always preferred hockey as you had to be focused and moving pretty much every moment of the match.
I can understand why plenty of young sportsmen would choose AFL over cricket possibly for that reason as much as anything else and why they would enjoy the short cricket formats more than the long one.
November 28th 2011 @ 9:35pm
Ian Whitchurch said | November 28th 2011 @ 9:35pm | Report comment
Stabpass,
http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/mgt/research/acrew/sports-benchmarks.pdf is a good place to start.
Shield cricketers get paid crap – they are the victims of Australian cricket not being able to make payroll … essentially, the response to this has been that the first team (ie ACB central contracts) get paid, and the reserves (ie the Shield players) dont.
At $50 000, a base Sheffield Shield contract is about equal to a rookie contract in AFL, and rookies in Australian football are badly paid enough that Orren Stephenson refused to be one until he got offered a real contract – one that paid him more than his day job.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/cricket/australia/selector-jamie-cox-critisizes-cricket-australia-for-slashing-state-payments-to-fund-the-twenty20-big-bash/story-fn2mcu3x-1226084006515
The cause of this is that cricket in Australia doesnt have any money, because – apart from maybe four days a year in Melbourne – crowds for cricket in Australia are poor to awful.
Being in denial about this isnt helpful.
November 29th 2011 @ 9:51am
stabpass said | November 29th 2011 @ 9:51am | Report comment
Was going to post something similar yesterday, the only guys picking cricket are the ones offered good contracts (Keath) , or in Marshes case family/historical reasons.
Still as a single guy getting around 50,000 to do something you love, wouldn’t be all bad would it !.
November 28th 2011 @ 11:28pm
jamesb said | November 28th 2011 @ 11:28pm | Report comment
well in the NRL, the best players come from QLD, while in cricket the best players come from NSW.