So far, so good for the young Australian bowlers
By Spiro Zavos, 2 Dec 2011 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Australia cricket, Cricket, New Zealand cricket
Australia's Mitchell Starc, second left, celebrates with team member David Warner. AP Photo/Tertius Pickard
Related coverage
It’s early days in the Australia versus New Zealand Test at Brisbane, for the new players and the new management team. But taking five wickets in two sessions represents a good start for the (green) baggy green caps.
There was history in the fact that taking two new fast bowlers into a Test, with not one Test between them, had not been done since Australia’s first Test back in the 19th century.
What stood out particularly in the way the team went about its business was that the coaching staff had for once (at least since the John Buchanan era) done its homework effectively. Everything the Australians did on the field suggested planning and thinking about how to get the best out of the talents of the players.
As Mark Taylor pointed out, for the first time in several years the staggering of the slips and the distance between players was correct. It’s a little point but dozens of little improvements tend to add up to one big improvement.
Richie Benaud thought that while this was an improvement, the slips could stand a bit further apart from each other. Something for the captain and the coaching staff to think more about.
Talking about placement of close catchers, it has always been a puzzle to me why the silly mid-on fields so close to the bat. Why not drop back a couple of metres? Usman Khawaja was so close he dropped two sharp chances. Slightly further back, he would have missed one of the chances which was hit into the ground, but he would have snaffled the second miss.
Getting back to the general point, though, there seemed to be plans worked out to dismiss the various batsmen. The bowlers pitched up to the openers, producing some slashes that didn’t go to hand from Brendon McCullum, and a lazy drive that did catch the edge of the stolid Martin Guptill.
Then the pressure went on McCullum from Mitchell Starc bowling around the wicket. A shortish ball moving into McCullum forced a cramped cut that was snapped up by David Warner in the gully.
This was great bowling and great tactical play. The same tactic worked against the dangerous Jesse Ryder.
For Kane Williamson, it had obviously been noted that to the off-spinner he is inclined to flick balls outside his off-stump and spinning in away to leg. So a short forward leg and a short backward leg were placed. Within the space of a few balls, Williamson, a sound and generally technically correct batsman, had edged the ball into the leg trap.
I liked the way, too, captain Michael Clarke brought on Nathan Lyon with 40 minutes of play left in the first session. A good test of the quality of cricket captains is the way they handle their spinners. Ricky Ponting, after Shane Warne had retired, was almost embarrassed to bowl his spinners. When he did, he rarely brought them on at the appropriate time.
But Clarke has confidence in Lyon. And the bowler repaid this confidence by bowling accurately with some spin and a lot of bounce. The great Benaud has always insisted that bounce is more important to a spinner than spin. And who can argue with someone whose knowledge of the art of spinning goes back to the days of Bill O’Reilly, a bounce bowler if ever there was one.
By giving Lyon a chance with a newish ball, Clarke ensured his spinner had a strong chance of getting the bounce he needed to trap Williamson into his false shot.
Of the two new fast bowlers, I thought Mitchell Starc more impressive than James Pattison. Pattison has a bit of a hangdog look about him when things aren’t going well. He can learn from Peter Siddle that attitude is everything for a fast bowler.
Starc appears the more thoughtful and optimistic of the two. He moves the ball in and away from the batsman, unlike the other Mitchell who just used to bowl a heavy ball across right-hand batsman.
At present New Zealand looks like falling short of a good total on a Brisbane pitch which could turn into a belter on the second and third day. So the impressive bowling of the youngsters has to be seen in the light of the fact that the pitch was on the bouncy side.
When the liveliness dies down will be the time to confirm whether the start has been as good as it seems right now.
But so far, so good.
Follow all the action from Day 2 of the Test on The Roar’s live blog.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- Australia cricket, Cricket, New Zealand cricket


December 2nd 2011 @ 7:50am
Jason Cave said | December 2nd 2011 @ 7:50am | Report comment
While it’s early days yet in this series and this summer, I think the signs are promising not so much for now, but in the future, and especially the Ashes 2013. It’ll be interesting to see how James Pattinson and Mitchell Starc will go for the remainder of the season.
December 2nd 2011 @ 8:08am
Gavin said | December 2nd 2011 @ 8:08am | Report comment
**i think ricky ponting was very justified to be embarrassed to use his spinners
December 2nd 2011 @ 8:11am
Atawhai Drive said | December 2nd 2011 @ 8:11am | Report comment
For mine, four of the NZ batsmen got themselves out _ Williamson being the only exception.
The Black Caps don’t play much Test cricket these days and it showed. Expect them to do better in the second innings.
The Australian fielding wasn’t all that flash either.
December 2nd 2011 @ 9:04am
Chris said | December 2nd 2011 @ 9:04am | Report comment
I thought it was a pass mark for the Australians. Bowling was competent, not spectacular. But I agree with Spiro, there was clearly a plan being executed (well, more accurately there was a plan and the team was trying to execute it), which is a good thing. Fielding was a mixed bag – I’m still baffled how Clarke actually managed to drop that catch. But his captaincy is without doubt a big step up from Ponting.
NZ batting was atrocious. Vettori reminds me of the role Allan Border used to play for Australia back in the mid-80s. A regular top order collapse that needs rescuing.
December 2nd 2011 @ 9:44am
Frankie Hughes said | December 2nd 2011 @ 9:44am | Report comment
Starc’s debut has been pretty exciting thus far. He’s swung the ball more on his day, than Johnson has in his entire career.
Pattinson doesn’t look all that special. Considering Harris and Cummins will return. Harris, Starc and Cummins will be a better attack.
I hope Josh Hazlewood gets into the mix soon, certainly the best partner for Cummins.
December 2nd 2011 @ 9:53am
Rugby Reg said | December 2nd 2011 @ 9:53am | Report comment
overall it was a promising day. We bowled to plans and got the results.
yes the batmen played some woeful shots but the pressure was applied.
I thought we were actually a bit unlucky in the first hour. A lot of plays and misses but no edges.
make no mistake, Aussie cricket is on its way back, led by pup who is turning out to be a very good captain
December 2nd 2011 @ 10:20am
jameswm said | December 2nd 2011 @ 10:20am | Report comment
Yeah it was funny how Starc got his wickets caught cutting at point. The McC one was good bowling as he was cramped, but he nearly had McC a few other times. The Ryder was one was better hit but again, he looked troubled beforehand.
December 2nd 2011 @ 10:18am
jameswm said | December 2nd 2011 @ 10:18am | Report comment
Agree a bit with Frankie – right now, Pattinson is a bit of a poor man’s Harris. But he’s 21 and can certainly improve. He holds the seam up, gets good away swing, and bring the odd one back (on purpose from what I could tell). He bowled wide too often though, and his length could improve a bit. He’s certainly got promise.
Starc though could really be anything. He lopes in and flings them down at 139-143kmh, seemingly with little effort. He made McCullum look pretty silly a few times.
He really needs to work on his line and length. All he needs to do is land it consistently short of a length on off stump. Some will come back and some won’t (and maybe he can control that, even by holding it across the seam occasionally), and the batsman will be drawn into playing the ones going across him because of the ones that come back.
It’s a simple formula and if Starc can get his line and length right, his physical attributes and movement will do the rest. Someone work on all this with him – please?
Siddle wasn’t too bad, but Johnson would have to be gone with Starc there. Siddle will at best be there to hold up an end, but he bowls wide too often.
December 2nd 2011 @ 10:35am
Frankie Hughes said | December 2nd 2011 @ 10:35am | Report comment
I still feel sorry for Copeland, he did everything that was asked of him in Sri Lanka. Then was surplus to requirements in South Africa and now Siddle continues to keep him out the side, yet rarely gets too many wickets.
December 2nd 2011 @ 10:50am
Fisher Price said | December 2nd 2011 @ 10:50am | Report comment
They like Siddle’s tough guy thing.
December 2nd 2011 @ 10:58am
Frankie Hughes said | December 2nd 2011 @ 10:58am | Report comment
All good and well bowling short all day, but getting minimal wickets from that tactic is useless.
December 2nd 2011 @ 11:24am
Justin said | December 2nd 2011 @ 11:24am | Report comment
I agree and without looking I would assume he has the best record in 1st class cricket yet cant get a run. Yes he is only medium pace but he holds an end and takes wickets. Not much more you can do than that.
December 2nd 2011 @ 11:42am
Fisher Price said | December 2nd 2011 @ 11:42am | Report comment
Quite. His exclusion is a disgrace.
December 2nd 2011 @ 11:41am
Eric said | December 2nd 2011 @ 11:41am | Report comment
I didn’t see every ball by any means, but Starc bowls a lot of rubbish. Bit like Johnson, and got wickets with ordinary balls/ordinary shots. I don’t understand why Cutting was omitted. He has the best Shield record by a mile. I think they went for Starcs left arm.
December 2nd 2011 @ 12:31pm
jameswm said | December 2nd 2011 @ 12:31pm | Report comment
Eric I DID see every ball and Starc bowled a lot of crackers and probably less rubbish than Pattinson. Starc’s ball to get McCullum cramped him by coming back in and hit higher on the bat. The Ryder one was luckier, but you don’t always get wickets with your best balls.
Most had him ahead of Pattinson on the day, so I think you’re venting in the wrong direction.
December 2nd 2011 @ 11:54am
Rickety Knees said | December 2nd 2011 @ 11:54am | Report comment
They have to bring Copeland in – he can build pressure from one end while also picking up wickets. The current attack is too loose and have allowed the Kiwi’s to dodge a bullet.
December 2nd 2011 @ 12:28pm
Frankie Hughes said | December 2nd 2011 @ 12:28pm | Report comment
They’re are clearly building an attack looking forward to the India series. They must want to bomb India with pace. If Copeland is deemed too slow, the best line bowler is Hazlewood, and he’s pretty lively as well.
December 2nd 2011 @ 12:32pm
jameswm said | December 2nd 2011 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
And Hazlewood can bowl all day.
I think Harris and Cummins are our best two bowlers and the others are fighting for the 3rd and 4th spots.
December 2nd 2011 @ 12:33pm
Johnno said | December 2nd 2011 @ 12:33pm | Report comment
Funny everyone has forgotten peter george who has had a good season at the South Australia red backs. He played a test last year vs India.