Choosing names for the NBL’s newest franchises
It was announced this week that the NBL commission are in the final stages of approving two new teams for the league’s 2012-13 season. It’s hoped that by the end of January a new team from Melbourne and a team returning to the Brisbane market will be approved.
Despite in-depth financial and marketing planning already being done, it’s known that the Melbourne team is yet to choose a name. S
o lets get to the all important naming process, and while we’re at it let’s consider the Brisbane team as well.
Brisbane:
Considering the rich history associated with the Brisbane Bullets, it’s a sure thing that the returning team will take up the old name. As much fun as it would be to think of some new creative idea, I just don’t think it’s going to happen. Though I could see the Brisbane Blackhawks, Barons, Bats or Bluebottles.
Verdict: Brisbane Bullets
Melbourne:
Unlike the Bullets, the new Melbourne team has no history to speak of, save for its many failed predecessors (not associated with the new bid).
For the first time, the secondary Melbourne team will play out of an arena other than Hisense Arena, instead at the new State Basketball Centre in Wantirna South (South Eastern Suburb, 25kms from CBD).
Set in what is undeniably Australia’s basketball homeland, the team is not likely to be short of supporters, even if the arena can’t fit more than 3,200 spectators (a good 2,000 less than should be the minimum.
In the past, Melbourne teams have sported ‘South Melbourne’ (Dragons), ‘North Melbourne’ (Giants), ‘South East Melbourne’ (Magic) and ‘Victoria’ (Titans/Giants) as their titles.
Considering the new backers, I think it unlikely that they’ll take an old name, making a straight up ‘Melbourne’ team my preferred choice for naming. Other options could include ‘Wantirna South’ and ‘Knox’ (Suburb names) or possibly a return to ‘South East Melbourne’ or just ‘East Melbourne’.
Despite all the other choices available, a simple Melbourne title does two things.
• Opens the entire Melbourne area for a fan base, even allowing them to stake claim to the occasional marquee game played at Hisense Arena.
• It asserts their equality with the Melbourne Tigers. Anything other than a ‘Melbourne’ title would show that they are fearful of the Tigers’ brand.
With the nickname in mind, there’s no doubt that a new name is 100% necessary, to move away from the failed past’s of former franchises.
If the team adopts the ‘Melbourne’ title, options could include the Melbourne Marlins or, riding off the success of the Dallas NBA team, there would always be a market for the Melbourne Mavericks. No matter how many times I look at alternate names, I’m certain that, should the team be a ‘Melbourne’, ‘East Melbourne’ or ‘South East Melbourne’ team, then the nicknames must be ‘Mavericks’.
If however, the team opts for a suburban title (Wantirna or Knox), then the most obvious choices are the Wasps and the Knights respectively.
Verdict: Melbourne Mavericks
No matter where they’re based out of, or who’s playing for them, the return of a Brisbane franchise and a cross town competitor in Melbourne can only be good news for fans in two of Australia most basketball crazy areas.
Let’s hope that the league approves the bids and we can all look forward to the Melbourne Mavericks facing off against the Brisbane Bullets in season 2012-13.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Other Sports articles
- Cheap Seats Podcast: Episode 7 (24)
- Bases loaded, but Australian baseball strikes out (24)
- Will Tebow lead the Patriots to the promised land? (16)
- Could Vergne replace Webber? (14)
- 2014 MLB season set to launch in Sydney (13)
- Wimbledon 2013: Men’s Singles preview (12)
- Justin Gatlin and the question that remains (10)
- Suzuki to return for 2015 MotoGP season (0)
- Wimbledon 2013: Women’s Singles preview (0)
- New owners for Lotus (0)
- MotoGP’s three amigos sweep the podium in Catalunya (7)
- US Open: English Rose denies Jason Day his maiden major (1)
- Wimbledon 2013: Men’s Singles preview (13)
- King James must dominate for Miami (3)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Basketball, NBL

December 19th 2011 @ 10:44am
Football United said | December 19th 2011 @ 10:44am | Report comment
no to melbourne mavericks. what does a maverick have anything to do with melbourne or australian culture? And if you name the next team melbourne again you bring up the same problems as Melbourne heart by giving fans no point of difference to the larger existing team.
December 19th 2011 @ 2:35pm
Michael DiFabrizio said | December 19th 2011 @ 2:35pm | Report comment
Disagree there Football, very different scenario here. Firstly, the team’s playing in Knox. That’s a pretty significant point of difference. Secondly, even if they played at the same venue as the Tigers, there’d be a point of difference in that there’s a massive chunk of supporters in Melbourne that have grown up supporting teams other than the Tigers. In fact, they’ve grown up hating the Tigers.
December 19th 2011 @ 12:02pm
Chop said | December 19th 2011 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
Would love to see Tinkler take up a license and bring back the Newcastle Falcons….
December 19th 2011 @ 1:37pm
Stuart Fazakerley said | December 19th 2011 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
Bring back the South East Melbourne Magic, or failing that, the South Dragons.
December 19th 2011 @ 4:23pm
thesportsguy said | December 19th 2011 @ 4:23pm | Report comment
borrowing the name “mavericks” is a silly idea. for one, most NBA teams are named after something relevant to the team, either drawing from its state, city, or original roots of the franchice. the mavericks arent called the mavs for no reason, the team is based in dalla texas, and like their other texan counterpart the san antonio spurs, they have a nickname that the locals respond to. the spurs on a texans boot, or mavericks (continuing the western theme in texas) which is something to do with cattle farming.
the houston rockets were oringally from san diego and were named because of the rocket program there, so like most transfers, the name stuck when it was relocated. Being in texas, you can count it having another western, or cowboy themed nickname as thats what the locals respond to.
the new york knicks, or knickerbockers, is due to the large amount of dutch people that colonized NY and the type of pants the settlers wore. the colors of the team also are the colors of NY city, orange, blue and white.
the LAKERs were originally a team in minneapolis “the land of 10,000 lakes” so the name lakers made sense .in moving the franchise to LA they kept the original name.
the celtics is an obvious one, they are the home of the fighting irish in boston. no more needs to be said on their origins. its a name the ENTIRE city responds to.
My point is starting a new franchise doesnt automatically mean you name them something that has no historical, or current significnace like the “mavericks”
i like the idea of using its geography, south east melbourne, or wartnirna etc. even using the most successful basketball team around there as the name is a good idea as the entire region (whos involved in basketball) would automatically have an interest. im not sure who that exactly is, but if its the knox dragons, or butterflys (joke) even, then by all means name it that!
the dallas mavericks shared the same nickname as the University of texas at arlington by the way, clever way of having your locals respond to a new franchise!!
December 20th 2011 @ 11:10am
Australian Rules said | December 20th 2011 @ 11:10am | Report comment
My favourite brand-out-of-water in America is the Utah Jazz. Originating in New Orleans before relocating to Utah, the image and culture associated with the back-street New Orleans jazz scene couldn’t be further from the image and culture of the Mormon state.
Though, Velociraptors were apparently never found in Nth America either, and I doubt anyone would begrudge Toronto for being phonies. But it’s amusing nonetheless. I read a questionnaire (may have been Sports Illustrated) that asked people to vote on the lamest brand/nickname from a list of 30 chosen clubs around the world. With respect to it being a mascot to a full-contact football team of blokes, the “Sydney Swans” won comfortably (the Rabbitohs were also in the top 10).
December 21st 2011 @ 4:01pm
mushi said | December 21st 2011 @ 4:01pm | Report comment
yep but Toronto chose an ferocious anthromorphic animal which is pretty typical for sports teams jsut like the Bronco’s getting away with it because it was an animal.
December 19th 2011 @ 5:17pm
Chris Chard said | December 19th 2011 @ 5:17pm | Report comment
On another note too the Melbourne storm were all set to become the Melbourne Mavericks upon their introduction to the NRL, with the logo a masked bandit holding a fistfull of Aces. The name was abandonded after it was thought to be ‘too American’ …not something that would be of particular concern in a sport with strong American origins such as basketball I would have thought.
Personally I’d go watch a team called the Bats play!
December 19th 2011 @ 6:04pm
gfunk said | December 19th 2011 @ 6:04pm | Report comment
there is no way the mavericks will be the name. first and foremost because the dallas mavericks and the nba will never allow the nbl to use a name which has a registered trademark etc. see townsville suns having to change their name to the crocs because of action brought about by the phoenix suns and the nba. something associated with the area and bball history in that area would be good.
December 19th 2011 @ 8:02pm
Michael DiFabrizio said | December 19th 2011 @ 8:02pm | Report comment
I’d be careful using the word ‘never’, the NBL does have a team called the Hawks after all..
December 19th 2011 @ 8:51pm
jamesb said | December 19th 2011 @ 8:51pm | Report comment
atlanta hawks (nba)
wollongong hawks (nbl)
Sacramento kings (nba)
Sydney kings (nbl)
May 7th 2012 @ 1:31am
anonymous said | May 7th 2012 @ 1:31am | Report comment
Adelaide 36ers (nbl)
Philadelphia 76ers (nba)
South East Melbourne Magic (nbl)
Orlando Magic (nba)
Sydney Supersonics (nbl)
Seattle Supersonics (nba)
December 20th 2011 @ 4:02am
gfunk said | December 20th 2011 @ 4:02am | Report comment
yes….very true
April 16th 2012 @ 2:22pm
NBL Guy said | April 16th 2012 @ 2:22pm | Report comment
how about the Port Melbourne Panthers
December 19th 2011 @ 8:04pm
Michael DiFabrizio said | December 19th 2011 @ 8:04pm | Report comment
For anyone interested, here’s a blog I’ve done on the possible new team: http://www.michaeldifabrizio.com/post/14446914677/second-melbourne-nbl-team-cannot-ignore-the-past
I agree with the Magic/Dragons suggestion, plus advocate both the Tigers and the new team playing derbies and other big games out of Hisense Arena.
December 19th 2011 @ 11:23pm
Connor Kret said | December 19th 2011 @ 11:23pm | Report comment
Don’t get me wrong, I’d like to see the Dragons return, for the banner raising. I just don’t think the previous owners will be willing to give up thier brand to a model they don’t dully support. Additionally, the new team will no doubt have the selfish idea that any 2nd team will have to be new for the sole reason that they must be in control, of not only the future, but the past.
December 21st 2011 @ 10:02am
Lucan said | December 21st 2011 @ 10:02am | Report comment
Go for “The Magic Dragons” and have Puff as their mascot.
December 29th 2011 @ 7:45pm
Harro said | December 29th 2011 @ 7:45pm | Report comment
A magic giant is a Titan…. been done I know… new name… keep it relivant to the S.E of Melbourne… rangers would be great but obviously Dandenong have that… will continue to think… maybe bats is a good name given Melbourne was originaly called Batmania… Really liked the dragons but again needs to be new…
December 19th 2011 @ 8:24pm
langou said | December 19th 2011 @ 8:24pm | Report comment
The nickname doesn’t necessarily have to start with the same letter as their name. There seems to be a split in Australian sport between traditional teams that have adopted something tangible”, such as “Sharks”, ” Lions”, “Bombers” or ” Tigers” , and new teams which seem to go for concepts such as “Thunder”, “Power”, “Suns” or “Roar”.
December 20th 2011 @ 9:45am
Australian Rules said | December 20th 2011 @ 9:45am | Report comment
You’re forgetting the Melb teams: the St Kilda (and then the Sth Melb) Saints, as well as the South East (formerly Nunawading) Spectres. Not to mention the Geelong Supercats.
I understand the desire to start fresh with a name but I don’t think reviving an old brand is necessarily a bad thing. The S.E.Melb Magic had genuine broad support in Melb and represented the foil to the Tigers old-school brand…they were true cross-town rivals. Yes, this was in the heady days of the early 90s when NBL games attracted 12,000 a game in Melb, but to re-ignite the feud between the clubs in the sporting capital could prove a masterstroke for the sport.
December 20th 2011 @ 10:11am
thesportsguy said | December 20th 2011 @ 10:11am | Report comment
agreed. i like the idead of borrowing the name from an established local club.
when rugby union decided to open a club in melbourne, i found it weird that they used the name rebels…it has no association, ties or any relations to anything relevant about melbourne or its short rugby history.
i thought going with Melbourne Power would have been better – it relates to the other melbourne rugby team (storm) and references melbournes biggest rugby union club, the powerhouse. the rebel name was way out of left field.
id like to see the new bball team do something similar.
December 20th 2011 @ 9:20pm
mitchwally said | December 20th 2011 @ 9:20pm | Report comment
The Melbourne Rebels Super Rugby team went with the Rebels name after the 2007 ARC team of the same name- although the competition only lasted one season, the branding associated with the name was strong. So it does relate to Melbourne’s Rugby history- which is far from short- Victorian teams played early Wallaby and Waratahs touring teams as they transited across the country to sail to England.
Also the “Rebel” moniker has an allusion to going against the considered norm in Victoria- AFL!
December 20th 2011 @ 9:30pm
The Cattery said | December 20th 2011 @ 9:30pm | Report comment
It’s quite a popular name in Melbourne, although I’m sure more would think of the Eureka Stockade than going up against the AFL!
December 21st 2011 @ 10:05am
thesportsguy said | December 21st 2011 @ 10:05am | Report comment
did they really? there you go. interesting, never knew that! cheers mitchwally
December 20th 2011 @ 12:23pm
Brett McKay said | December 20th 2011 @ 12:23pm | Report comment
I don’t even follow basketball, but I can’t believe no-one’s mentioned the old Eastside Melbourne Spectres….
December 20th 2011 @ 5:46pm
Johnno said | December 20th 2011 @ 5:46pm | Report comment
Brett were you a Canberra Cannons fan in the day, did you love going out to watch Australian captain Phil Smythe running around for the Cannons.
I was a basketball fan so i miss th egret days of the NBL in the 90′s.
December 20th 2011 @ 6:28pm
Ryan O'Connell said | December 20th 2011 @ 6:28pm | Report comment
What about the Coburg Giants!
December 20th 2011 @ 6:39pm
Johnno said | December 20th 2011 @ 6:39pm | Report comment
Launceston Casino City anyone lol. NBL champions 1981