Great captaincy by Clarke helps the fast bowlers to fizz
By Spiro Zavos, 30 Dec 2011 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
James Pattinson has been a key for Australia in this series
Related coverage
Ian Chappell, the best of the Channel 9 commentary team in my view, made the point as India was collapsing like a flimsy building in an earthquake in its second inning at the MCG that a team like Australia can re-build more quickly when it has a strong fast bowling attack.
As Chappell was making this point, the bowling attack of Ben Hilfenhaus, James Pattinson (Man of the Match?) and Peter Siddle (the real Man of the Match) was ripping through the strong (on paper, at least) Indian batting lineup.
Good players like Gambhir and great players like Rahul Dravid and VVS Laxman were just blasted away by the fire power of the fast bowling attack.
And it was an attack. There was very little negative bowling. Virtually every ball was bowled with the malice of taking a wicket. The ball was pitched up inviting the drive – and the mistake, as the ‘Little Master’, Sachin Tendulkar, found out to his cost.
What a change from a couple of years ago when the Australian bowling attack couldn’t take 20 wickets in a Test, even if they’d been given several weeks to do so. In this Test, Australia bowled 141 overs to the 180 or so by India. The bowlers took 20 wickets with a strike rate of a wicket every seven overs. This is an outstanding achievement.
A great deal of credit has been given to the new fearsomeness and efficiency of the Australian fast bowling attack has been given to the new bowling coach, Craig McDermott. He has insisted on the bowlers bowling a fuller length rather than banging the ball into the pitch in the hope of forcing a mistake.
By bowling fuller, the bowlers gave the ball more length in which to swing. And in the modern game, with all the protections available to batsmen, it is the fuller ball that forces mistakes rather than the shorter ball.
The strategy was so successful for all three fast bowlers that all of them had claims to the Man of the Match Award.
The question must be raised: why has it taken McDermott’s arrival on the coaching panel for this strategy to be employed?
Now the team needs some sage advice from the batting coach to get a better result from the team’s batsmen. At one stage in the second innings Australia was 4 for 27 and on the brink of a total, match-losing collapse.
Significantly, old hands Ricky Ponting and Michael Hussey rescued the team. Hussey and Ponting were lucky that the DRS was not available because Hussey was actually ‘dismissed’ three times without being given out, and Ponting was ‘dismissed’ once when he was 15.
By putting the senior batsmen through a batting camp where a two-piece ball was used to get the players used to the extravagant swing that the Indian bowlers sometimes achieve, the new coach Mickey Arthur was establishing (I believe) his credentials to fix up his team’s batting problems. If he can help eliminate the now almost customary collapses, Arthur will make Justin Langer’s position as batting coach redundant.
Aside from the admirable bowling by the fast bowlers, the main feature of Australia’s performance was the brilliant captaincy of Michael Clarke. Clarke had his critics before his appointment.
The criticism, to be fair, was mainly directed at his Generation-Y lifestyle. But he is emerging as a fine attacking captain in the tradition of Richie Benaud, Ian Chappell and Mark Taylor.
When Tendulkar looked like smashing the bowlers out of the game in the second innings, Clarke had a long conversation with Pattinson and got him to bowl full on Tendulkar’s fourth and fifth-stump line. The ploy worked. The great batsman immediately looked human, even mortal.
Then Pattinson was taken off and Siddle was brought on. His first ball, on the fourth-stump line, saw Tendulkar pushing forward and getting a nick which was snaffled by Hussey in the gully.
Clarke also is not afraid to bring on his spinner Nathan Lyon, especially at the tail-enders. Lyon got hit for a few boundaries before David Warner took a brilliant catch on the boundary to end India’s second inning.
Before the Test the Australian side had a transitional look about it. There were the three tyros at the top of the order and two veterans in the middle, the return of a journeyman bowler who had struggled badly in the Ashes series and a keeper who no longer scores important runs.
The tyros are still in a transitional phase, even though Ed Cowan’s 68 was the 10th best score by an Australian opener in his first innings in a Test.
When – probably sometime well into next year – Shane Watson returns, a decision might have to be made about whether to leave him at opening or to bat him either at four (Ponting’s position) or six (replacing Hussey).
I think that for the balance of the side, Watson needs to bat down the order so that he can be the fourth medium/fast bowler.
This leaves the opening positions and number three to be worked out. Time, and how the tyros perform, will provide the answers here in due course.
As for the keeping question, I think it is now a waiting game for Tim Paine’s finger to heal properly before he takes over as Brad Haddin’s successor.
By the time the next Ashes series comes around the Australian side will be different from the side that played so splendidly at the MCG this week. But the heart of the side will be there.
There is a group of fast bowlers now who can take wickets in Tests, at last. And there is a captain, again at last, who knows how to use a good fast bowling attack to force a strong batting side into a rout.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, Craig McDermott, Cricket, Michael Clarke, Test cricket


December 30th 2011 @ 7:54am
Jason Cave said | December 30th 2011 @ 7:54am | Report comment
It would be interesting to see how this Australian pace attack would fare in English conditions in 2013-the home of seam & swing bowling,
The question is-does Australia have a ‘Terry Alderman’ type bowler who would be able to exploit these conditions in 2013 as Alderman did on the 1989 Ashes tour where he took 41 wickets and made Graham Gooch look ordinary, to the point where Gooch asked the England selectors to drop him from the team?
December 30th 2011 @ 8:33am
cruyff turn said | December 30th 2011 @ 8:33am | Report comment
During last year’s Ashes I thought Hilfenhaus was a poor man’s Terry Alderman, but with the refinements he’s made to his action, plus superior fitness, he may end up being the man you’re looking for. If he can develop an off-cutter like Terry did, then he’ll be very useful.
With the way Siddle’s bowling right now, you’d think he’d be going on that 2013 tour, along with Pattinson and Cummins of course. And as for the fifth fast bowling spot, well, it depends who does well next domestic season. It will come from Cutting, Hazelwood, Starc, or maybe even Copeland – the type of bowler who couldexploit English conditions.
December 30th 2011 @ 2:42pm
Brendon said | December 30th 2011 @ 2:42pm | Report comment
Hilfenhaus was the best bowler of either side in 2009.
December 30th 2011 @ 1:20pm
Viscount Crouchback said | December 30th 2011 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
An extremely interesting question, Jason.
My personal view is that this Aussie “pace battery” stands comparison with the English pace attack. The Australians – somewhat to my chagrin! – seem to have gone from having no genuine world class bowlers to having a multitude of such bowlers within the space of a month and I sincerely believe they ae genuinely world class. That said, I think the Australian batting is less than world-class and thus invites a good thrashing in 2013….but let us see!
December 30th 2011 @ 4:07pm
Bayman said | December 30th 2011 @ 4:07pm | Report comment
Viscount,
I think you’re right about the bowling………..and the batting!
December 30th 2011 @ 9:29pm
Jason Cave said | December 30th 2011 @ 9:29pm | Report comment
This is why the Australians would have to work on their batting between now and England 2013. While Ponting & Hussey have extended their careers for now, however, will they still be there in 2 years time when the selectors sit down to name the Australian squad for England in 2013?
December 30th 2011 @ 8:25am
Chris said | December 30th 2011 @ 8:25am | Report comment
Yes, the bowling (both the players and coach) seem to be doing a great job. But the batting remains a concern – really have to wonder what Langer has been doing as batting coach. Hughes has come and gone with his technique and state of mind in a worse position than when he was first selected, and there was very little on display from the rest of them to give any degree of confidence that any of them are capable of batting well against halfway decent bowling.
And wasn’t dropping Khawaja for Marsh a brilliant decision…
December 30th 2011 @ 8:43am
Seiran said | December 30th 2011 @ 8:43am | Report comment
I think it’s safe to say, Marsh was brought back into the side way too early.
December 30th 2011 @ 9:19am
Atawhai Drive said | December 30th 2011 @ 9:19am | Report comment
Khawaja will be back, sooner or later. While he’s out of the team, he might like to do some work on his fielding. Phil Hughes can’t field either.
Marsh allegedly proved his fitness by scoring 99 in a BBL game. He didn’t look fit in Melbourne; it seemed obvious his back was giving him trouble.
December 30th 2011 @ 8:18pm
Red Kev said | December 30th 2011 @ 8:18pm | Report comment
Khawaja’s two low running catches in the BBL tonight would aggressively disagree with that statement.
December 30th 2011 @ 9:16am
BARGE-ARSE said | December 30th 2011 @ 9:16am | Report comment
I am having great reservations about Langer as batting coach. Although I am not party to what he does with our batsmen, I suspect that his tuition may be not that technically proficient and may rely on a more psychological approach, evoking the spirit of the teams he used to play in. It is not working whatever he does though! Also I am worried for Warner as he has looked out of his league in the India test match (great fielder though).
December 30th 2011 @ 12:08pm
Tommy said | December 30th 2011 @ 12:08pm | Report comment
Don’t worry about Warner! Superstar.
December 30th 2011 @ 3:05pm
Harry said | December 30th 2011 @ 3:05pm | Report comment
I share those reservations. I was dismayed watching the presentation of Ed Cowan’s cap to see him smothered in an embrace by the person next to him a seond after receiving the coveted cap. Let the bloke enjoy his moment. Of course that person turned out to be Langer. He needs to be reminded he’s there to be a technical coach, not cheerleader or defacto team member. And as we all know, there is still an awful amount of work to be done with our batsmen.
December 30th 2011 @ 4:17pm
Bayman said | December 30th 2011 @ 4:17pm | Report comment
Harry,
Yes, I too saw the Langer embrace and had the same “cheerleader” thought. Given that Australia’s batting since Langer arrived has been a tad fragile I am amazed he hasn’t attracted more comment.
It is entirely possible that McDermott’s elevation has just happed to coincide with the arrival of some genuinely fine fast bowlers, and a pretty handy spinner, but the real reward has been Peter Siddle. Long criticised, correctly, as quickish but straight up and down Siddle has been transformed by McDermott if we are to believe the press.
Years of back of a length rubbish has been replaced by a bowler of genuine menace. All power to McDermott if he’s the reason and all power to Siddle for listening.
December 30th 2011 @ 4:28pm
Bayman said | December 30th 2011 @ 4:28pm | Report comment
…..that would be…..”just happened to coincide…..”
December 30th 2011 @ 9:31am
Grimmace said | December 30th 2011 @ 9:31am | Report comment
Great performance from the quicks, but lets not get too excited just yet. Its a good start, lets see if they can back it up. Batsmen still need to improve.
December 30th 2011 @ 10:13am
Luke said | December 30th 2011 @ 10:13am | Report comment
“why has it taken McDermott’s arrival on the coaching panel for this strategy to be employed?” This is because Troy (the myth) Cooley was in charge of the bowling attack. There is nothing really different about Hilfenhaus’s action or ability since he got dropped, but he bowled much more intelligently than he has done for quite some time. He was bowling way too short under Troy Cooley and now McDermott has come up with the novel approach of pitching the ball up. All of a sudden our attack looks alot more potent and the reason is because most of them have started to develop a Cricket brain under McDermott that was seriously absent under Cooley.
What worries me is that Cooley is in charge of the Centre of Excellence, get him away from the young kids there asap or else we will have a whole new generation of bowlers that bowl short rubbish.
December 30th 2011 @ 12:11pm
Tommy said | December 30th 2011 @ 12:11pm | Report comment
Completly agree. Cooley seemed to be more about getting wrist positions & runs ups correct rather than the bigger picture of actually getting batsman out! Having said that, Cooley might be better suited at the COE where getting technique & building stamina is probably the main focus.
December 30th 2011 @ 2:01pm
Brett McKay said | December 30th 2011 @ 2:01pm | Report comment
Luke, Hilfenhaus has made a few noticeable changes in the off season, all of which have been put down to Tassie’s bowling coach Ali de Winter, who interestingly enough, was just pipped by McDermott for the Australian post. Namely, his grip on the ball and his wrist position now are more condusive to his natural outswinger, and he’s also bowling from slightly wider on the crease, which mean the ball is angled more towatd the stumps before starting to swing away.
If you go back to the Ashes series last year, he was letting go of the ball almost in front of the umpire’s eyes, meaning the batsmen could leave anything pitch on or outside off stump as the outswing took it away..
It seems that McDermott’s big change for the quicks is to trim a metre or so off their target area. Under Cooley, around 6-6.5m from the stumps was considered the length to bowl, and McDermott has pulled this into about 5m. The effect and hope is to give the ball the more opportunity to swing with the fuller length. And obviously, it’s working a treat.
ONe of the papers yesterday had a great quote from Wasim Akram who put the difference down to rookie quicks being coached by one of the great Australian fast bowlers of the last 30 years vs a guy that played a bit of state cricket for a few years, they’re worth reading if you see them..
December 30th 2011 @ 2:21pm
Viscount Crouchback said | December 30th 2011 @ 2:21pm | Report comment
Good points, Brett… but bear in mind that Hilfenhaus and Siddle pitching a yard fuller won’t be sufficient in 2013.
December 30th 2011 @ 3:00pm
Harry said | December 30th 2011 @ 3:00pm | Report comment
You may not remember it but the current number one bowler in the world (arguable of course, but IMO he is) Jimmy Anderson took two absolute pastings all Australian summer long on his first two tours ihere in 03 and 06/07. We all know what happened last summer. Point being – bowlers can change and improve. We will see whether thats the case for Siddle and Hilfenhaus, both of whom took what I thought would be test career ending punishment from Cook and Co last Ashes series. But here they are back again. However I think in time they will be replaced – perhaps by the next Ashes series – by Cummns and Starc, joining Pattison in what could be a very useful attack indeed.
December 30th 2011 @ 3:36pm
Brett McKay said | December 30th 2011 @ 3:36pm | Report comment
I guess we’ll only know what’s sufficient in 2013 when it is 2013, Viscount, but your point is noted..
December 30th 2011 @ 4:27pm
Bayman said | December 30th 2011 @ 4:27pm | Report comment
Viscount,
I think you’ll find that in England, where batsmen only seem to push forward, it will be very sufficient indeed. You may find, however, that’s it’s more Cummins and Pattinson than Siddle and Hilfy.
McDermott’s method simply reflects the modern urge to go forward which, in turn, has been brought about by short form cricket and truckloads of protective equipment. There were always “front foot” players but today that’s everybody.
Not too many catches at cover or mid-off/on in Melbourne. Pretty much all bowled, lbw and caught in the arc. Classic front foot dismissals to balls pitched up and doing a bit.
December 30th 2011 @ 4:34pm
Bayman said | December 30th 2011 @ 4:34pm | Report comment
Luke,
Hilfy has also got rid of the knee problem – at least for now – and that has allowed him to drive through the crease more. He’s a fair bit quicker today than in the last year or so. As Brett has said, he’s also worked on his action with de Winter so he has changed quite a bit since last year.
I was surprised by his selection – did not see it coming – but he certainly paid his way and backed up the selectors faith. Add him, again, to the growing list of Test quality fast bowlers.
Now, for the batting……….
December 30th 2011 @ 11:03am
Tommygun said | December 30th 2011 @ 11:03am | Report comment
Great test match, very happy to get the win. However, I think Pattinson must be elevated a spot in the batting order. He is far technically superior compared to Siddle. Also, why did they sacrifice Lyon in the second innings towards the end of the day!! Poor Bloke.
Batting remains a real worry, I would happily take 11 Peter Siddle’s into the next test!
December 30th 2011 @ 11:21am
Swampy said | December 30th 2011 @ 11:21am | Report comment
Our bowling attack is vastly improved because without Mitchell Johnson we are maintaining the pressure. Sure MJ was a ‘match winner’ on his day but most of the time he was incapable of keeping pressure on from one end. Like when warne and McGrath were operating, there has been no let up in the pressure on the batsman to score rather than just waiting for the soon to be received poor delivery from MJ.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
December 30th 2011 @ 1:11pm
Rhys said | December 30th 2011 @ 1:11pm | Report comment
Swampy, excellent point there about ‘maintaining the pressure’. Both Siddle and Pattinson stated that post match, the idea of bowling partnerships. While Johnson was in the side flinging the ball all over the place, building pressure through tight bowling at both ends just wasn’t possible. I also think Lyon has played an important role too in that regard.
December 30th 2011 @ 12:17pm
Tommy said | December 30th 2011 @ 12:17pm | Report comment
Spiro, excellent article. However, I think praised needs to be held back until after the series. This series is far from over & it really wouldn’t surprise me we get absolutely thumped in Sydney. Our batting still needs attention & the main problem IMO is the captain’s lack of runs. I have critisized Clarke’s batting a lot on this forum. His defensive technique is terrible & I predict he won’t score a half century in this series unless there is a meaningless second innings with no pressure on a flat pitch at some stage.
December 30th 2011 @ 12:37pm
Tommy said | December 30th 2011 @ 12:37pm | Report comment
One more rant, not totally related to this article. Even though I hate the Big Bash, I have been watching it anyway, just because it is on. Last nights game was not a patch on the test match just completed. 6s hit without having the fear of getting out are cheap thrills IMO & watching Herscheele Gibbs slog Ryan Harris in the first over really didn’t impress me at all.
But the thing that sh!ts me the most about the big bash is the insistance on recuiting 3rd rate poms as so called “marquee players.” Paul Collingwood, Owis Shah, Micheal Lumb, Luke Wright & Jade Dernbach to name a few. It just makes my blood boil when I see these pretenders announced by commentators / ground announcers as star recuits. They are hopeless! Throw in some other pretenders like Flip Van der Mere, Fidel Edwards, Brendam McCallum, Dwayne Bravo & we have almost full team of people who should be thrown out of the competition & replaced with young Australians. The new rule should be that each team has to play a kid from the Aust U19s team & thereby giving them a chance to become the next David Warner / Nathan Lyon.
December 30th 2011 @ 5:12pm
Chris said | December 30th 2011 @ 5:12pm | Report comment
Dwayne Bravo a pretender?
December 30th 2011 @ 8:21pm
cruyff turn said | December 30th 2011 @ 8:21pm | Report comment
I completely agree with your point regarding overseas “stars”. Fair enough if the player is Chris Gayle, or someone who can draw the crowds and add something to the competition, but like you say, those squad spots should be given to young Australian players.
Kurtis Patterson, for example, is only 18 years old. He hit 157 in his Shield debut last month, but is he playing in the BBL? Just did some research and he was offered Phil Hughes’ place, but he turned it down. OK, maybe a poor example, but he’s the type of player the sides should be targeting, instead of the middle-of-the-road overseas recruits you mention.
December 30th 2011 @ 12:55pm
Bob said | December 30th 2011 @ 12:55pm | Report comment
I’ve been thinking about Australia’s bowling improvement since our success in Sri Lanka (anyone remember that attack?). It may be that McDermott has been changing their length (finally!!!) however I also believe it has something to do with bowlers such as Pattinson and Siddle realising the value of consistent line and length when Copeland bowled. That’s why they were carrying drinks there and he was playing…sadly, he may have helped his own demise by showing the way to do it, over after over. I do hope they consider Copeland for England at the very least.
I compliment Clarke on his captaincy too, he seems a clever skipper and will hopefully pick up his own game with the bat soon, like at the SCG.