Clarke should aim for 350 not out, at least
By Spiro Zavos, 5 Jan 2012 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, Michael Clarke, Ricky Ponting, SCG, Test cricket
Michael Clarke leads Australia looking for a clean sweep over India at Adelaide Oval.
Related coverage
Michael Clarke played one of the great innings at the SCG, on the second day of the second Test against India. He is not out 251 after starting the day on 47. He has faced 341 balls, hit 31 fours and a six, and has batted forcefully and elegantly throughout the entire day.
This is a rare feat in modern Test cricket.
After the first day’s play when 13 wickets fell the pundits were talking about T(20)est cricket, a game of bashing batting and the regular tumble of wickets. This new form of Test cricket is so fast-moving that spectators do not have time for Mexican Waves before the next wicket falls.
Now, though, on the second day we have the fall of only one wicket in an entire day’s play. At this sort of pace the game might have to go on for a couple of weeks to get a result. Of course, this won’t happen when India bat. They should be so tired that they capitulate as they did in their first innings.
Clarke’s innings, for all its flair and shot-making, was nearly chanceless. There was hardly a false stroke. There was a ruthlessness, too, about Clarke’s batting. One in 10 balls he faced was dismissed to or over the boundary.
And for those of us who enjoy the aesthetics of cricket, there was hardly an ungainly stroke either. This was batting in the NSW tradition of elegant and beautiful batting, the method of Victor Trumper and Archie Jackson. These two players are the paragons of the NSW method of batting that was carried on through to Alan Kippax, Stan McCabe, Ian Craig, Richie Benaud, and in modern times to Mark Waugh.
From virtually the first ball he faced, Clarke was on the front foot driving elegantly and powerfully through the field. Beauty and ruthlessness in the one package.
Remember that Clarke came in to bat towards the end of the first day when Australia was 3 for 37 and poised on the brink of yet another collapse. But bold stroke-making from Clarke, particularly, and from Ricky Ponting (134 off 225 balls) to a lesser extent, has pulled the game away from India.
As he made his weary but ebullient way off the field, Clarke was interviewed by Mark Nicholas. He said two interesting things. First, he felt that Australia needed a lead of at least 350 runs. Second, that his main consideration was not amassing a personal record batting score but winning the game.
What he didn’t say, but was implied in these comments, is that he has batted Australia into a position where he can achieve a personal milestone of scoring, say, 350 runs before having to declare. Australia is currently 271 runs in front. If Clarke takes his total to somewhere near 350, his side will be nearly 450 in front.
This might seem to be an excessive lead. But this Test now is more about time than runs as far as Australia is concerned. The longer Clarke can leave India on the field during the third day, the better his team will be placed to achieve a second victory in the series, and victories in the third ans fourth Tests.
The point here is that only two days of the Test have been played. There are three days to go. It would be foolish to expose the Australian bowlers to the possibility (slight though it might be but possible if say Rahul Dravid and Sachin Tendulkar make 100s) of three days bowling to dismiss India. If they can’t dismiss India in five sessions (which allows for a declaration at tea time today), then so be it. This is more than enough time to dismiss any side.
Batting on, if possible, to tea time would allow a couple of hours of intense bowling by the three-man Australian pace attack on day three, to be followed by an overnight rest and another assault on the fourth morning. By the fourth day, too, the pitch should begin to crack up and offer a better chance to Nathan Lyon take wickets with his off-spinners.
Another reason for batting on is that this will prolong the agony the Indian attack is enduring in the Test. Australia had to bowl only 59 overs in India’s first innings. The Indian bowlers have already had to bowl 116. Three of the bowlers have conceded a century: Zaheer Khan (3 for 106), Ravi Ashwin (0 for 103) and Ishant Sharma (1 for 106). Umesh Yadav (0 for 96) is coming close behind them.
Keep these bowlers out on the field for four more hours if possible, and let the Indian old-timer batting stars get leg-weary and frustrated chasing balls to the boundary. These are the tactics to win a five-day Test, and a series with two more Tests to play and win. The bowlers will feel like flogged horses trying to get up for the next Test, and the batsmen will be tired of limb and mind.
This is hardly the right mental attitude to take to the task of trying to bat out two days against a pumped-up Australian bowling attack on a wearing pitch.
The situation Clarke finds himself in is that he can kill off India as slowly and as painfully (to them) as he likes.
And he has all the time in the world to score virtually as many runs as he wants to, provided he is good enough to push on and on in his run chase.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, Michael Clarke, Ricky Ponting, SCG, Test cricket


January 5th 2012 @ 7:27am
Viscount Crouchback said | January 5th 2012 @ 7:27am | Report comment
A super effort from Clarke. I wonder if this innings might encourage his many detractors on The Roar to publicly resile from their hitherto rather snobbish attitude towards the plucky young fellow?
January 5th 2012 @ 7:42am
Redb said | January 5th 2012 @ 7:42am | Report comment
Spare us the NSW bias – “NSW tradition of elegant and beautiful batting”
Heard of Greg Chappell – he came from South Australia, NSW has no particular claims there.
My read is Clarke wants a 350 lead which means another 100 runs, he can get his 300 and declare, doesn’t need 350.
A brilliant innings from Clarke and one which will go a long way to building wider respect for the Australian captain.
January 5th 2012 @ 8:42am
Ken said | January 5th 2012 @ 8:42am | Report comment
I don’t think he was suggesting that NSW can lay claim to every elegant batsman ever to play the game – just that they’ve had a good record at producing shot-making, twinkle-toed batsman through the years. There was an interesting article on cricinfo the other day putting this down to the inherent balance in the SCG’s pitch, whether or not it’s that simple who knows? http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/current/story/547669.html
If we were starting the 4th day then I would agree with you, declaring at 350 – sometime around lunch probably – it’s a demoralising lead and would be a fairly obvious play. With 3 days to go though, there’s just no time pressure, might as well leave your opponents in the field chasing leather – I suspect Spiro’s right and they’ll bat out most of the day if things keep going their way.
January 5th 2012 @ 9:53am
Redb said | January 5th 2012 @ 9:53am | Report comment
I think they should bat on, but listening Clarke yesterday when he came off the field he said he wants another 100 runs (for the team). Maybe it was just a tentative comment not wanting to sound arrogant.
That said we don’t want India to bat again, so I agree that after just 2 days play we could bat until tea & add another 200 runs and then give ourselves 2 and a bit days to get them out, weather permitting.
January 5th 2012 @ 8:05am
Harry said | January 5th 2012 @ 8:05am | Report comment
Hate articles which automatically assume whats going to happen and are dismissive of teams. And Spiro you do realise that test matches run for 5 days? i.e. there are still nine sessions of cricket to go, and we’ve only played six so far.
Clearly there is no hurry and Clarke should bat for as long as possible. I’d be quite comfortable if he batted till an hour after tea today, set India in excess of 00 to make us bat again and have six and a half sessions to bowl them out.
Australia still have to take 10 Indian wickets on a pitch which yielded up one yesterday. Go back to the first Ashes test last year in Brissy when after lots of wickets in the first two days the batsmen – particularly the team batting 3rd – spent the next 3 days carting the bowlers.
Magnificent batting by Clarke – he gave the very difficult caught and bowled chance on 182 to Sharma, and by my count was beaten 4 times outside the off stump yesterday. Apart from that didn’t really look like getting out.
Ponting always looked shaky on the hook and pull but apart from that played some wonderful strokes. I’d also note that by his demeanour in walking off yesterday he looked awfully like a man knowing he was doing it for the last time.
January 5th 2012 @ 8:58am
jamesb said | January 5th 2012 @ 8:58am | Report comment
i wouldn’t be surprised if Clarke is out very early on.
Backing up from full days batting wouldn’t be easy one would think. Than again, the indian bowlers wouldn’t exaclty be fresh either.
From an overall point of view, I want Australia to bat half a day if they can, declare, have a lead over 400.
Day 3 will still be good for batting, so you wouldn’t want to give the Indians a sniff by declaring overnight for example.
January 5th 2012 @ 9:11am
Johnno said | January 5th 2012 @ 9:11am | Report comment
Today if i were clarke i would bat for 15-20 overs India will be tired and demoralised then get them in before lunch for a nasty 10 over session , and take a few wickets 2 before lunch, and it might even be all over by today.
January 5th 2012 @ 9:41am
Red Kev said | January 5th 2012 @ 9:41am | Report comment
No, three days to go, Australia should aim to bat as long as possible – all day and declare sometime just before or during the final session. Maybe they can’t do it but they should aim there. Spiro is right when he says the test match is more about time than runs.
January 5th 2012 @ 9:31am
Chris said | January 5th 2012 @ 9:31am | Report comment
Lot of assumptions going on today…
January 5th 2012 @ 9:45am
B.A Sports said | January 5th 2012 @ 9:45am | Report comment
I was so happy for Clarke yesterday and while i want him to do as well as possible today, i kind of hope he doesn’t amass any huge records like a 400 or something because you just know the detractors will come flying out and tell us how he is self absorbed or some garbage like that.
January 5th 2012 @ 10:18am
The Bush said | January 5th 2012 @ 10:18am | Report comment
Spiro, if Australia declared at Tea today, that would leave seven (7), not five (5) sessions left in the Test. But as you say, either way, more than enough time to get the wickets. My only concern would be that seven (7) sessions also leaves plenty of time for India to bat the Test away.
Another consideration is whether you want the tail-enders to bat at all – i.e. keep them fresh for bowling. Is it a case that the two (2) at the crease bat hard, but sensibly, for as long as they can and if one (1) gets out, then you give Haddin carte blanch to go crazy (about the only thing he’s good at) and then declare without your bowlers even having to pad up?
January 5th 2012 @ 10:57am
Jimbo said | January 5th 2012 @ 10:57am | Report comment
I got the impression watching Clarke quite early on, even before he scored his century, that I was witnessing something special. As you correctly say, unlike Ponting, who always gave the impression of being a man batting himself back into form, going on sheer bloody mindedness more than anything else, he hardly played a false stroke. A truly sublime performance and one I will remember for quite a while.
January 5th 2012 @ 11:17am
Seiran said | January 5th 2012 @ 11:17am | Report comment
It was, and is, a good knock for Clarke. I think the fact that Ponting, Clarke, and soon (maybe) Hussey are scoring big is an indication of a wicket that has lost all venom. This needs to be taken into consideration before people start making such a big thing about the team performance.
If Aus went in first they would probably have been in the same predicament as India found themselves in, and Australia found themselves in, batting first, against England on the same wicket not so long ago.
With this dead wicket, I wouldn’t be surprised to see India being able to bat out the remainder of the test for a draw.