Australian batsman Ricky Ponting (right) and Mike Hussey make their way from the ground at tea on the third day of the first test between Australian and India at the MCG in Melbourne, Wednesday, Dec. 28, 2011. (AAP Image/Julian Smith)
Related coverage
The Border-Gavaskar Series train has rolled into Perth this week, with the Australians as cock-a-hoop as the Indians are shell-shocked.
If there’s a worse place than Perth for a sub-continental side to land in search of a desperate face-saving win, then I can’t think of it readily.
India did last win here, in 2007-08, and were even trailing 2-0 when they did, but that now-infamous series was being played between teams a lot more closely-matched than Australia and India are currently.
On the back of the crushing innings victory in Sydney, Australia arrive in the west missing only the giant-killing Test rookie, James Pattinson, who is being rested while he manages a foot injury. Two-Test leftie Mitchell Starc has won a recall to the 12-man squad after being overlooked for Ben Hilfenhaus for the Melbourne Test.
Australia will still be well-equipped for what remains as arguably the world’s fastest, bounciest 22-yard strip of turf. Pattinson will most likely be replaced by Ryan Harris, who is set to resume his eight-Test career on the same ground as he and Mitchell Johnson ripped through England in Australia’s only Ashes Series win last summer.
As has been the case for as long as I can remember, the annual debate about “the need for speed” rages over the make-up of the Australian attack in Perth.
Western Australian spinner, Michael Beer, was lobbed from obscurity into the Test squad for the WACA Test last summer, though Australia ultimately preferred to play the pace quartet of Johnson, Harris, Hilfenhaus, and Peter Siddle.
Johnson and Harris both finished that Test with 9 wickets apiece, and there’s little doubt that will be fresh in the minds when the decision comes down on whether offie Nathan Lyon holds his spot, or whether Starc plays Test no.3.
Lyon has managed only one wicket in each of the Melbourne and Sydney Tests so far, both of them tail-enders as the Indian innings has come to an abrupt end. But in fairness, the Australian quicks taking 37 of the 40 Indian wickets in the series has meant that Lyon really hasn’t had to do much more than he has.
But that still doesn’t make the decision any easier, nor does it clarify the debate.
WACA CEO, former Australian opener Graeme Wood, has offered his two cents that Australia should go in with four quicks, no doubt hoping that the thought of Indian batsmen being bombarded with the short stuff promotes ticket sales.
Former Western Australian and now Australian coach, Mickey Arthur is leaning back on the side of a balanced side containing Lyon, while WACA curator Cameron Sutherland is having the proverbial each way, diplomatically suggesting that while a four-prong pace attack would do well, spin will play a part toward the end of the match.
Early pictures of the WACA deck showed a strip barely distinguishable from the outfield, though it has obviously dried up, browned off, and flattened out since then. What we see at the toss tomorrow will be altogether different again.
The debate about the Australian line-up still pales in comparison to that of what’s being thrown India’s way since the SCG loss last week. Even quicker than what Fleet Street bestows on England, India’s media and former greats have turned on the side in spectacular fashion.
The words of an Indian scribe are still fresh in my ears, when after the first innings collapse in Sydney, he screamed “they are letting the nation down!” down the phone during a radio interview back home. It would’ve been quite funny, if he wasn’t so deadly serious.
Former Captain Sunil Gavaskar has questioned the team’s quantity and quality of preparation, and would have been thrilled at the news that the Indians went go-karting on arrival in Perth. Commentator Sanjay Manjrekar, once a national team-mate of Sachin Tendulkar’s, believes VVS Laxman should make way for Rohit Sharma, while there as also calls for Rahul Dravid or even Virender Sehwag to shuffle down the batting order, if that’s what’s required to spark the struggling top order.
Curiously, calls have even been coming for Ravi Ashwin to be left out in favour of Paul Adams-impersonating left-armer, Pragyan Ojha, on the grounds that Ashwin is apparently still not ready for Test cricket. I don’t know how much more ready he can be, given he’s already taken 26 wickets in five Tests, and is currently second only to Tendulkar on India’s run charts this series.
And then, as if India won’t be fired up enough by the stern words coming from home and their travelling press corps, we have the curious case of Brad Haddin.
In a Sydney radio interview on Monday, Haddin boldly declared, “We know this side can be as fragile as any team in the world if things aren’t going their way and they can turn on each other and the media turns on them pretty quick. We knew if we could keep them out there and put the numbers like we did on the board we knew we’d get the rewards because they break quicker than anyone in the world.”
Of all the people questioning the mental fragility of cricketers currently, I wouldn’t have thought Haddin would feature too far up the list of those well qualified to do so. Had this come from any of the Australian quicks, or Michael Clarke (though as captain, he wouldn’t anyway), or even Mike Hussey and Ricky Ponting, you wouldn’t have been too worried. But Brad Haddin, in his current vein of form?
The issue, as I commented on colleague Luke Doherty’s piece yesterday, isn’t so much the message itself. The message is on the money, and even somewhat common knowledge. India are a fragile side away from home. They do break quicker than any other team. The issue is the poor choice of messenger handling the delivery.
As a retort, Zaheer Khan’s “Well, Brad Haddin, I think he should focus on his ‘keeping, that looked really fragile to me…” was as piercing and as precisely executed as a Tendulkar square drive. He even added a kind of evil chuckle.
Some mighty big statements need to be backed up now, but the Perth Test has a real edge about it as a result. India desperately need to recover or another away series whitewash is well on the cards. And on current form, that would be a fair reflection of the teams.
Recommend this story.
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.


January 12th 2012 @ 7:17am
Vas Venkatramani said | January 12th 2012 @ 7:17am | Report comment
Too early to call a whitewash Brett. Fragile as India may be, I think parts of Australia’s team are vulnerable to be exploited.
The top order is still a concern. While Cowan showed in Melbourne he has the gumption for patience, Warner needs to leave more judiciously, while Marsh just needs to bat some time before playing a booming cover drive. Zaheer has been good enough in the first two Tests to exploit any weaknesses in the Australian batting, Ishant has often bowled better than his figures suggest, and the pace of Perth will be enjoyed by Umesh Yadav.
India’s batting seems the greater concern, but with all the top order (Kohli excepted) passing 50 at least once this series, you can say they aren’t in bad nick, but also give credit to the Aussie bowlers for working to a plan of attack continuosly.
All I know is the scribes said the same thing four years ago, and India surprised us. We should be wary of a repeat, and not underestimate a backlash (which is now plausible after the brain-addled comments from Haddin).
January 12th 2012 @ 8:29am
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 8:29am | Report comment
Is it really too early though Vas? Yes, India could bounce back in Perth, you’re quite right, but if they get beaten in this Test too, what are they going to be like mentally come Adelaide. They have to win this Test, otherwise whitewash isn’t that unlikely..
January 12th 2012 @ 9:25am
Vas Venkatramani said | January 12th 2012 @ 9:25am | Report comment
It is too early, for the mere reason being we haven’t secured the series yet. For me, the key for us is to win this Test match so that we can secure the series. Of course, a draw will do that too, but I don’t understand people who go into games settling for a draw.
If we win in Perth, we should then go to Adelaide trying to win that Test match alone. I liked what Hussey said a few days ago about going back to a “nil-all mentality”. I think it’s a good attitude to have, because that means the team is looking at the processes that deliver them victory as opposed to the result itself.
I just don’t see any point talking about a whitewash two weeks before we find out if it can happen. Because if India draw or win this Perth Test, this article will cease to have meaning. I’d rather hope the team does the little one percenters theyve been doing so far, because their discipline has been outstanding.
That will get us the result more than anything else…
January 12th 2012 @ 9:45am
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 9:45am | Report comment
Vas, this article loses meaning tomorrow! I understand the safety-first approach, it’s one I quite often use myself, but you do realise you’ve just gone down the same path as me in your comment just there:
“If we win in Perth, we should then go to Adelaide trying to win that Test match alone.”
And a win in Adelaide would result in….??
We’re on the same page here, Vas. We want the same thing. Whitewash or not, we want the team to play well and win where possible. It’s OK to say it…
January 12th 2012 @ 11:31pm
Brian said | January 12th 2012 @ 11:31pm | Report comment
If the adelaide pitch is its normal self it does not look like either side has the spinning options to take 20 wkts there. since warne retired Australia has only beaten nz in adelaide.
January 13th 2012 @ 7:14pm
Brett McKay said | January 13th 2012 @ 7:14pm | Report comment
India all out 161. How about now, Vas?
January 12th 2012 @ 8:32am
Viscount Crouchback said | January 12th 2012 @ 8:32am | Report comment
I think 4-0 is the most likely possibility.
January 12th 2012 @ 8:35am
Chris said | January 12th 2012 @ 8:35am | Report comment
Yeah, I think using the ‘W’ word at this point is a little early! As you point out Brett, remember the last time India was here…
But I think everyone needs to calm down about Brad Haddin’s comment. As usual, the media takes one sentence out of a whole answer to a question and waves it from the parapet. Zaheer Khan then played his role well by stoking the fire. The media and large sections of the public seem to fall for it every time, but I suspect the pplayers themselves gave it absolutely no attention whatsoever.
The more interesting thing to consider is whether Starc or Lyon will play. And considering the first two Tests were over in four days, does the WACA curator’s comment that “spin will play a part towards the end of the match” mean anything? If the AUstralian quicks are all fit and ready to go and continue the form they have been in so far, there’s a reasonable chance this Test will be over in four days too.
January 12th 2012 @ 8:51am
sheek said | January 12th 2012 @ 8:51am | Report comment
Good stuff Brett,
Is it an age thing, or too much clutter of sport, or have I stopped caring as much?
I can quote you series between Australia & India from 1967/68 to 1986 without access to stats. The 90s are forgotten, as are the 2000s, apart from the wonderful 2001 series.
I can’t even remember the last few series without resorting to the record books. I miss the old days, when you could savour the taste of a series, like a gourmet meal, for months after its conclusion.
These days, they throw them at you (tests) one after the other, the previous one quickly forgotten, just like a chinese takeaway. Anyway, a whitewash is very much likely at this point…..
January 12th 2012 @ 9:05am
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 9:05am | Report comment
Sheek, it probably is a case of too much of a good thing, but given the MCC’s Cricket Committee are leading the call for Test Cricket’s preservation by scheduling more Test Cricket, a call now being echoed by the likes of Rahul Dravid and other leading players, I doubt very much that you’ll have a chance to “catch up” again any time soon.
But it could be an age thing too. I’m pretty good currently, but let’s meet up in [insert appropriate number here] years when I’m your current age, and we’ll see if I too only remember series from [that number again] years ago…
And I’m glad you managed to mention today’s topic there too, that was like one of those delightful gentlemanly anecdotal replies where the actual answer is reached at some point, but really isn’t as interesting as the anecdotes themselves. Great to hear from you as always!!
January 12th 2012 @ 11:24am
formeropenside said | January 12th 2012 @ 11:24am | Report comment
In sheek’s defence, in the 1990′s there was one tour by India to Australia in 1990/91, and a couple of tours to India in 1994 and 1996 I think. Not a lot.
January 12th 2012 @ 11:30am
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 11:30am | Report comment
quite true FOS, there was a good period there where it seemed we hardly played India at all..
January 12th 2012 @ 2:18pm
Rhys said | January 12th 2012 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
I reckon there are a three of factors in the resurgence of Australia v. India series. The 2001 series in India was so exceptional in the quality of cricket it produced that I think it had fans from both countries salivating at the prospect of more regular tussles between the two nations.
The second factor that comes to mind is the demise of the West Indies team. During the 80s and 90s the Windies toured Australia more regularly than any other team (well it seemed that way anyway), but we rarely see them out here these days, probably due to the fact that they aren’t the drawcard they used to be.
Which leads me to the third factor – Australia v. India series generate bucket loads of money.
January 12th 2012 @ 2:24pm
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 2:24pm | Report comment
and Ryhs, your last super-accurate factor is why there’s been a whole lot more India-Australia series in the last decade than there was in the 90s…
January 12th 2012 @ 9:04am
sledgeross said | January 12th 2012 @ 9:04am | Report comment
Gday all, been away for a month and good to be back!
I would go for the 4 quicks, and if it looks like it could turn, give Clark and Warner a few overs. We always undervalue our part-timers in our test teams (think of AB).
January 12th 2012 @ 9:45am
Big Steve said | January 12th 2012 @ 9:45am | Report comment
Mentally it looks pretty certain we will see a whitewash after the Sydney test. But maybe the indians did the right thing taking themselves out of cricet for a few days to refresh. Different methods work for different people, and hopefully the indians know whats best.
I was wondering if any concnerns about Harris breaking down again will influence the choice on Starc playing. Without Watson, it will be handy having Starc in the team if Harris cant bowl most of the second innnings. Although I hope he doesnt get injured again.
January 12th 2012 @ 10:01am
Chris said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:01am | Report comment
And there’s always Hussey and Ponting to roll their arms over…
January 12th 2012 @ 10:26am
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:26am | Report comment
Steve, there’s always going to be an element of risk with Harris, for sure, but it doesn’t sound like the risk this time is as pronounced as it might have been in Melbourne, say.
Sounds like it’s still looking greenish over in Perth, too..
January 12th 2012 @ 10:17am
TomC said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:17am | Report comment
I feel like India are a real chance to win in Adelaide. Particularly if another Australian fast-bowler gets injured.
But seeing as the Indian batsmen still seem to be struggling to deal with the Australian pitches I can’t see anything other than a loss in Perth. Maybe if Sharma can repeat his heroics from four years ago and they can bowl out the Aussies very cheaply but that seems unlikely.
January 12th 2012 @ 10:20am
jameswm said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:20am | Report comment
I’d go 4 quicks.
I do think this is one test Hilfy should play, as he’s the ideal upwind bowler with his outie. Hussey can help him, as he bowls little outies as well. Siddle can also do some donkey work.
You then have Harris, Siddle, and Starc to come downwind. A bit ironic, as Harris and Starc really move the ball, and none is a real flyer in the Lee or Tait mould.
Clarke can bowl a few overs of spin to pick up the run-rate.
I think that’s enough bowlers to pick up the pieces. Each of these 4 bowlers is quite different in style, and attack the bastmen in different ways. I’d like to see all 4 bowling.
And of course, you pick 4 quicks, Clarke has to have the balls to bowl if he wins the toss. You want to bowl 1st and 3rd. And the aim would be to bowl them out on the first day, and do another Sydney on them.
January 12th 2012 @ 10:28am
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:28am | Report comment
James, funnily enough, I think Lyon should play for the same reasons you’ve outlined there for The Hilf. The breeze should assist Lyon’s offies nicely. The big question mark is just how green the deck is still…
January 12th 2012 @ 12:37pm
jameswm said | January 12th 2012 @ 12:37pm | Report comment
Brett I just don’t really see Lyon getting wickets. From memory, even Warnie never did that well over there.
Clearly though Harris is in and Starc and Lyon are fighting for the last spot. Lyon will get a big workout in Adelaide, and I’d like to see Starc given another go. His good balls are just as lethal as the other Mitchell’s, and I’m hoping his consistency has improved. I also think his height will help him, though possibly not to get LBWs and bowleds. Maybe he can get a couple of LBWs given by naive umpires, where hawk-eye shows they were going over the top. And of course with no DRS. I do want that to come back and bite the Indians on the butt.
January 12th 2012 @ 1:34pm
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 1:34pm | Report comment
I’d be happy either way James, to be honest. Interestingly Beer himself has been going OK in Perth this year from what I understand, so it could well be a flip of the coin when they see the deck in the morning..
January 13th 2012 @ 8:30am
Brett McKay said | January 13th 2012 @ 8:30am | Report comment
James, the WACA deck still looks green, veeeery green. Surprisingly green, way greener than last summer. Starc might get the nod, unless something drastic happend this morning..
January 13th 2012 @ 1:17pm
Brett McKay said | January 13th 2012 @ 1:17pm | Report comment
got it right, James, Starc in for Lyon…
January 12th 2012 @ 10:38am
Frankie Hughes said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:38am | Report comment
Ditch Lyon, he’s not very good. He got a bit of beginners luck in Sri Lanka and some charity wickets from New Zealand. Heck Warne and MacGill could easily replace him.
January 12th 2012 @ 12:10pm
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
humour me then, Frankie, and name three better alternatives in Australia, and you’re not allowed Warne, MacGill and Hogg…
January 12th 2012 @ 12:39pm
jameswm said | January 12th 2012 @ 12:39pm | Report comment
That certainly makes it harder.
You’re stuck with Hauritz, Krejza and someone else. I don’t really think any of Beer, Doherty, SOK, Doran or O’Brien will ever be test level spinners. Really, Lyon and Hauritz are the best we’ve got.
January 12th 2012 @ 1:37pm
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
O’Keeffe of that list is the one I rate, but you’ve just highlighted my point nicely. Lyon’s doing a reasonable job as asked of him, so he may as well continue doing it..
January 12th 2012 @ 2:23pm
jameswm said | January 12th 2012 @ 2:23pm | Report comment
Yeah I certainly wouldn’t change spinners now. I think Lyon and Hauritz are our best two. Lyon gets nice shape, good energy on the ball and seems to have his wits about him.
January 12th 2012 @ 2:44pm
JohnB said | January 12th 2012 @ 2:44pm | Report comment
Boyce (Q) and Maxwell (V) should be on that list as future possibles, but certainly not for the present
January 12th 2012 @ 7:10pm
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 7:10pm | Report comment
John, Boyce is certainly one to watch, nice shape, good amount of turn. Some ‘A’ tours would help him enormously..
January 13th 2012 @ 7:10pm
Chop said | January 13th 2012 @ 7:10pm | Report comment
I can definitely see SOK playing test cricket, he’d make a good #6 or #7 on top of his spin bowling. If he’d been fit when Lyon was picked he might’ve got a shot then.
January 13th 2012 @ 1:37am
Frankie Hughes said | January 13th 2012 @ 1:37am | Report comment
Nathan Hauritz and Stephen O’Keefe are both far superior to Nathan Lyon. Lyon is an honest trier, but that’s all.
January 13th 2012 @ 8:33am
Brett McKay said | January 13th 2012 @ 8:33am | Report comment
Frankie, given that Hauritz and O’Keeffe have been injured for good chunks of this summer, you’ve again highlighted the shortage of options currently. And I’m not sure about them being “far superior” anyway – Hauritz doesn get Lyon’s turn, and O’Keeffe seems to bowl darts at the base of the stumps now…
January 13th 2012 @ 9:19am
Frankie Hughes said | January 13th 2012 @ 9:19am | Report comment
O’Keefe is a fine bowler, stunning fielder and decent with the willow. Bowling darts is down to T20…
Hauritz doesn’t get as much turn as Lyon granted. But his skill is in flight and drift. He’s also a good fielder and decent with the bat.
January 13th 2012 @ 9:25am
Brett McKay said | January 13th 2012 @ 9:25am | Report comment
Frankie, we’re probably more closely alligned on these guys than we realise, and they’re certainly the best spinners in Australia currently, in my humble opinion. Either one could play in the national team in either of the three formats, and none would let anyone down.
Either way, she’s still looking a touch green over there in the west still, this all might be a moot discussion within a few hours…
January 12th 2012 @ 10:38am
Ryan O'Connell said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:38am | Report comment
If the Indians should find there way onto The Roar today, this headline (coupled with Haddin’s comments) should provide all the motivation they need to bounce back in Perth. And I’ll hold you personally responsible if they do, Brett!!
It wasn’t that long ago that Australia were bowled out for 47 against South Africa, and then lost a Test match to the lowly ranked New Zealand.
Now our out-of-form keeper is mouthing off about the opposition being fragile, and The Roar’s accomplished cricket writer is saying the series will be a whitewash, despite their being two Tests to go. Dangerous stuff.
Let sleeping dogs lie, I say!
January 12th 2012 @ 10:41am
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:41am | Report comment
Ryano, haven’t you heard? All’s forgiven over the 47 in South Africa since Sri Lanke were rolled for 43 overnight…
And read carefully mate, I’m not stupid enough to say it WILL be a whitewash, I’m saying there’s a decent chance it MIGHT be if India lose in Perth..
January 12th 2012 @ 10:45am
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:45am | Report comment
..and as I’ve had to explain to a mate today, the Aussies ARE on the cusp of a whitewash!! A win in Perth makes them even more … cuspier!!
January 12th 2012 @ 10:54am
Ryan O'Connell said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:54am | Report comment
I love it!
“I’m not stupid enough to say it WILL be a whitewash. . .”
“The Aussies ARE on the cusp of a whitewash!!”
Is that an each way bet?
January 12th 2012 @ 11:04am
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 11:04am | Report comment
you’ve been talking to my mate, haven’t you?!? Of course it’s an each way bet, that way I’m never wrong!!
January 12th 2012 @ 11:08am
Ryan O'Connell said | January 12th 2012 @ 11:08am | Report comment
I’m still in shock that I labelled you “The Roar’s accomplished cricket writer. . .”
January 12th 2012 @ 11:19am
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 11:19am | Report comment
I wasn’t bringing that up in case you changed your mind..
January 12th 2012 @ 11:02am
Australian Rules said | January 12th 2012 @ 11:02am | Report comment
Mmmmm…cuspy
January 12th 2012 @ 12:44pm
jamesb said | January 12th 2012 @ 12:44pm | Report comment
Brett
I think India will beat Australia in Perth. In the second test, Australia had players like Warner, cowan, marsh, Lyon and haddin that didn’t contribute.
for me, that gives India a chance in this test match
January 12th 2012 @ 1:15pm
jameswm said | January 12th 2012 @ 1:15pm | Report comment
You’re assuming they won’t contribute next test.
January 12th 2012 @ 2:49pm
JohnB said | January 12th 2012 @ 2:49pm | Report comment
Exactly. You can as readily say Australia won in Sydney, even though half the side didn’t contribute. How much will they win by if even a couple of the passengers come good!?
January 12th 2012 @ 1:56pm
Boris said | January 12th 2012 @ 1:56pm | Report comment
Can you expand on your theory there jamesb?
In the second test India’s entire bowling attack didn’t contribute and the batsmen that did make runs didn’t make anywhere near as many as Clarke, Hussey and Ponting…
So…?
January 12th 2012 @ 5:06pm
jamesb said | January 12th 2012 @ 5:06pm | Report comment
jameswm and boris
the 5 players that i mentioned, 4 of them are not established. Between them, Lyon, Warner, Marsh and Cowan have only played roughly 20 tests. Haddin has struggled with either bat or gloves in the last 12 months
this perth wicket they’ll be playing on by the looks of it will be a green top. Does the top 3 have the experience to get past the first couple of hours of batting. The first two hours of batting is very important. Bowlers are fresh, new ball etc.
Now relying on the same players, Hilfy, Clarke, Huss, Ponting, and Siddle to contribute the same way as it was in Sydney is risky. Patto is out of this test (who did contribute in Sydney), while Harris, fingers cross is still standing and performing when this test is complete.
The point I’m trying to make is the players that missed out in Sydney, at least half of them NEED to step up in Perth. If they do that we’re a chance, if not, it could be 2-1.
I think its fair to say, Brad Haddin is the player under most pressure.
January 12th 2012 @ 2:21pm
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2012 @ 2:21pm | Report comment
JB, doesn’t India’s similar lack of contributions in Melbourne give Australia as much chance??