Big, bad expansion for Big Bash League?
By Ben Carter, 12 Jan 2012 Ben Carter is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- BBL, Big Bash League, Cricket, Twenty20, Twenty20 cricket
Two reports, one in Sydney’s Daily Telegraph and the other on the Fox Sports’ website, on Thursday hinted at Cricket Australia’s desire to pursue expansion of the domestic Twenty20 Big Bash competition as early as next summer.
According to Malcolm Conn and Robert Craddock in the Tele, Gold Coast, Geelong, Canberra and Newcastle are all “in the running to have a Big Bash team as soon as next summer”.
But why?
Because the “reinvigorated Twenty20 competition continues to explode”, apparently. Quick, better call the bomb disposal squad to diffuse any further potential dangers, then.
Now, excusing the entirely separate (and ongoing) debate as to the exact value of T20 as a cricket format, is expanding the tournament really the smartest idea, particularly so soon?
Yes and no.
Most fans replying via the Tele and Fox comment lines suggest there isn’t enough depth to support two, three or four more teams at present.
It depends on what you think the T20 series is for, really. Is it supremely serious, top-flight cricket? Or just a highly-paid runaround for all concerned to give school kids on holidays something to watch during January? Probably the latter.
Dilution of talent? Not really a key issue if imports can be included in each team. Even from across the “ditch” in New Zealand. Or, be bold, brave and different and add to the current cap on internationals by giving every side the option of taking on a single International Cricket Council Associate or Affiliate player – you could have some of the best batsmen and bowlers from the likes of Ireland, Holland, Kenya and Afghanistan experiencing Australian conditions more often, possibly as a prelude to further one-day international tours by their native teams.
Incredibly, Cricket Australia’s Mike McKenna told Conn and Craddock that the Big Bash League wasn’t to be revamped into a city-based competition until 2013. That was news to me. Perhaps some extra thought could have gone into its formation then? Less silly names and shirt colours that don’t have much at all to do with each team would have been a start.
Melbourne Renegades in blue, Sydney Strikers in blue, Adelaide Reds in red, Perth Scorchers in tan-ish, dusty orange perhaps, Hobart Hurricanes (if they must) in predominantly Apple Isle green and the Brisbane Heat (if they must) in maroon and yellow. Enough said. Just about perfect, it would have been, too.
Anyway, also incredibly, planning was already taking place for a 10-team competition as part of a 20-year plan to take the Big Bash up to 2030 and beyond.
The two major options being considered during that timespan are, according to McKenna “more teams and more games”. More teams would mean more games, but more games shouldn’t be bolted onto the existing teams.
“Geelong, Gold Coast, ACT and Newcastle have populations which are attractive to us who aren’t served by international cricket,” McKenna said.
He may be right, but why not offer them a combination of international and domestic cricket. Why Canberra in particular hasn’t hosted more one-day internationals over the last decade remains a mystery well beyond the level of unfathomable to me.
Personally, I’m actually all for a strong, healthy and vibrant national T20 lueague. I’m also for fun, new ideas. I’m also for a degree of sanity and logic. If Cricket Australia is intent on turning every state and/or territory on to the joys of T20 cricket, then expansion is a reasonable step to consider. It’s how the administration goes about it that will make or break the competition.
There was probably some great merit in avoiding the two-team scenario in Melbourne and Sydney from the outset and placing two new sides from outside the main capital cities that already stage Sheffield Shield/Ryobi Cup matches. Geelong (or my preferred location, Bendigo) would have been fine within Victoria. Equally, Newcastle (as suggested already) or perhaps Gosford might have done the job in New South Wales. A joint venture between the local A-League, rugby league and cricketing identities could work a treat.
But the real kicker for me would have to be Canberra. The Capital Territory Comets were a brilliant addition to the old state one-day series back in the day and it was a shame to see them get forced out in favour of a strict six-side fixture set. Let’s bring the blue-and-yellows into the frame once more.
The Comets’ venue, Manuka Oval, is the new Hobart (or Cardiff) – the place that just needs an extra stand or two and some floodlights (which may be coming within the next couple of years, apparently) to give it extra calendar clout when it comes to attracting more games. Build it and they would come, as the old Field Of Dreams adage goes.
And then there’s the television side of things. Apparently Channel Nine can bid to show the Big Bash as early as two years away (the 2013-14 summer). Is it worthwhile? Provided it’s broadcast properly, in digital high definition – along with the Tests and World Series games – and not ruined by too much advertising, then yes.
And this is speaking as someone who still is on the fence about whether the Big Bash – in its new, spanglier format – is the right kind of presentation that T20 cricket deserves (or should have) in Australia.
Cricket Australia should sit back, wait a couple of years and reassess things in 2013. Maybe give a window of sorts to the tournament – around the majority of the Test series each summer, perhaps tied in more closely with the one-day international side of the calendar during mid-January to late February, but that discussion is for another day.
I suppose expansion talk is all well and good, but the proof comes with the practical, logistical side also making sense. Having invested so much in the re-branding the T20 competition this year, Cricket Australia wouldn’t want to press the even-faster-forward button too early by mistake and cause its Big Bash to become an equally Big Crash.
The Ashes journey begins
The Australian cricket team have left Australia to begin their tour of England, with a mission to reclaim the Ashes.
Australian captain Michael Clarke and his teammates were optimistic about their chances before jetting off.
Click here to hear the thoughts of our Australian cricket team as they left for England.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- England are a greatly overrated Test team (183)
- DIZZY: Australian bowlers look the goods for the Ashes (76)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (74)
- The Aussie cricket team aren’t THAT bad (58)
- Clarke take note: England has some weak points for Ashes (48)
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (46)
- DIZZY: It’s time for the Aussie batsmen to fulfill potential (43)
- Why Channel Nine will retain the international cricket TV rights (11)
- New Zealand shows fight, and then capitulates, again. (12)
- How can we win the Ashes? (47)
- I should have called Craddock: Warner (34)
- Aussies Abroad: Journeymen expats tear up early County season (33)
- Adam Gilchrist bows out Gangnam Style (3)
- Landmark day for women’s sport as cricket cuts a cheque (15)
- Why Channel Nine will retain the international cricket TV rights (11)
- New Zealand shows fight, and then capitulates, again. (12)
- How can we win the Ashes? (47)
- Aussies Abroad: Journeymen expats tear up early County season (33)
- Adam Gilchrist bows out Gangnam Style (3)
- The Aussie cricket team aren’t THAT bad (59)
- Australians off to win back the urn (1)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- BBL, Big Bash League, Cricket, Twenty20, Twenty20 cricket


January 12th 2012 @ 5:16pm
Redb said | January 12th 2012 @ 5:16pm | Report comment
CA need to sort out the congested cricket calendar before expanding the Bigbash. I heard Geelong was being considered, that would be 3 Vic teams which is too many. They should have put Geelong in from the start.
I think one dayers need to be scaled back to allow for more T20 cricket.
The TV ratings have been outstanding but dont kill the goose that lays the golden egg. There is such a thing as too much cricket.
January 12th 2012 @ 5:20pm
Ben Carter said | January 12th 2012 @ 5:20pm | Report comment
Hi Redb – yep. I would’ve gone for a Geelong team and one Melbourne city team to start with. And cut back the Ryobi Cup to a single set of matches (15 games, semis, final) to make it easier to schedule the Big Bash, but aside from that, it could, as you say, become too much of a (apparently) good thing…
January 12th 2012 @ 5:31pm
Working Class Rugger said | January 12th 2012 @ 5:31pm | Report comment
What you suggested Ben could have also applied to the Sydney teams. One in Sydney and another in say Newcastle from day one or at the very least place the Thunder further West in Western Sydney. In my opinion if any such expansion were to occur Canberra is an absolute must and I would shop around the prospect to the NZCB with the option of including NZ teams in the competition.
January 12th 2012 @ 5:33pm
Ben Carter said | January 12th 2012 @ 5:33pm | Report comment
Hi WCR – As far as I am aware the Kiwis want to build their own T20 competition (as you would!), but I’ve always thought that either a mega-series involving the teams from both countries OR an annual challenge match between the Trans-Tasman champions could be good….
January 12th 2012 @ 6:07pm
Working Class Rugger said | January 12th 2012 @ 6:07pm | Report comment
Absolutely, the Kiwi’s should look to build their own league. What I was thinking was more along the lines of say the top 2 teams from their competition participate in the Big Bash as an added extra to the own domestic structure. Rotating on a year by year basis depending on their respective standings. The commercial opportunity to introduce more games against different opposition could be somewhat attractive to them. Just a thought.
January 12th 2012 @ 5:33pm
Redb said | January 12th 2012 @ 5:33pm | Report comment
I think eventually we will end up with two forms of cricket, tests and T20. T20 has all the action elements of 50 over cricket but not the boring middle overs of 1s and 2s accumulation.
I know there is a One Day World Cup – but its better to concentrate on the traditional form of the game and the new generation version. T20 will grow interest in test cricket amongst the new generation they’re not interested in one dayers.
January 12th 2012 @ 5:36pm
Ben Carter said | January 12th 2012 @ 5:36pm | Report comment
Even as a cricket fan I might just (slightly) disagree (a bit). I am one of those weird people who absolutely loves ODIs. Personally, I believe they should now be cut back to 40 overs a side. T20 seems too short to some, 50 is probably too long nowadays. I like to still see an innings go for more than 90 minutes and have a bit of see-saw potential to it (unless you play for Sri Lanka, of course, judging by last night’s 43-run capitulation in South Africa)…
January 12th 2012 @ 5:38pm
Redb said | January 12th 2012 @ 5:38pm | Report comment
Its OK to disagree, I have almost zero interest in one dayers these days. I prefer test cricket full stop, but think if you want to entertain with extravagant but unorthodox batting T20 is the go.
January 12th 2012 @ 5:18pm
Ben Carter said | January 12th 2012 @ 5:18pm | Report comment
Response from Brendon Julian and Mark Waugh to the topic now at FOX sports website…
http://www.foxsports.com.au/cricket/domestic-cricket/fox-sports-kfc-t20-big-bash-league-experts-brendon-julian-and-mark-waugh-urge-caution-on-expansion/story-fn5k3es5-1226242722652
January 12th 2012 @ 5:35pm
Redb said | January 12th 2012 @ 5:35pm | Report comment
They are spot on re the thinning of talent. As the Bigbash grows and generates more interest and revenue the comp should be able to attract more players from around the world to fill teams. CA needs player supply to exceed demand first before expanding. Its the safer option.
January 12th 2012 @ 5:44pm
The_Wookie said | January 12th 2012 @ 5:44pm | Report comment
Way too early to start adding teams, no name talent wont help either. However the 20/20 monster is growing, and expect it on FTA in 2 years. That poses a challenge not just for cricket but for competing sports.
January 12th 2012 @ 10:19pm
Ben Carter said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:19pm | Report comment
Hi Wookie – dare I say it, if the Big Bash did go from strength to strength AND ended up being on Nine, what affect might that have on the A-League? Admittedly there would be some die-hards either way who couldn’t care less about the other sport, but some sports fans might think they’ll take an evening in front of the couch on free-to-air for cricket in mid-January over a drive down to their nearest A-League venue… Just a thought…
January 13th 2012 @ 1:50am
The_Wookie said | January 13th 2012 @ 1:50am | Report comment
20/20 turns cricket into the same kind of sport you can chill out for the afternoon without wasting the whole day. if ratings persist like this, then FTA would be mad not to bid for it when it can. Cricket has always been the nations great Sports Unifier. Sports nuts, be the League, Union or AFL generally fall into line with cricket season. Tests were too long for the casual observer and even ODIs literally take the whole day.
20/20 changes that, its not much longer than a football match, and so fits nicely onto tv, and can be scheduled easily. Morever with cricket behind it, and state cricket shareholders in the teams at present, theres no ground issues to negotiate. If the Bash season is extended next year, the A-league is going to lose a lot of those casual sports people looking for stuff to watch.
With that in mind, its not so much a threat to the A-league as it is to their hope of getting big money for tv rights, particularty on FTA where cricket has been a summer staple for years, and soccer hasnt had a lookin for some time. Current tv ratings have the bash miles ahead I believe – and they are both exclusively paytv. If theres one national team that can take on the Socceroos for popularity, its the Australian Cricket team.
Its all such a long call, but Cricket has great market power here, greater than probably any other sport because of its national reach, and huge public awareness.
January 13th 2012 @ 1:35pm
JamesP said | January 13th 2012 @ 1:35pm | Report comment
Les is already worried. I also posted this on another thread
http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/les-murray/blog/1088873/A-League-Big-Bashed
January 12th 2012 @ 5:52pm
Nathan of Perth said | January 12th 2012 @ 5:52pm | Report comment
Mother of god, Gold Coast, seriously? Everyone pursues glittering dreams of teams there but does it ever work out like people think it should?
But in general, definitely get BBL teams in new places. I think there’s enough depth to the talent in this country to support it; quite the contrary, I think we’ve had people withering on the vine without opportunities.
January 12th 2012 @ 6:28pm
sheek said | January 12th 2012 @ 6:28pm | Report comment
Nice article Ben.
You probably nailed it with this – “It depends on what you think the T20 series is for, really. Is it supremely serious, top-flight cricket? Or just a highly-paid runaround for all concerned to give school kids something to watch during January”.
For me, it’s a money grab, pure & simple.
Whether it’s sustainable in this day & age of the attention-deficit generation remains to be seen. I wouldn’t be prematurely declaring any victory just yet. They say that traditionally the second season is always tougher than the first season.
Someone might like to tell us how the IPL crowd figures & ratings have held up? How many years now – 5 or 6?
History is full of passing fads. The hula hoop, twist, cabbage patch dolls, streaking, rubik’s cube, chicken dance, teenage mutant ninja turtles, telly bubbies, macarena & planking are just a few I can think of off the top of my head. I’m sure everyone can come up with heaps more.
All the rage today, gone tomorrow. Or this season’s high fad, but forgotten next season.
I’ve made my peace with T20 – it’s probably here to stay whether I like it personally, or not. But that doesn’t mean I have to be continually exposed to the blindingly tasteless uniforms & totally meaningless nicknames.
I’m not sure it’s place is in senior cricket either. Most certainly use it in the junior forms. I like the idea of perhaps reducing limited overs cricket from 50 to 40 overs. I’m still a fan of limited overs cricket, even though our numbers are dwindling, Ben.
If the BBL proves to be sustainable, will CA resort to some traditional colours & names for its teams? So far 4 of the names refer to the weather – Thunder, Heat, Scorchers & Hurricanes. While the remaining 4 are heavily Americanised – Renegades, Stars, Strikers & Sixers (although the last two have some cricket relevance).
I find it intriguing how this totally contrived comp got off the ground. It has no roots in reality, no connection to history or tradition. It’s totally manufactured -the colours & the names. But then, the entire cyber world we occupy today is outside of reality also, isn’t it?
Mark Twain was an American, but still he is one of my favourite writers & humourists. Twain cautioned against jumping on the populist bandwagon – “Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause & reflect”.
I think we will have to wait & see if the BBL is still bringing the huge crowds & ratings in 3-5 years from now…..
January 12th 2012 @ 10:22pm
Ben Carter said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:22pm | Report comment
Hi Sheek – thanks for the compliment (they seem rare for most writers!). I agree – I’ve made my peace with T20 as a format of the game, but not quite made full peace with this particular competition.
Also agree I’ve thought for a while that T20 is arguably best served as a domestic/club/youth/schools initiative, along with an introductory option for Associate-level teams. T20 internationals between Test nations to me are not much more than warm-ups for one-day games.
Let us rally to our joint cause – ICC, we demand ODIs stay, the 40-over way! All together now…
January 12th 2012 @ 7:06pm
Gleeso said | January 12th 2012 @ 7:06pm | Report comment
Oh wow, a Big Bash article on the Roar…they suddenly dried up once it became a massive success.
January 12th 2012 @ 10:24pm
Ben Carter said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:24pm | Report comment
Hi Gleeso – heh, heh. Such a success that I’m still choosing to remain unimpressed (with the way Cricket Australia has formatted the thing!). I know some people probably reckon I’m becoming an early old git (I still like whole music albums, not singles, and to buy them on CD, not download!)… but this post is not about whether T20 is a fun way to pass three hours with some cricket to watch. It’s about whether the new format brought in this year is worthy of expansion so quickly.
January 12th 2012 @ 11:53pm
Gleeso said | January 12th 2012 @ 11:53pm | Report comment
Mate, I’ll give you credit, at least you’ve made an attempt at being slightly impartial…which is more than I can say for the Roar commentators in recent weeks.
And as for age…I reckon I might beat you on that one…I’ve been watching cricket since the late 70s and this has been one of the most exciting times for the sport. I’m overjoyed to see my young son and daughter get into the Big Bash and see the interest spread to test cricket where they can’t miss a ball of it.
You might think the names and colours are stupid but 440,688 people at an average of 18,362 a game to date don’t seem to mind. Not to mention the 300,000 watching each game on pay-TV.And if you want stupid and illogical foundations for sporting teams…how about any rugby code…based in Melbourne.
I think the Big Bash warrants expansion over the next couple of seasons and this is why:-
IHobart is a prime example:- you might think the name and colours of the team are silly…but try telling that to the almost 10% of that city who turn up to a sell-out game. Hobart is smaller in population to Newcastle, Gold Coast and Canberra and slightly larger than Geelong. Adelaide and Perth are also smaller cities with loyal following of the new teams.
*Geelong is a sporting town, despite being small. They average 20,000 at Simonds Stadium every Cats game. The Geelong public have been keen for a Big Bash team. No doubt the city will get behind a local team. Simmonds Stadium hosted a Big Bash game in 2009 with a crowd of 12,327. The facility is ready and only requires a drop-in pitch.
*I remember the days of the Canberra Comets, and like you, I thought it was a shame to see them go in what was a backward step. It’s a joke how this nation’s capital has been treated cricket-wise. Manuka Oval is a good facility and an upgrade with light towers is planned. If a T20 team was to start there the ACT Government could possibly fasttrack the project like it did with the Narrabundah Ballpark prior to the inaugural ABL season.
*Newcastle is more than twice as big as Hobart (546,788) and is the 7th largest city in Australia. they are parochial sports fans and are crying out for a cricket team. The problem with Newcastle is the lack of a decent facility, however with possible investors like Nathan Tinkler, who knows what might be possible with a Newcastle franchise.
*The Gold Coast-Tweed area is the 6th largest population centre in the country (approaching 600,000). All Gold Coast Stadium needs is a drop-in pitch and from all accounts would be a great place to watch cricket. A Gold Coast team would also proviide a local derby element with the Brisbane Heat.
As for format, I don’t see a problem with playing 5 tests (don’t think Hobart warrant one) in Nov-Dec-Jan with the last test at New Years in Sydney as in previous years. Sheffield Shield would be played throughout the majority of the test series. This will free test players up for most of January and into February.
In February, I wouldn’t mind seeing a T20 tri-series between Australia, a test playing nation and a minnow (Canada, Ireland, Scotland, Netherlands). I would give the minnow a 4-day first class match at Hobart against Australia A. This would raise the profile of the minnow country and expose it to greater first class competition.
I also think a small State-of-Origin T20 series might be an idea.
As the format is dying a natural death… I would ultimately like to see the 50-over domestic cut and a 3 game international ODI series held for postarity.
January 12th 2012 @ 7:47pm
Dylan said | January 12th 2012 @ 7:47pm | Report comment
I’ve only been to 1 big bash game this season & that was the thunder against the strikers at homebush, but looking at going next wednesday night to the scg. Kind of stuck who to follow between the sixers & the thunder considering I’m from Newcastle. Would support a Newcastle franchise, however we really don’t have the best facilities for it. Unless number sports ground gets a major renovation I’ll be making treks to Sydney too watch it. If it gets expanded next season Gold coast will be the next side in as metricon stadium doesnt have a summer tenant & is nice & new.
January 12th 2012 @ 10:07pm
Jason Cave said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:07pm | Report comment
I would best advise CA not to go at a million miles an hour and expand the Big Bash straight away. It’s better to wait 2-3 years and see how the competition evoles before growing it. They should have a slowly, slowly approach in regards to expansion. Maybe have a team representing the ACT in 2 years (Canberra) and a team representing the Northern Territory. Bring the NT team into the Big Bash one year after the admission of the ACT side.
January 12th 2012 @ 10:25pm
Ben Carter said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:25pm | Report comment
Hi Jason – totally agree. If Cricket Australia does insist on this new format, then Canberra’s got to be the next place for a team, no doubt.
January 13th 2012 @ 12:12am
Gleeso said | January 13th 2012 @ 12:12am | Report comment
I’m a former Territorian and would love to see it, but an NT team is completely unviable. Cricket in Darwin is played in the dry season which is the southern winter and football is played in the wet season during the Big Bash.
Marrara Oval during the time the Big Bash is on would be a quagmire from the footy and Messers Duckworth and Lewis would love it because a tropical downpour hits the place every evening.
Alice Springs plays cricket during the southern summer but it’s a town of 25,000 which makes it fairly unlikely.
Not gonna happen.
As for the Canberra Comets…it would be great to get Brad Haddin to captain them as someone who played in the original team. Maybe with the addition of Nathan Lyon and Michael Bevan as a coach there could be a real local flavour to the team.
January 12th 2012 @ 10:18pm
Chris said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:18pm | Report comment
CA should look to the A League for lessons on expanding too quickly into secondary markets.
The TV ratings have been great, but would adding teams in Geelong, Gold Coast or Canberra add to these figures significantly? The A League’s experience would say no. Let’s see how it goes in two or three years’ time before rushing to expand.
January 12th 2012 @ 10:50pm
James said | January 12th 2012 @ 10:50pm | Report comment
I wouldnt add new teams yet, i would expand the timeframe of the comp so it runs for another 1-2 weeks, golden opportunity missed to have the return melbourne derby at etihad and sydney derby at the scg…so plenty of room for growth in both crowds and tv numbers…but i’d hold out on adding new teams for now.