Is Michael Clarke set for another big score at Perth?
By Spiro Zavos, 13 Jan 2012 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, Michael Clarke, Test cricket
Australia's cricket captain Michael Clarke celebrates. AP Photo/Rob Griffith
Related coverage
Michael Clarke’s mammoth 329 not out at the SCG during the second Australia-India Test in the 2011/2012 summer boosted his Test average from 46 to 48. This is likely to be a one-off huge increase.
Outside of Don Bradman throughout his entire, and the occasional brilliant season by individual players, it is most unusual for a huge score to be followed by a sequence of very large scores.
There was a lot of talk about Sachin Tendulkar being a latter-day Bradman with his 99 centuries in international cricket. This is nonsense. Anthony Shillinglaw, an expert on Bradman’s unusual (and rarely copied) method of batting, ‘the Continuous Rotary Batting Process,’ has sent out statistics on Bradman’s which put all talk about comparisons into the ridiculous category.
Take this one Bradman statistic, for instance: first-class matches 338, not outs 43, highest score 452, aggregate 28,067, average 95.1.
For most batsmen, and Bradman again has to be regarded as an exception, the physical and mental effort involved in scoring a massive scores in a Test match, say, seems to effect their ability to score heavily for a while after. It’s as if batsmen have a quantum of runs in their locker in a season. If they exceed their average contribution for a match too excessively, then the ‘law of averages’ pulls them back for a while with low scores.
Towards the end of 2003, for instance, Matthew Hayden scored 380 against Zimbabwe at the WACA. He batted only five sessions. The physical and mental effort involved with the innings did seem to have an impact on his future scoring. Towards the end of 2004, according to his Wikipedia entry he ‘suffered a considerable form-slump’ which continued into 2005 when he averaged only 35.33 in the five-Test Ashes series.
Hayden scored a career-saving 138 in the Fifth Test at the Oval. Then in the 2005/2006 season it was business as usual for Hayden with three Test hundreds in three successive innings.
Incidentally, statistics suggest that Hayden has to be considered one of the greatest openers in the history of Test cricket. He scored the second most runs of any Test opener at an average of 50.7.
I reckon that because openers face the new ball and because it is hard for them to get not outs that an opener’s average should be boosted by about 8 runs an innings to get a fair balance with players batting down the list, like Clarke. Hayden also has the third best conversion rate in Test cricket for a long-term player with a century every 3.13 innings, behind Bradman (who else?) at 1.79 and Clyde Walcott at 2.93.
Getting back to Clarke, he has a history, as LeftArmSpinner pointed out on The Roar after the 329 not out score, of putting together a ‘mixed bag of high and low scores’. This season, for instance, against Sri Lanka he scored 23, 60, 13, 6, 112: against South Africa, 151, 2, 11, 2: against New Zealand, 139, 22, 0: and against India 31, 1 and 329.
So we have 15 innings here, four centuries and five scores under 10, seven under 14, with one not not out, for an impressive average of over 61 but with a median score of 22/23.
To a certain extent, Clarke’s method of going for the bowling from the start does not favour the accumulation of a huge average. He is a Doug Walters type of batsman. He scores so quickly, often in situations where no one else can get going, that he can win Tests with his batting.
The problem with this is that, so far, he has lacked consistency in his scoring. Perhaps you can’t have both, the flashing, helter-skelter scoring method and a high strike rate of big innings. But this is something that Clarke will have to work out as his career continues.
When Ponting and Michael Hussey drop out of the Test side, whenever that will be, Clarke will be left as the senior batsman and the only great batsman left in the side. He will probably have to take a bit more care about building bigger scores than he does now.
Perth’s WACA, a ground that gives full value to stroke-makers, is as good a time as any for Clarke to accept the problems he creates for his side when, as has happened this season, he has too many failures getting going. Once he has got past 31, his next ‘lowest’ scores have been 60 and 112.
A bit more care then in the early stages of his innings should be in order. For once Clarke gets going he scores so quickly he gives his bowlers plenty of time to get opposing sides out. As well, there is no better sight in world cricket, in terms of aesthetics, of Clarke in the zone smoothly, seemingly effortlessly and with great elegance, dispatching the bowling to all parts of the field.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, Michael Clarke, Test cricket


January 13th 2012 @ 7:04am
Frankie Hughes said | January 13th 2012 @ 7:04am | Report comment
The touch Pup has been in recent time, I wouldn’t be surprised if he scored 200+ at the WACA. Only concern is he was issues with the rising ball.
January 13th 2012 @ 8:30am
Jason said | January 13th 2012 @ 8:30am | Report comment
Actually Clarke has been feast or famine since he became captain. Recent experience would suggest he’ll be lucky to reach 20 for the rest of the series.
January 13th 2012 @ 11:59am
Brendon said | January 13th 2012 @ 11:59am | Report comment
Since taking full time captaincy Clarke is averaging 64.42 with 4 centuries from 9 tests. Thats a century every 2.25 tests.
Sounds like feast and little famine to me.
January 14th 2012 @ 1:44am
Jason said | January 14th 2012 @ 1:44am | Report comment
From the article above:
“So we have 15 innings here, four centuries and five scores under 10, seven under 14, with one not not out, for an impressive average of over 61 but with a median score of 22/23. ”
Sounds like much feast and much famine.
January 13th 2012 @ 8:42am
Vas Venkatramani said | January 13th 2012 @ 8:42am | Report comment
It’s the nature of batting Spiro that one ball can have your name on it. In this respect, a batsman only has once chance to make it right.
Clarke’s formline doesn’t suggest anything to unique about his situation compared to other batsmen. Every batsman is fallible to getting dismissed early before they are set. Rather than bad batting, I’d chalk that down to good bowling.
Of course, the best batsmen have a survival instinct early in their innings while settling before changing to a scoring instinct once they’re in.
But again, Clarke’s formline is nothing special. It’s a normal run of low and high scores, which suggest to me that he’s playing on pitches that seem to offer the bowlers something to work with, and that is definitely not a bad thing.
January 13th 2012 @ 9:27am
Al said | January 13th 2012 @ 9:27am | Report comment
Clarke should knock out a ton easily, matter of fact, it will be that easy he will have time to knock back a beer on the pitch and give a toast to the ground staff….. Who may or may not still be there….
January 13th 2012 @ 9:38am
TomC said | January 13th 2012 @ 9:38am | Report comment
It seems like a long bow that Hayden’s poor form in 2005 was influenced by a long innings in 2003. He had excellent series against India and Sri Lanka in 2004 immediately after the short Bangladesh series.
Hayden is certainly one of Australia’s best openers, but I think the qualifier to his fantastic average is that he played mostly in a decade when most international bowling attacks aside from Australia were relatively weak.
Otherwise, I think Spiro makes a lot of good points, particularly about Clarke’s struggle for consistency. This is even more important as captain of a team where every batsman seems to be struggling for consistency right now.
January 13th 2012 @ 12:10pm
Disco said | January 13th 2012 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
I recall Hayden struggling in New Zealand prior to the 2005 Ashes tour. Once there, according to the man himself, ‘Haydos’ struggled because the English bowlers bowled defensively at him – i.e. they bowled well and he couldn’t deal with it.
January 13th 2012 @ 9:43am
jameswm said | January 13th 2012 @ 9:43am | Report comment
Hayden scored 30 test centuries in 180 innings.
How is that a ton every 3.13 innings? It’s not even every 3.13 tests, though it’s close.
He passed 50 once very 3.12 innings – maybe that’s what you meant to say, Spiro?
January 13th 2012 @ 9:48am
Spiro Zavos said | January 13th 2012 @ 9:48am | Report comment
jameswm, the statistic was supposed to be Tests played. So it is a hundred in every 3.13 Tests played rather than an innings played. Somehow this thought became mixed up with innings played. I don’t know if I can blame the sub for this but someone (probably me) made the mistake. Thanks for picking it up.
January 13th 2012 @ 10:00am
jameswm said | January 13th 2012 @ 10:00am | Report comment
In that case spiro it’s 30 hundreds in 103 tests, which means a 100 once every 3.43 tests, not 3.13. Sorry to be pedantic, but I do like my maths and stats.
January 13th 2012 @ 10:18am
Brett McKay said | January 13th 2012 @ 10:18am | Report comment
Spiro, since we’re talking stats, did Bradman really play 338 first class matches?? Take out his 50-odd Tests, that’s still 280-ish state and tour games??
January 13th 2012 @ 9:52am
Happy Hooker said | January 13th 2012 @ 9:52am | Report comment
OK Spiro, let me see if I have got this straight. Clarke goes out and scores 329no, his average jumps from 46 to 48, which you say is likely to be a one-off huge increase.
So, you’re saying Clarke is not likely to score 329no every time he goes out to bat?
Well, thanks for that exclusive. All us Roarers are very lucky to have you to point that out for us.
January 14th 2012 @ 12:50am
AndyMack said | January 14th 2012 @ 12:50am | Report comment
Well said HH, wanted to say the same myself.
Batsmen score runs one day, miss out the next. Its the nature of cricket.
And the idea that Hayden’s 380 meant he couldnt bat for the next 18 months is quite laughable. OMG.
January 13th 2012 @ 9:58am
Chris said | January 13th 2012 @ 9:58am | Report comment
Clarke’s batting average has risen since he has taken on the captaincy. I think there are some other players who are performing far worse than Clarke who we should be a bit more concerned about…Marsh
January 13th 2012 @ 11:38am
Bearfax said | January 13th 2012 @ 11:38am | Report comment
Like I said before, Oz will have to learn how to score without always relying on Clarke, Ponting and Hussey, especially as the latter two are nearing the ends of their careers. Warner, Cowen and Marsh (though Warner’s fielding gives him an edge) must do their share of the scoring for a change, otherwise when Ponting and Hussey retire, get ready for a string of sub 100 innings totals.
And raising the ‘Bradman’ comparison doesnt much assist because he was a freak and quite possibly a once in a millenium occurrence.