The exclusive club of Australian glovemen
By sheek, 19 Jan 2012 The Crowd is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- alan knott, Australian Cricket, Brad Haddin, Cricket, Wally Grout, wicketkeepers
Related coverage
With all the speculation flying around about the future of Australian wicket-keeper Brad Haddin, I thought I would take the opportunity to look at the history of the men who have stood behind the stumps.
They are indeed an exclusive bunch.
In 135 years, only 31 men have been accorded the honour of wicket-keeper of the Australian cricket team. Of these, five played a single Test, one played two Tests, while eight played fewer than 10 Tests.
This leaves then just 17 men who kept wicket in 10 or more Tests. But only 11 men have kept wicket for Australia in over 20 Tests, making that a very exclusive club indeed.
Our very first long-term custodian was apparently right out of the top drawer – Jack Blackham. He played 35 tests from 1877-94. Some historians continue to argue that in pure terms, he remains the best keeper we’ve ever had.
Blackham was followed by Jack ‘Stumper’ Kelly, who was reputedly almost as good. Just as good or better in the eyes of some. Kelly played 36 Tests from 1896-1905.
Kelly was followed by Hanson ‘Sammy’ Carter, whose profession was an undertaker. Again, Carter was considered by some as being as good or even better than his predecessors.
Post World War I, Carter was good enough to keep the much younger Bert Oldfield out of the Test team, playing eight of 13 tests in 1920/21. Carter played 28 tests from 1907-21.
Oldfield finally made the position his for most of the inter-war years, playing 54 tests between 1920-37. Bradman thought Oldfield was our best keeper until Don Tallon came along.
There was a furore when the 22-year-old Tallon was omitted from the 1938 Ashes touring team. As it was, he had to wait until after World War II, when he was 30, before making his debut against New Zealand in 1946.
Tallon played 21 tests 1946-53, and is quite often regarded as our best keeper, batting aside. Even on this count, his first-class batting average was an excellent 30.
Gil Langley replaced Tallon as our premier keeper, playing 26 Tests from 1951-56. Although thickset, Langley was appeciated for his craft. Hot on the heels of Langley came one of our most beloved keepers, Wally Grout.
Like Kelly, Carter, Tallon and Langley before him, Grout was either 29 or 30 when he debuted. Generally speaking, our best keepers have had to bide their time.
Grout played 51 tests between 1957-66, then died tragically in 1968 at age 41 from a massive heart-attack. He gave his name to the rhyming slang for ‘your shout’.
Desiring another long-term keeper, the selectors took a punt in 1970 on Rod ‘Bacchus’ Marsh. Despite earning the insulting tag of ‘iron gloves’ early in his career, Marsh improved to the point where only the extraordinary Englishman Alan Knott was considered his superior throughout the 1970s.
Marsh ended up playing 96 Tests 1970-84. He was also an excellent bat in his early years, and was the first specialist Australian keeper to hit a Test century – 118 against Pakistan in 1972/73.
It wasn’t until Ian Healy was plucked almost from obscurity in 1988 that Australia found its next long-term custodian. Healy was our first (and so far only) keeping centurion, playing 119 Tests from 1988-99. Healy was named wicket-keeper in the Team of the Century announced in early 2000.
Despite his all-round greatness, Heals couldn’t keep Adam Gilchrist at bay forever, and Gilly’s batting alone demanded he be selected in the Test team.
Since then, Gilly has become recognised as our best ever keeper, largely on the basis of his explosive batting. He simply redifined the position of the number seven batsman-cum-wicket-keeper. Gilly played 96 Tests from 1999-2008.
Following Gilly is the now maligned Brad Haddin, who was always going to find it a hard act to follow Gilly. To date, Haddin has played 32 Tests since 2008.
Six other keepers managed to play 10-19 Tests, often waiting a long time for their opportunity. Barry Jarman toured South Africa in 1957/58, along with Grout. As the much younger man, Jarman was expected to claim the position, but alas, not so.
By the time Jarman did get it in 1967/68 he was 30, and he only played 19 Tests overall 1959-69. Jarman was replaced by Brian Taber, a tidy and effiecient keeper.
When Jarman was unavailable to tour South Africa again in 1966/67 (with Grout retired), Taber played the five Tests. He finished with 16 Tests from 1966-70.
Steve Rixon and Ken Wright were two of the three keepers used by Australia during the World Series Cricket dispute. Rixon eventually played 13 Tests from 1977-85, and Wright 10 Tests 1978-80.
Two more keepers reached double figure tests – Wayne Phillips kept wicket in 18 Tests in 1984-86, and Tim Zoehrer in 10 Tests 1986-87.
When Haddin is eventually pensioned off, who will be Australia’s next long-term keeper, and member of this very exclusive club?
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Selectors get it wrong with Warner call, again (74)
- Ricky Ponting, you are the weakest link: Goodbye! (66)
- Ponting punted from ODIs but can he still rise to the Test? (55)
- Channel Nine unwise to snub sub-continent clash (44)
- Australia lose but Forrest stands out from the trees (41)
- Ponting dropped from One Dayers (38)
- Why Ponting should stay and we should let him (32)
- Allan Border Medal preview: Who can outshine Clarke?
- Ponting’s being self-indulgent, says Lawson (19)
- Aussies get message from Ponting axing
- Siddle shielded from ODI cricket duties (4)
- Clarke to win the 2012 Allan Border Medal (2)
- Memories of the Master Blaster’s greatest Test innings (3)
- Why Ashwin’s Mankad was a legitimate dismissal (8)
- Clarke to win the 2012 Allan Border Medal (2)
- Memories of the Master Blaster’s greatest Test innings (3)
- Is Ponting’s decision to play on the right one? (9)
- The Mankad: Ashwin-Thirimanne, ethics and the law in the gentleman’s game (32)
- How far can Ricky Ponting go? (1)
- India vs Sri Lanka, Gabba ODI: cricket live scores, commentary (197)
- Ricky Ponting, you are the weakest link: Goodbye! (67)
- Explore:
- alan knott, Australian Cricket, Brad Haddin, Cricket, Wally Grout, wicketkeepers

January 19th 2012 @ 8:03am
Jeff Dowsing said | January 19th 2012 @ 8:03am | Report comment
Very interesting piece – Australia have been blessed for glovemen over the history of test cricket. It’s a tough career choice when you consider how few cricketers make the national team and only one stands behind the stumps.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
January 19th 2012 @ 8:04am
Redb said | January 19th 2012 @ 8:04am | Report comment
Good article Sheek, a nice trip down memory lane. Rod Marsh remains my favorite keeper his combo with Lillee the stuff of legend (and to a lesser extent Thommo).
Australia was very lucky to have Marsh, Healy & Gilchrist as highly competent keeper-batsmen for almost 4 decades. Haddin pales in comparison but his test average is not his downfall. 2011/12 has been a nightmare for him, his batting has deteriorated and his keeping with it. Time to go.
I rate Wade as the next keeper-batsmen, though many pin their hopes on Paine. According to the experts Wade’s batting is solid and his keeping improving. Hopefully, “Wade for the Windies” will be the mantra the selectors adopt.
January 19th 2012 @ 8:39am
sheek said | January 19th 2012 @ 8:39am | Report comment
Redb,
I agree with you – Marsh is my personal favourite; Healy the best if you combine keeping & batting; but Gilchrist claims the spot (if picking an all-time Aussie XI) simply because of the brutal power of his batting, while his keeping was adequate.
The Englishman Alan Knott however, is the best keeper-batsman I’ve seen in my time, since from about 1967/68.
January 19th 2012 @ 9:16am
Justin said | January 19th 2012 @ 9:16am | Report comment
Yes Gilchrist was just ridiculous with bat and not too shabby with the gloves. He always kept pretty well to Warne and the quicks without being a remarkable gloveman.
I would love to see how many Tests Gilly essentially won off his own bat???
January 19th 2012 @ 10:52am
Redb said | January 19th 2012 @ 10:52am | Report comment
Totally agree on a best XI that Gilchrist would be my pick also. Just loved ‘Bacchus’, still remember a one day game at the Adelaide Oval where he kept plonking the ball over the mid wicket fence (those short boundaries the commentators kept saying).
January 19th 2012 @ 8:49am
jameswm said | January 19th 2012 @ 8:49am | Report comment
Good stuff Sheek
Haddin was woeful last night. Letting byes through, out 2nd ball to a nothing shot, dropped a catch.
His keeping to spinners is awful. I thought the gloves were supposed to stay down till the ball bounced, and come up with it?
As for our next – could be Paine, Wade or Nevill. Nevill is the longshot of the 3, but has the best batting record (FC average a whisker under 50 and rising).
January 20th 2012 @ 3:31am
AndyMack said | January 20th 2012 @ 3:31am | Report comment
Imagine the Victorians outrage if Neville was picked before Wade….. Might be worth doing it just for the amusement it would cause me.
But seriously, I think Wade should be in the team now.
Great article, good memories. We have been blessed with good keepers for sure, not just good with gloves and bat, but very likeable guys as well.
January 19th 2012 @ 8:49am
Brett McKay said | January 19th 2012 @ 8:49am | Report comment
Nice one Sheek, a great history. Would you say Jack Blackham was the best ‘keeper you ever saw??
As Jeff mentioned at the top, it’s quite extraordinary that Australia has still only used 427 Test players since 1877. When Brad Haddin was awarded the 400th Baggy Green, England had already used upwards of 640 players in the same period. When you point out that only 31 players have donned the gloves, you’ve quite correct in describing it as an exclusive club.
For the future, Paine, Wade and Nevill are going to be the obvious names thrown up, but I’ll add one more for a just a little further down the track. Wade’s no.2 for Victoria is a young ex-ACT ‘keeper-batsman named Ryan Carters, who the Vic picked up straight out of school (Carters is also ridiculously smart, high-90s for his UAC score). Carters is 21, but has already played 6 first class games since debuting against an English XI last summer. He played a couple of Shield games as a specialist batsman. Certainly one to watch..
January 19th 2012 @ 8:59am
sheek said | January 19th 2012 @ 8:59am | Report comment
You velly funny man Blett……….
January 19th 2012 @ 9:26am
Brett McKay said | January 19th 2012 @ 9:26am | Report comment
sorry, couldn’t resist..
January 19th 2012 @ 9:35am
sheek said | January 19th 2012 @ 9:35am | Report comment
Brett,
‘Black Jack’ Blackham was just before my time, but I think both Spiro & David knew him…..!!!
January 19th 2012 @ 8:59am
B.A Sports said | January 19th 2012 @ 8:59am | Report comment
Interesting that all of our more recent keepers have come into criticism for their keeping ability at various stages of their careers. Marsh was tagged “Iron Gloves”, it was always suggested that Gilchrist was not as good a gloveman as Berry and others in state cricket, even Healy was nicknamed “prawns” for a while there (because if you left him in the sun too long he stunk). Also interesting that given it’s uniqueness as a position and that so few people in the public /media have any idea about the intricacies of wicket keeping, that so many feel they are qualified to criticise our keepers.
January 19th 2012 @ 9:02am
sledgeross said | January 19th 2012 @ 9:02am | Report comment
Yeah Brett, heard some buzz about Carters (not that you would be ACT biased though mate).
Interesting for me are the stop-gap keepers, blokes like Phil Emery (who forced Gilly to head west) and Manou, who only play a test or two.
January 19th 2012 @ 9:24am
Brett McKay said | January 19th 2012 @ 9:24am | Report comment
Sledgie, I started hearing about this 15yo kid playing first grade here when I was still playing, but I never actually got to see him keep live until about his second-last game in Canberra. He’s always been a good bat, his maiden first grade 100 was in a GF as a 17yo, and he pretty much went to Melbourne the following year. So yeah, obviously there’s a bit of local pride in throwing his name up, but in truth, I don’t know him, he didn’t play for my club, and I really never saw him play. But a lot of good judges around the traps have been talking about him for a long time now, and that’s good enough for me..
January 19th 2012 @ 9:25am
Brett McKay said | January 19th 2012 @ 9:25am | Report comment
that, Sledgie, and he’s done very well since getting into the Vics system, obviously…
January 19th 2012 @ 9:14am
sheek said | January 19th 2012 @ 9:14am | Report comment
Thanks guys,
What I find interesting is the huge variance over history as to who is actually our best keeper. The candidates are many. In this respect, it tells us that our standard of keepers has been extraordinarily high, almost certainly more so than any other country.
Perhaps Gilly is today acclaimed as our best because his batting removes the argument over pure keeping skills. Otherwise, the arguments might be endless & inconclusive!
Keeping genius is highly subjective. Is it the number of dismissals per test, or the ability to take that rare catch or stumping when it presents itself? Does the number of dropped catches come into play? But then, who’s kept a 100 year record of that?
One study, about a decade ago, determined keeping greatness by the number of byes conceded per runs made. And on that count, from memory, Sammy Carter was judged the best.
But there are so many variables. The poor condition of a wicket can hinder tidy keeping. And any good keeper needs his bowling attack to provide him with opportunities.
From Blackham to Kelly to Carter to Oldfield to Tallon to Langley to Grout to Marsh to Healy to Gilchrist, the standard has been exemplary. Haddin can perhaps thank his lucky stars the selectors wanted a mini-Gilly to follow him. That is, someone who batted quite well while keeping adequately.
January 19th 2012 @ 1:40pm
Jason said | January 19th 2012 @ 1:40pm | Report comment
“Keeping genius is highly subjective. Is it the number of dismissals per test, or the ability to take that rare catch or stumping when it presents itself? Does the number of dropped catches come into play? But then, who’s kept a 100 year record of that? ”
Yeah, it’s a hard one. If a keeper drops a tough chance does it actually mean he is worse than the other guy who would have even made it into a chance in the first place?
In my view, the best judges of the quality of the keepers are the bowlers. If you prefer A over B it’s probably because you’ve seen enough of A to think that they will make and take more chances. Obviously across eras and different teams it is harder to compare but it’s a decent starting point.
January 19th 2012 @ 3:22pm
Australian Rules said | January 19th 2012 @ 3:22pm | Report comment
Gilchrist once said that dropping a catch, as wicketkeeper, was the worst feeling he had in cricket…because you’re denying your teammate a wicket, often after they’ve spent over after over charging in all day in the sun.
He said he’d much rather score a duck, than drop one catch for the whole match.
Always thought that was interesting, and underscored his own sense of his job as a wicketkeeper first, batsman second.
January 20th 2012 @ 1:28pm
JohnB said | January 20th 2012 @ 1:28pm | Report comment
Another thing making comparison difficult is the change in the approach to standing up to the stumps to the quicker bowlers. Now it’s a bit of a surprise tactic if there’s a military medium on. I gather pre-WWII the keeper often stood up to even the quicker medium pace bowlers (say someone like Zaheer Khan or maybe Trent Copeland) and would virtually always stand up to anyone slower than that. That and perhaps the greater proportion of overs bowled by spinners in the past (or maybe changes to pitches or batting approaches or equipment – or something else!) may also account for the relatively small number of dismissals the older keepers took per game. Maybe the greater use of spinners in the past (and that standing up tendency) put more focus on pure keeping skills, with batting looked on as more ancillary?
January 19th 2012 @ 11:50am
Jeff Dowsing said | January 19th 2012 @ 11:50am | Report comment
What kind of bowlers they’re keeping to is pretty important. Marsh gets marked down for his keeping to spinners but how often was he actually keeping to spinners – at least spinners of any great note? But to Lillee, Thompson & co, he was sensational and that contributed to most of our test wins of his era anyway.
Probably one of the best all round keepers Australia has seen never played for Australia; Darren Berry.
January 19th 2012 @ 12:03pm
sheek said | January 19th 2012 @ 12:03pm | Report comment
Warnie often felt his good mate Berry should have got a few caps at least. But he had two guys named Healy then Gilchrist to contend with.
January 19th 2012 @ 1:44pm
The Barry said | January 19th 2012 @ 1:44pm | Report comment
I often think Gilchrist’s keeping is marked down because he was such a good batsman. Although time dims the memory I don’t recall him missing too many chances, or having any sort of extended period where his keeping wasn’t up to scratch. He had to keep to Warne for most of his career, which must be one of the tougher assignments for a keeper. He also had to keep to a 150+ kph bowler in Brett Lee and everything in between. Again, I don’t recall him duffing too many chances.
Sheek – do you or anyone else have any idea why it took so long for the keeper-batsman role to take hold in cricket as it has now rather versus the pure keeper? One idea I had was that maybe there were more bowling all-rounders historically so the keeper-allrounder wasn’t as necessary – but I haven’t seen anything that shows that was the case.
The keeper-batsman is an absolute must now – but it took 100 years to get here…
January 19th 2012 @ 2:46pm
sheek said | January 19th 2012 @ 2:46pm | Report comment
The Barry,
That’s a very good question. And I don’t claim to have a right-up answer.
In the 1800s the keepers were almost always in the last 3 batting positions. And that continued in many cases right up to the end of the 60s. Obviously, keeping ability was considered paramount above all else.
It might also be that at training, before the introduction of nets, the keeper fielded to everyone else while they took turns at both batting & bowling. Other than that, I can’t give you a definitive answer.
From the top of my head, the first two keeper-batsmen as such, at the beginning of the 30s,were the Englishman Les Ames, & the South African Jock Cameron. Why it took so long for the keeper-batsman to evolve is an intriguing question indeed.
The cricket wicket-keeper can be viewed in a similar light to the rugby union & league fullback. Until just after WW2, the fullback was generally seen as the custodian of the last line of defence. He was supposed to be safe & sure. Position himself in the right place at all times, kick well & defend well. That was it.
Slowly, the idea fermented that the fullback was being under-utilised, & could also be a very powerful counter-attacking weapon. Today, we must look back in bemusement that the position was once viewed so conservatively. It’s the same I guess, with wicket-keeping.
Today, it won’t matter how brilliant a keeper you are, if you can’t also score runs reasonably well.
January 20th 2012 @ 1:45pm
Jason said | January 20th 2012 @ 1:45pm | Report comment
There have always been top shelf batsmen who have also kept. You mention Ames above – he scored over 100 first class tons but as a keeper batsman in Tests never really performed to that level (at least against Australia). Fred Spofforth famously boycotted the first ever test because Billy Murdoch wasn’t chosen as the keeper. (Murdoch of course being a fine batsman who scored Test cricket’s first ever double ton).
What Gilchrist did was perform at as BOTH a keeper and batsman which I think the evidence of history shows is not easy to do. The likes of Sanga and Walcott all had far better test averages than Gilchrist but if you look at their records while keeping they aren’t as good. Sanga averaged 42 as a keeper and about 65 when batting only. Only really Andy Flower has a comparable long term record as a keeper and batsman although Prior is proving an excellent batsman as well.