Jim Magilton is confident he can get Melbourne Victory firing again AAP Image/Joe Castro
Related coverage
Back in October last year, The Australian’s chief sportswriter, the curmudgeonly Patrick Smith, tackled his onset of post-AFL season blues by opining on the then hoopla surrounding the start of the A-League season, the Melbourne Spring racing carnival and even the NBL.
The headlines and column inches hijacked by Harry Kewell and Black Caviar must have been headache inducing and his column amounted to a lamentable piece of wishful thinking.
“This weekend these sports – soccer, basketball and racing – will get publicity they do not normally generate or deserve.”
“History says once the wave of interest has washed away, the sports will shrink back into their own mediocrity. And ponder what might have been.”
Three months later Mr. Smith’s prediction of football’s decline into mediocrity is predictably off the mark as the A-League keeps producing an increasing number of high quality matches and a growing appreciative audience.
I sincerely doubt Mr. Smith has noticed.
However, when it comes to “undeserved” publicity, I have good news for Mr. Smith.
In scenes not witnessed since the bad old days of the NSL, one of the most critical matches of the season for Melbourne Heart was criminally ignored in The Age last Saturday.
The substantial 20 page sports section managed to have less column inches on the A-League than what most Australian men pack away in their budgie smugglers sans d’eau froide.
Don’t believe me. Here’s the proof. The piece was only 139 words.
“Melbourne Heart will tonight look to solidify its place in the top three by rebounding from last week’s disappointing 2-1 loss to Perth.”
This was the sum total of what we learned about the home town team as they prepared their match against the formidable Brisbane Roar.
It was also inaccurate as this one solitary line failed to mention Heart’s more recent loss to the Mariners.
Last week I wrote that a “finals run is paramount for the Red and White as they battle to win the hearts and minds of the Melbourne sporting public”
An important part of this battle entails publicity to generate interest and increase attendances. The indifference coming from the “serious” newspaper in town doesn’t help Melbourne Heart’s cause.
Some would say that Heart’s sponsorship by “tabloid” rival the Herald Sun has contributed to this state of affairs.
If only it were that simple. Newspapers are no strangers to commercial imperatives that override sensible editorial policies and dictate budgets.
The Age shares the same building in Melbourne with the most vehemently anti-football radio station in Melbourne, the Faifax owned 3AW. With newspaper budgets being slashed as they slowly head the way of the dinosaur, focusing on making the most of where you investment lies becomes paramount.
It is called laying your eggs in the one basket.
On February 19 2007, The Age produced one of the most startling front pages in its long history. A massive headline, the size of which is normally reserved for the declaration of war, cheekily trumpeted the “JOY OF SIX” to celebrate Melbourne Victory’s deflowering of Adelaide United in the A-League Grand Final.
The Age’s editor back then was football mad Mancunian, Andrew Jaspan, and Faifax’s commercial arrangement, since lapsed, with Melbourne Victory saw the thoughts of Archie Thompson and Kevin Muscat grace the pages of the Sunday Age.
It would have been enough to send Mr. Smith around the bend.
And for some senior Age journalists it actually did.
In April 2008, Crikey reported that “they demanded a protocol governing the newspaper’s many “partnerships” and “sponsorships” to protect editorial independence.”
“The statement details six incidents that “can be documented” and together “create the impression that the paper is now willing to court favour with vested interests.”
One of the six incidents included:
“Sports coverage – ‘special relationships’ with organisations such as Telstra Dome and the Melbourne Victory Football Club “risk corrupting normal news judgement.”
Was this an example of football, as Patrick Smith put it, “getting the publicity they do not normally generate or deserve.”
Publicity reserved for other sporting codes.
Athas Zafiris is on Twitter @ArtSapphire
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- A-League, football, melbourne heart, Melbourne Victory


January 25th 2012 @ 3:10am
Axelv said | January 25th 2012 @ 3:10am | Report comment
Did this also coincide with The Age ending their sponsorship with the Victory?
What an absolute joke, purely disgusting.
Getting information of what we want to know about, and being told information of what they think we should know about are two entirely differently ways of delivering news.
No wonder I never read The Age anymore (includes online) . Michael Lynch’s writing has also gone rapidly down hill. Although if it weren’t for The Age, I would not have known that the 1st season of the A-League even existed, it was my only medium at the time to learn about the A-League and the Melbourne Victory. Since then I was reading columns about Melbourne Victory games from Michael Lynch, articles from Archie Thompson (In one he apologized for his bad form on the field) and Muscat. In the last couple of years I have noticed there has been next to no coverage of MV or the A-League, this explains everything.
January 25th 2012 @ 5:48am
Kasey said | January 25th 2012 @ 5:48am | Report comment
I just don’t understand the mentality of the zealot-monocoders like Smith. Does he expect AFL to be played year round? Does he not like cricket? I have lived in every mainland capital city over the last 15 years and for years now I’ve suspected that Melbourne’s rabid infatuation with AFL has lead to it being the most “unfriendly towards football” media market in the land. I regularly get howled down by the pro-Melbourne lobby on here who throw out random incidents like HK on the Footy show and the like to prove that: yes Melbourne is the sporting capital of the universe!, but in terms of mainstream media coverage, I’m afraid Adelaide and even Perth has its big brother beat hands down. Not a day goes by over Summer that the Advertiser(NewLtd) has an AUFC story in its sport pages. It all seemed to start around the time that United went on that epic ACL run. We didn’t win the title, but we seemed to win something more important…a solid place on the cities crowded sports landscape. Thanks to Perth’s last 5 years in the NSL, where they dominated and won titles, despite the lean times of recent, there exists a solid fanbase in Perth just waiting for the club to turn around its mediocrity and you see it in the papers, Glory are still the obvious number 3 behind the Weagles and the Shockers, but as in Adelaide, following the Glory/United is viewed as a valid choice.
January 25th 2012 @ 1:23pm
Tigranes said | January 25th 2012 @ 1:23pm | Report comment
Kasey
the Force get far bigger crowds than Glory do these days, so Im not sure if Glory are still the obvious No. 3 in Perth.
January 25th 2012 @ 2:24pm
bob said | January 25th 2012 @ 2:24pm | Report comment
who are the force?
January 25th 2012 @ 7:49pm
Nathan of Perth said | January 25th 2012 @ 7:49pm | Report comment
Western Force, RU
January 25th 2012 @ 7:22am
crashy said | January 25th 2012 @ 7:22am | Report comment
Comon guys- let’s get over this seige mentality complex. Couldn’t care less about AFL but Victorians are fiecelt protective of their code . The same thing can be said about rugby league in the Telegraph in NSW.
Assoc football is massive so don’t worry about the small stuff!
January 25th 2012 @ 8:30am
McGr1me said | January 25th 2012 @ 8:30am | Report comment
Please don’t bring up the Terrorgraph.
Last week this rag had 2 full pages of soccer running up to the Mariners (1st) Vs Heart (3rd)
Problem was there was no “A” League mentioned.
The 4 or 5 articles were all about the Premier League & European transfer rumors.
January 25th 2012 @ 8:53pm
c said | January 25th 2012 @ 8:53pm | Report comment
Yeah was is it with all this epl coverage (and of course coverage of any international negative football event) to the exclusion of our teams
January 25th 2012 @ 3:56pm
gumpy said | January 25th 2012 @ 3:56pm | Report comment
Well I’m a proud Victorian and I can categorically state I couldn’t give a tinker’s cuss about ‘AFL’ – in no small part due to years of being expected to cop the crap dished up by the Patrick Smiths of the world. Mind you, he took a sly dig I dished out to him on talkback radio a while back fairly well, which hints he might possess a sense of humour after all. In any case, he(and most others of his ilk) will either be slumming it in the nursing home or the grave within 20+ years, so it’ll be all good in the end.
January 25th 2012 @ 7:44am
Redb said | January 25th 2012 @ 7:44am | Report comment
What say you Athas about the noticeable increase in A League coverage in the much despised Herald Sun, is this paper not part of the Melbourne sports media? Hmmm…
Havent noticed any drop off in the Age, I look at the online version daily on my mobile and there have been many occasions when A League stories have been listed first or in front of biggish cricket articles.
Please don’t channel Les Murray it leads to a life of bitterness.
January 25th 2012 @ 10:40am
Qantas supports Australian Football said | January 25th 2012 @ 10:40am | Report comment
Les Murray is in my view is the best Football journalist in Australia. Thank God he has stayed around long enough to allow younger enterprising football writers to follow his lead—the likes of Craig Foster, Ned Zelic, David Zdrilic, now leading the charge to give football its rightful voice in Australian media. Finally football analysis is so much more readable with these men. Also not forgetting we have some women football journalists who are making a good fist of it as well. The future is very bright even tho the usual anti-football detractors do their darndest to damage Football’s image.
January 25th 2012 @ 12:08pm
Brian said | January 25th 2012 @ 12:08pm | Report comment
do you work at SBS or are you taking the mickey?
January 25th 2012 @ 12:29pm
Kasey said | January 25th 2012 @ 12:29pm | Report comment
With all due respect to Lazlo Urge, he is unfortunately tarting to show signs of some of the traits we find annoying in football hating media types. An inability to recognize that things have changed and that a new reality exists. I personall think Les is still stuck in the SW&P era and has failed to recognize that the advent of the HAL has largely moved he game beyond that. He is like the CIA, still valiantly fighting an old war. He also sems to be suffering from a crippling dose of relevance-deprivation syndrome. Now that fox has all the football, something I just don’t think SBS has ever accepted. I watched the most recent episode of TWG and poor old les seemed to just be like that grandpa that wakes up for moments of lucidity and then fdes out into mumbling about old things. I thought Ned Zelic would jump out of his seat with impatience waiting for the old guy to finish his sentence.
January 25th 2012 @ 1:46pm
Qantas supports Australian Football said | January 25th 2012 @ 1:46pm | Report comment
So you would prefer Robbie Slater’s racism rhetoric. God how pathetic was that outburst? At least Les has sophistication dignity and style going for him. Something that the well respected Martin Tyler recognises with his continued association with SBS and Les Murray. There’s no substitute for class my friend.
January 25th 2012 @ 12:14pm
Danny_Mac said | January 25th 2012 @ 12:14pm | Report comment
Hmmmm, is that the same les murray that had to retract a fairly lengthy section of a book published regarding Lucas Neill and Pim Verbeek during the 2010WC? the same Craig Foster that practically racially abused the new victory coach, and the same Zelic that pundits for FoxSports?
January 25th 2012 @ 12:32pm
philipcoates said | January 25th 2012 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
Must be taking the Mickey. I tolerate Les like you might tolerate an old uncle who has a lot of wisdom but occasionally seems to be pining for the good old days. Foster is a tele-evangelist preacher who has lost all sense of perspective . Unfortunatly, for me, his knowledge and insight is overwhelmed by his overly robust opinions and an almost inability to say anything positive or constructive unless it’s Barca. And Zelic is a raving nut who makes little sense at the best of times.
January 25th 2012 @ 4:11pm
Brian said | January 25th 2012 @ 4:11pm | Report comment
Les usually has to look at his paper to know the score at half time. 99% of what he says could have been drafted before the game started.
January 26th 2012 @ 12:42am
asanchez said | January 26th 2012 @ 12:42am | Report comment
There has been a decent increase in A-league coverage and stories in the Herald Sun this year.
They have recruited David Davutovic as their number 1 Football man, so this is why.
And he’s done very well so far, with some cracking articles.
There has definitely been a drop off from The Age on the A-league this season. A couple of years ago, when they sponsored Melbourne Victory, there was soccer stuff all the time. Michael Lynch, who is their chief football writer as they say, would be lucky to write an article every 4 or 5 days, sometimes weekly on the A-league.
The 2 papers have totally reversed roles.
January 25th 2012 @ 8:14am
philipcoates said | January 25th 2012 @ 8:14am | Report comment
This article tells us nothing we don’t already know. When MVFC was sponsored by The Age they got excess coverage. 3AW is listened to by red necks and bogans and heavily covers AFL and no mention of A league. Seems to me to be normal business. I don’t listen to classic FM radio and expect top 40 hits. Media play to their markets.
That said, I get all my reading on-line and I think The Age and The Herald Sun do a fair job and always have news reports on football despite the odd example that was used in this piece.
Agree with Redb, don’t channel Les and end up bitter and twisted.
January 25th 2012 @ 8:57am
Australian Rules said | January 25th 2012 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Couldn’t have said it better Phil.
When in Melb recently I saw coverage of the A-League in both papers, seemed pretty good. My local rags have little AFL content in winter so I go on-line…problem solved.
January 25th 2012 @ 8:16am
crashy said | January 25th 2012 @ 8:16am | Report comment
Small clarification Kasey. The western Force are number 3.
January 25th 2012 @ 10:21am
Kasey said | January 25th 2012 @ 10:21am | Report comment
So out of the entire conversation, the point you wish to debate is the relative position in the sporting hierarchy of Weagles, Shockers, Force and Glory?
One of those interesting ‘I wonder’ conversations often seen on the Adelaide United message boards, isthe how long until United overtake Port Power in the Adelaide Rankings? FWIW, I honestly think we could sell out Hindm,arsh every game for 2 seasonsa and because this is an AFL (ARF) state, a Port player breaking wind at training would still get more coverage than many United stories.
January 25th 2012 @ 12:52pm
The_Wookie said | January 25th 2012 @ 12:52pm | Report comment
Ive thought this for some time. Port could well be surpassed by United in the future, but theyd need a bigger stadium. Adelaide United gets pretty good coverage during the summer. From memory, so did the Rams.
January 25th 2012 @ 6:01pm
Ben of Phnom Penh said | January 25th 2012 @ 6:01pm | Report comment
I’ve generally thought of the Adelaide media as being rather fairer to football compared to some other regions.
January 25th 2012 @ 8:31am
Dean said | January 25th 2012 @ 8:31am | Report comment
Why would anyone of reasonable intellect, who has access to the internet (smart phone, tablet, computer) be reading The Age or the Herald Sun? There are so many valuable news sources, with articles that are beautifully written by respected journalists, available at the touch of a button, so what possible value are either of these substandard local publications? People, who continue to read The Age & Herald Sun deserve what they receive. It’s not a case of “buyer beware” it’s a case of “buyer you know exactly what you’re getting so stop complaining”.
January 25th 2012 @ 8:41am
BigAl said | January 25th 2012 @ 8:41am | Report comment
help us out here deano – what is your recommended reading list
January 25th 2012 @ 8:56am
Dean said | January 25th 2012 @ 8:56am | Report comment
Australian news: ABC24 (tv); ABC News website; AM, PM (ABC Radio)
World news: SBS1 World News
Business news (& good coverage of Australian politics): AFR
Sport: pick your sport and find a sport-specific website
January 25th 2012 @ 9:41am
BigAl said | January 25th 2012 @ 9:41am | Report comment
Wouldn’t argue about any of that lot – and would include The Age there.
Even the HUN has its place in a diverse media landscape – otherwise it would cease to exist
January 25th 2012 @ 10:13am
Dean said | January 25th 2012 @ 10:13am | Report comment
BigAl if I want to know if some AFL or cricket player’s wife/girlfriend broke her toenail, yes, the Herald Sun is an invaluable addition to my daily news input. However, I’m not so inclined. I put it to you that there is not a single real news story that appears in The Age/Herald Sun and is not available on the ABC news website. So, I stand by my original comment: if anyone is after real news stories (not celebrity gossip, or reports on every car accident or assault in Victoria) there is no reason for anyone to be reading substandard publications like The Age or Herald Sun.
And, in my opinion, both these local publications will cease to exist within the next 10 years. Circulation figures are shocking at The Age and have been in free-fall at Herald Sun. I’d be surprised if even 10% of people under the age of 30 buy even one newspaper a year.
January 25th 2012 @ 9:51am
trent said | January 25th 2012 @ 9:51am | Report comment
I have to say that The Age can be an excellent read – especially on Saturday – and with the SMH is perhaps the best major daily paper* in Australia. Admittedly, the competition is incredibly awful,and they’re a significant step down in quality from the Guardian/Observer in the UK.
I’m no Fairfax employee or flag waver, but I’ve had a look at almost every paper in Australia at one time or another and those two are head and shoulders above the rest.
As for SBS, their news service has gone down the gurgler over the past few years, especially after Mary Kostakidis left. Too many pointless stories from US/UK news services that have little relevance to Australia (such as Harry Redknapp’s tax trial story last night – why the hell is that considered important news here?).
*does not include the Sunday Age.
January 25th 2012 @ 10:30am
Dean said | January 25th 2012 @ 10:30am | Report comment
trent, what’s the attraction of reading a newspaper when it contains stories that are 8-24 hours old? It’s no longer “news” by the time it appears in the newspapers the following morning. Surely, if you have access to the internet, by the time a news story is written, edited, printed & delivered you’ve read that same story multiple times on-line or heard the story multiple times on radio & tv?
January 25th 2012 @ 11:14am
trent said | January 25th 2012 @ 11:14am | Report comment
Yes, I can and do get the latest news as it happens on my PC/iPhone, but big deal. The Age has some excellent writers (and a few … ones – basically any AFL writer who turns his hand to writing about the soccah – Greg Baum, Richard Hinds, etc). I read it more for the opinion and feature pieces than as a source for the latest news.
The Hun is truly awful, a gossip rag and Murdoch propaganda machine. Can’t really be compared the The Age.
And anyway, it gets delivered and I pay next to nothing for it. It’s a carry over from the days when as a Victory member I got the Age delviered 4 days a week for $25.
January 25th 2012 @ 8:33am
Lucan said | January 25th 2012 @ 8:33am | Report comment
No surprises here. But this commerical bias goes beyond the HAL.
There’s absolutely no journalistic justification for a double page spread for the Melbourne Storm before each matchday in the Hun. If they didn’t share the same father the Storm would be lucky to be a footnote in that AFL rag.
January 25th 2012 @ 12:20pm
Danny_Mac said | January 25th 2012 @ 12:20pm | Report comment
Journalistic justification and Herald Sun in the same sentence? youre having a larf mate!
January 25th 2012 @ 8:40am
Fake ex-AFL fan said | January 25th 2012 @ 8:40am | Report comment
Incorrect. The problem with your posts are that you make your points with a knife, a twist, and a crooked smile. Think about offering something that is interesting, debatable and useful to the site. The author plays no part in moderation. Thanks, Roar Mods.
January 25th 2012 @ 9:42am
BigAl said | January 25th 2012 @ 9:42am | Report comment
Neat turn of phrase there mods. !
January 25th 2012 @ 8:55am
JohnL said | January 25th 2012 @ 8:55am | Report comment
I wonder if media actually pay attention to these:
http://www.presscouncil.org.au/statements-of-principles/
And if so, are they enforceable?
January 25th 2012 @ 11:03am
Kasey said | January 25th 2012 @ 11:03am | Report comment
Fairfax issue with one of their strident anti-football journos. This linked article has nothing to do with Sokkah-phobia, but is more to do with how self indulgent this particular journo/collumnist has become in recent times.
http://www.smh.com.au/national/selling-point-was-a-telling-point-brazen-but-not-unethical-20120124-1qfir.html
January 25th 2012 @ 11:26am
trent said | January 25th 2012 @ 11:26am | Report comment
Good old Fitzy. Who could ever forget his performance on the First Tuesday Book Club a few years back when the other guests disagreed with his opinion on a book. Don’t think he was ever asked back.
January 25th 2012 @ 12:21pm
Danny_Mac said | January 25th 2012 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
Its a shame, because I quite enjoy his books…
January 25th 2012 @ 12:47pm
trent said | January 25th 2012 @ 12:47pm | Report comment
Too self indulgent and sentimental for me.