Sport and religion need divine intervention
By Melanie Dinjaski, 26 Jan 2012
- Tagged:
- Margaret Court, Melanie Dinjaski, NFL, Religion, Tennis, Tim Tebow
Tim Tebow - 3:16 had a certain relevance in his game for the Broncos (NFL)
Related coverage
What do Tim Tebow and Margaret Court have in common? Using their ‘sport hero’ status, they both feel an obligation to preach to those that don’t follow their belief system, and both have also shared their irrational insecurities about their athletic ability.
Separately these characteristics are tolerable but for me when they are combined they are the most frustrating thing in the sporting world.
Note: Before I get into the nitty gritty, I’d like to say that I am not writing this with the intention of offending anyone. I am simply stating my opinion on an issue which has been on my mind for some time. I will try to do so in the most respectful way possible.
Tim Tebow. NFL quarterback for the Denver Broncos and the man behind the popular ‘Tebowing’ craze .
Along with his footballing duties, Tebow takes every opportunity to pray, talk about Jesus, preach and talk about Jesus some more, much like his pastor father.
When Denver wins Tebow doesn’t put that down to his own ability, his hours of training and dedication to learning the ins and outs of the sport. He doesn’t put it down to the hard work of his teammates and coaching staff around him.
No, he puts it all down to Jesus, first and foremost.
Jesus, to Tebow is basically dishing out favours like he’s got a catalogue of I.O.Us from a poker night gone wrong.
He just calls it “being blessed”.
Tebow has made it very clear that his priorities in life put God first. Not family or friends, not his career, not contributing to the world, but God.
Though I think it’s mad to put family second to anything, that part of Tebow’s faith alone is fine.
In fact he’s not the only sportsperson to have voiced this sort of thanks and devotion to their god or their “lord and saviour Jesus Christ”. It’s quite common actually. If it gives them greater self-belief then power to them.
But here’s what I really don’t like.
In the past, Tebow and his faith led him to put his face to a controversial anti-abortion Superbowl advertisement. But more on that stuff later.
Like Tebow, here in Australia our very own Australian tennis legend of the 60s and 70s Margaret Court was involved in another controversial talking point with her passionate contribution to the Herald Sun yesterday.
Expanding on comments she first made during the ALP conference earlier this month Court, now an evangelistic preacher, listed her pet hates about society today.
This included lying politicians, political correctness, the decline of Christian values and the sanctity of marriage, and the inability of gay people to “work” harder at being straight. Her words, not mine.
Court also revealed her insecurity over her outstanding achievements.
Winning 62 Grand Slam titles during her seventeen-year career, she believes that if she had “accepted Jesus Christ, and believed that he came to earth as the son of god, to die for our sins” she “could have won six Wimbledons, not three.”
Just like Tebow, Court believes that she could have cashed in on some sort of points system where more faith equates to more trophies. What a deal!
Don’t you think it’s sad that these two have such little faith in their own ability?
But back to the religiously fuelled, backward political stance Tebow and Court indulge in.
I truly can’t stand when sportspeople and religion get tangled up in politics. It’s never, ever a good look. As the average sports fan all I’m hearing is, “I’m a big successful sport star, listen to me”. Pure arrogance.
Court and Tebow are fine people. They certainly seem polite and law-abiding. It is true that everyone is entitled to their opinion and should be free to practice their religion.
But when you impose that religion on others, use to it to degrade yourself and those around you, while also spreading outdated, oppressive views, you are pushing your luck.
Anyway, my point in it all is this – separate the two vices. In the sporting arena Tebow and Court are/were marvellous.
Just keep your religion and it’s associated political stances private, and let your sporting gift be public. That’s how it should be.
After all, if my brief stint in the Catholic education system taught me anything (besides how to run a Melbourne Cup sweep), it’s that Jesus was all about humility. Or something.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- Margaret Court, Melanie Dinjaski, NFL, Religion, Tennis, Tim Tebow

January 26th 2012 @ 6:30am
Charles Hubbard said | January 26th 2012 @ 6:30am | Report comment
Read what God wants to teach Tim Tebow…
http://www.christiansagainstnike.com/
January 26th 2012 @ 4:16pm
CHARLES ROCKEFELLER said | January 26th 2012 @ 4:16pm | Report comment
this is a terrible and bias article against Christians – why does she dislike and have NO TOLERANCE of Christians – again Christian are vifiled and rediculed for their beliefs – knowing Jesus Christ and following his teachings is the best life style choice I believe one can make and everyone has to make life style choices – and I am so glad I follow Jesus Christ – I have been given an eternal future.Margret Court and Tim Tebow have great veiws and I too love Jesus Christ .
January 27th 2012 @ 10:33am
kovana said | January 27th 2012 @ 10:33am | Report comment
Most transparent xtian i have come across on the web.
January 27th 2012 @ 4:02pm
Gob Bluth said | January 27th 2012 @ 4:02pm | Report comment
Stay away from that shellfish Charles, lest you be damned to eternal damnation……
January 26th 2012 @ 7:34am
Andrew said | January 26th 2012 @ 7:34am | Report comment
Following your logic, it’s not ok for Tim Tebow or Margaret Court to express views about faith, marriage or abortion because they are sporting athletes and should keep their political views silent. You can’t have it both ways. Current or former professional athletes should have the same freedom as anyone else in the public spotlight to express their views. I notice that Wallabies player David Pocock has taken a very public stance backing same sex marriage – should he be silenced too?
January 26th 2012 @ 1:21pm
Brendon said | January 26th 2012 @ 1:21pm | Report comment
Its not like Margaret Court and Tim Tebow are the ONLY Christians in sport. There are plenty of other christians in sport. Difference is they don;t act like complete boobs about it like Tebow and Court do.
February 8th 2012 @ 1:39pm
Matthew Skellett said | February 8th 2012 @ 1:39pm | Report comment
Well lol Andrew I’m sure there are many ,many ‘bible-believing christians’ who DO actually want to silence Mr Pocock because of his sympathetic views towards gay marriage -christians only believe in free speech when it’s not used to show up their own beliefs for what they are and be blessed
January 26th 2012 @ 7:34am
Gormon said | January 26th 2012 @ 7:34am | Report comment
Good luck with this, I hope you don’t open a huge can of worms against these do-gooders. I felt the same way when that Chilean miners thing happened; they each thanked Jesus for helping them, not the people who actually toiled away to do it! But I agree, keep sports and religion separate!
January 26th 2012 @ 8:37am
Rabbitz said | January 26th 2012 @ 8:37am | Report comment
If you feel the need to believe in mythical fairys at the bottom of the garden, or sky beings that is all well and good.
But keep it to yourself.
IMHO the right to religious expression does not override the obligation to not be overtly offensive. I, and many others, are offended by obvious and blatant proselytising. Your beliefs are between you and your Deity of choice.
Besides, if your Deity is responsible for all of you sports skill, may I politely suggest, you give back all the money you have been given as a result of that skill, you are claiming it under false pretenses.
January 26th 2012 @ 9:40am
Ryan O'Connell said | January 26th 2012 @ 9:40am | Report comment
Rabbitz, I read an interesting quote from Ricky Gervais the other day on Twitter: “Offense can only be taken, not given.”
I think what he was basically saying is that it is an individuals choice if they’re offended by something. Not sure if I 100% agree with him, but it’s an interesting viewpoint nonetheless.
January 26th 2012 @ 9:59am
Rabbitz said | January 26th 2012 @ 9:59am | Report comment
My only collary in agreeing with that assessment is intent.
If the intent is to offend or intimate superiority then offence can clearly be given. Proselytising is saying “my Deity is better than your Deity”, or “you are a lesser person because you don’t believe in my Deity”.
Or more closely related to the subject – “I am a better sportsman than everyone else because of my Deity”.
All these statements are designed to cause discomfort or offence in the listener.
January 26th 2012 @ 10:14am
kovana said | January 26th 2012 @ 10:14am | Report comment
“I am a better sportsman than everyone else because of my Deity”.
Really… did he say that? Or are you making up stuff much like how people believe in Sky wizards etc?
January 26th 2012 @ 10:27am
Rabbitz said | January 26th 2012 @ 10:27am | Report comment
Talofa Kovana,
They are not direct quotes, and were never meant to be.
Am I not allowed to characterise a mythical being in any form I wish? As restricting this would infringe my right os religious expression. Many Christians believe that man was created in God’s image. Many people believe that they are wizards, therefore God is a Wizard who lives in the sky. Q.E.D.
For the record I am a Pastafarian who believes in the Flying Spagetti Monster. (look it up)
Rev. Dr. Rabbitz D.D.
May you too be touched by His noodly appendage
January 26th 2012 @ 9:04am
Titus said | January 26th 2012 @ 9:04am | Report comment
Its funny how these two don’t preach messages on the dangers of overpopulation, the depletion of resources, the destruction of the natural environment, the dangers of greed, materialism, corruption and over-consumption and the need for all the people in the world to get together and solve these issues with or without divine assistance.
January 26th 2012 @ 9:57am
BigAl said | January 26th 2012 @ 9:57am | Report comment
Show business people have got this well and truly covered.
January 26th 2012 @ 11:09am
Titus said | January 26th 2012 @ 11:09am | Report comment
Haha….very true.
January 26th 2012 @ 9:14am
Kazama said | January 26th 2012 @ 9:14am | Report comment
I’d have to say sports stars, or celebrities in general, claiming that God is the reason they are successful is one of my biggest pet peeves.
Firstly, because they are basically discrediting their own abilities, the hard work they have put in to achieve that level of greatness, and the efforts of those who have supported them on their way to the top, solely for the sake of their religious beliefs.
Secondly, because it follows that underlying Christian idea that if you don’t believe what I believe, then I’m better than you. If you want to be as good as me, then you have to believe.
Essentially, they are using their status to preach and convert, and while they’re free to believe and say whatever they like, there is a problem there. To me, it’s just bloody annoying, but to others who idolise these people it can have an impact on what they think. And when you bring politics into it, or homophobic views such as Court’s, then there is a big problem.
January 26th 2012 @ 9:14am
MattRusty said | January 26th 2012 @ 9:14am | Report comment
Melanie, I feel your pain, I agree with most of what you say but my concern is that writing this piece will not give you peace.
I don’t agree with your point that these people should keep their opinions on religion and politics to themselves, because that would contradict the concept of free speech. You get your opportunity to share your view here and we’re listening but who are we to tell you what you should and shouldn’t have an opinion on. If we all reflect on why their comments frustrate us if we were honest perhaps we’d conclude that we’re just a little bit jealous that they are in a better position to share their view compared to ourselves.
I recommend that instead of being frustrated, you become fascinated by the influence of religion. How so many people can believe in something which was based on formed over 2,000 years ago, a message that has lasted the test of time even though evidence is there to counter their beliefs is incredible. I can’t get my head around why they believe what they do, what motivates them to say what they say, perhaps it’s fear, maybe it’s greed (“I could have had 6 Wimbledon’s instead of 3!) but you gotta respect the power of it.
I really like the way you closed the article about being more humble, like Jesus. But then again Jesus did say “spread the word of the Lord”. Is it too cynical a point to think that one thought you can have about these people is that they might be easily manipulated by other people because of their unconditional belief in “things”?
January 26th 2012 @ 3:31pm
joe blackswan said | January 26th 2012 @ 3:31pm | Report comment
“Is it too cynical…” no, I think that is actually a fair call. The fact that children are indoctrinated with religious beliefs by their parents (yes, some find “god” on their own as adults….usually after their last crutch broke) and thus learn not to question, just accept fiction as fact, would go a long way to explain how someone can be so readily manipulated to endorse a concept in the name of a deity. How else can you explain a young person strapping a bomb to themself and walking into a group of innocent people? This goes against human nature.
January 26th 2012 @ 7:32pm
JohnM said | January 26th 2012 @ 7:32pm | Report comment
Correct me if I am wrong, but It seems like a very primitive black and white worldview you have there Joe.
Parents who do “indoctrinate” their children (i.e. the minority of religious parents in the west) and teach them not to question are essentially priming their kids for athiesm/agnosticism. Everyone has a worldview, and kids are normally raised with a positive disposition to this worldview because of their parents influence. It goes both ways. What’s your beef?
Do you have kids yourself? How open-minded might you be if one of them chose, on their own initiative, to start exploring the bible and seeking to understand the life and message of Jesus from the New Testament? What about reading the Koran and wearing a head covering?
As for your final point, why does death, bloodshed, hatred, spite, ethnic conflict, survival of the fittest go against “human nature”? Do you not believe in biological evolution, or have you merely been fed Disney movies for the last 27 years?
Part of the Tebow angle IMO is that he genuinely loves talking about God at each and every opportunity, as a core part of his being. It is not just the sort of tokenism you see from Grammy award winners. It is also very hypocritical for people to allege to follow Jesus but not seek to promote the good news that he proclaimed (Matt. 28:18-20).
January 27th 2012 @ 2:39pm
joe blackswan said | January 27th 2012 @ 2:39pm | Report comment
John,
yes, I will correct you because you are wrong. I find it ironic that you say that I have a “very primitive black and white worldview”….do you see the irony? Religions, a man made construct, that is thousands of years old that states you have to worship a said god or you are considered less human; and you must follow a particular way of life….you are aware that in christianity (see original 10 commandments, not the altered catholic version) that women are on par as chatels and farmyard animals?
Have you heard of the Age of Enlightenment (starting in 17th century)? granted, this too was a long time ago.
do you know what apostasy is john? How do these children feel when they want to leave their religion? what if your child is gay?
John, if someone wants to to go down a religious path under their own steam because it offers them guidance, comfort, happiness then I have no problem with that.
“As for your final point, why does death, bloodshed, hatred, spite, ethnic conflict, survival of the fittest go against “human nature”? Do you not believe in biological evolution, or have you merely been fed Disney movies for the last 27 years?”…hmmm, I am not sure if you are trying to twist my comment about dodgy backpacks or if you are not bright enough to understand what you are saying. We humans were at one point swinging in the trees as chimpanzees…we evolved into neanderthals and then to the homo sapiens we are today (yes, I have missed many stages)… man left africa and travelled to all parts of the world, they did so in groups, they nurtured and protected those in the group, thus the group survived and thrived….when threatened they would whack each other over the head with a tree branch or rock. Fast forward a few years, we have evolved into full societies whose members are capable of reason and logic; to live and let live. When someone tries to manipulate another person to think and behave in an unreasonable way, this goes against human nature….and is not a case of “survival of the fittest”, you could argue it is “bloodshed” and “ethnic conflict” but these are not inherrited human qualities.
Regarding Tebow speaking publicly about his love of god, so be it….when he starts telling others how to act because that is what his religion preaches, it’s inappropriate.
Religion would be better if it acknowledged some of their ideologies are out dated in terms of human decency and made changes accordingly. (Joe 27:01:12)
January 26th 2012 @ 9:15am
amazonfan said | January 26th 2012 @ 9:15am | Report comment
What really annoys me about Tebow is the hypocrisy which is that if he was the exact same person, with the exact same views on moral issues (such as abortion), but was a Muslim (whom, in victory speeches said ‘Allah is Great’), he would be condemned as a religious extremist by the same people who support him now. For too many people who embrace his public religiosity, their support would cease if he was of the ‘wrong’ religion.
As for Court, she was a wonderful tennis player, perhaps the greatest female player of all time, however her views are incredibly disappointing, to say the least.
January 26th 2012 @ 9:26am
mds1970 said | January 26th 2012 @ 9:26am | Report comment
Margaret Court is no longer a tennis player, she’s been retired for decades. She is now a preacher, and her comments are as a preacher rather than as a tennis player. Her tennis past gives her a profile, but that’s a part of her life that’s long gone.
But it was silly of her to suggest she could have won six Wimbledons instead of three had she been a Christian at the time. I don’t know what her pre-Christian lifestyle was like, but unless she was indulging in some activity which affected her tennis, then I can’t see how it could have made any difference.
I’m a Christian – I may not always act like one, but I was brought up in a Christian environment and although I no longer have the time or interest in attending church more than once every couple of months, I still believe in Jesus. But that’s my faith, not necessarily anyone else’s – and I wouldn’t mention my beliefs on The Roar unless, like this, it’s directly relevant to the discussion. I was never any good at playing sport, although I love watching and talking about it. But I don’t subscribe to the theory that being a Christian automatically qualifies you to be wealthy or successful or anything like that – and believing in God is a different thing completely to following sport. (and for what it’s worth, I’m not fussed either way about gay marriage).
January 26th 2012 @ 6:44pm
Melanie Dinjaski said | January 26th 2012 @ 6:44pm | Report comment
Thanks for your contribution mds1970. Very interesting comments and shared in a very honest and civil fashion.
January 26th 2012 @ 9:48pm
Ben Carter said | January 26th 2012 @ 9:48pm | Report comment
Hi mds – as Mel said, well put. As a Christian person myself (and equally imperfect too!), I am someone who believes that IF a sportsperson also happens to be a Christian/Muslim/Jewish person, etc, etc, then that is part of their overall life and MAY, at times, come into their sporting activities. Fair enough – they shouldn’t have to deny what they believe in order to enjoy/play sport.
And if they do attribute their skill/ability etc to a God-given talent, then fair enough. They are humble enough to acknowledge that not everything in life is about themselves.
Sport and religion have had a long and potent mix. Ali comes to mind (for good or bad) and there have been plenty of political statements made on the sporting field over the years, too. Provided they are expressing their own personal belief (on any given issue) and not necessarily telling everyone else where to go/what to do then fair enough. If Tebow is against abortion, that is his perogitive (and I would understand why). He is a reasonably famous person who happens to have a political/ethical view – so what? Bono from U2 has a stance against poverty (for all his own fallibility) – he is free to make that claim and just happens to also be reasonably well known. Big deal. As others have said, if we took away what sportspeople believe, you’d lose something of the character potential of sport. Sport without belief in something bigger makes it less enthralling. Ditto for music, etc, etc…
January 26th 2012 @ 9:29am
Chris said | January 26th 2012 @ 9:29am | Report comment
One of the great things about living in a free society is the freedom of expression. I may not agree with everything that is said by public figures, but they certainly have the right to an opinion and the right to share it. If the media decides that they are willing to broadcast those opinions, then so be it.
Please tell me how these people are imposing their views on you? They are well known for having a belief system and are not afraid to be public about it. If you’re so offended by what they have to say, don’t read the articles in the paper and switch off when they get interviewed on tv/radio.
Lastly, by publically describing their beliefs as “backward”, “outdated” and “oppressive” you are being very hypocritical. Why should you be able to slag off what they believe in when you resent their public support of their beliefs? Can’t have it both ways Melanie.
January 26th 2012 @ 6:51pm
Melanie Dinjaski said | January 26th 2012 @ 6:51pm | Report comment
“Please tell me how these people are imposing their views on you?”
- When I’m watching the Superbowl, I don’t want to be preached to or sold your religiously fuelled backward political views. There was already one ad inspired by Tebow that was rejected for it’s overt attempt to spread “religious doctrine” –
Do what you want in private, follow whatever god you want in private. Fine. But when it starts imposing on the average sportsfan that’s a problem. If I wanted to be preached to then I’d go to a church.
January 26th 2012 @ 10:10pm
Oracle said | January 26th 2012 @ 10:10pm | Report comment
As soon as someone thanks “the good lord” for their success, then leave me out.
So much for the “Good Lord” looking over their opponent/s
Apparently “the Good Lord” is not discriminatory, so the argument ends right there and then.
January 27th 2012 @ 8:17pm
TomStorey said | January 27th 2012 @ 8:17pm | Report comment
I don’t want to be preached to about Pespi or Coors Light, but they pay for the right to do so and therefore are allowed. As an Australian fan, you don’t even get the US advertisements, but if Tebow is used to promote Christianity as his belief that’s no different from Aaron Rodgers promoting State Farm as his preferred insurance agent. They’re all there to do the same thing.
If you’re smart enough to make your own decision about insurance, I’m sure you can do it about religion.
Tebow certainly isn’t the first sportsman to ever thank God for his achievements, and you really need to look a lot further into American football culture if you think he’s the only one doing it. I’d suggest you start here:
http://www.nfl.com/videos/baltimore-ravens/09000d5d8264b360/Ray-Lewis-postgame-speech