A-League needs to entertain more consistently
By Mike Tuckerman, 27 Jan 2012 Mike Tuckerman is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- A-League, football, Melbourne Victory, Sydney FC
While much of the focus was on former Sydney FC defender Mark Milligan, there was some symmetry to the fact it was ex-Victory defender Sebastian Ryall who proved the man of the hour in the “Big Blue” yesterday.
Ryall’s goal was symptomatic of the match: unexpected and scrappy, but thoroughly entertaining.
Not for the first time this season, Victory will view a draw as a loss and Sydney FC coach Vitezslav Lavicka will be relieved all the attention is not on him.
In terms of the latter, the Sky Blues might as well start planning for next season because they don’t have the personnel needed to put up a fight in the finals this time around.
They simply don’t have the pace to trouble any but the most panicked of defences and it was instructive that both of their goals against Victory came from defensive blunders.
Victory are a more interesting prospect, if only because they do possess the sort of players who can challenge for the title – not that Jim Magilton seems to think so.
He’s already brought in Mark Milligan on loan, but the Victory defence still looked all at sea against their bitter rivals, particularly when the bustling Bruno Cazarine lurked.
Victory’s campaign has been fascinating to watch but fans of the Big-V must be growing increasingly nervous as the clock ticks down on the regular season.
They’ve still got difficult away fixtures against Brisbane Roar and Sydney FC to come, as well as the derby and another difficult home clash with league leaders Central Coast, and so far they haven’t shown any signs of sparking to life under Magilton.
That shouldn’t take away from what was an entertaining clash at AAMI Park – the kind we need more of on a consistent basis in the A-League.
I watched Newcastle Jets draw with Adelaide United a day earlier and maybe it was the neutral surrounds of Carrington Park in Bathurst, but the whole encounter was a ho-hum affair.
It’s a shame pre-match showers evidently kept some fans away but so far these community round fixtures have been a real mixed bag in terms of intensity.
At times the clash between the Jets and the Reds had a social kickabout feel to it and it wasn’t until Newcastle started to throw everything at Adelaide over a frenetic finale that it finally started to resemble a genuine A-League match.
It’s been one of the few downsides of the A-League this season: the fact entertaining fixtures are often bookended by the sort of dreary encounter which leaves casual watchers turning off their TVs and has others thinking twice about attending a game.
It’s a shame there hasn’t been a little bit more consistency because the quality of football on display has generally been quite high.
We just need a few more games like “the Big Blue” and a few less like “the Big Bore” in Bathurst to keep interest ticking over.
There should be a bit of interest in this weekend’s fixtures and now that the rain has eased in Brisbane, it will be fascinating to see how the Roar fare without suspended striker Besart Berisha.
Adelaide versus Perth is always a feisty clash as well, and hopefully we see some high-quality football to go with the lusty tackling and buzzing atmosphere.
Because it’s not just big-name rivalries which gets punters through the gates and fans watching on TV.
It’s also entertainment, and that’s something we could stand to see on a little bit more of a regular basis in the A-League.
Follow Mike on twitter @Mike_Tuckerman
- Explore:
- A-League, football, Melbourne Victory, Sydney FC

January 27th 2012 @ 8:13am
JAJI said | January 27th 2012 @ 8:13am | Report comment
Though every leagie around the world has its good games and bad games……for every Man City Spurs thriller there is a dour Stoke-Wigan affair in 10 degrees and rain…..
January 27th 2012 @ 8:20am
Dean said | January 27th 2012 @ 8:20am | Report comment
It’s interesting that, for all MVFC’s allegedly poor football this year (I say allegedly, because we must be doing something right to take the lead in 12 matches this year?), MVFC is always the team and involved in the game that is centre of discussion – before every round and after every round. Apparently we don’t play attractive football, yet our games rate the highest on tv. Neutrals, who watch our games say they love watching MVFC because our games are never dull – there’s always some drama, some talking point and 90% of our games are played at high intensity with no easy balls (Perth last week was part of the 10% that are not intense). We sit 3rd from the bottom of the table yet we get more attention around Australia than the teams that allegedly play attractive football: CCM, Brisbane & Heart.
Why is this so, I wonder?
January 27th 2012 @ 8:26am
JohnL said | January 27th 2012 @ 8:26am | Report comment
Maybe because of Harry Kewell? If he was playing for another club, do you think the centre of discussion would be around MV or the club the HK is at and whether or not they are performing?
January 27th 2012 @ 8:39am
Dean said | January 27th 2012 @ 8:39am | Report comment
Well Harry only arrived this season? But you’re right, the media attention on MVFC during the past 6 season could have been in anticipation of Harry joining MVFC? They’re pretty smart people in the media – or so they keep telling us.
Emerton came straight from the EPL to play for SFC, yet SFC doesn’t get much attention. Although Emerton seems to get injured an awful lot. And, pre-season the football experts were laughing about how Harry is injury-prone and won’t last 90′ of one game, let alone a whole season. So far, Harry has played every game except the one following an international, when he picked up a hamstring strain. Yesterday, Harry played 90′ with a significant shoulder injury; Emerton played 30′ after he injured his hamstring, yet again. Imagine the media ridicule if the roles were reversed?
January 27th 2012 @ 9:35am
JohnL said | January 27th 2012 @ 9:35am | Report comment
Apologies Dean. When you wrote about “football this year” and the “12 matches this year”, I assumed you were referring to the media attention for this season. Wasn’t aware you were talking about since the start of the competition.
January 27th 2012 @ 8:47am
Punter said | January 27th 2012 @ 8:47am | Report comment
Dean, you are right, being a SFC fan, there is not much love for MV on my part, but I do find watching MV compulsory viewing every week, they certainly have the X factor & their games live up to the top billing. Now that was difficult to say.
January 27th 2012 @ 1:36pm
Atawhai Drive said | January 27th 2012 @ 1:36pm | Report comment
Victory are always interesting to watch, not always for good reasons. But they’re never dull (although all codes of football produce drab games from time to time). Muscat needs to have a rethink about appropriate sideline attire.
January 27th 2012 @ 8:56am
JiMMM said | January 27th 2012 @ 8:56am | Report comment
Dean it’s because most of us find it instructive of the many ways in which a game can be thrown away. Its like watching a car crash.
January 27th 2012 @ 10:04am
Dean said | January 27th 2012 @ 10:04am | Report comment
JiMMM, as long as you’re watching that’s the main thing. And, if you feel inclined you should think about purchasing some MVFC merchandise – even if it is simply to destroy or burn it – your motivations are not important. We just want your money and your interest.
January 27th 2012 @ 10:42am
Roger said | January 27th 2012 @ 10:42am | Report comment
“Dean it’s because most of us find it instructive of the many ways in which a game can be thrown away. Its like watching a car crash.”
And you keep coming back for more. Good to see that you’re doing your bit to support the team.
January 27th 2012 @ 6:20pm
Roarfan said | January 27th 2012 @ 6:20pm | Report comment
Dean, it may also be because of all the controversy surrounding Victory and maybe many of those watching do it to see Victory get beaten. It is certainly not because the team plays the best football in the HAL,, not for the last 2 years anyway. The tall poppy syndrome is alive and well my friend. Not helped either by the attitude of a very small minority of Victory fans on some of these forums. I say small because MVFC has a huge following and the dozen or so who cultivate this dislike for the victory are only a minute percentage. And there is no denying that every club has a few red necks among its supporters.
I also must admit that I was sure that Harry Kewell was going to be a flop and that Brett Emerton would be the successful one. That view is slowly changing because HK is doing much better that I expected, although not yet of the promised standard, whilst Brett sofar has not set the world on fire.
When you claim to be the biggest, you are also the biggest target. Things can’t get any worse for MVFC, so they are bound to get better.
January 27th 2012 @ 8:40am
Qantas supports Australian Football said | January 27th 2012 @ 8:40am | Report comment
I thought the Melb V vs Sydney fixture was an excellent match. Of course some will say that it”s not a patch on EPL football, but I now can’t be bothered with the EPL anymore. I’ll still check for some results, but I can’t sit through and watch a replay like I use to anymore. The HAL has finally arrived in quality, atmosphere and tension. If you didn’t enjoy that game of Australian Football on Australia Day, then you are not a Football supporter.
January 27th 2012 @ 9:31am
pete4 said | January 27th 2012 @ 9:31am | Report comment
I agree over the past few years I have found my interest in the EPL is not there while the A-League is on. I take in the EPL results and some highlights but wait until our competition is done before watching any EPL matches
January 27th 2012 @ 9:42am
Realfootball said | January 27th 2012 @ 9:42am | Report comment
Agree. I can’t remember the last time I sat through an EPL game. Certainly not this season. I only get Fox for the A-League.
January 27th 2012 @ 10:38am
Roger said | January 27th 2012 @ 10:38am | Report comment
Agreed – thoroughly entertaining game. Plenty of goals, plenty of celebration, and plenty of heartache. The tragedy of the game is part of the beauty.
January 27th 2012 @ 11:57am
Midfielder said | January 27th 2012 @ 11:57am | Report comment
Agree Q …
January 27th 2012 @ 3:17pm
Bondy said | January 27th 2012 @ 3:17pm | Report comment
+ 1
January 27th 2012 @ 9:19am
striker said | January 27th 2012 @ 9:19am | Report comment
These regional games should go the games looked bad on TV and no atmosphere, as for Sydney and Melbourne both of these teams should look to next year they will not be there grand final time they need to get new players.
January 27th 2012 @ 9:33am
AGO74 said | January 27th 2012 @ 9:33am | Report comment
Agree. They look bad and with the games lacking in crowds and atmosphere it has definitely affected the quality of them.
January 27th 2012 @ 9:51am
clayts said | January 27th 2012 @ 9:51am | Report comment
Haha I still find it funny that before the season everyone was applauding (and fearing) the squad that MVC had ammassed. “Oh with Harry Kewell, a golden boot winner (who has barely been seen..what the?), Hernandez, Thompson and the like, this team is going to score goals a plenty, look out Brisbane Roar” was the cry. Now, 3 coaches later, it’s, “Look to next season, Victory, you need new players.”
Now some would argue that given the talen they had at their disposal, probably among if not the best in the A-League on paper, that it is in the player’s minds that is leading to their defeats. I remember when Ange signed all these new players and gave the boot to the more old-school veterans that most pundits predicted the Roar to come last. Shows how much everyone “knows”. What I have learned is to make up your own mind about things.
January 27th 2012 @ 10:16am
AGO74 said | January 27th 2012 @ 10:16am | Report comment
Clayts – I was talking about the first point of Strikers comment – regional games!
January 27th 2012 @ 10:25am
Qantas supports Australian Football said | January 27th 2012 @ 10:25am | Report comment
Good point about Ange, but just forget about where these two teams are on the latter for a moment. Yesterday’s game in Melbourne was enthralling football—entertaining—quality—atmosphere with real tension up to the 93rd min…. For a drawn game, which all the other pundits from the other codes keep telling us are boring to watch. This game was a magnificent advertisement for Australian Football—worthy of a top of the table clash.
January 27th 2012 @ 1:21pm
clayts said | January 27th 2012 @ 1:21pm | Report comment
I totally agree that yesterday’s match was entertaining stuff. The quality lacked at times but it was exciting and sounded like the atmosphere was really good. I do think (on tv) at least, that having a pretty full stadium makes for MUCH better viewing – to go to what Nordster was saying.
In general, I have enjoyed watching Victory games, partly because I love the attention that they get after turning in an ordinary performance with all these “stars” in their side, but also because I find myself cheering for the other side. This makes what would otherwise be a completely neutral game notsomuch so. Hey, I reckon I’m probbaly not alone
January 27th 2012 @ 1:31pm
Dean said | January 27th 2012 @ 1:31pm | Report comment
Much rather have my football club “hated” than “ignored”. I can’t imagine how it must feel to follow any of the other 9 HAL clubs and watch MVFC get all the recognition regardless of how they play or whether they win, lose or draw. Life just isn’t fair.
January 27th 2012 @ 1:55pm
Qantas supports Australian Football said | January 27th 2012 @ 1:55pm | Report comment
You’re not alone I’m a GCU FC supporter…
January 27th 2012 @ 10:36am
Roger said | January 27th 2012 @ 10:36am | Report comment
clayts – in all my time following the A-League, I don’t think that the “experts” (fans included) have ever gotten their early season predictions right.
Although, it’s funny how everyone is an expert after the fact.
January 27th 2012 @ 11:31am
nordster said | January 27th 2012 @ 11:31am | Report comment
so they should dump it because u reckon the BACKDROP looked bad on the tele ???
Not that the stuff on pitch was scintillating the other night, can’t blame Bathurst for that as the pitch was ok.
On the crowd and atmosphere, people at the Bathurst game who went enjoyed themselves from what i’ve been told. You really can’t judge the games on the same standards as a larger city venue.
only thing that would make them better would be to play them on friday or saturday nights, triple the numbers right there. Unfortunately with the season length limited by broadcasters, its a no go… after all they only brought these in to fill the midweek games.
January 27th 2012 @ 10:58am
Luke said | January 27th 2012 @ 10:58am | Report comment
This coming from an outsider who really only has started following Soccer (or Football I should say) this season. The Victory-Sydney match was a fantastic contest. Maybe not so much in pure football terms but the atmosphere was fantastic and was a great advertisement for the game.
Football is always going to have dull draws, just like Cricket the game itself unfortunately sometimes lends itself to them. But a good entertaining draw just like in Test Cricket, is just as enthralling as a win.
This season the A-League has been very entertaining for the most part imo. This coupled with a good Premier League season over in England has converted me into a Football fan (and believe me that was VERY tough to do), and games like Melbourne-Sydney are the reason why.
January 27th 2012 @ 11:06am
Roger said | January 27th 2012 @ 11:06am | Report comment
Welcome to the Football community Luke
You’ll get to love the game more and more.
January 27th 2012 @ 12:09pm
Michael said | January 27th 2012 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
That’s probably true Luke and we probably shouldn’t expect blockbusters every game.
But Mike was right when he said that the first half of the Jets-Adelaide game was like a social kickabout. It was so slow, like a training session. That’s not good enough.
January 27th 2012 @ 11:00am
Suneer Chowdhary said | January 27th 2012 @ 11:00am | Report comment
January 27th 2012 @ 11:49am
Roarchild said | January 27th 2012 @ 11:49am | Report comment
I thought Adelaide vs Newcastle was pretty good in the second half. I think people were turned of by the background and camera angles which made it look low key.
Something to remember when people call for A league clubs to move to places like Ballymoore.
When I was a kid going to an NSL game didn’t feel like much of a step up from watching your local federation team so that’s the benefit of the well maintained modern stadia. It feels like the big league.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
January 27th 2012 @ 12:05pm
Griffo said | January 27th 2012 @ 12:05pm | Report comment
What is ‘entertainment’ anyway? A positive result? Heaps of goals? Crowd atmosphere? Players going at each other hammers-and-tongs for the full 90, dragging each other off the field into an ambulance when the whistle blows?
Some might say all the above, but I’m looking for quality – how have the coaches improved in a tactical sense; how are the teams playing?
As long as the quality is getting better every year and the majority of games are of quality then the game (and the entertainment factor) will grow. Certainly if most of the games were of the (was it SydneyFC vs Perth regional game) for the majority, it would be a worry.
Being a Jets fan I probably have a bit more of an interest in the Bathurst game, but I didn’t think it was boring. Certainly not the worse game this season. Both teams have not been consistent, but both needed a win and didn’t get it. I wonder though what the 2300-odd fans attending at Bathurst thought?
I wonder though at the regional games. Are FFA playing the long game and trying to grow a fanbase in regional areas? To me, the FFA would be better off sending these games to the next potential club areas: Canberra, Wollongong, Tassie, Geelong, Western Sydney.
January 29th 2012 @ 5:46pm
PeterK said | January 29th 2012 @ 5:46pm | Report comment
Agree strongly with your last point Griffo.
Perhaps FFA wants to try to encourage some more people who live “geographically on the fringe” to become fans of existing clubs — which is laudable enough.
Whose “home” game was it in Bathurst? It’s interesting that Sydney had to travel the relatively short distance to Cambpelltown (was it?), when others seem to have to travel further. I must admit to not being too sure of my NSW geography, but from the little I believe to be true, Sydney to Campbelltown seems quite short to me. Please correct me where I’m wrong.
Perhaps FFA could do Big Wed at regional grounds? Perhaps we need TWO regional games per season (then it could be a “home” match for every club, and not just for half of them as this year). One of the regionals could be fairly close by, seeking to tempt new fans to existing clubs, and the other could be much further afield as you suggest.
January 27th 2012 @ 12:06pm
Axelv said | January 27th 2012 @ 12:06pm | Report comment
I’m in the firm belief that a large vocal crowd off the field, lifts the intensity on the field, and it also increases the pressure and drama making it compelling viewing.
Mike talks about how the Newcastle vs Adelaide was more like “the Big Bore” , could this be because I could only hear the players yelling and hear nothing in the crowd? The crowd weren’t interested in getting involved in the game, and neither were the players, it was like watching a training session, it had the atmosphere of one too.
January 27th 2012 @ 12:33pm
Realfootball said | January 27th 2012 @ 12:33pm | Report comment
One of the reasons I love watching Victory home games (even if to barrack against them) is the atmosphere. The singing, the noise, the full stands (at AAMI park) – it makes such a difference, just as much on tv as live. But I’m not nearly so keen to watch Eithad games for the same reason – even 20k looks empty. The sense of the game being surrounded by spectators is so important on television. You can see the lift for the players, too. For the opposite effect, look at what Skilled Park does to a game. I don’t even tune in on tv – those endless empty seats just kill it stone dead.
January 27th 2012 @ 12:36pm
The Cattery said | January 27th 2012 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
It’s an important point and drives a lot of the popularity of the EPL.
January 27th 2012 @ 1:31pm
Realfootball said | January 27th 2012 @ 1:31pm | Report comment
The crowd, as an image, looming over the field of play, creates a potent sense of live theatre. The emotional charge even comes through over the television – another reason for staying away from oval ground, which – even if full – significantly diminish the visual impact. The size of the crowd is far less important that the imagery – which is why Suncorp with 15,000 doesn’t deliver nearly the atmosphere on tv that Hindmarsh does with, say, 11000. Conversely, the live atmosphere at Suncorp with 13-15000 is superb – its the empty seats in the tv frame that kill for television.
January 27th 2012 @ 1:45pm
Ian Whitchurch said | January 27th 2012 @ 1:45pm | Report comment
No matter what you are playing, do it in an appropriate-sized stadium.
Note if you want to sell memberships, selling out grounds helps a lot.
January 27th 2012 @ 1:49pm
Realfootball said | January 27th 2012 @ 1:49pm | Report comment
Yes, we can dream, but I can’t see a boutique stadium in Brisbane ever being a possibility.
January 27th 2012 @ 2:08pm
Ian Whitchurch said | January 27th 2012 @ 2:08pm | Report comment
Realfootball,
If there was the will to do it, and there isnt, then Ballymore could be redeveloped into a very nice little boutique stadium by a joint venture of the QRU, the second Brisbane league side and the Roar.
Instead, all three parties will keep hanging seperately.
January 27th 2012 @ 2:28pm
Stabilo said | January 27th 2012 @ 2:28pm | Report comment
Ballymore was going to be upgraded from a massive grant during the Rudd Govt, but got knocked down. Shame really. Could have been turned into a great little stadium with some modernisation.
January 27th 2012 @ 3:53pm
Axelv said | January 27th 2012 @ 3:53pm | Report comment
To be honest I have no idea why the Victorian state government spent $260 million on AAMI Park, while there was a demand for it in Melbourne, it’s quite unusual for them to give out that sort of money for Football and Rugby. It’s absolute perfect for us and I’m just in love with this stadium
I think that possibly the construction workers in Melbourne were bored and wanted a project to be proud of. Maybe the re-development of Ballymore is still on the cards and it will be looked at again in a few years?
January 27th 2012 @ 4:50pm
The Cattery said | January 27th 2012 @ 4:50pm | Report comment
Axel
you might recall that the new ground was originally going to cater for 20,000.
But at the exact moment that they were finalising the details, it was the second season of the A-League and in the space of a month, the Victory had home crowds of 50k and 40k at Etihad, so there was much lobbying to double the capacity. The Storm were happy with 20k, and the Rebels were not yet a concept.
In the end they compromised and made it around 31k, but put in foundations to up it to 40k sometime in the future. However, as we saw with the WC bid, all of a sudden no one was interested in expanding it to 40k because it would cost tens of millions of dollars to take apart the fancy roof.
January 27th 2012 @ 5:36pm
Axelv said | January 27th 2012 @ 5:36pm | Report comment
Yep Cattery I’m fully aware of everything you’ve said.
That they were going to build the stadium in the first place at 20,000 surprised me and it would have cost close to a very similar amount. In the end it turns out that it’s a good thing that they made it 30,000, it suits Storm, Victory and I assume Rebels just perfectly, I feel 20k is too small, and 40k is too big. How awesome it is to finally have a proper rectangular stadium in Melbourne!
January 27th 2012 @ 12:49pm
Griffo said | January 27th 2012 @ 12:49pm | Report comment
You have to applaude the Victory supporters, especially after the Roar game earlier in the season when they were quickly down to 9 players.
They certainly let the players know they were right behind them with singing and chanting for the rest of the game.
January 27th 2012 @ 1:54pm
Roger said | January 27th 2012 @ 1:54pm | Report comment
20K crowd all willing the players on yesterday. Very decent turnout.
January 27th 2012 @ 2:56pm
clayts said | January 27th 2012 @ 2:56pm | Report comment
Well it was scheduled on a public holdiay, where, judging by the lack of people in the city today, took the day off and the weekend before school goes back, meaning that most folk are well and truly home from holidays. The weather was perfect also aside from some wind, but since when is Melbourne not windy. I reckon that may have helped the crowd figure somewhat. Contrast that to the 7k Heart got on that Wednesday when Tomic was playing next door, in the middle of the busiest holdiay period in the country.. 20k was ok but compared to the 40k they got in the first round against Sydney, I’d say a pass mark only. Still, better than any other club but I wouldn’t be jumping up and down about a Victory Sydney game getting 20k..
January 27th 2012 @ 3:08pm
Dean said | January 27th 2012 @ 3:08pm | Report comment
The game was virtually sold out. From what I’ve been told, there were no General Admission tickets available. The only unsold tickets were Category A & B ($54 & $41 respectively for adults). And, even then there were only 2-3k of these more expensive tickets unsold. The only way to sell out the stadium I think is to make more sections “general admission” – people don’t want to spend $40+ on tickets to a H&A match.
January 27th 2012 @ 3:31pm
Axelv said | January 27th 2012 @ 3:31pm | Report comment
+1 Dean.
I think they should convert parts of the sides of the 3rd tier to General Admission. Say, have the middle sections Cat A and B, but if 2-3 bays on each side of the stand on level 3 are GA, it will fill up much better. GA is very popular at AAMI Park this season and that it’s been proven by being the most densely packed area’s of AAMI Park all season.
General admission is fantastic, it’s affordable and you have the choice of sitting with friends.
January 27th 2012 @ 4:42pm
Stevo said | January 27th 2012 @ 4:42pm | Report comment
It is too simplistic to compare AAMI crowds with Etihad for the reasons given by Dean and Axelv. I was almost thinking of going down and spending my hard earned mulla to help Harry but decided that there would be next to no GA tickets available so I slummed it at home and pulled a coupla beers while watching the circus unfold – highly entertaining though.
January 27th 2012 @ 2:01pm
The Kop said | January 27th 2012 @ 2:01pm | Report comment
On the Bathurst atmosphere, the fact that the University students were away is also another factor that should be taken into consideration.This was poor scheduling by FFA as they set the date before deciding the venue. This, coupled with the poor weather and a venue which offers limited shelter created the somewhat subdued atmosphere. Fans left the ground satisfied but another 1000-1500 spectators would have made all the difference.