Big Bash League more smash than crash
By Mark Young, 31 Jan 2012 Mark Young is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Big Bash League, Cricket, Cricket Australia, Dave Warner, Sydney Thunder
I was so certain that the Big Bash League was going to be a massive flop, I tried to bet money on its inevitable failure. To my astonishment, it has been the big hit of Summer.
It is time to reflect on what Cricket Australia did right and why I was so very very wrong!
The moment I heard that Cricket Australia had planned to bail on having the state teams play an end of season, T20 competition, and instead have a brace of new teams with ‘funky’ names and ‘vibrant’ (read: silly) colours, I groaned with disappointment.
As it drew closer and word got out that the teams would have a mix of local and interstate players in addition to old timers such as Shane Warne and Stuart MacGill, my disappointment turned to derision, and I knew that this silly competition would flop harder than Mark Riddell in a kiddy pool.
Looking back, the only disappointment was the crowds at the first two games. From that point on, the crowds were huge, TV audiences enormous and the whole competition became a massive talking point of summer sport.
Cricket Australia should take a bow for this outcome, they nailed it in many respects.
The games were priced to get the crowds in and they made sure there was abundant promotion. Certainly for the Sydney Thunder that played at ANZ Stadium near where I work, there were ads each day in the Sydney Tabloid and free tickets with any big purchase at the local shopping centre at Rhodes.
It also managed to tap in to a great market niche, ‘PEBKOH’s! Or Parents Exasperated with Bored Kids on Holidays.
January is a rather long month for parents with school kids and taking them to a Big Bash League game is a great option. It doesn’t require a day in the sun, promises plenty of scoring and action and provides a safe atmosphere without too much swearing, abuse and drunkenness.
The competition also benefited enormously from the enthusiastic and very generous support in the media. This was hardly surprising in News Limited publications, which were very keen to get a product to stop League, Union and AFL fans switching their service off in the off-season.
The big difference in media coverage for the Big Bash compared to other Pay TV sports such as the A-League and Super Rugby was the boots and all approach from the ABC.
The national broadcaster made the decision to broadcast numerous games across the country on ABC local radio, and the Grandstand cricket team spoke about the competition every day during the Test match coverage.
This sort of enthusiastic advocacy with a huge audience gave the new competition, enormous exposure and legitimacy – it was the sort of media coverage which football fans can only dream of.
There was also the novelty of seeing former champions such as Warne and Brett Lee running around. To put a little perspective to this, Big Bash Headline act Shane Warne played his first Test match for Australia in 1992 when David Warner was in kindergarten at Matraville Public School.
Indeed Shane was even good enough to hit a cyclist with his car and then complain about it on Twitter to keep people talking about him and the BBL. (Maybe Harry Kewell should punch a slow orderer at McDonalds to get some football publicity?)
However, I think that the biggest factor in favour of the Big Bash League, is that T20 cricket is a damn good sport. It is long enough to enable a good competition and rewards good batting and bowling.
It may not have the stately majesty of Test cricket or the full day of play featured in ODIs but let’s remember, our American cousins have a summer sport about the same in time and scope as T20 and they treat it with a reverence, just short of religious.
Every criticism of T20 has been based on comparisons to other forms of cricket. I think that when you judge it on its own merits, it stands strong as a great game.
There are challenges ahead for Cricket Australia. I am surely not the only person disappointed or bemused by David Warner being in every pre-competition ad, only to get the solitary innings thanks to international duties (mind you, what an innings it was!).
Similarly, the timing of the expansion into new territories is fraught with danger.
I would like to see the competition in a three-week window with a couple of games each day. This small window could eventually be quarantined to ensure all the stars feature.
The load of cricket should not be an issue. Next month in Abu Dhabi, there is the ICC World T20 qualifying competition which features 72 matches in 12 days! Every team plays every day.
Surely the BBL teams can play every second day, allowing for travel around the country.
So well done Cricket Australia, for a great competition! I thought it was going to be an embarrassing dud and couldn’t have been more mistaken. Job well done!
(P.S. Still can’t stand the silly names and colours though!)
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (41)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- England win first Test by five wickets (5)
- Gilchrist says his playing days are over
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (44)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Aussie Hussey defends IPL after fix claims (2)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (44)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Brad Haddin must not be selected for Australia again (8)
- Is Australia finally warming to Michael Clarke? (7)
- Explore:
- Big Bash League, Cricket, Cricket Australia, Dave Warner, Sydney Thunder


January 31st 2012 @ 8:31am
Chris said | January 31st 2012 @ 8:31am | Report comment
I really don’t get the criticism about the colours and names. And as usual, I haven’t heard any of the critics come up with anything better. Keep in mind they wanted to avoid the historical ties in certain situations (i.e. neither of the Sydney teams should be in blue, etc).
But overall I agree that the BBL has been a fantastic success. There are obviously some tweaks that need to be done – scheduling is the key one to start with. And a couple of the teams need to spend a little more time on recuitment next season – yes Sydney Thunder, I’m looking at you!
January 31st 2012 @ 9:01am
turbodewd said | January 31st 2012 @ 9:01am | Report comment
CA must not fool themselves into believing that the ridiculous uniforms are part of the success. The AFL proves that modest styling is just as popular. Also, 2 teams in Melb and 2 in Sydney is a total waste. If you want to make money remove that duplication and put a team in Auckland to snare NZ viewers (why pass up a market of 4.5 million?!) and the 8th should go to the Gold Coast or Newcastle or Canberra which are the next biggest cities.
Apart from that its a good recipe. But I would go further, it should aim to be the AFL of summer. Less international cricket – more BBL! The 4-0 series whitewash of India was a pathetic spectacle due to the visitors, and they are amongst the best apparently!
January 31st 2012 @ 10:08am
Mark Young said | January 31st 2012 @ 10:08am | Report comment
I humbly submit my comments on December 23 10:53am http://www.theroar.com.au/2011/12/23/state-passion-trumps-fake-big-trash-league/
“If the Sydney Thunder and Sixers crowds are more the %120 of the Blues crowds from last year, i will admit that I am wrong and don’t know squat about this.”
Let it never be said I welch on a bet!
January 31st 2012 @ 10:56am
Matt F said | January 31st 2012 @ 10:56am | Report comment
Victory! I’d actually forgotten about that bet. Thanks for reminding me
February 1st 2012 @ 1:24pm
Mark Young said | February 1st 2012 @ 1:24pm | Report comment
Well played Matt, But did you see Senna anywayt??
January 31st 2012 @ 1:20pm
Russ said | January 31st 2012 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
Mark, alternatively your mistake was comparing BB crowds from an Ashes summer with BBL from an opponent Australians are less concerned with. The crowds from the Pakistan-WI season were of comparable size too. Will be more interesting to compare how the BBL goes when England are in town in two years, particularly if it still lacks for the test players.
January 31st 2012 @ 1:24pm
Mark Young said | January 31st 2012 @ 1:24pm | Report comment
That is true Russ, but a bet is a bet!
January 31st 2012 @ 1:40pm
Nathan of Perth said | January 31st 2012 @ 1:40pm | Report comment
I don’t know that you could say that, Russ, the crowds for the India test matches were every bit as strong as that for the Ashes.
January 31st 2012 @ 2:45pm
Russ said | January 31st 2012 @ 2:45pm | Report comment
Nathan, not sure of other grounds, but the MCG was down about 20% on last year. It makes a difference, but then so would scheduling, with the T20/ODI games in Melbourne being in the middle of the BB last year and 08/09, and after in 09/10 and this season. Might be interesting to check the T20 international crowds on Friday too. They’ve been declining year on year since India last toured (not that 60k is a bad crowd).
January 31st 2012 @ 1:25pm
Nathan of Perth said | January 31st 2012 @ 1:25pm | Report comment
You’re as honourable a man as I have met, Mark
January 31st 2012 @ 11:29am
sheek said | January 31st 2012 @ 11:29am | Report comment
T20 is obviously here to stay at some level of the game’s structure. Any form of cricket that’s over in 3 hours is going to get a huge tick from today’s attention-deprived culture.
But there’s a lot about the BBL, as mentioned by others, that is so much flim-flam, tacky add-ons. It’s all froth & bubbles, with little substance beneath the surface at present.
For starters, CA needs to ensure that T20 is here to stay & not just a passing fad to entertain bored teenagers until the next fad comes along.
The garish rainbow team colours & absurd nicknames suggest CA itself isn’t sure the BBL is a permanent thing yet!
I would say right now that CA are entitled to think that the BBL has won them a ‘battle’, but it hasn’t won the ‘war’ yet. Not by a long shot. It would be folly for CA to think they are home & hosed with the BBL…..
January 31st 2012 @ 11:58am
Chris said | January 31st 2012 @ 11:58am | Report comment
Come on sheek – let’s hear your suggestions as to what the team colours and nicknames should be!
January 31st 2012 @ 12:58pm
turbodewd said | January 31st 2012 @ 12:58pm | Report comment
Sydney Sailors – reference to the First Fleet
Adelaide Engines – reference to the motor heritage
Perth – ?
Brisbane – ?
Melbourne Miners – reference to gold mining heritage of Vic
Hobart – well Im not sure why they even have a BBL team, Hobart is too small for an AFL team. Canberra is twice the size for example.
Auckland – ?
January 31st 2012 @ 1:23pm
Mark Young said | January 31st 2012 @ 1:23pm | Report comment
Yup all of those are superior to the Sixers, Scorchers, Thunder etc, etc.
Tubodewd get on the phone to CA and sort them out!
January 31st 2012 @ 4:29pm
sheek said | January 31st 2012 @ 4:29pm | Report comment
Well, at least you made an effort at sensible suggestions, turbodewd.
Sydney Old Salts might be more appealing than Sailors. Perhaps even Mariners, although that’s over-used. Fleet is taken by the rugby union ARC.
Adelaide Hotrods. Engines sucks frankly. Or something that connects with the history – Lights after founding father Col Light. Or wombats – the state animal.
Perth Swans. Why not – everyone else has abandoned the state bird. Spirit is taken by rugby unioin ARC.
Brisbane Heat. Yeah, the BBL got that right. Nothing worse than a still ,hot, sticky summer day in the outer west flatlands of Brisbane. Or the Griffons, which I think is on the city coat of arms.
Melbourne Gallopers, tipping our hats to the city’s, & state’s, equine history. They’re also entitled to use Diggers, as in gold diggers. Although the RSL is mighty touchy about this. Axemen is taken by rugby union ARS.
Hobart Seahawks. Well, it is an island state full of pirates escaping from reality!
But seriously, as I’ve shown below, the exercise ought to be straight-forward…..
January 31st 2012 @ 4:37pm
Nathan of Perth said | January 31st 2012 @ 4:37pm | Report comment
Perth Black Swans. More Perth teams need to embrace the Black Swan and the Schwarz und Gelb.
January 31st 2012 @ 2:40pm
sheek said | January 31st 2012 @ 2:40pm | Report comment
Elementary Chris,
I accept that national club sides are the way of the future. However, it’s not difficult to retain tradition.
The teams must be the same for Sheffield Shield, Ryobi Cup (& equivalents) & BBL.
Here’s your starting 8.
1. Sydney Blues (ex-NSW). Sky blue with navy blue trim.
2. Brisbane Bulls (ex-Qld). Maroon with gold trim.
3. Perth Warriors (ex-WA). Yellow with black trim.
4. Adelaide Redbacks (ex-SA). Scarlet with navy blue & gold trim.
5. Melbourne Bushrangers (ex-Vic). Navy blue with white trim.
6. Tasmania Tigers (no change, keeps both north & south happy). Green with yellow & red trim.
7. Canberra Comets. Royal blue with gold & white trim.
8. Newcastle Miners. Royal blue with red trim.
All going well, expansion teams can be considered in the future for Gold Coast, Geelong, East Melbourne & West Sydney, etc (in all 3 forms).
But I’m guessing test cricket & Sheffield Shield are on the way out anyway. I don’t believe the will is there (from CA/ICC, etc) to preserve the longer forms of the game…..
January 31st 2012 @ 2:51pm
Nathan of Perth said | January 31st 2012 @ 2:51pm | Report comment
Three NSW/NSW’s-pet-territory-Canberra teams, one Victorian? Curious choice.
January 31st 2012 @ 3:13pm
sheek said | January 31st 2012 @ 3:13pm | Report comment
Nathan of Perth,
Not really, NSW has always traditionally been the power-house of Australian cricket, often more so than Victoria. Just today in the local papers, is a ’2nd XI’ of NSW players now appearing for other states.
I recall during the 1970s for example, Northern NSW, who played out of Newcastle, could pick a pretty powerful XI of at least one current test player, & maybe a couple of past & future test players. Also several players with Shield experience.
Back then they were definitely stronger than Tasmania.
The Canberra Comets played in the domestic limited overs comp for several seasons, some years ago. Newcastle & Canberra are among 7 of 8 most populous cities in Australia (Gold Coast being the other).
So adding Newcastle & Canberra is a logical natural progression…..
January 31st 2012 @ 3:20pm
Nathan of Perth said | January 31st 2012 @ 3:20pm | Report comment
That could probably be more honestly translated ‘has always dominated the selection board’
That said, a Canberra and Newcastle side, particularly the former, would be a very welcome inclusion.
January 31st 2012 @ 3:32pm
Renegade said | January 31st 2012 @ 3:32pm | Report comment
Sounds like an envious western australian to me lol
January 31st 2012 @ 3:52pm
Nathan of Perth said | January 31st 2012 @ 3:52pm | Report comment
Every other state says it too, Renegade
January 31st 2012 @ 5:21pm
Matt F said | January 31st 2012 @ 5:21pm | Report comment
The other states are clearly just as envious Nathan! It doesn’t stop them from signing NSW players though
January 31st 2012 @ 6:25pm
Nathan of Perth said | January 31st 2012 @ 6:25pm | Report comment
Stops them getting Test Selection if we can get them into other state’s sides!
January 31st 2012 @ 7:43pm
Don Corleone said | January 31st 2012 @ 7:43pm | Report comment
What are people’s thoughts on a mid-BBL state of origin series…like the old Aussie Rules state carnivals?
Two conferences: North-East- NSW, Vic, Qld,
South-west: WA, SA, Tas
Each team plays each other once and the winners of the conferences play a grand final.
If domestic one-day dies a natural death…this would be a way to keep the state identities alive in limited-overs.
I’d also go for a traditional/ old skool look with 1930s style VCA, NSWCA, QCA cap logos. The current logos could stay on the shirt…uniform colours and the nicknames Blues, Redbacks and Warriors stay.
January 31st 2012 @ 10:00pm
Don Corleone said | January 31st 2012 @ 10:00pm | Report comment
These would be my additional Big Bash team suggestions:-
(Name – Colours – Mascot – Ground)
Newcastle Steelers – Silver/Black – Steele worker – Newcastle #1 (upgraded)
Canberra Bombers – Yellow/Royal Blue – Canberra Bomber – Manuka Oval
Geelong Pistons/Autos – Navy Blue/Grey – Vintage Ute – Simonds Stadium
Gold Coast Sharks – Gold/White – Great White Shark – Gold Coast Stadium
February 2nd 2012 @ 12:12pm
Chris said | February 2nd 2012 @ 12:12pm | Report comment
sheek – that list is a cop out. CA (for beter or worse) has stated they want to get away from the traditional colours and names for the BBL teams.
And where is the Newcastle team going to play?
January 31st 2012 @ 1:37pm
Nathan of Perth said | January 31st 2012 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
Lets be honest, sheek, for all the buzz about T20 after it was formerly labelled as such, this sort of very limited overs cricket comprised a goodly portion of the lower grade cricket underpinning the sport in Aus. People just can’t blow entire days per game anymore.
And I’d say its won a bit more than a battle, though yes, not a war. Definitely a successful campaign season, I’d say.
January 31st 2012 @ 2:42pm
sheek said | January 31st 2012 @ 2:42pm | Report comment
Well Nathan,
As I’ve suggested elsewhere, it may well be with all the money & marketing being thrown at BBL, that CA is preparing & conditioning the viewing public to accept long-term T20 cricket at the eventual demise of test cricket & Sheffield Shield.
January 31st 2012 @ 2:57pm
Nathan of Perth said | January 31st 2012 @ 2:57pm | Report comment
Test Match CAN be the mainstay still because it only requires people burn a few days of annual leave to attend the international matches rather than burning scads of it to attend repeated domestic Sheffield Shield matches. Wouldn’t mind seeing the T20 occupy the more summer months whilst money is invested into smaller Sheffield Shield grounds for autumn/winter/spring months play. You wouldn’t run the T20 hard up against the NRL/AFL but you could certainly get low-spectator interest Sheffield Shield cricket busily establishing the basis of professional Australian cricket at other times. After all, what is the point of having the Shield matches in a hundred thousand seat stadium when the same pitch can be established at an alternative venue.
Sheffield Shield is for the players, BBL is for the spectators, whilst Test Cricket is for both.
January 31st 2012 @ 3:00pm
Jason said | January 31st 2012 @ 3:00pm | Report comment
I still have confidence that eventually the crowds will realise what a poor substitute for test cricket T20 is.
I mean, no single game really has any meaning, there are basically no consequences if you get out, bowling is reduced to taking the pace off the ball and landing it in a very small area where your field settings should prevent any big shots and very few games have any genuine tension – certainly nothing like the build up of a couple of sessions of a close test. Even what is seen as the great fun in T20 – hitting 4s and 6s – descends to the point of boredom. (In some of those Chris Gayle innings, the biggest talking point was not that he sit a six but whether one was more than 110m).
I may be an old(ish) fogey but I am not convinced that T20 won’t go the same way as basketball in this country as people realise that fireworks, loudspeakers and dancing girls do not make for a great long term sport.
January 31st 2012 @ 3:10pm
Nathan of Perth said | January 31st 2012 @ 3:10pm | Report comment
Thankfully, we’re not asking people to take to T20 as a substitute for Test Cricket. In fact, one of the things I noticed most about the summer was how the Border-Gavaskar and the BBL created a positive feedback between each other.
And although there is a greater focus on limiting the run rate rather than taking wickets, you are sorely mistaken if you believe there are no consequences to getting out, which the Scorchers found out to their utter dismay in the BBL final.
January 31st 2012 @ 3:21pm
sheek said | January 31st 2012 @ 3:21pm | Report comment
Jason/Nathan,
This is where my opinion diverges from yours.
I’ve spoken before about the “unintended consequences” of history. CA are very careful to talk about how T20 is supposed to compliment test cricket.
But with the enormous resources of money & marketing being poured into the BBL, CA might be unintentionally (or intentionally) conditioning the public to accept another form of cricket altogether.
Of course, I want to see test cricket preserved, but logic says this might not be possible…..
January 31st 2012 @ 4:15pm
Jason said | January 31st 2012 @ 4:15pm | Report comment
Of course there are consequences in the course of the game but losing wickets is the natural result of how the game is played.
What I meant is that for a batsman, they can get out going for a slog or reverse paddle or whatever and not really worry if they get out because i) it is what they are meant to do and ii) they will get another bat in a couple of days anyway.
January 31st 2012 @ 4:22pm
Nathan of Perth said | January 31st 2012 @ 4:22pm | Report comment
But they’re not going to get a second chance in the match itself and despite what you said earlier, in a league a match has meaning, in particular in the finals. Gibbs and Ronchi were probably lamenting their dismissals intensely given the tremendous impact they had on the match. Which, by the way, were the result of good planning and bowling.
January 31st 2012 @ 4:39pm
Jason said | January 31st 2012 @ 4:39pm | Report comment
Sheek – if you are worried about the demise of test cricket, just take yourself to an NBL game.
January 31st 2012 @ 5:21pm
sheek said | January 31st 2012 @ 5:21pm | Report comment
Jason,
Watching basketball hurts my neck – just like watching tennis in the old days when the only camera was set up at the net.
Tennis: left-right-left-right-left-right…..
Basketball: left-right-left-right-left-right…..
Notice now how the camera at the tennis is set at one end. So instead of turning your head left to right, you now only have to nod: up-down-up-down-up-down.
Other than that, I have no idea what you meant about watching a NBL game…..
February 1st 2012 @ 12:34am
Maggie said | February 1st 2012 @ 12:34am | Report comment
Re the bored teenagers – I noticed that while there were lots of kids at the one BBL match I went to they seemed more interested in doing the Mexican Wave than watching the cricket. Even though this was one of the matches that was only decided on the last ball they were still doing Waves in the last over. Nothing wrong with that if they find it fun – but makes me wonder about their interest in the “cricket”.
February 1st 2012 @ 11:52am
Luc said | February 1st 2012 @ 11:52am | Report comment
And I’ve read this exact same comment about every form of the game for the last 20 years. It’s got nothing to do with the BBL.
January 31st 2012 @ 9:08pm
Swampy said | January 31st 2012 @ 9:08pm | Report comment
Why does Hobart have a team? Well they averaged 12k per match (which definitely will be more in future with the increased capacity signed off on for AFL) and for 5 matches total 60k times $20 per ticket equals $1.2m in the CA kitty. So I guess it wasn’t too much of a failure…
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
February 1st 2012 @ 8:28am
sheek said | February 1st 2012 @ 8:28am | Report comment
Don Corleone,
Great effort with the team nicknames & suggestions. This is what I like to see – a considered effort, combining history, tradition, lifestyles of a region.
Very well done…..
February 1st 2012 @ 8:48am
sheek said | February 1st 2012 @ 8:48am | Report comment
Don Corleone,
Just further to your siggestions.
Canberra Bombers – what inventive thinking. Of course, there was a jet-powered light bomber in the 1950s known as the Canberra Bomber. Very clever!
You called Newcastle the Steelers, which is probably more appropriate than Miners. However, I don’t know what the former rugby league Illawarra Steelers would think of that!
Also, you suggested colours of silver & black. You may know this, but when Newcastle first entered the inaugural Sydney rugby league comp in 1908, they played in cherry & white hoops, with black shorts. Same as English rugby club Gloucester.
However, when they were readmitted in 1988, both St.George & Illawarra were playing in red & white, so they chose red & blue. I guess it’s fair to say, red & blue have become associated with the Newcastle-Hunter region only through the Newcastle Knights.
February 1st 2012 @ 9:08am
Mark Young said | February 1st 2012 @ 9:08am | Report comment
I agree Sheek – It just goes to show that if a bunch of fans can do a better job then what is Cricket Australia paying their Marketing clever nicks for?
I think that what Jason was referring to with the NBL was that back in the early 90s, it was the big things, and people were forecasting it would take over from Cricket etc.
February 1st 2012 @ 9:32am
sheek said | February 1st 2012 @ 9:32am | Report comment
Mark,
Yes, the NBL was the biggest thing in Australian sport for several years during the early 90s. Then it ran out of steam. Once the novelty wore off, fans drifted away in alarming numbers. I mentioned this myself in previous threads.
As many other Roarers have mentioned, CA attempts to be targeting interest in things other than the actual quality of the cricket – gimmicky nicknames, garish team colours, mexican waves, constantly blaring music, offers of prizes on the big screen.
None of this actually has anything to do with the quality of the cricket on the pitch. What happens when the novelty wears off…..?
February 1st 2012 @ 10:38am
jameswm said | February 1st 2012 @ 10:38am | Report comment
In terms of timing, I think we need to keep two thing in mind.
1. It has to be in the school holidays. Kids who aren’t hugely into cricket love the T20 and the shorter format helps them without doubt. All teams can have afternoon games (on a double header day) which are even better for the kids. This might hurt gate takings, but not for weekend games.
2. You want to try to avoid clashes with tests, to have your best players playing. I think a 5-test series can be finished by 6 Jan, at the end of the Sydney test. You can start your 3-week window straight away, and the comp can run for the last 3 weeks of the school holidays. Perfect. Fits both categories. 8 teams, each team plays 7 games in 3 weeks, which is only 2-3 per week. And you don’t need a week before the final. The semis can be on a wed/thurs night with the final on the last Saturday before school goes back, and the ODI series can run during February.
February 1st 2012 @ 10:46am
Mark Young said | February 1st 2012 @ 10:46am | Report comment
Great comment Jameswm, See, it can work!
February 1st 2012 @ 11:14am
The Cattery said | February 1st 2012 @ 11:14am | Report comment
I ‘m not sure if anyone has mentioned this yet, but the BBL grand final got ratings on Fox of 459, while semi-final 2 got 300k – these are super, super results, amongst the best of the best.
It seems to me a bit perplexing that people would immediately start concluding that it’s all going to fall in a heap – it makes more sense to me that with even CA taken by surprise by the success of the league, that they will endeavour to build on it and make sure it’s sustainable. If you can get these sorts fo results when going into it in a half-assed manner – what will happen when they start taking it seriously?
With obvious candidates for expansion, and places like Canberra crying out for more cricket for years now, and FTA knocking on the door, well, let us say CA has plenty to ponder, and it’s mostly good news.
February 2nd 2012 @ 12:16pm
Chris said | February 2nd 2012 @ 12:16pm | Report comment
Good point Cattery – various critics are moaning about colours and team nicknames and predicting the death of cricket, but at the end of the day, cricket is a sport that is there for enjoyment. If more people enjoy T20 than Test cricket than why is that a problem?
I personally like all forms of cricket, but it’s not up to me to decide what people should or shouldn’t be interested in.
February 2nd 2012 @ 8:50pm
Don Corleone said | February 2nd 2012 @ 8:50pm | Report comment
If New Zealand get a team in the Big Bash at some point…this young lady must surely be a boundary rider….