Sheffield Shield key for Australian cricket
By GarethIan, 31 Jan 2012 GarethIan is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- Australian Cricket, BBL, Big Bash League, Cricket, Sheffield Shield, Test cricket, Twenty20
Throughout the summer there has been a lot of focus placed on the Big Bash League and its impact on the Sheffield Shield and in-turn Test cricket.
Australia’s four Test obliteration of an impotent Indian side prevented any significant discovery of the flaws in the current scheduling.
Had Australia not performed with such effect, the selection panel would have been pondering long and hard over how to choose viable replacements given the lack of four-day cricket to gauge upon.
Despite Australia’s success the ever-increasing commercialisation of domestic cricket is very much in need of addressing.
Over the past few years there have been a number of changes to the structure and scheduling of domestic cricket in Australia.
However, as a result of the demand created by accelerating lifestyles it has been the game’s shortest form being revolutionised much to the disadvantage of four-day cricket.
From a money making point of view this is a proven method, supplying what is in the most demand. Unfortunately for Cricket Australia, Shield cricket is the breeding ground for Test match cricketers and where the intricacies and technicalities are best taught.
Furthermore, four-day cricket is the only way to prepare a cricketers body for the rigours of Test cricket.
There are very few players who can, like David Warner has recently shown, make the transition from Twenty20 cricket to Test match cricket. Without a strong Sheffield Shield, Australia’s Test cricket will suffer.
As such, Australia’s domestic cricket needs yet another revamp to include four-day cricket throughout the summer whilst still maintaining a financially viable model.
This is best done by continuing the recent success of domestic Twenty20 cricket in Australia and stimulating interest in Shield cricket.
The first change necessary is to schedule the season in a way that enables Test match regulars to play for their state, especially at the start of the summer. This will have two major effects upon Shield cricket.
Firstly, it will attract more fans as it gives the public more opportunities to watch their cricketing heroes. Secondly, it will improve the quality of cricket being played at the domestic level providing a format which is even more conducive to generating Test cricketers than current Shield cricket.
The next step in increasing the interest for Shield cricket is to amplify its availability through introducing day-night Shield matches. This allows people to attend a session or two of the cricket after work or school.
The sceptics will claim that it can provide one team with an unfair advantage but the fact is cricket it not fair – pitches deteriorate, the weather changes. Not that this will be a great unfairness.
Starting the day’s cricket at midday will result in an 8pm finish, a time at which most cities of Australia where Shield cricket is played are still quite light due to daylight savings.
In fact, earlier this year the fourth day of a Shield match between Victoria and Queensland went well past 8pm at the MCG in search of a result.
To accompany the day-night Shield matches should be a Twenty20 or 50-over match either the day before or after in an effort to condition our country’s cricketers to five day cricket.
The injuries to young bowlers James Pattinson and Patrick Cummins this summer are indications that the domestic system isn’t priming athletes for test cricket well enough.
An example proposal would be to play a Twenty20 or 50 over game on a Friday night to attract the fans looking for a pleasant way to finish off the working week and then a Shield match starting on the Saturday.
Days one and two, those usually with the highest attendance, would fall on the weekend providing more opportunity for patrons to attend whilst days three and four could be attended after work as a social outing or means to unwind.
On the subject of 50-over cricket, the need for a strongly followed domestic competition is almost nonexistent.
There are no skills used in 50 over cricket that are not utilised more so in the longer or shorter forms of the game except for complicated captaincy due to fielding restrictions and powerplays which result in a contrived and supervised version of the sport.
Whilst it would be rash to cease the 50 over competition at the domestic level in the next few years it might be best played in a shortened competition played alongside other cricket rather than a six-month season.
Rather, the Twenty20 competition should be extended following the Big Bash’s recent success. Twenty20 cricket is the future of the short form of cricket and 50 over matches are currently trying to fill a void that for now does not need to be filled.
There are, of course, many other initiatives that need to be incorporated to create a model that is successful both from a business and sporting point of view but what is certainly needed is more importance being placed upon Shield cricket.
There is no arguing it is the environment in which future Test cricketers develop to become greats in the pinnacle of the sport.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (41)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- England win first Test by five wickets (5)
- Gilchrist says his playing days are over
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (44)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Aussie Hussey defends IPL after fix claims (2)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (44)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Brad Haddin must not be selected for Australia again (8)
- Is Australia finally warming to Michael Clarke? (7)
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, BBL, Big Bash League, Cricket, Sheffield Shield, Test cricket, Twenty20


January 31st 2012 @ 11:46am
sheek said | January 31st 2012 @ 11:46am | Report comment
The questions surrounding the future of cricket are firstly fundamentally philosophical, which will then impact on the structure. Will future generations care about test cricket? Do they care enough now?
Talking about the Sheffield Shield is meaningless unless we know how serious people are about preserving test cricket. The two go hand in glove.
If we were serious about preserving test cricket & Sheffield Shield, then I would have thought this was where CA/ICC, etc would be focusing their attention. Not by concentrating on another form of the game that could become a serious rival, potential usurper & ultimate destroyer to test cricket.
As much as I’m a fan of test cricket, I understand it won’t survive without tinkering. 5 x 6 hour days is too long. Reduce that to 4 x 7 hour day/nights. Introduce coloured national clothing. Jazz it up. Lunch & tea breaks extra added on.
England used to have 3 day tests. So if 4 x 7 day/night tests is still considered too long, then reduce it to 3 x 8 hour day/night tests. That’s better than losing test cricket altogether, isn’t it?
Ditto Sheffield Shield. 4 x 6 hour days is too long. Reduce this to 3 x 7 hour day/nights. As with test cricket, introduce state/provincial coloured clothing. Again, jazz it up. Lunch & tea breaks extra added on.
Also, Sheffield Shield might consider changing from states to national clubs, with an additional two teams. Consider this 8 team Sheffield Shield – Sydney Blues, Brisbane Bulls, Perth Warriors, Adelaide Redbacks, Melbourne Bushrangers, Tasmania Tigers, Canberra Comets & Newcastle Miners.
These 8 national club teams continue the tradition of preserving the former state nicknames. Furthermore, these 8 national club teams would be the same for Sheffield Shield, Ryobi Cup (& equivalents) & BBL.
I’m just suspicious with all the money & marketing directed at T20, that CA is preparing & conditioning the viewing public to accept a new form of cricket – T20 (BBL) in place of test cricket & Sheffield Shield.
January 31st 2012 @ 1:37pm
Hiudsns said | January 31st 2012 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
Are you joking? England never played 3 day tests. Making the players wear coloured clothing isn’t going to attract any more fans. Lengthening the days will just put more strain on the players one of test crickets charms is the length of the game. The Sheffield shield doesn’t need any jazzing up it will never attract spectators it’s simply a development competition for future test cricketers. Tests are fine as they are, however I wouldn’t mind seeing day night test cricket introduced as it would actually pull in crowds.
January 31st 2012 @ 2:46pm
sheek said | January 31st 2012 @ 2:46pm | Report comment
Hiudsns – you born last week? Go do some history research…..
January 31st 2012 @ 8:56pm
Atawhai Drive said | January 31st 2012 @ 8:56pm | Report comment
Hiudsns, you need to do some research before lifting a finger.
To take just one example, the 1926 Ashes series in England consisted of four three-day Tests and one timeless Test. All five Tests started on a Saturday, with a rest day following on Sunday.
Tests have been played over three, four, five and six days (Australian and India played a six-day Test in 1978). And there were also timeless Tests, played to a finish.
January 31st 2012 @ 12:36pm
sheffield shield said | January 31st 2012 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
You need Sheffield Shield cricket to build the test team but let’s face it – 4 days or 5 days – very few people are interested in attending.
It can be done in the off season so that we can have all the players available elsewhere.
January 31st 2012 @ 2:26pm
Nathan of Perth said | January 31st 2012 @ 2:26pm | Report comment
Interested in attending hell. Very few people who do not live on the interest of their trust funds could possibly be ABLE to attend Sheffield Shield matches.
Yes, this is a critical form of development for the national game, but lets not kid ourselves, it is impossible to make this an easily attendable competition in the modern era.
January 31st 2012 @ 2:50pm
sheek said | January 31st 2012 @ 2:50pm | Report comment
That’s the dilemma, isn’t it? Do nothing, & the longer forms will die anyway. Try to make them relevant to the present with some tweaking, & who knows, you might buy some extra decades…!
The proud pine, standing tall & straight, is bent & broken in the storm. The wise oak, clinging strong beside the river bank, bends & twists with the gale.
We can be like the proud pine, & be broken quickly, or the wise oak, adapting & changing as necessary…..
January 31st 2012 @ 10:16pm
Don Corleone said | January 31st 2012 @ 10:16pm | Report comment
Test cricket isn’t going to die. The Ashes is not only a significant sporting event but an historical and cultural event between Australia and England. The Melbourne and Sydney tests have become engrained in the social culture of the cities. It may change but it will never die.
February 1st 2012 @ 12:26am
Maggie said | February 1st 2012 @ 12:26am | Report comment
I love Sheffield Shield matches, sitting up in the Ladies Stand at the SCG which is forbidden territory for non-members at Test matches, close enough to the SpeedBlitz Blues dressing room that I can hear anyone with the misfortune of getting a duck throw his bat and curse, with my thermos of tea and sandwich. Ah it is bliss. It is true that there are not many of us but we are a loyal lot and we enjoy our cricket.
January 31st 2012 @ 7:27pm
Don Corleone said | January 31st 2012 @ 7:27pm | Report comment
Rather than throw the baby out with the bathwater, I think tradition can’t be under-estimated and I think the Shield’s history could be it’s greatest asset.
Baseball is a prime example. Teams like the Yankees, Red Sox, Reds, Detroit, Phillies and Pittsburgh have barely changed their logos and uniforms, if at all, some since the 1800s. They still play with white or white on pin-stripe for home games and grey for away games.
I see people walking around with Yankees caps with the old NY symbol, I reckon the old VCA (white on dark blue), NSWCA (powder blue, royal blue and red cross) and QCA (white on maroon) logos are just as historically significant and marketable symbols. The nicknames Bulls, Blues and Bushrangers could be maintained.
I’ve never seen this historical side of the Shield really promoted…i.e. merchandise. I think it could complement the revamped Big Bash.
Day/night Shield on Thurs/Fri/Sat/Sun could be a great idea.
Also, I think it would be a joke if Foxsports did not have a dedicated cricket channel some time in the future where Shield games could be shown (especially after the ratings of the Big Bash). I have friends in Canada who have 2 dedicated cricket channels to chose from.
February 1st 2012 @ 8:55am
sheek said | February 1st 2012 @ 8:55am | Report comment
Well done Don Corleone,
I like you – someone with an interest in the history & tradition of sports.
You know, one thing puzzles me. My old 1970s editions of Australian Cricket yearbooks, describe Victoria’s Sheffield Shield colours back then as black cap & twin black stripes on jumper (no other colours being permitted anywhere else).
Now I always thought Victoria’s state colour was a dominant navy blue with white as an assist. Either the cricket editor was colour blind, or indeed, the Victorian cricket team did play in black caps. I would love someone to confirm this.
And yes, history & tradition is too quickly dismissed by the 20 & 30 something year olds marketing whizz kids only interested in the quick buck.
I agree with you – don’t throw the baby out with the bath water. Instead of pouring all its money & marketing into T20, CA ought to be directing some of those funds to improving Sheffield Shield. There are ways & means. And reconnecting with history & tradition is a good place to start.
February 1st 2012 @ 11:53am
Atawhai Drive said | February 1st 2012 @ 11:53am | Report comment
Thanks to Maggie, Don Corleone and Sheek for sticking up for the Sheffield Shield.
Watching a Shield match at the SCG is like being a member of an exclusive club, in which the sole criterion for entry is not your wealth or your social status, but your enthusiasm for the game.
As someone just on the wrong side of 60, it can be a little disconcerting to look around occasionally and realise I’m one of the youngest spectators present, but what the hell? As long as I can comfortably manage the walk up from Central, I’ll get along to a Shield match or two every season.
A real pleasure of arriving early at the SCG for a Shield match is the chance to watch net practice. At some grounds, net spectators are kept at a distance either behind the bowler’s arm or side-on to the action. At the SCG, you’re behind the batsman and quite close to the net _ a wicketkeeper’s perspective.
Watching Dougie Bollinger bowl to Michael Clarke one day, a fellow tragic beside me turned and said: “That’s why they call it fast bowling.” I knew what he meant.
Spectator numbers have little relevance to Shield cricket. It is what it always has been: a development platform for the only form of cricket that matters, Test cricket. Long may they both continue.
February 1st 2012 @ 5:58pm
Maggie said | February 1st 2012 @ 5:58pm | Report comment
I agree with everything you have said Atawhai particularly the bit about the importance of Shield as a development platform. Another of the things I like about Shield games is that because the spectator noise is not overwhelming, you can actually hear what is being said on the field. For example in the 2010-11 season, after Nathan Hauritz had been dropped from the Test team (and treated badly in a lot of media comment) and returned to the NSW team, I could hear how much encouragement and support he was giving to Steve Smith and Steve O’Keefe when they were bowling. My admiration for Hauritz grew enormously.
February 1st 2012 @ 6:06pm
Red Kev said | February 1st 2012 @ 6:06pm | Report comment
I’m going to make the effort to go to my first shield game this year (assuming it isn’t raining and that my boss is nice of course) – NSW v Qld starting on March 1. I am hoping to get down on the train for the Friday and part of Saturday (2nd and 3rd) of that game.
February 1st 2012 @ 7:23pm
Maggie said | February 1st 2012 @ 7:23pm | Report comment
Well sounds as if that will make at least three of us there! Actually there are always a couple of hundred at least. Hope you write a comment piece for The Roar afterwards.
February 1st 2012 @ 2:01pm
Talisman said | February 1st 2012 @ 2:01pm | Report comment
Excellent points Don Corleone – especially the one about the traditional State logos – they would seem to me to be much more ‘marketable’ than fancy names. I just can’t come to grips with the State’s nicknames. If someone says the Bulls, I’m thinking, now is that WA or SA? And who wants to be named after highway robbers & bandits? Or be associated with deadly spiders? I’m surprised Tassie didn’t become the convicts. But, as DC pointed out, the traditional colours, logos & names may be more valuable than CA realise.
February 1st 2012 @ 7:36pm
Don Corleone said | February 1st 2012 @ 7:36pm | Report comment
@ sheek The white VCA on navy blue has been the prominent Victorian cap. I have a set of 1934 cigarette cards and players like Woodfull and Darling are wearing it.
Interestingly, South Australia had a navy blue cap for many years.