London’s Olympic Games have a long way to come
By Justin Cinque, 10 Feb 2012 Justin Cinque is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- 2012 London Olympics, London Olympics, Olympic Games
The 2012 Olympic Games are just under six months away, and London is preparing for the biggest event in the United Kingdom since the 1966 FIFA World Cup. But just how successful will the Games of the XXX Olympiad be?
Two Mondays back, while in London, I took the underground out to Stratford in the north-eastern suburbs (for football followers, that’s about halfway between the headquarters of Championship side West Ham United and League One strugglers Leyton Orient).
I was heading to the site of the upcoming Olympic Games. Having lived in Sydney during what we liked to call the greatest Olympics ever, I was disappointed with what I saw.
London’s Olympic Park isn’t nearly finished, and perhaps this is why there isn’t any signage at Stratford Underground to point visitors in the right direction. (Strictly speaking there was one sign, except that one was sending people in the wrong direction.)
Following the incorrect sign led me towards the Athletes’ Village, and while it was still supported with scaffolding, I can still happily declare it will outdo Delhi’s Village for the 2010 Commonwealth Games.
However, having spent a week working in that Commonwealth Games Village in 2010, London wouldn’t need much more than a two-star rating to surpass it.
Athletes’ Villages are rarely impressive buildings, and London’s is no different, but you’d expect the complex to adequately house and accommodate the athletes.
The Olympic Stadium, situated in a small gully about half a kilometre from Stratford Underground station, can’t be seen until you are only two or three hundred metres away, and the stadium itself doesn’t boast impressive architecture to rival Beijing’s Bird’s Nest.
If you’re wondering, those last two points are both negatives.
Sydney’s ANZ Stadium can be seen from as far away as four or five kilometres, so whenever you drive by you are reminded, if not of the 2000 Olympics, then at least of the stadium’s presence in western Sydney. London doesn’t have this.
Furthermore, the 2012 stadium’s design (relatively flat and circular) is aesthetically unexceptional. The exterior is rather old and boring; it is nowhere near as impressive as Melbourne’s much smaller AAMI Park, for example, which cost half as much to build.
Adjacent to the Olympic stadium is the aquatic centre, which could best be described as an eyesore, or to speak more politically, underwhelming. In that assessment it is not dissimilar to the main arena across the road.
We’ve seen impressive stadia from Germany and South Africa during recent FIFA World Cups; from New Zealand, principally through Dunedin’s Forsyth Barr Stadium, at last year’s Rugby World Cup, and from Beijing in 2008. These don’t just help their event leave a legacy. They demonstrate improvements and achievements in technology and engineering, and leave their countries a first-class facility for the decades to come.
London’s 80,000-seater stadium is advertised as eco-friendly (merely a requirement these days), but it fails to paint London in a positive light. Luckily there are buildings in the CBD like the Shard of Glass (a skyscraper to be completed in time for the Games) that will give a better impression of the city.
And there’s no point betting where the Olympic flame will sit.
The 35-metre high wire structure sitting right behind the stadium could only be there for one purpose. While it is different and won’t play to everyone’s taste, it can be used as a signpost by patrons trying to find their way to the stadium, although you would think the Organising Committee will have proper signage installed by the time the Games begin.
Surrounding the stadium is meant to be the Olympic Park. At the moment, it could be more accurately called the ‘Olympic Construction Site’ because the whole complex is still being completed.
There’s plenty of time to have this finished, but a couple of weeks of rain could make things interesting.
There has been plenty of publicity about the future of the Olympic Park after the Games. This will likely be determined by whether a football team takes on the stadium as their new home ground.
There was interest from Tottenham Hotspur but it appears West Ham, providing they overcome legal challenges from Leyton Orient and Spurs, will move into the stadium for the 2014/2015 football season.
Whether the Hammers’ move to the Olympic stadium is a successful one remains to be seen. At the nearby Stratford City Westfields, a new West Ham shop was opened late last year but folded in less than a couple of months.
The Westfields will be a big hit during the Olympics. It is situated between the Olympic Site and the Underground station and includes a casino which will give fans, and I guess athletes, a way to spend their evenings during the Games.
Better still, the shopping centre will give the Olympic site something Olympic Park in Sydney hasn’t really had – some real atmosphere after the Games. I was at Homebush earlier in the week and it was good to see a small commercial district finally giving the area some much-needed life.
But London is a fantastic city with plenty of sights and history, meaning there is no reason why it can’t host a great Olympics.
The transport system in London is outstanding (the tube is among the world’s best metropolitan train systems) and it will help the Games run smoothly.
But the modest funding compared to the billions thrown at Beijing by the Chinese Government could undermine London’s event. You only have to look at the quality of stadia to get an idea.
And there seems to be a lack of interest from the London public about the Games.
The locals weren’t talking about it while I was there. Most of the talk was about the English Premier League, and more specifically, Arsene Wegner’s issues at Arsenal.
There certainly isn’t the excitement there was in Sydney five or six months out.
In London, I couldn’t honestly tell the city was about to host the biggest (or second-biggest, depending who you talk to) sporting event in the world.
There weren’t many signs or banners (although there is a faulty countdown clock in Trafalgar Square), no ads on the sides of buses, and I didn’t see one TV commercial. There was certainly no rival to John Clarke’s The Games mockumentary that aired just before the 2000 Olympics. Something just didn’t feel right.
It could be because this will be London’s third time hosting. Or perhaps it’s an indication that the Olympics don’t mean as much as they once did, especially in a first-world country like England. Maybe it will be better to reserve judgement for a few months.
One thing is certain: for London’s Games to impress like those in Beijing or Sydney a lot more work has to be done. The Olympic site must be finished, the city has to get itself in the mood and the locals need to come to the party.
With the world watching, London wouldn’t want to blow it.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Other Sports articles
- My top 10 Australian sporting stars over 50 years (81)
- Frankel, 2012 Lockinge Stakes: Live race updates, blog (70)
- Miami Heat level NBA playoffs with Pacers at 2-2 (43)
- Frankel sounds warning to Black Caviar with resounding win (26)
- How to like LeBron James, despite it all (26)
- Black Caviar ready to travel after celebrating her 21st (16)
- London Olympics: How will Nine and Foxtel go? (13)
- Netball champs look for first Aussie win
- The Roar: UFC 146 previews and predictions (2)
- Australians face tough draws at Roland Garros (4)
- King Novak chases record Grand Slam tally (3)
- Frank Mir out to cement his place amongst the greats at UFC 146 (6)
- Sixers claw their way back into NBA series
- The great UFC 146 shake up: who has missed out? (2)
- The Roar: UFC 146 previews and predictions (2)
- Australians face tough draws at Roland Garros (4)
- King Novak chases record Grand Slam tally (3)
- Frank Mir out to cement his place amongst the greats at UFC 146 (6)
- The great UFC 146 shake up: who has missed out? (2)
- UFC 146: Heavyweight main card should pack a punch (1)
- Federer back in game to grab world’s number one spot (3)
- Explore:
- 2012 London Olympics, London Olympics, Olympic Games


February 10th 2012 @ 9:50am
Richard said | February 10th 2012 @ 9:50am | Report comment
One thing the Brits know how to do is how to put on a world class event. They seem to be able to do it at will whenever there’s a Royal occasion. The apparent lack of “excitement” could actually be the calmness borne of experience. In a great city like London, the games may not “stick out” like they might have done in Sydney or Beijing, but I have no doubt they will be highly successful nevertheless.
February 10th 2012 @ 11:38am
John said | February 10th 2012 @ 11:38am | Report comment
Interesting piece Justin – (impressed you were thinking about The Roar while deep overseas! – Is there a UK Roar like site I wonder?).
I hope this puts London back on the map for being a great city – a friend lives there and loves it, but you get the feeling the London shine has worn off just a little with the riots (which, no, where not necessarily in London CBD – but you hear a little bit about London riots and that’s enough for some to avoid it for years)
February 10th 2012 @ 4:26pm
jcinque said | February 10th 2012 @ 4:26pm | Report comment
Truth be told, I was sort of dragged out there but enjoyed it all the same.
Hosting the Olympics will only do the city good things especially if they do a good job. The whole two weeks will be postive PR for London if it all goes well.
February 10th 2012 @ 1:58pm
Johnno said | February 10th 2012 @ 1:58pm | Report comment
Sydney the best games ever and the head of the IOC said that to a world wide television audience too. So if the IOC man says it is the best games ever it must be as they know what a good Olympics more valid than any one elses opinion.
February 10th 2012 @ 2:02pm
Julian Cheyne said | February 10th 2012 @ 2:02pm | Report comment
A little local knowledge might come in useful
First, read some local comment in response to articles in the British press. ‘Lack of interest’ is a kind way of putting widespread hostility and derision. Take the comments to an article I picked at random http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/olympics/9066493/London-2012-Olympics-tickets-will-be-flown-over-from-Arkansas-as-printing-contract-goes-to-American-firm.html#disqus_thread
Second, Spurs have abandoned their bid to move to the stadium and the deal with West Ham has fallen through. The whole thing has started from scratch. West Ham appear to be still bidding but have said they may drop out altogether.
Third, a couple of weeks of rain will make absolutely no difference to the construction programme. I know some people think Britain is perpetually shrouded in rain clouds and fog!
Fourth, curious that Justin didn’t see any advertising for the Olympics. Personally I am fed up with it. It’s all over the TV and newspapers.
Fifth, we’ve already had a mocumentary, two series on BBCTV called Twenty Twelve, almost more real than the thing itself! I think there’s one more on the way.
Sixth, not sure what he is referring to with the 35 metre wire structure. I think he may be thinking of the Orbit, also under construction, a ridiculous steel ‘sculpture’ by Anish Kapoor.
Seventh, East London is flat so it is not entirely surprising that the stadium cannot be seen for four or five kilometres. Not many buildings can. It would have to be a skyscraper! But thank heavens it doesn’t. The idea of this monstrosity being seen for miles is truly appalling.
Eighth, interesting Justin thinks the tube is in such good shape to cope. The government is warning people not to come into London, to walk, cycle to work or just to stay at home for fear the system can’t cope with both the normal traffic and the spectators coming to the Games!
Still it’s always interesting to read of others’ perceptions of the place!
February 10th 2012 @ 3:59pm
Johnno said | February 10th 2012 @ 3:59pm | Report comment
Sydney Olympic park was such a good spot. just a easy train ride out there to Homebush, very easy.
February 10th 2012 @ 4:17pm
jcinque said | February 10th 2012 @ 4:17pm | Report comment
Always good to hear from a local.
I can honestly say (and after having a look at them the other day once more) the papers I read made hardly a mention of the Olympics apart from stating the days to go on the front page as well as one of them having a feature about a British athlete 10 pages from the back page… and TV was almost the same.
As for the train system they were putting out the same warnings before Sydney and everything went smoothly (in fact, I don’t think it’s functioned better at any other point in my life) and it wouldn’t be an exaggeration to say London’s tube system is three times better than Sydney’s cityrail so I wouldn’t have thought there’d be an issue there.
The problem with the stadium is not that it can’t be seen for five kilometres, the problem is it can’t be seen until you’re right in front of it. There’s no problem seeing the nearby apartments, athlete’s village, westfields etc from some distance, just that the stadium is at the bottom of a hill. It’s a detracting feature. An issue that Australia’s best stadia (which I know more about) like the MCG and ANZ don’t have. People in London will never be able to walk to that stadium like people do when they go at a big match at the MCG – it’s like the people are being drawn to the sporting mecca.
West Ham did succumb to the legal challenges from Spurs and Leyton Orient I now see but there was never any guarantee that the stadium would be a football stadium post Olympics anyway and it still might not.
The point is London has a long way to go. Six months before Sydney, the stadium and olympic park had already had heaps of test events (including hosting the 1999 nrl gf). London can’t do this because with all the construction work around you wouldn’t be able to get a crowd in to test it apart from the fact that it’s just not ready!
February 10th 2012 @ 4:39pm
Johnno said | February 10th 2012 @ 4:39pm | Report comment
I think who ever designed that London Olympic stadium should of technologically designed it in a way that meant, it could be reconfigured after the Olympics to a a rectangular model.
February 10th 2012 @ 7:22pm
Tom Callaghan said | February 10th 2012 @ 7:22pm | Report comment
Jeez,
You blokes are still sore about losing the Ashes and coming below Great Britain in the 2008 Olympic medal table aren’t you?
It sounds to me as if Australian wine (whine?) has a long way to come with all the sour, bitter, grapes in your country!
February 11th 2012 @ 3:05am
Jamie said | February 11th 2012 @ 3:05am | Report comment
There are so many inaccuracies in this article its almost unbelievable.
So you were surprised that 6 months before the Games, there is still construction ongoing? What did you expect, to be able to wander round as you liked?
Actually all of the venues are long finished and test events have been happening since last summer – http://www.londonpreparesseries.com/previous-events.html
It doesn’t sound like you actually entered the Olympic Park or Athletes Village, just observed from a distance. it also doesn’t sound like you did any research about the structures/ issues, or realise just how much work has been done on what was one of the most difficult and contaminated former industrial sites, anywhere in the world.
Your point about not feeling a sense of excitement about the Games, well I completely disagree. Pretty much all of the Olympic and Paralympic tickets sold out immediately, something that has never happened before, and the vasy majority of people who actually love here are really excited about it – just you watch.
‘Adjacent to the Olympic stadium is the aquatic centre, which could best be described as an eyesore, or to speak more politically, underwhelming’ – are you aware that it has large temporary seating wings on it which are just for the Games, and will be removed afterwards? Unlike Athens, Sydney or Beijing the London Olympics is all about LEGACY and not just the 2 weeks of the games. The Aquatics Centre is stunning already inside and when the wings are removed in legacy will be equally stunning outside – http://static.worldarchitecturenews.com/news_images/10094_4_Aquatics%203%20big.jpg – and will be a great resource for the local community.
February 12th 2012 @ 1:24pm
jcinque said | February 12th 2012 @ 1:24pm | Report comment
“So you were surprised that 6 months before the Games, there is still construction ongoing? What did you expect, to be able to wander round as you liked?”
Yes. We were doing that in Sydney 18 months out.
It’s great that the tickets have been sold out but I expected more excitement from a city that was about to host its biggest event in 46 years. I found the public infinitely more interested in the domestic football competition than the Olympic Games.
As for the aquatic centre, it is obvious that the wings are temporary, Sydney had temporary wings also (and they were harsh on the eyes) You would expect a nice interior but it doesn’t compare to the brilliance of Beijing’s Ice Cube, especially when situated next to a plain main arena. I assume the aquatic centre will continue to host events post-Olympics just as Sydney’s one does. This isn’t something special – in fact for five years I was a member (swimming weekly at) the Sydney Olympic Aquatic Centre.
I’ve lived in an Olympic city before so I can compare. London doesn’t feel like Sydney did five months out. This is surely a concern.
February 12th 2012 @ 1:35pm
jcinque said | February 12th 2012 @ 1:35pm | Report comment
And I forgot to add that I would’ve loved to have been to get up right next to the stadium and the aquatic centre (and even go inside) but wire fencing made that impossible. It’s difficult to get any further if you’re not a construction worker. So, yes I had to stay behind the barracades and look on from 50 or 60 metres away. You can’t get any closer!!
It’s interesting you think people are really excited. It completely contradicts what a commenter above said “‘Lack of interest’ is a kind way of putting widespread hostility and derision.”
February 12th 2012 @ 1:39pm
Julian Cheyne said | February 12th 2012 @ 1:39pm | Report comment
Who said we were interested? Lots of people are not interested. London is a much bigger city than Sydney so it may be the Olympics does not dominate the city in the same way. But actually there is a lot of hostility to the Games. You seem to assume it is a great event. Personally I disagree, most of the promises made by the organisers are complete rubbish and were from day one. Just because Sydney was enthusiastic doesn’t mean the same is going to happen in London.
Feel free to criticise, there’s a lot to criticise!
February 12th 2012 @ 1:53pm
jcinque said | February 12th 2012 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
I agree, London is a bigger and more spectacular city than Sydney, so it is understandable that the Olympics don’t dominate the city but they should (and I expected them to) have a bit bigger presence than what they currently do.
Whether the Olympics are a great event is completely subjective. One can’t deny their grandness and importance (on an economic and global scale) so the pressure will be on London to perform. Just like I have done in this article, people will constantly be comparing 2012 to previous Games. So not only will the Games reflect on the organisers but on the city as a whole. Look at what 2004 did for Athens – not much good because the Games were poorly organised and attended. The people didn’t care and the city’s reputation suffered.
February 12th 2012 @ 1:56pm
Johnno said | February 12th 2012 @ 1:56pm | Report comment
London won’t be better than Sydney jcinque, that is non negotiable
February 12th 2012 @ 2:14pm
Julian Cheyne said | February 12th 2012 @ 2:14pm | Report comment
Olympics will reflect on city as a whole! Absolute rubbish. London is much bigger than the Olympics. It will be forgotten in no time. London will not benefit from the Olympics, it will not bring tourism benefits, quite the opposite. They didn’t bring tourism benefits to Sydney either. See research by European Tour Operators Association. London does not need the Olympics. One of the more idiotic claims is the Olympics will make London a World City! It already is. The whole thing is just a vanity project pushed forward by a small clique of politicians.
Non-negotiable! This is ridiculous stuff!
This whole thing just becomes a kind of nationalist competition. No-one is allowed to criticise the Olympics in places like Sydney or Barcelona. Actually things were not as great as portrayed. For example read Helen Jefferson Lenskyj on Sydney http://www.cjsonline.ca/reviews/sydney.html
February 11th 2012 @ 11:05am
Custodian Guardian Joe said | February 11th 2012 @ 11:05am | Report comment
You can join our campaign ‘Cancel London Olympics’
Universe Custodian Guardians
February 12th 2012 @ 2:53pm
Johnno said | February 12th 2012 @ 2:53pm | Report comment
Olympics are a waste of taxpayers money. Why should the tax payer have to pay for them. If the IOC want to have an Olympics they should privately fund it. Those arguments that it helps the tourism industry and gets a return on the taxpayers investment does not wash with me.
February 12th 2012 @ 3:37pm
jcinque said | February 12th 2012 @ 3:37pm | Report comment
Julian,
You say “It will be forgotten in no time,” and maybe in London the Olympics will be easily forgotten (although if London does either a brilliant or horrible job I doubt it) but the world won’t forget it in no time.
The world hasn’t forgotten Munich or Moscow or Barcelona, Sydney or Athens. The Olympics will reflect on London positively or negatively. The world will be focused on the city for two weeks. It will lead the news, be on the front page of the paper, it will be on people’s minds when they wake up in the morning and see it on the television. In Australia, I know, you won’t be able to hide from it.
London may easily forget but the world won’t. The Olympics may not be as innocent as they once were but they’re still massive. They’re aren’t many events that bring almost all the countries of the world together. It’s big news. And there’s still big care factor.
February 12th 2012 @ 3:45pm
Johnno said | February 12th 2012 @ 3:45pm | Report comment
jcinque acknowledge the cost to the taxpayer. many Londoners are angry about the costs to the taxpayer. And Olympucs do not always make a long term profit. WHen the UN are debating problems in the world they are not worrying about who has not hosted an Olympics or any other taxpayer funded major event. Respond to that jcinque about the argument of it wasting billions of tax payers money.
February 12th 2012 @ 4:02pm
jcinque said | February 12th 2012 @ 4:02pm | Report comment
The money spent on an Olympics goes to show how much countries want to host it and host it well. Whether it is economically sustainable thinking is something else altogether.
But what does the UN have to do with it? If the IOC fund it or the host funds it, it’s not going to make much of a difference to the UN. Sure money spent on an Olympics could help make the world better but if there was no Olympics would that money be going there anyway?
I understand the importance of sport. The Olympics provide hope and inspiration for people all over the world.If it gets kids thinking about exercise and the benefits of sport then I think that’s fantastic.
If the taxpayer pays for it then so be it, they are the beneficiaries of the spending. The Olympics will be played in their backyard which inturn will be the focus of the world during its duration.
What you are asking me to comment on is far bigger than the Olympics. If you want, it could be a discussion about the postivies and negatives of a capitalist-democratic world…or capitalism and democracy as singular entities.
February 13th 2012 @ 1:10am
Julian Cheyne said | February 13th 2012 @ 1:10am | Report comment
I think we will just have to disagree with the importance of the Olympics. I don’t think it is important and it does not stimulate sports participation. On the contrary elite events turn people into spectators not participants. The Olympics is now entirely tied up with corporate interests, big money sport and celebrity. Obesity went up in Sydney after the Olympics.
As for the city’s reputation, it may well be a city will be remembered for a good or a bad Olympics. So what? Athens Olympics may have been a disaster but it doesn’t stop people going there! I would go to Athens for what it is famous for, its historic sites, sun (Greece as a whole) and islands. What difference does it make if the Olympics site is derelict? As I said the Olympics does not improve tourism, actually it damages it and London is a big well known city. Londoners will laugh at it if it is rubbish!
There are no benefits for taxpayers, the alleged benefits turn out not to be true, I could run through all the rubbish that is talked about London, and the costs are hidden, they are far higher than those admitted. Sydney is a case in point. Sydney also involved bribery in getting the Games. There are people who suffer from the Olympics and its impacts.
The Olympics is a corporate brand. It was never innocent, it was tied in with fascism and racism for years. Now it is about media rights and corporate sponsors. The IOC pays absolutely no attention when thousands, hundreds of thousands are evicted to make way for the Games. The IOC is a closed corrupt self-perpetuating oligarchy. LIke much else people can be deceived into doing things and the fact that cities are prepared to pay for the Olympics to come to their city tells us nothing about whether this is a sensible thing to happen! In London the decision was made by four politicians and that was after their own commissioned report told them it would not bring any benefits!