It’s time to cut Gold Coast United loose
Clive Palmer has wrought destruction on his own club (AAP Image/Laine Clark)
Related coverage
Gold Coast United has reached the point of no return, with owner Clive Palmer engaging in a public war of words with the governing body, Football Federation Australia, coach Miron Bleiberg quitting after his farcical suspension, and the exodus of players beginning.
In the week since my last column, written in the wake of their lowest home crowd of the season, the club has self-imploded with Palmer doing the detonating.
From the appointment of a 17-year-old debutant as captain, the suspension of arguably their strongest asset, Bleiberg, who has subsequently quit the club, to James Brown kick-starting the player exodus by signing with the Newcastle Jets.
With Palmer reportedly meeting with the players today to discuss the future of the club, there appears to be little he can say to stop them from running to Coolangatta Airport and getting out of the rabble that is Gold Coast United.
After all, following his comments over the weekend, why should anyone hang around?
“I don’t even like the game,” Palmer told The Sunday Mail. “I think it’s a hopeless game. Rugby league’s a much better game.
“The club is a very small, insignificant portion of what I do. We’ve got over $20 billion of projects.”
And there, in a few quotes, is what is fundamentally flawed with Gold Coast United. It is Clive Palmer’s Gold Coast United, not Gold Coast’s Gold Coast United – and that’s always been the case.
Bleiberg has rightly resigned, telling the Courier-Mail “I’ll not be back”
“Clive can take my job but he took away my dignity – no one can take away my dignity.
“If Clive wanted to hurt me, he succeeded. If he didn’t mean to hurt me, he made a mistake.”
Ever since Palmer’s blustering entry into the league with brash comments of undefeated seasons, private jets and more, the club became an extension of his own ego and persona.
So why should the people of the Gold Coast care and commit to the club when their figurehead seemingly doesn’t?
It’s all downhill from here, surely – no coach, few players signed on beyond this season, what fans that remain surely questioning their loyalty to a club that is “insignificant” in the eyes of its owner, and with the governing body preparing to find any means necessary to kick them out of the competition.
Palmer’s licence agreement for Gold Coast United doesn’t expire till 2014, and despite his controversial comments, followed by the lukewarm response from the FFA, it appears the mining magnate isn’t ready to walk away without a fight.
“If we wanted to stay (in the A-League) and they (FFA) wanted to take it (the licence) off us, they’d all be in court, and Ben Buckley would run a thousand miles,” Palmer said.
“That’s the reality of it. They can say what they like … the A-League’s a joke. I don’t think I’ll ever talk to Ben again in my life, to be honest.”
If Palmer and Gold Coast United CEO Clive Mensink, Palmer’s partner in the mining world, decide they want to hang around, the FFA faces the challenging task of finding someway to either remove Palmer and Mensink from the club (but then who would want to takeover the damaged remains?) or remove the club from the competition.
The buck stops with Palmer and Mensink unless there is some legal recourse the FFA can call on.
Palmer seems to be holding out hope on moving the club out of its expensive Skilled Park renting agreement, which costs a reported $40,000 per match to the Queensland sate government (according to SBS’s The World Game), and into the council-owned Southport Tigers Rugby League Club ground.
According to The World Game, “Palmer is prepared to sink $250,000 into redeveloping the ground, which currently has just one stand – built at his own expense – into an A-League fit stadium with revamped change rooms and floodlights,” turning it into 5000-capacity stadium.
Not only does it help the bottom line, it’s a far more realistic size stadium for a club that at its last home game only filled six percent of Skilled Park (1723 in a 27,400-seat stadium).
But even if Palmer gets his way and Gold Coast United moves into Southport, his club’s brand is in tatters, with a series of own goals that has seen that club go from the 10,336 crowd that watched them defeat English Premier League side Fulham 2-1 at their birth to their current 3704 average or the 1723 that attended their last home game. Those who have stood by the club have every right to walk away after Palmer’s comments.
This current situation highlights the flaw in handing a license to Palmer: the club and, in many ways, the A-League’s future in Queensland’s second biggest region at the mercy of one man, who makes his fortune elsewhere and has little intimate knowledge or care of how the sport operates.
Now the FFA is paying the price for that mistake, with its expansion moves in tatters as Gold Coast follows the sorry path of North Queensland Fury.
With the Gold Coast Suns AFL club established and on the rise as they mature into the competition and marketplace, the Gold Coast Titans NRL club battling for their own renaissance, the Gold Coast Blaze NBL club a competitive summer opponent, and the possibility that Cricket Australia’s Big Bash League could expand into the Gold Coast, United appears to have little hope of surviving in a market that arguably can’t sustain all these clubs.
It was always questionable whether Gold Coast could sustain an A-League franchise. But once Palmer and co started on the path of tarnishing their own brand – no community engagement, setting incredibly unrealistic expectations, crowd caps, public war of words, internal bickering and more – they had no chance of rectifying given they were selling to a region as competitive and fickle as the Gold Coast.
Today the club is officially a basket case. They will claim the wooden spoon, as they were always destined to do when they failed to replace their departing big names at the end of last season with experience, relying far too heavily on youth. And the squabble over the future will only drive that promising youth to other more stable clubs.
To add insult to injury, Wednesday night’s rescheduled home match against league leaders, the Central Coast Mariners, looms as a further embarrassment; their record lowest crowd of 1658 surely in danger of being lowered.
If the FFA can convince Palmer to move on, then the priority switches to filling the void – keeping the A-League at 10 teams is vital at a time when the governing body is negotiating the next television rights deal, and western Sydney remains fertile land for the game.
This should be a motivator – two birds with the one stone. Easier said than done, yes, but essential for the league as it stands at the crossroads. There’s no alternative.
The damage is well and truly done on the Gold Coast. There is no going back.
In response to Palmer’s comments, Ben Buckley said, “I remind Clive that as a chairman and owner of a club, he has obligations to the competition, his fellow club chairman and investors in the other nine clubs, and to the game itself.”
Gold Coast had already let down the competition, the other nine clubs and the game itself before Palmer’s comments. The reality is it does so every time it plays at home and cameras beam pictures of empty grandstands across the country. As I wrote last week, that does untold damage to the A-League brand.
This, now, is beyond bad publicity. Gold Coast United and Palmer must go.
More opinion:
Mike Tuckerman: Say goodbye to Gold Coast United
Luke Doherty: A-League’s Palmer feud expected to drag on
Adrian Musolino is editor of V8X Magazine, and has written as an expert on The Roar since 2008, cementing himself as a key writer who can see the big picture in sport. He freelances on other forms of motorsport, football, cycling and more.

February 20th 2012 @ 9:49am
King of the Gorgonites said | February 20th 2012 @ 9:49am | Report comment
mmmmm very interesting……
and this was the sport that was gonig to tak over Australia?
at least by getting rid of GCU the average attendance of the HAL would increase.
February 20th 2012 @ 9:59am
Titus said | February 20th 2012 @ 9:59am | Report comment
I guess it is preferable to the entire competition falling over, ala the Australian Rugby Thingamiship
February 20th 2012 @ 10:02am
The Cattery said | February 20th 2012 @ 10:02am | Report comment
Titus
KOGS deserves a rebuke, but don’t fall into the same trap of delving into things that don’t need to be delved into and which have nothing to do with the main story.
February 20th 2012 @ 10:51am
Titus said | February 20th 2012 @ 10:51am | Report comment
You’re right TC, apologies.
February 20th 2012 @ 10:00am
The Cattery said | February 20th 2012 @ 10:00am | Report comment
KOGS
I have to object to the tone of your post. This is not a time to be dancing on anyone’s grave.
It’s a big, big sports story, and there are lessons here for all sporting bodies, and not only that, ordinary people are affected by this sort of nonsense, and I think it’s incumbent on all sports fans to stand up and say that it’s unacceptable.
February 20th 2012 @ 10:39am
King of the Gorgonites said | February 20th 2012 @ 10:39am | Report comment
i am dancing on no ones grave. i know that the rebels could face that same prospect if soem important people pull the plug. its a useful remidner of the pitfalls of private ownership.
February 20th 2012 @ 10:04am
striker said | February 20th 2012 @ 10:04am | Report comment
King you just have to look at the MLS since it began nearly 20 years ago it also has cut teams at the start now its booming so this comp wont die like you wish if anything this will be better without GCU bring on westerny sydney the heartland of the game.
February 20th 2012 @ 10:40am
King of the Gorgonites said | February 20th 2012 @ 10:40am | Report comment
agree. GWS needs a team. parramatta stadium would be ideal.
February 20th 2012 @ 2:10pm
cos789 said | February 20th 2012 @ 2:10pm | Report comment
What is GWS? Seriously, its a made up thing. The A League would be wise to steer clear of that name.
West Sydney or Parramatta should be the name used.
February 20th 2012 @ 2:17pm
The Cattery said | February 20th 2012 @ 2:17pm | Report comment
In fact, when the original West Sydney license was awared to the Sydney Rovers, the promoters of that name argued that for marketing purposes it was best to steer clear of any name that contained West or Western in it.
February 20th 2012 @ 9:03pm
joe blackswan said | February 20th 2012 @ 9:03pm | Report comment
I would have thought Greater Western Sydney as a name is a good throw net over a large population and area, and thus fan base….certainly helps establish rivalry/division with the incumbent team’s fan base. Whilst it is a mouth full, I think AFL did well here.
February 20th 2012 @ 9:07pm
The Cattery said | February 20th 2012 @ 9:07pm | Report comment
joe
I don’t disagree with what you’re saying, I’m just relaying what I recall reading at the time of the Sydney Rovers bid.
February 20th 2012 @ 2:26pm
Griffo said | February 20th 2012 @ 2:26pm | Report comment
Geographically, Greater Western Sydney is huge.
I haven’t met any Sydney-siders yet who thought transportation across the metropolis was that great.
Really two, maybe three teams with boutique stadiums could occupy what is termed the GWS to allow for transportation to venue…
…and that doesn’t include Wollongong.
The FFA really stuffed up the Wollongong bid when they required all bids had to include Western Sydney in it’s catchment area.
Will still need work to make it successful, though.
February 20th 2012 @ 11:03am
Nathan of Perth said | February 20th 2012 @ 11:03am | Report comment
Well to be fair, your sport was supposed to as well!
February 20th 2012 @ 11:02am
Luke said | February 20th 2012 @ 11:02am | Report comment
What have the FFA done to mend the relationship between themselves and Palmer? Palmers obviously frustrated but whats been done to not let things get to this point?
February 20th 2012 @ 11:34am
The Cattery said | February 20th 2012 @ 11:34am | Report comment
Luke
it’s a good question, but we are probably now well past the point of no return. Smithies in the DT is saying this morning that Lowy has made a decision to throw GCU out and go to 9 teams next season – but that ain’t backed up by any other mediea reprot that I have seen.
As Roarchild has intimated on other threads, the trendline for this sort of occurence has been heading in the same direction for a long time now, and CP being who and what he is, I doubt anyone could have intervened.
February 20th 2012 @ 12:25pm
David of Canberra said | February 20th 2012 @ 12:25pm | Report comment
Adrian, thanks for a good column – interested in your views about whether a Canberra team could be quickly inserted into the gap created if Gold Coast go under.
Given the way Canberra football fans responded to the great season of Canberra United in the W League, I think a men’s Canberra United, using the existing brand of the women’s team, would be the way to go.
The Canberra A-league team, run by local top ACTEW-AGL exec Ivan Slavich, should be asked if they can move quickly if required. It’s time for the national capital to have a presence in the A League.
February 20th 2012 @ 12:44pm
The Cattery said | February 20th 2012 @ 12:44pm | Report comment
Rumours are out there that the FFA is already talking to prospective owners about filling the breach, but they are probably focusing on a second Sydney team, the FFA probably know that if they got Canberra in as a 10th team, it might be a long, long time before they can consider a second Sydney team.
Anyway, if the Canberra bid team stil exists, they should be lobbying both the FFA and ACT Govt right now – whatever the FFA does, it needs to act quickly, under normal circumstances, 6 months would not be enough time to get team off the ground.
If the FFA can’t get the second Sydney team up and running, then the Canberra bid becomes quite attractive, and let’s not forget, the FFA is the next cab off the rank (after the NRL) in terms of finalising the next TV deal – it can’t go into negotiations with only 9 teams – that would be a financial disaster.
February 20th 2012 @ 12:53pm
Roger said | February 20th 2012 @ 12:53pm | Report comment
“it can’t go into negotiations with only 9 teams – that would be a financial disaster.”
Spot on Cattery. I would expect FFA to be knee deep in two very serious bids from Canbberra and Western Sydney.
February 20th 2012 @ 1:40pm
The Cattery said | February 20th 2012 @ 1:40pm | Report comment
FFA are now treading a very, very fine line between perfect timing and a godsent opportunity (to have a well structured 10 team comp from next season); and absolute disaster with 9 teams heading into TV negotiations.
Lowy and the FFA execs are about to earn their keep big time.
February 20th 2012 @ 1:21pm
Griffo said | February 20th 2012 @ 1:21pm | Report comment
I agree, the Canberra bid should see this as an opportunity to enter the A-League if the opportunity arises.
The opportunity may not present itself, but at least Canberra bid would be ready with a solution.
I don’t think the same could be said for any Western Sydney bid, unless their bid is already equally in motion.
This negative publicity is all at the wrong time for the FFA’s negotiations for the next media deal.
Something tells me Palmer knows this.
February 20th 2012 @ 7:28pm
Football United said | February 20th 2012 @ 7:28pm | Report comment
would love to see a canberra team go up next as west sydney hasn’t got it’s act together but by god, NOT ANOTHER UNITED!.
February 21st 2012 @ 10:32am
David of Canberra said | February 21st 2012 @ 10:32am | Report comment
point taken … but the Canberra United brand is now pretty strong, thanks to the W-League. As long as no-one suggests reviving the Cosmos brand!
February 20th 2012 @ 12:30pm
Roarchild said | February 20th 2012 @ 12:30pm | Report comment
I think it could have been avoided but Buckley wasn’t the man to do it.
Palmer went over Buckley’s head direct to Lowy very early on and Lowy accepted that.
While I feel for Buckley because it’s hard to provide strong leadership when you are over ruled by the real boss (world cup bid) and can’t make quick decisions due to lack of funds he hasn’t done himself any favors by hiding from the fans and not spending enough time with the owners.
He just never seems to go to football games or even give the impression he watches it like Demetriou and Gallop do. There are a lot of anorak nerds who follow football waiting to pounce on the mispronunciation of an Ajax or such but you have to at least try. The new Sydney FC CEO Dirk Melton is very much a league man but I think he’s a great example of what Buckley should have done.
With Clive I think no matter what it was going to end in tears but the damage should have been a lot less. Midway through the first season it was obvious he needed to get out of that stadium deal and he was never going to be a “well behaved*” owner.
It’s now near the end of the 3rd season.
It would have required a little bit of massaging Fox but I am sure they don’t like covering Skilled Park games either and the community round shows it’s possible. All of a sudden Palmer wouldn’t be losing so much money so he is happier and it’s also less expensive for the FFA to intervene if needed.
That all should have been sorted out before the start of GCU’s season 2 and didn’t require hindsight.
* Patiently losing heaps of money while his club did the hard work growing their fan base.
February 20th 2012 @ 12:47pm
The Cattery said | February 20th 2012 @ 12:47pm | Report comment
Good post, plenty of good points made there, it’s probably true that it was allowed to fester for far too long with nothing concrete happening to find a solution.
February 20th 2012 @ 12:46pm
ChrisW said | February 20th 2012 @ 12:46pm | Report comment
Always been a supporter of keeping gcu in the A-league and just putting up with palmer but its beyond a joke now hes damaged the image of the game and arguably set back football in gold coast by a decade.
I hope A-league can return to Gold coast maybe contact the gold coast galaxy bid consortium.
Maybe bleiberg will coache another team in the A-league.
I disagree about gold coast being fickle just look at Gold Coast Blaze.
February 20th 2012 @ 12:51pm
Phil said | February 20th 2012 @ 12:51pm | Report comment
I blame Ben Buckley & Frank Lowy for all this. Expansion is in tatters & millions of dollars wasted on a World Cup bid.
All I know is that once again we’re the laughing stock of sport in Australia.
February 20th 2012 @ 1:01pm
Chris said | February 20th 2012 @ 1:01pm | Report comment
That’s a bit harsh. Everything was looking peachy at the start of the season – two high profile recruits, much improved marketing effort, a mea culpa from the FFA on dropping the A-League ball to bid for the World Cup and strong attendances and tv ratings. Clive Palmer’s bizarre behaviour has ruined all of that good work.
February 20th 2012 @ 1:11pm
nordster said | February 20th 2012 @ 1:11pm | Report comment
Palmer’s behaviour only “ruins” the rest of the league if u put the off-field hot air from some demented mining magnate and owner of the cellar-dwelling GCU, over the fantastic football and passion we are seeing elsewhere in the competition.
Your choice Phil, chris et al …
February 20th 2012 @ 12:59pm
HardcorePrawn said | February 20th 2012 @ 12:59pm | Report comment
If GCU do disappear this would make them the 3rd A League club to have done so since the league’s foundation. Surely the risk of a club no longer being in existence is likely to put off any potential fans for current and future teams (apart from those that look to have strong fanbases already). If GCU’s position in the A League was to be taken by a Western Sydney team, why would potential fans want to splurge on season tickets, memberships, and replica kits etc when there’s a very real risk that the club might not exist 12 months later.
I think that the FFA and/or the League itself really needs to offer some form of guarantee that teams will be given at least 3 or 4 years to find their feet, and conduct due diligence with prospective club owners (similar to English football’s ‘Fit and Proper Person Test’, although looking at some of the shysters that get hold of English teams that doesn’t appear to have the desired effect…) to ensure that the plug is not pulled from any other teams in this manner again.
February 20th 2012 @ 1:17pm
Griffo said | February 20th 2012 @ 1:17pm | Report comment
It seems that Palmer has had enough and wants out but will not do so unless he is compensated for as much as the FFA is willing to agree to.
Palmer is the problem child in the classroom that wants to skip class but cannot leave unless told to – and wants to grab a lollipop from the jar on the way out.
Palmer is doing all that is required of him as a licensee, and is hoping his antics will make the FFA go to the courts to get a bigger exit fee. He will not walk away with nothing back in return.
I have to agree with Foz’s piece in The Sun Herald yesterday:
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/a-league/ffa-must-share-the-blame-for-palmers-gold-coast-problems-20120218-1tfv9.html
- the FFA need to do more when kick-starting clubs and learn from this experience for future investors in new (and even old) clubs.
While the FFA are showing signs of learning from past mistakes, I have to feel for the Gold Coast United club and it’s fans.
If the clubs survives with a new owner, the club and owner will have a load of work to do to become part of the wider community again. It will be a long-term mission.
If the club doesn’t survive, there will be another set of fans bitter at loosing an A-League team to cheer for. I doubt many will go to Brisbane easily.
It is also a shame for Palmer, who chose football over League as a way of investing into community and sport. If it all went swimmingly, would he have funded other clubs and infrastructure? He may yet get his boutique stadium going, but increasingly it seems he’ll leave the game for good for the right price.
Another question: would he have done any better owning an NRL club? The answer I think would come down to the help from the NRL…
February 20th 2012 @ 2:18pm
Australian Rules said | February 20th 2012 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
Griffo, much of what Foz says in that article is true.
However, rather than caution the pitfalls of private ownership (like we’re currently seeing), Foster still enthusiatically advocates the Big Chief style of ownership for the Australian game and, in the process, completely exonerates Palmer. Yes, the state of affairs on which GCU entered the League made things hard for Clive, and turned him into a tyrant, but he always was one!
People are now shocked and angry that he is acting this way. What did people honestly expect? He bought a lemon. He was told it would go and it didn’t. People were so busy in rapturous applause for Clive’s money that no-one thought…is this a good idea? And clearly from Foz’s comments, they still don’t.
Having private owners elsewhere in the world might work, but in Australia, where there’s a population of 22M to share 4 football codes, it’s far too risky. Member-based ownership (subsidised by the FFA), equitable stadium deals and tonnes of community involvement are 3 key ingredients to make Football work in this country…not the bank balance (and whim) of a cranky mining magnate.
February 20th 2012 @ 2:28pm
The Cattery said | February 20th 2012 @ 2:28pm | Report comment
Your post gets me thinking, could the 10th team come in with, say, the backing of either the NSWPL or the ACT comp, as a bit of a change from the single owner model.
February 20th 2012 @ 2:50pm
Griffo said | February 20th 2012 @ 2:50pm | Report comment
Having private owners elsewhere in the world might work, but in Australia, where there’s a population of 22M to share 4 football codes, it’s far too risky.
I would think having a relatively small population in a saturated sports market would make the private owner/consortium model just as viable…
Member-based ownership (subsidised by the FFA), equitable stadium deals and tonnes of community involvement are 3 key ingredients to make Football work in this country…not the bank balance (and whim) of a cranky mining magnate.
…but I also agree with your three points, except for the FFA clause to some degree. If the FFA have little money initially, then it would be hard to subsidise many clubs (unless the media deal was astronomical), and wouldn’t that imply the community model at the beginning is only part the answer and need private funding as well?
I would like to see a community kick-start a club with memberships, but what is a viable number of memberships to own/run/upgrade a stadium; employ people for football operations; a team and support staff; transport costs; gear and all of that? I know sponsorships help of course but to me over time most clubs will become membership supported. That would be ideal for all A-League clubs, but it is a long game.
February 20th 2012 @ 1:31pm
Ed said | February 20th 2012 @ 1:31pm | Report comment
The FFA should have seen the writing on the wall with GCU years ago. As for the derogatory comments that are sure to come from the mainstream about Aleague football as a result of this mess. I believe the world game will have the last laugh. I work in a staunchly AFL oriented workplace and even here people are starting to talk with passion about the Aleague. I now consider it my league since it is so much more relevant than the EPL. We just need to stay solid throughout the bad times that this fat bond villian wants to bring and football will win through eventually.
February 20th 2012 @ 2:02pm
Johnno said | February 20th 2012 @ 2:02pm | Report comment
I see a domino effect happening. A-league can not survive on 5 or 6 clubs it needs more.
It has alienated to many fans, eg rejecting the FFA cup, not allowing victory to play in the mirrabella cup, pathetic scheduling of regional matches, alienating core supporters in west sydney, and old NSL clubs eg Sydney olympic who have the funds to start a club in the A-league just need a licence.
Troubled clubs
Fury gone
Gold coast in serious trouble n the brink of extinction frank low can not keep buying or looking after clubs
Wellington pheonix all sorts of financial problems
Central coast mariners despite having good crowds and juniors are having financial problems
And I blame all this on alienating many fans. Sydney olympic or south melbourne could have a club, get an FFA cup going too.
The A-league has to change it’s whole business model, plus embracing boutique 10-15,000 size stadiums like in the MLS.
Big stadiums cost a fortune in rent money down the drain. Skilled park, suncorp, etihad stadium, SFS all cost a lot.
Places like Kograh,belmore sports ground, parramatta stadium the ideal type of stadiums.
And work closer with state league clubs too.
And embrace old football with new football, .
February 20th 2012 @ 2:42pm
striker said | February 20th 2012 @ 2:42pm | Report comment
Johnno go away with your Sydney Oympic crap everyone knows it has no chance getting in the A-League and i am an old NSL supporter, move on buddy.
February 20th 2012 @ 2:48pm
Johnno said | February 20th 2012 @ 2:48pm | Report comment
you go away. You move on buddy. Have you looked at the business plan of sydney olympic I have striker. More state government money to belmore sports ground to, hard core supporters, why wouldn’t olympic or sth melbourne be a hit striker.
You have so much faith in the A-league current models, yet they are many fo the clubs going broke or barely surviving stop being a true believer striker you deny reality that the A-league has to change it’s business models and operations to survive, coz what they are doing now is not working striker.
February 20th 2012 @ 3:20pm
striker said | February 20th 2012 @ 3:20pm | Report comment
Yeah you guys were the kings of robbery after 50 years you dont have one club or a ground that you own and now you want to be given a A-League licence, i support football and have accepted this is the best way forward even if its not perfect its alot better run than the old NSL, at least all games are shown live with FOX and most of the mainstrem media show highlights, even the today show are giving tickets to this years final which hows the games is going in the right direction, the best thing for Olympic would be to join forces with the old clubs and support a western sydney team where they wont be judged by ethnicity.
February 20th 2012 @ 7:36pm
Football United said | February 20th 2012 @ 7:36pm | Report comment
i actually wouldn’t mind olympic getting in as they have a fairly sound buisness plan and youth development (same for south melbourne on that mater) but only after a new west sydney club is established first. fans in western sydney had reasons for not joining olympic previously and thus i think it would be good to give them a a option of either a new club with a new identity or joining up with a established team with strong heritage.